ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1458 by chrisfen, Wed Sep 15 06:34:49 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1470 by chrisfen, Thu Sep 16 23:40:02 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
2 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3   %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 < %\usepackage{endfloat}
4 > \usepackage{endfloat}
5   \usepackage{amsmath}
6   \usepackage{epsf}
7   \usepackage{berkeley}
8 < %\usepackage{setspace}
9 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 < %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 < %\pagestyle{plain}
13 < %\pagenumbering{arabic}
14 < %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 < %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 < %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 < %\brokenpenalty=10000
11 > \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 > \pagestyle{plain}
13 > \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 > \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 > \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 > \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 > \brokenpenalty=10000
18 > \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 > \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
19 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomolous Ice}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
27 < \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
27 <
28 < \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
26 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
28   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29  
30   \date{\today}
31  
32 < %\maketitle
32 > \maketitle
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36 + The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low pressure regime
37 + were calculated using thermodynamic integration.  These integrations
38 + were done for most of the common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a
39 + structure we recently observed to be stable in one of the single-point
40 + water models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1
41 + atm) for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
42 + generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
43 + known low-pressure ice structures under all of the common water
44 + models.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an
45 + effect on the calculated free energies, and can result in altered free
46 + energy landscapes.
47   \end{abstract}
48  
39 \maketitle
40
41 \newpage
42
49   %\narrowtext
50  
51   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 48 | Line 54 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56  
57 + Molecular dynamics is a valuable tool for studying the phase behavior
58 + of systems ranging from small or simple
59 + molecules\cite{Matsumoto02,andOthers} to complex biological
60 + species.\cite{bigStuff} Many techniques have been developed to
61 + investigate the thermodynamic properites of model substances,
62 + providing both qualitative and quantitative comparisons between
63 + simulations and experiment.\cite{thermMethods} Investigation of these
64 + properties leads to the development of new and more accurate models,
65 + leading to better understanding and depiction of physical processes
66 + and intricate molecular systems.
67 +
68 + Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
69 + simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
70 + its behavior under varying simulation
71 + conditions.\cite{Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
72 + These models have been used to investigate important physical
73 + phenomena like phase transitions and the hydrophobic
74 + effect.\cite{Yamada02} With the choice of models available, it
75 + is only natural to compare the models under interesting thermodynamic
76 + conditions in an attempt to clarify the limitations of each of the
77 + models.\cite{modelProps} Two important property to quantify are the
78 + Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies, particularly for the solid forms of
79 + water.  Difficulty in these types of studies typically arises from the
80 + assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a
81 + wide range of pressures and temperatures. There are currently 13
82 + recognized forms of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate
83 + the entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is
84 + focused on the phases having the lowest free energy at a given state
85 + point, because these phases will dictate the true transition
86 + temperatures and pressures for their respective model.
87 +
88 + In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
89 + crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This work is
90 + unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
91 + through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
92 + under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
93 + events are interesting in and of
94 + themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
95 + obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
96 + polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
97 + this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
98 + simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
99 + water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
100 + tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
101 + molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
102 + their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
103 + constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
104 + as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
105 + subunits appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
106 + crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
107 + open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
108 + diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
109 + that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
110 +
111 + \begin{figure}
112 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
113 + \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
114 + elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$
115 + relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-$i^\prime$, $a =
116 + 1.7850c$.}
117 + \label{iceiCell}
118 + \end{figure}
119 +
120 + \begin{figure}
121 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
122 + \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
123 + down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
124 + octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
125 + less dense than ice $I_h$.}
126 + \label{protOrder}
127 + \end{figure}
128 +
129 + Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
130 + minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
131 + investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
132 + the previous work and related
133 + articles\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85}). Those results only
134 + considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
135 + contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
136 + absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
137 + thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
138 + and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
139 + and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
140 + observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
141 + SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
142 + from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
143 + common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
144 + field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
145 + be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
146 + in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
147 + this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
148 + it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
149 + the other two faces.
150 +
151   \section{Methods}
152  
153   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
154 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
155 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
156 < bodies, with orientational motion propogated using the symplectic DLM
157 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
158 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
155 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
156 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
157 > the implementation of these techniques can be found in a recent
158 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
159  
160   Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
161   several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
162   SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
163   400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
164 < same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
165 < phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 < resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
67 < temperatures.
164 > same technique in order to determine melting points and generate phase
165 > diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities resulting in a
166 > pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective temperatures.
167  
168   A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
169   over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
170 < for which the free energy is known. This transformation path is then
171 < integrated in order to determine the free energy difference between
172 < the two states:
170 > for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
171 > path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
172 > difference between the two states:
173   \begin{equation}
75 \begin{center}
174   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
175   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
78 \end{center}
176   \end{equation}
177   where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
178 < transformation parameter. Simulations are distributed unevenly along
179 < this path in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest
180 < change in the potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted
181 < of $\sim$25 simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system)
182 < to 75 ps (near the reference state) in length.
178 > transformation parameter that scales the overall
179 > potential. Simulations are distributed unevenly along this path in
180 > order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
181 > potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
182 > simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
183 > (near the reference state) in length.
184  
185   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
186 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
89 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
186 > crystal was chosen as the reference state. In an Einstein crystal, the
187   molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
188   and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
189 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
190 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
189 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
190 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
191   \begin{eqnarray}
192   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
193   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 110 | Line 207 | state.
207   minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
208   molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
209   state.
210 +
211   \begin{figure}
212 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{rotSpring.eps}
212 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
213   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
214   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
215   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
# Line 122 | Line 220 | cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff v
220   \end{figure}
221  
222   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
223 < cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA ). By
224 < applying this function, these interactions are smoothly truncated,
225 < thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting from
226 < harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction was
227 < also investigated on select model systems in a variety of manners. For
228 < the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed dielectric constant of
229 < 80 was applied in all simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the
230 < least computationally expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P),
231 < simulations were performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to
232 < compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use
233 < of an Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
223 > cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
224 > ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
225 > truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
226 > from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
227 > was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
228 > manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
229 > dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
230 > simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
231 > expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
232 > performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
233 > \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
234 > summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
235   calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
236 < mechanics software package. TINKER was chosen because it can also
237 < propogate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most direct
238 < comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy difference
239 < in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the previous results
141 < in order to predict changes in the free energy landscape.
236 > mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
237 > difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
238 > previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
239 > landscape.
240  
241   \section{Results and discussion}
242  
# Line 148 | Line 246 | Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered var
246   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
247   and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
248   model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
249 < Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
250 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
251 < stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
252 < disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
253 < ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
254 < 8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
255 < ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
256 < $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
249 > Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
250 > $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
251 > as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
252 > proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
253 > antiferroelectric version that has an 8 molecule unit
254 > cell.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules
255 > for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for
256 > ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
257   were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
258  
259   \begin{table*}
# Line 165 | Line 263 | kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF
263   \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
264   variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
265   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
266 < kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
266 > kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
267 > $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
268   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
269 < \hline \\[-7mm]
270 < \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
271 < \hline \\[-3mm]
272 < \ \quad \ TIP3P  & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
273 < \ \quad \ TIP4P  & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
274 < \ \quad \ TIP5P  & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
275 < \ \quad \ SPC/E  & \ \quad \ -12.67 & \ \quad \ -12.96 & \ \quad \ -13.25 & \quad -13.55\\
276 < \ \quad \ SSD/E  & \ \quad \ -11.27 & \ \quad \ -11.19 & \ \quad \ -12.09 & \quad -12.54\\
277 < \ \quad \ SSD/RF & \ \quad \ -11.51 & \ \quad \ NA* & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.29\\
269 > \hline
270 > Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
271 > \hline
272 > TIP3P & -11.41(4) & -11.23(6) & -11.82(5) & -12.30(5)\\
273 > TIP4P & -11.84(5) & -12.04(4) & -12.08(6) & -12.33(6)\\
274 > TIP5P & -11.85(5) & -11.86(4) & -11.96(4) & -12.29(4)\\
275 > SPC/E & -12.67(3) & -12.96(3) & -13.25(5) & -13.55(3)\\
276 > SSD/E & -11.27(3) & -11.19(8) & -12.09(4) & -12.54(4)\\
277 > SSD/RF & -11.51(4) & NA* & -12.08(5) & -12.29(4)\\
278   \end{tabular}
279   \label{freeEnergy}
280   \end{center}
# Line 185 | Line 284 | temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy
284   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
285   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
286   models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
287 < temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
288 < project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
287 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
288 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures
289   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
290   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
291 < only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
292 < temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
293 < does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
294 < diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
295 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
296 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
297 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
291 > although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
292 > different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
293 > ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
294 > phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
295 > B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
296 > Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
297 > TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
298 >
299   \begin{figure}
300   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
301   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
# Line 205 | Line 305 | higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram
305   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
306   \label{tp3phasedia}
307   \end{figure}
308 +
309   \begin{figure}
310   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
311   \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
# Line 221 | Line 322 | temperatures of several common water models compared w
322   \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
323   \begin{center}
324   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
325 < temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
325 > temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
326 > experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
327 > transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
328 > liquid or gas state.}
329   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
330 < \hline \\[-7mm]
331 < \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
332 < \hline \\[-3mm]
333 < \ \ $T_m$ (K)  & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 &  297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
334 < \ \ $T_b$ (K)  & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 &  396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
335 < \ \ $T_s$ (K)  & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - &  - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
330 > \hline
331 > Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
332 > \hline
333 > $T_m$ (K)  & 269(8) & 266(10) & 271(7) & 296(5) & - & 278(7) & 273\\
334 > $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(3) & 337(3) & 396(4) & - & 348(3) & 373\\
335 > $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(3) & - & -\\
336   \end{tabular}
337   \label{meltandboil}
338   \end{center}
# Line 244 | Line 348 | ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the
348   studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
349   using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
350   being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
351 < ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the presence of ice
352 < B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
351 > ordered and disordered molecular
352 > arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
353 > Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
354   predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
355   calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
356   previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
# Line 253 | Line 358 | advantagious in that it facilitated the spontaneous cr
358   at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
359   all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
360   conditions. While troubling, this behavior turned out to be
361 < advantagious in that it facilitated the spontaneous crystallization of
361 > advantageous in that it facilitated the spontaneous crystallization of
362   Ice-{\it i}. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
363   SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
364   risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk changes when
# Line 264 | Line 369 | TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD
369   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
370   TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
371   \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
372 < \AA\. These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into a
373 < liquid. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
372 > \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
373 > liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
374   \label{incCutoff}
375   \end{figure}
376  
# Line 275 | Line 380 | differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. Thi
380   involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
381   free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substantial dependence on
382   cutoff radius. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
383 < differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. This trend is much
384 < more subtle in the case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies
385 < calculated with a reaction field present provide a more accurate
386 < picture of the free energy landscape in the absence of potential
387 < truncation.
383 > differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. Interestingly, by
384 > increasing the cutoff radius, the free energy gap was narrowed enough
385 > in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
386 > simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
387 > simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
388 > greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
389 > case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
390 > reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
391 > energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
392  
393   To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
394   long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
# Line 291 | Line 400 | cutoff radius is observed in these results. Ice-{\it i
400   SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. TIP4P and TIP5P
401   are not fully supported in TINKER, so the results for these models
402   could not be estimated. The same trend pointed out through increase of
403 < cutoff radius is observed in these results. Ice-{\it i} is the
403 > cutoff radius is observed in these PME results. Ice-{\it i} is the
404   preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
405   water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
406   differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
407 < narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
407 > narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear that
408   Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
409   with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
410   do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
# Line 310 | Line 419 | long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.
419   the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
420   long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
421   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
422 < \hline \\[-7mm]
422 > \hline
423   \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
424 < \hline \\[-3mm]
425 < \ \ TIP3P  & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
426 < \ \ SPC/E  & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
424 > \hline
425 > TIP3P  & -11.53(4) & -11.24(6) & -11.51(5) & -11.67(5)\\
426 > SPC/E  & -12.77(3) & -12.92(3) & -12.96(5) & -13.02(3)\\
427   \end{tabular}
428   \label{pmeShift}
429   \end{center}
# Line 324 | Line 433 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where
433   \section{Conclusions}
434  
435   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
436 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where calculated under
436 > $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
437   standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
438   integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
439   minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
# Line 333 | Line 442 | estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
442   solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
443   interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
444   cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
445 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald summation
446 < correction. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
447 < computed free energy values, but Ice-{\it i} is still observed to be a
448 < relavent ice polymorph in simulation studies.
445 > estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
446 > summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
447 > computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
448 > energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
449 > these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
450 > polymorph that should be considered in simulation studies.
451  
452 + Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
453 + investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
454 + experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
455 + and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
456 + regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
457 + of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
458 + name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
459 + said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
460 + most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
461 + negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
462 + deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
463 + non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
464 + our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
465 + and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
466 + i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of the predicted
467 + S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous solid
468 + water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that could
469 + not be assigned in HDA could correspond to peaks labeled in this
470 + S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
471 + agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
472 + such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
473 + to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this ice polymorph
474 + is named appropriately or if it should be promoted to Ice-0.
475 +
476 + \begin{figure}
477 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
478 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$
479 + calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
480 + \label{fig:gofr}
481 + \end{figure}
482 +
483 + \begin{figure}
484 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
485 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
486 + 77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
487 + instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
488 + trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
489 + compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
490 + studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
491 + \label{fig:sofq}
492 + \end{figure}
493 +
494   \section{Acknowledgments}
495   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
496   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines