ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1460 by chrisfen, Wed Sep 15 20:12:03 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1465 by gezelter, Wed Sep 15 22:33:18 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
2 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3   %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 < %\usepackage{endfloat}
4 > \usepackage{endfloat}
5   \usepackage{amsmath}
6   \usepackage{epsf}
7   \usepackage{berkeley}
8 < %\usepackage{setspace}
9 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 < %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 < %\pagestyle{plain}
13 < %\pagenumbering{arabic}
14 < %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 < %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 < %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 < %\brokenpenalty=10000
11 > \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 > \pagestyle{plain}
13 > \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 > \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 > \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 > \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 > \brokenpenalty=10000
18 > \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 > \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
20 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
21
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomalous Ice}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
27 < \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
28 <
29 < \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
26 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
28   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29  
30   \date{\today}
31  
32 < %\maketitle
32 > \maketitle
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36   The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low pressure regime
37 < were calculated using thermodynamic integration of systems consisting
38 < of a variety of common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a recent
39 < computationally observed solid structure, was determined to be the
40 < stable state with the lowest free energy for all the water models
41 < investigated. Phase diagrams were generated, and melting and boiling
42 < points for all the models were determined and show relatively good
43 < agreement with experiment, although the solid phase is different
44 < between simulation and experiment. In addition, potential truncation
45 < was shown to have an effect on the calculated free energies, and may
46 < result in altered free energy landscapes.
37 > were calculated using thermodynamic integration.  These integrations
38 > were done for most of the common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a
39 > structure we recently observed to be stable in one of the single-point
40 > water models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1
41 > atm) for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
42 > generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
43 > known low-pressure ice structures under all of the common water
44 > models.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an
45 > effect on the calculated free energies, and can result in altered free
46 > energy landscapes.
47   \end{abstract}
48  
51 \maketitle
52
53 \newpage
54
49   %\narrowtext
50  
51   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 60 | Line 54 | Molecular dynamics has developed into a valuable tool
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56  
57 < Molecular dynamics has developed into a valuable tool for studying the
58 < phase behavior of systems ranging from small or simple
59 < molecules\cite{smallStuff} to complex biological
60 < species.\cite{bigStuff} Many techniques have been developed in order
61 < to investigate the thermodynamic properites of model substances,
57 > Molecular dynamics is a valuable tool for studying the phase behavior
58 > of systems ranging from small or simple
59 > molecules\cite{Matsumoto02andOthers} to complex biological
60 > species.\cite{bigStuff} Many techniques have been developed to
61 > investigate the thermodynamic properites of model substances,
62   providing both qualitative and quantitative comparisons between
63   simulations and experiment.\cite{thermMethods} Investigation of these
64   properties leads to the development of new and more accurate models,
# Line 72 | Line 66 | simulations, and has resulted in a variety of models t
66   and intricate molecular systems.
67  
68   Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
69 < simulations, and has resulted in a variety of models that attempt to
70 < describe its behavior under a varying simulation
71 < conditions.\cite{lotsOfWaterPapers} Many of these models have been
72 < used to investigate important physical phenomena like phase
73 < transitions and the hydrophobic effect.\cite{evenMorePapers} With the
74 < advent of numerous differing models, it is only natural that attention
75 < is placed on the properties of the models themselves in an attempt to
76 < clarify their benefits and limitations when applied to a system of
77 < interest.\cite{modelProps} One important but challenging property to
78 < quantify is the free energy, particularly of the solid forms of
79 < water. Difficulty in these types of studies typically arises from the
80 < assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water that water
81 < adopts over a wide range of pressures and temperatures. There are
82 < currently 13 recognized forms of ice, and it is a challenging task to
83 < investigate the entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally,
84 < research is focused on the phases having the lowest free energy,
85 < because these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
86 < pressures for their respective model.
69 > simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
70 > its behavior under varying simulation
71 > conditions.\cite{Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
72 > These models have been used to investigate important physical
73 > phenomena like phase transitions and the hydrophobic
74 > effect.\cite{Yamada02} With the choice of models available, it
75 > is only natural to compare the models under interesting thermodynamic
76 > conditions in an attempt to clarify the limitations of each of the
77 > models.\cite{modelProps} Two important property to quantify are the
78 > Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies, particularly for the solid forms of
79 > water.  Difficulty in these types of studies typically arises from the
80 > assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a
81 > wide range of pressures and temperatures. There are currently 13
82 > recognized forms of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate
83 > the entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is
84 > focused on the phases having the lowest free energy at a given state
85 > point, because these phases will dictate the true transition
86 > temperatures and pressures for their respective model.
87  
88 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to the
89 < study of crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This
90 < work is unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was
91 < arrived at through crystallization of a computationally efficient
92 < water model under constant pressure and temperature
93 < conditions. Crystallization events are interesting in and of
94 < themselves\cite{nucleationStudies}; however, the crystal structure
95 < obtained in this case was different from any previously observed ice
96 < polymorphs, in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} This crystal
97 < was termed Ice-{\it i} in homage to its origin in computational
88 > In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
89 > crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This work is
90 > unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
91 > through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
92 > under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
93 > events are interesting in and of
94 > themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
95 > obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
96 > polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
97 > this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
98   simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
99   water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
100   tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
101 < waters so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
101 > molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
102   their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
103   constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
104   as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
# Line 113 | Line 107 | that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice
107   open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
108   diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
109   that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
110 +
111   \begin{figure}
112 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{unitCell.eps}
113 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-2{\it i}, the elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$ relation is given by $a = 1.0607c$, while for Ice-2{\it i}, $a = 0.8925c$.}
112 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
113 > \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
114 > elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$
115 > relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-$i^\prime$, $a =
116 > 1.7850c$.}
117   \label{iceiCell}
118   \end{figure}
119 +
120   \begin{figure}
121 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{orderedIcei.eps}
121 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
122   \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
123   down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
124   octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
# Line 127 | Line 126 | Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it
126   \label{protOrder}
127   \end{figure}
128  
129 < Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
130 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
131 < being studied (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
132 < see the previous work and related
129 > Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
130 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
131 > investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
132 > the previous work and related
133   articles\cite{Fennell04,Ichiye96,Bratko85}). Those results only
134 < consider energetic stabilization and neglect entropic contributions to
135 < the overall free energy. To address this issue, the absolute free
136 < energy of this crystal was calculated using thermodynamic integration
137 < and compared to the free energies of cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ (the
138 < experimental low density ice polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density,
139 < but very stable crystal structure observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in
140 < free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes
141 < results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized
142 < (soft sticky dipole extended, SSD/E) in addition to several common
143 < water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field
144 < parametrized single point dipole water model (soft sticky dipole
145 < reaction field, SSD/RF). In should be noted that a second version of
146 < Ice-{\it i} (Ice-2{\it i}) was used in calculations involving SPC/E,
147 < TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B)
148 < is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit it is extended in the direction of
149 < the (001) face and compressed along the other two faces.
134 > considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
135 > contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
136 > absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
137 > thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
138 > and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
139 > and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
140 > observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
141 > SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
142 > from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
143 > common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
144 > field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
145 > be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
146 > in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
147 > this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
148 > it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
149 > the other two faces.
150  
151   \section{Methods}
152  
153   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
154 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
155 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
156 < bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the symplectic DLM
157 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
158 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
155 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
156 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
157 > the implementation of these techniques can be found in a recent
158 > publication.\cite{DLM}
159  
160   Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
161   several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
162   SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
163   400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
164 < same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
165 < phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 < resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
168 < temperatures.
164 > same technique in order to determine melting points and generate phase
165 > diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities resulting in a
166 > pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective temperatures.
167  
168   A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
169   over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
170 < for which the free energy is known. This transformation path is then
171 < integrated in order to determine the free energy difference between
172 < the two states:
170 > for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
171 > path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
172 > difference between the two states:
173   \begin{equation}
174   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
175   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
# Line 185 | Line 183 | Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the syst
183   (near the reference state) in length.
184  
185   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
186 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
189 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
186 > crystal was chosen as the reference state. In an Einstein crystal, the
187   molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
188   and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
189 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
190 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
189 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
190 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
191   \begin{eqnarray}
192   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
193   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 210 | Line 207 | state.
207   minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
208   molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
209   state.
210 +
211   \begin{figure}
212 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{rotSpring.eps}
212 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
213   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
214   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
215   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
# Line 222 | Line 220 | cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff v
220   \end{figure}
221  
222   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
223 < cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA ). By
224 < applying this function, these interactions are smoothly truncated,
225 < thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting from
226 < harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction was
227 < also investigated on select model systems in a variety of manners. For
228 < the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed dielectric constant of
229 < 80 was applied in all simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the
230 < least computationally expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P),
231 < simulations were performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to
232 < compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use
233 < of an Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
223 > cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
224 > ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
225 > truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
226 > from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
227 > was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
228 > manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
229 > dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
230 > simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
231 > expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
232 > performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
233 > \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
234 > summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
235   calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
236 < mechanics software package. TINKER was chosen because it can also
237 < propagate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most direct
238 < comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy difference
239 < in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the previous results
241 < in order to predict changes in the free energy landscape.
236 > mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
237 > difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
238 > previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
239 > landscape.
240  
241   \section{Results and discussion}
242  
# Line 248 | Line 246 | Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered var
246   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
247   and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
248   model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
249 < Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
250 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
251 < stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
252 < disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
253 < ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
254 < 8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
255 < ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
256 < $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
249 > Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
250 > $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
251 > as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
252 > proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
253 > antiferroelectric version that has an 8 molecule unit
254 > cell.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules
255 > for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for
256 > ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
257   were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
258  
259   \begin{table*}
# Line 267 | Line 265 | kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF
265   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
266   kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
267   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
268 < \hline \\[-7mm]
268 > \hline
269   \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
270 < \hline \\[-3mm]
270 > \hline
271   \ \quad \ TIP3P  & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
272   \ \quad \ TIP4P  & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
273   \ \quad \ TIP5P  & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
# Line 285 | Line 283 | temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy
283   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
284   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
285   models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
286 < temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
287 < project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
286 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
287 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures
288   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
289   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
290 < only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
291 < temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
292 < does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
293 < diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
294 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
295 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
296 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
290 > although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
291 > different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
292 > ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
293 > phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
294 > B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
295 > Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
296 > TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
297 >
298   \begin{figure}
299   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
300   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
# Line 305 | Line 304 | higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram
304   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
305   \label{tp3phasedia}
306   \end{figure}
307 +
308   \begin{figure}
309   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
310   \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
# Line 323 | Line 323 | temperatures of several common water models compared w
323   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
324   temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
325   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
326 < \hline \\[-7mm]
326 > \hline
327   \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
328 < \hline \\[-3mm]
328 > \hline
329   \ \ $T_m$ (K)  & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 &  297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
330   \ \ $T_b$ (K)  & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 &  396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
331   \ \ $T_s$ (K)  & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - &  - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
# Line 399 | Line 399 | narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less c
399   preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
400   water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
401   differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
402 < narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
402 > narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear that
403   Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
404   with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
405   do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
# Line 414 | Line 414 | long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.
414   the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
415   long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
416   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
417 < \hline \\[-7mm]
417 > \hline
418   \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
419 < \hline \\[-3mm]
419 > \hline
420   \ \ TIP3P  & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
421   \ \ SPC/E  & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
422   \end{tabular}
# Line 428 | Line 428 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where
428   \section{Conclusions}
429  
430   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
431 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where calculated under
431 > $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
432   standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
433   integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
434   minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
# Line 437 | Line 437 | estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
437   solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
438   interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
439   cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
440 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald summation
441 < correction. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
440 > estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
441 > summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
442   computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
443   energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
444   these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
# Line 446 | Line 446 | experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather
446  
447   Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
448   investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
449 < experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past
449 > experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
450   and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
451 < regime leads the authors to be hesitant in ascribing relevance outside
452 < of computational models, hence the descriptive name presented. That
453 < being said, there are certain experimental conditions that would
454 < provide the most ideal situation for possible observation. These
455 < include the negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small
456 < clusters in vacuum deposition environments, and in clathrate
457 < structures involving small non-polar molecules.
451 > regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
452 > of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
453 > name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
454 > said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
455 > most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
456 > negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
457 > deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
458 > non-polar molecules.  Fig. \ref{fig:sofkgofr} contains our predictions
459 > of both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$) and the structure
460 > factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for this polymorph at a temperature of 77K.  We
461 > will leave it to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this
462 > ice polymorph should really be called Ice-{\it i} or if it should be
463 > promoted to Ice-0.
464  
465   \section{Acknowledgments}
466   Support for this project was provided by the National Science

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines