ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1454 by chrisfen, Mon Sep 13 21:28:16 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1477 by gezelter, Fri Sep 17 15:59:25 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
2 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3   %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 < %\usepackage{endfloat}
4 > \usepackage{endfloat}
5   \usepackage{amsmath}
6   \usepackage{epsf}
7   \usepackage{berkeley}
8 < %\usepackage{setspace}
9 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 < %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 < %\pagestyle{plain}
13 < %\pagenumbering{arabic}
14 < %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 < %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 < %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 < %\brokenpenalty=10000
11 > \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 > \pagestyle{plain}
13 > \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 > \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 > \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 > \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 > \brokenpenalty=10000
18 > \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 > \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
19 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomolous Ice}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
27 < \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
27 <
28 < \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
26 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
28   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29  
30   \date{\today}
31  
32 < %\maketitle
32 > \maketitle
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36 + The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs which are stable
37 + at low pressures were calculated using thermodynamic integration to a
38 + reference system (the Einstein crystal).  These integrations were
39 + performed for most of the common water models (SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P,
40 + TIP5P, SSD/E, SSD/RF). Ice-{\it i}, a structure we recently observed
41 + crystallizing at room temperature for one of the single-point water
42 + models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1 atm)
43 + for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
44 + generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
45 + known low-pressure ice structures under all of these water models.
46 + Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an effect on the
47 + calculated free energies, and can result in altered free energy
48 + landscapes.  Structure factor for the new crystal were generated and
49 + we await experimental confirmation of the existence of this new
50 + polymorph.  
51   \end{abstract}
52  
39 \maketitle
40
41 \newpage
42
53   %\narrowtext
54  
55   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 48 | Line 58 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
58  
59   \section{Introduction}
60  
61 + Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
62 + simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
63 + its behavior under varying simulation
64 + conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
65 + These models have been used to investigate important physical
66 + phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
67 + hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
68 + choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
69 + under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
70 + the limitations of each of the
71 + models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
72 + important properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
73 + energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
74 + these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
75 + possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
76 + pressures and temperatures.  There are currently 13 recognized forms
77 + of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
78 + energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
79 + phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
80 + these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
81 + pressures for the model.
82 +
83 + In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
84 + crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
85 + unique in that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at through
86 + crystallization of a computationally efficient water model under
87 + constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization events
88 + are interesting in and of themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}
89 + however, the crystal structure obtained in this case is different from
90 + any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment or
91 + simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure Ice-{\it i}
92 + to indicate its origin in computational simulation. The unit cell
93 + (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight water molecules that stack in
94 + rows of interlocking water tetramers. Proton ordering can be
95 + accomplished by orienting two of the molecules so that both of their
96 + donated hydrogen bonds are internal to their tetramer
97 + (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal constructed of
98 + water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those
99 + observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these subunits
100 + appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
101 + crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
102 + open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
103 + diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
104 + that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
105 +
106 + \begin{figure}
107 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
108 + \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
109 + elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  The spheres represent the
110 + center-of-mass locations of the water molecules.  The $a$ to $c$
111 + ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
112 + $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.7850c$ respectively.}
113 + \label{iceiCell}
114 + \end{figure}
115 +
116 + \begin{figure}
117 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
118 + \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
119 + down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
120 + octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
121 + less dense than ice $I_h$.}
122 + \label{protOrder}
123 + \end{figure}
124 +
125 + Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
126 + minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
127 + had investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
128 + see our previous work and related
129 + articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
130 + considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
131 + contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
132 + have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
133 + thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
134 + and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
135 + and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
136 + observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
137 + SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
138 + from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
139 + common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
140 + field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
141 + be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was
142 + used in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell
143 + of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i}
144 + unit it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed
145 + along the other two faces.
146 +
147   \section{Methods}
148  
149   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
150 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
151 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
152 < bodies, with orientational motion propogated using the symplectic DLM
153 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
154 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
150 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
151 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
152 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
153 > the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
154 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
155  
156 < Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
157 < several ice crystals using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, and SSD/E
158 < water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and 400 K for all of
159 < these water models were also determined using this same technique, in
160 < order to determine melting points and generate phase diagrams.
156 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique for
157 > determination of free energies of condensed phases of
158 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}. This
159 > method, implemented in the same manner illustrated by B\`{a}ez and
160 > Clancy, was utilized to calculate the free energy of several ice
161 > crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
162 > SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
163 > and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
164 > this same technique in order to determine melting points and to
165 > generate phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 > which correspond to a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their
167 > respective temperatures.
168  
169 + Thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations during
170 + which the system of interest is converted into a reference system for
171 + which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation path
172 + is then integrated in order to determine the free energy difference
173 + between the two states:
174 + \begin{equation}
175 + \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
176 + )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
177 + \end{equation}
178 + where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
179 + transformation parameter that scales the overall
180 + potential. Simulations are distributed strategically along this path
181 + in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
182 + potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
183 + simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
184 + (near the reference state) in length.
185 +
186   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
187 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
188 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
189 < molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
190 < and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
191 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
192 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
187 > crystal was chosen as the reference system. In an Einstein crystal,
188 > the molecules are restrained at their ideal lattice locations and
189 > orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as applied by B\`{a}ez and
190 > Clancy, the total potential for this reference crystal
191 > ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
192 > \begin{equation}
193 > V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
194 > \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
195 > \end{equation}
196 > where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
197 > the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
198 > of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
199 > respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
200 > of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
201 > $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
202 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
203 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
204   \begin{eqnarray}
205   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
206   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 81 | Line 212 | where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a
212   )^\frac{1}{2}}\exp(t^2)\mathrm{d}t\right ],
213   \label{ecFreeEnergy}
214   \end{eqnarray}
215 < where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a} In equation
216 < \ref{ecFreeEnergy}, $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and
86 < $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are the spring constants restraining translational
87 < motion and deflection of and rotation around the principle axis of the
88 < molecule respectively (Fig. \ref{waterSpring}), and $E_m$ is the
89 < minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
90 < molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
91 < state.
215 > where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is the minimum
216 > potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
217  
218 + \begin{figure}
219 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
220 + \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
221 + $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
222 + z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
223 + body-frame {\it z}-axis. $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
224 + constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
225 + and $\omega$ directions.}
226 + \label{waterSpring}
227 + \end{figure}
228  
229 + In the case of molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the
230 + target reference state.  There are several examples of liquid state
231 + free energy calculations of water models present in the
232 + literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
233 + typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
234 + interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
235 + molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the most convenient
236 + methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
237 + interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
238 + parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
239 + results in excellent agreement with other established
240 + methods.\cite{Baez95b}
241  
242 + Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
243 + cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
244 + ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
245 + truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
246 + from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
247 + was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
248 + manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
249 + dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
250 + simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
251 + expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
252 + performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
253 + \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, the effects of utilizing an Ewald
254 + summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing single
255 + configuration calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the
256 + TINKER molecular mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The
257 + calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of PME was
258 + applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
259 + free energy landscape.
260  
261   \section{Results and discussion}
262  
263 + The free energy of proton-ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
264 + compared with the free energies of proton ordered variants of the
265 + experimentally observed low-density ice polymorphs, $I_h$ and $I_c$,
266 + as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
267 + and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
268 + model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
269 + Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
270 + $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
271 + as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
272 + proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
273 + antiferroelectric version that we devised, and it has an 8 molecule
274 + unit cell similar to other predicted antiferroelectric $I_h$
275 + crystals.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728
276 + molecules for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000
277 + molecules for ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger
278 + crystal sizes were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff
279 + values.
280 +
281 + \begin{table*}
282 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
283 + \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
284 + \begin{center}
285 + \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
286 + variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
287 + of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
288 + kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
289 + $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
290 + \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
291 + \hline
292 + Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
293 + \hline
294 + TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3)\\
295 + TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.33(3)\\
296 + TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & -12.29(2)\\
297 + SPC/E & -12.67(2) & -12.96(2) & -13.25(3) & -13.55(2)\\
298 + SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2)\\
299 + SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & NA* & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
300 + \end{tabular}
301 + \label{freeEnergy}
302 + \end{center}
303 + \end{minipage}
304 + \end{table*}
305 +
306 + The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
307 + that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
308 + models studied. With the calculated free energy at these state points,
309 + the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points
310 + and to build phase diagrams.  Figures
311 + \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
312 + from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
313 + although the crossing points between the phases move to slightly
314 + different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
315 + ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
316 + phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
317 + B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
318 + Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
319 + TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
320 +
321 + \begin{figure}
322 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
323 + \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
324 + regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
325 + the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
326 + experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
327 + higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
328 + \label{tp3phasedia}
329 + \end{figure}
330 +
331 + \begin{figure}
332 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
333 + \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
334 + regime. Calculations producing these results were done under an
335 + applied reaction field. It is interesting to note that this
336 + computationally efficient model (over 3 times more efficient than
337 + TIP3P) exhibits phase behavior similar to the less computationally
338 + conservative charge based models.}
339 + \label{ssdrfphasedia}
340 + \end{figure}
341 +
342 + \begin{table*}
343 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
344 + \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
345 + \begin{center}
346 + \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
347 + temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
348 + experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
349 + transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
350 + liquid or gas state.}
351 + \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
352 + \hline
353 + Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
354 + \hline
355 + $T_m$ (K)  & 269(4) & 266(5) & 271(4) & 296(3) & - & 278(4) & 273\\
356 + $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(2) & 337(2) & 396(2) & - & 348(2) & 373\\
357 + $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(2) & - & -\\
358 + \end{tabular}
359 + \label{meltandboil}
360 + \end{center}
361 + \end{minipage}
362 + \end{table*}
363 +
364 + Table \ref{meltandboil} lists the melting and boiling temperatures
365 + calculated from this work. Surprisingly, most of these models have
366 + melting points that compare quite favorably with experiment. The
367 + unfortunate aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs
368 + between Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the
369 + liquid state. These results are actually not contrary to previous
370 + studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
371 + using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
372 + being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
373 + ordered and disordered molecular
374 + arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
375 + Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
376 + predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
377 + calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
378 + previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
379 + not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it shows a sublimation point
380 + at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
381 + all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
382 + conditions. While troubling, this behavior resulted in spontaneous
383 + crystallization of Ice-{\it i} and led us to investigate this
384 + structure. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
385 + SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
386 + risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk lessens when
387 + applying a longer cutoff.
388 +
389 + \begin{figure}
390 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
391 + \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
392 + TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
393 + \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
394 + \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
395 + liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
396 + \label{incCutoff}
397 + \end{figure}
398 +
399 + Increasing the cutoff radius in simulations of the more
400 + computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
401 + the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
402 + involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
403 + free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substantial dependence on
404 + cutoff radius. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
405 + differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. Interestingly, by
406 + increasing the cutoff radius, the free energy gap was narrowed enough
407 + in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
408 + simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
409 + simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
410 + greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
411 + case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
412 + reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
413 + energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
414 +
415 + To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
416 + long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
417 + was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
418 + inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the
419 + correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
420 + energy of identical crystals both with and without PME. The free
421 + energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and SPC/E
422 + water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend pointed
423 + out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
424 + results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
425 + for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
426 + the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
427 + significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
428 + stable polymorph with the SPC/E model.  The free energies of Ice-{\it
429 + i} and ice B nearly overlap within error, with ice $I_c$ just outside
430 + as well, indicating that Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with respect
431 + to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$ with SPC/E. However, these results do
432 + not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is
433 + a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
434 + phase behavior of water models.
435 +
436 + \begin{table*}
437 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
438 + \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
439 + \begin{center}
440 + \caption{The free energy of the studied ice polymorphs after applying
441 + the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
442 + long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
443 + \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
444 + \hline
445 + \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
446 + \hline
447 + TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3)\\
448 + SPC/E  & -12.77(2) & -12.92(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2)\\
449 + \end{tabular}
450 + \label{pmeShift}
451 + \end{center}
452 + \end{minipage}
453 + \end{table*}
454 +
455   \section{Conclusions}
456  
457 + The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
458 + $I$, ice B, and our recently discovered Ice-{\it i} structure were
459 + calculated under standard conditions for several common water models
460 + via thermodynamic integration. All the water models studied show
461 + Ice-{\it i} to be the minimum free energy crystal structure with a 9
462 + \AA\ switching function cutoff. Calculated melting and boiling points
463 + show surprisingly good agreement with the experimental values;
464 + however, the solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The
465 + effect of interaction truncation was investigated through variation of
466 + the cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
467 + estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
468 + summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
469 + computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
470 + energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
471 + these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
472 + polymorph that should be considered in simulation studies.
473 +
474 + Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all of the
475 + investigated simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible
476 + experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
477 + and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
478 + regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
479 + of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
480 + name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
481 + said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
482 + most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
483 + negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
484 + deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
485 + non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
486 + our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
487 + and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
488 + i} at a temperature of 77K.  In our initial comparison of the
489 + predicted S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous
490 + solid water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that
491 + could not be assigned in an early report on high-density amorphous
492 + (HDA) ice could correspond to peaks labeled in this
493 + S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
494 + agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
495 + such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
496 + to our experimental colleagues to make the final determination on
497 + whether this ice polymorph is named appropriately (i.e. with an
498 + imaginary number) or if it can be promoted to Ice-0.
499 +
500 + \begin{figure}
501 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
502 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$
503 + calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
504 + \label{fig:gofr}
505 + \end{figure}
506 +
507 + \begin{figure}
508 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
509 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
510 + 77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
511 + instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
512 + trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
513 + compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
514 + studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
515 + \label{fig:sofq}
516 + \end{figure}
517 +
518   \section{Acknowledgments}
519   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
520   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
521 < the Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster under NSF grant
522 < DMR-0079647.
521 > the Notre Dame High Performance Computing Cluster and the Notre Dame
522 > Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR-0079647).
523  
524   \newpage
525  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines