ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1463 by gezelter, Wed Sep 15 21:11:19 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1468 by gezelter, Thu Sep 16 21:15:38 2004 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20  
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{Ice-{\it i}: a novel ice polymorph predicted via computer simulation}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
# Line 70 | Line 71 | effect.\cite{evenMorePapers} With the choice of models
71   conditions.\cite{Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
72   These models have been used to investigate important physical
73   phenomena like phase transitions and the hydrophobic
74 < effect.\cite{evenMorePapers} With the choice of models available, it
74 > effect.\cite{Yamada02} With the choice of models available, it
75   is only natural to compare the models under interesting thermodynamic
76   conditions in an attempt to clarify the limitations of each of the
77   models.\cite{modelProps} Two important property to quantify are the
# Line 84 | Line 85 | In this paper, standard reference state methods were a
85   point, because these phases will dictate the true transition
86   temperatures and pressures for their respective model.
87  
88 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to the
89 < study of crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This
90 < work is unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was
91 < arrived at through crystallization of a computationally efficient
92 < water model under constant pressure and temperature
93 < conditions. Crystallization events are interesting in and of
94 < themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
95 < obtained in this case was different from any previously observed ice
96 < polymorphs, in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} This crystal
97 < was termed Ice-{\it i} in homage to its origin in computational
88 > In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
89 > crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This work is
90 > unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
91 > through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
92 > under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
93 > events are interesting in and of
94 > themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
95 > obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
96 > polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
97 > this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
98   simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
99   water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
100   tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
101 < waters so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
101 > molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
102   their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
103   constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
104   as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
# Line 109 | Line 110 | that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice
110  
111   \begin{figure}
112   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
113 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-2{\it i}, the elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$ relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-2{\it i}, $a = 1.7850c$.}
113 > \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
114 > elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$
115 > relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-$i^\prime$, $a =
116 > 1.7850c$.}
117   \label{iceiCell}
118   \end{figure}
119  
# Line 122 | Line 126 | Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it
126   \label{protOrder}
127   \end{figure}
128  
129 < Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
130 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
131 < being studied (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
132 < see the previous work and related
129 > Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
130 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
131 > investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
132 > the previous work and related
133   articles\cite{Fennell04,Ichiye96,Bratko85}). Those results only
134 < consider energetic stabilization and neglect entropic contributions to
135 < the overall free energy. To address this issue, the absolute free
136 < energy of this crystal was calculated using thermodynamic integration
137 < and compared to the free energies of cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ (the
138 < experimental low density ice polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density,
139 < but very stable crystal structure observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in
140 < free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes
141 < results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized
142 < (soft sticky dipole extended, SSD/E) in addition to several common
143 < water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field
144 < parametrized single point dipole water model (soft sticky dipole
145 < reaction field, SSD/RF). In should be noted that a second version of
146 < Ice-{\it i} (Ice-2{\it i}) was used in calculations involving SPC/E,
147 < TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B)
148 < is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit it is extended in the direction of
149 < the (001) face and compressed along the other two faces.
134 > considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
135 > contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
136 > absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
137 > thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
138 > and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
139 > and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
140 > observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
141 > SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
142 > from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
143 > common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
144 > field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
145 > be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
146 > in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
147 > this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
148 > it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
149 > the other two faces.
150  
151   \section{Methods}
152  
153   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
154 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
155 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
156 < bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the symplectic DLM
157 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
158 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
155 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
156 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
157 > the implementation of these techniques can be found in a recent
158 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
159  
160   Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
161   several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
162   SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
163   400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
164 < same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
165 < phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 < resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
163 < temperatures.
164 > same technique in order to determine melting points and generate phase
165 > diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities resulting in a
166 > pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective temperatures.
167  
168   A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
169   over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
170 < for which the free energy is known. This transformation path is then
171 < integrated in order to determine the free energy difference between
172 < the two states:
170 > for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
171 > path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
172 > difference between the two states:
173   \begin{equation}
174   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
175   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
# Line 180 | Line 183 | Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the syst
183   (near the reference state) in length.
184  
185   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
186 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
184 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
186 > crystal was chosen as the reference state. In an Einstein crystal, the
187   molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
188   and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
189 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
190 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
189 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
190 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
191   \begin{eqnarray}
192   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
193   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 220 | Line 222 | truncated, thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dyn
222   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
223   cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
224   ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
225 < truncated, thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting
225 > truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
226   from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
227   was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
228   manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
# Line 231 | Line 233 | mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} TINKER was ch
233   \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
234   summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
235   calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
236 < mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} TINKER was chosen because it
235 < can also propagate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most
236 < direct comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy
236 > mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
237   difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
238 < previous results in order to predict changes in the free energy
238 > previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
239   landscape.
240  
241   \section{Results and discussion}
# Line 246 | Line 246 | Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered var
246   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
247   and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
248   model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
249 < Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
250 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
251 < stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
252 < disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
253 < ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
254 < 8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
255 < ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
256 < $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
249 > Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
250 > $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
251 > as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
252 > proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
253 > antiferroelectric version that has an 8 molecule unit
254 > cell.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules
255 > for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for
256 > ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
257   were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
258  
259   \begin{table*}
# Line 263 | Line 263 | kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF
263   \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
264   variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
265   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
266 < kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
266 > kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
267 > $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
268   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
269   \hline
270 < \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
270 > Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
271   \hline
272 < \ \quad \ TIP3P  & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
273 < \ \quad \ TIP4P  & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
274 < \ \quad \ TIP5P  & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
275 < \ \quad \ SPC/E  & \ \quad \ -12.67 & \ \quad \ -12.96 & \ \quad \ -13.25 & \quad -13.55\\
276 < \ \quad \ SSD/E  & \ \quad \ -11.27 & \ \quad \ -11.19 & \ \quad \ -12.09 & \quad -12.54\\
277 < \ \quad \ SSD/RF & \ \quad \ -11.51 & \ \quad \ NA* & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.29\\
272 > TIP3P & -11.41(4) & -11.23(6) & -11.82(5) & -12.30(5)\\
273 > TIP4P & -11.84(5) & -12.04(4) & -12.08(6) & -12.33(6)\\
274 > TIP5P & -11.85(5) & -11.86(4) & -11.96(4) & -12.29(4)\\
275 > SPC/E & -12.67(3) & -12.96(3) & -13.25(5) & -13.55(3)\\
276 > SSD/E & -11.27(3) & -11.19(8) & -12.09(4) & -12.54(4)\\
277 > SSD/RF & -11.51(4) & NA* & -12.08(5) & -12.29(4)\\
278   \end{tabular}
279   \label{freeEnergy}
280   \end{center}
# Line 283 | Line 284 | temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy
284   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
285   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
286   models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
287 < temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
288 < project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
287 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
288 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures
289   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
290   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
291 < only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
292 < temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
293 < does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
294 < diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
295 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
296 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
297 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
291 > although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
292 > different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
293 > ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
294 > phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
295 > B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
296 > Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
297 > TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
298  
299   \begin{figure}
300   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
# Line 321 | Line 322 | temperatures of several common water models compared w
322   \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
323   \begin{center}
324   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
325 < temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
325 > temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
326 > experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
327 > transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
328 > liquid or gas state.}
329   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
330   \hline
331 < \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
331 > Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
332   \hline
333 < \ \ $T_m$ (K)  & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 &  297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
334 < \ \ $T_b$ (K)  & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 &  396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
335 < \ \ $T_s$ (K)  & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - &  - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
333 > $T_m$ (K)  & 269(8) & 266(10) & 271(7) & 296(5) & - & 278(7) & 273\\
334 > $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(3) & 337(3) & 396(4) & - & 348(3) & 373\\
335 > $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(3) & - & -\\
336   \end{tabular}
337   \label{meltandboil}
338   \end{center}
# Line 344 | Line 348 | ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the
348   studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
349   using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
350   being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
351 < ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the presence of ice
352 < B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
351 > ordered and disordered molecular
352 > arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
353 > Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
354   predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
355   calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
356   previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
# Line 364 | Line 369 | TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD
369   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
370   TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
371   \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
372 < \AA\. These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into a
373 < liquid. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
372 > \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
373 > liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
374   \label{incCutoff}
375   \end{figure}
376  
# Line 399 | Line 404 | narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less c
404   preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
405   water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
406   differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
407 < narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
407 > narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear that
408   Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
409   with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
410   do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
# Line 417 | Line 422 | long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.
422   \hline
423   \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
424   \hline
425 < \ \ TIP3P  & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
426 < \ \ SPC/E  & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
425 > TIP3P  & -11.53(4) & -11.24(6) & -11.51(5) & -11.67(5)\\
426 > SPC/E  & -12.77(3) & -12.92(3) & -12.96(5) & -13.02(3)\\
427   \end{tabular}
428   \label{pmeShift}
429   \end{center}
# Line 428 | Line 433 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where
433   \section{Conclusions}
434  
435   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
436 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where calculated under
436 > $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
437   standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
438   integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
439   minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
# Line 437 | Line 442 | estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
442   solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
443   interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
444   cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
445 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald summation
446 < correction. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
445 > estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
446 > summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
447   computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
448   energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
449   these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
# Line 446 | Line 451 | experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather
451  
452   Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
453   investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
454 < experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past
454 > experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
455   and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
456 < regime leads the authors to be hesitant in ascribing relevance outside
457 < of computational models, hence the descriptive name presented. That
458 < being said, there are certain experimental conditions that would
459 < provide the most ideal situation for possible observation. These
460 < include the negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small
461 < clusters in vacuum deposition environments, and in clathrate
462 < structures involving small non-polar molecules.
456 > regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
457 > of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
458 > name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
459 > said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
460 > most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
461 > negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
462 > deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
463 > non-polar molecules.  Fig. \ref{fig:gofr} contains our predictions
464 > of both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$) and the structure
465 > factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for this polymorph at a temperature of 77K.  We
466 > will leave it to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this
467 > ice polymorph should really be called Ice-{\it i} or if it should be
468 > promoted to Ice-0.
469  
470 + \begin{figure}
471 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
472 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) ice $I_c$ at 77 K from simulations of the SSD/RF water model.}
473 + \label{fig:gofr}
474 + \end{figure}
475 +
476   \section{Acknowledgments}
477   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
478   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines