ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1461 by chrisfen, Wed Sep 15 20:22:21 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1471 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 17 06:47:18 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
2 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3   %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 < %\usepackage{endfloat}
4 > \usepackage{endfloat}
5   \usepackage{amsmath}
6   \usepackage{epsf}
7   \usepackage{berkeley}
8 < %\usepackage{setspace}
9 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 < %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 < %\pagestyle{plain}
13 < %\pagenumbering{arabic}
14 < %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 < %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 < %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 < %\brokenpenalty=10000
11 > \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 > \pagestyle{plain}
13 > \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 > \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 > \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 > \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 > \brokenpenalty=10000
18 > \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 > \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
20 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
21
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomalous Ice}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
27 < \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
28 <
29 < \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
26 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
28   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29  
30   \date{\today}
31  
32 < %\maketitle
32 > \maketitle
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36   The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low pressure regime
37 < were calculated using thermodynamic integration of systems consisting
38 < of a variety of common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a recent
39 < computationally observed solid structure, was determined to be the
40 < stable state with the lowest free energy for all the water models
41 < investigated. Phase diagrams were generated, and melting and boiling
42 < points for all the models were determined and show relatively good
43 < agreement with experiment, although the solid phase is different
44 < between simulation and experiment. In addition, potential truncation
45 < was shown to have an effect on the calculated free energies, and may
46 < result in altered free energy landscapes.
37 > were calculated using thermodynamic integration.  These integrations
38 > were done for most of the common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a
39 > structure we recently observed to be stable in one of the single-point
40 > water models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1
41 > atm) for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
42 > generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
43 > known low-pressure ice structures under all of the common water
44 > models.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an
45 > effect on the calculated free energies, and can result in altered free
46 > energy landscapes.
47   \end{abstract}
48  
51 \maketitle
52
53 \newpage
54
49   %\narrowtext
50  
51   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 60 | Line 54 | Molecular dynamics has developed into a valuable tool
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56  
57 < Molecular dynamics has developed into a valuable tool for studying the
58 < phase behavior of systems ranging from small or simple
59 < molecules\cite{smallStuff} to complex biological
60 < species.\cite{bigStuff} Many techniques have been developed in order
61 < to investigate the thermodynamic properites of model substances,
62 < providing both qualitative and quantitative comparisons between
63 < simulations and experiment.\cite{thermMethods} Investigation of these
64 < properties leads to the development of new and more accurate models,
65 < leading to better understanding and depiction of physical processes
66 < and intricate molecular systems.
57 > Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying the phase
58 > behavior of systems ranging from small or simple molecules to complex
59 > biological species.\cite{Matsumoto02,Sanz04,Marrink01} Useful techniques
60 > have been developed to investigate the thermodynamic properites of
61 > model substances, providing both qualitative and quantitative
62 > comparisons between simulations and
63 > experiment.\cite{Widom63,Frenkel84} Investigation of these properties
64 > leads to the development of new and more accurate models, leading to
65 > better understanding and depiction of physical processes and intricate
66 > molecular systems.
67  
68   Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
69 < simulations, and has resulted in a variety of models that attempt to
70 < describe its behavior under a varying simulation
71 < conditions.\cite{lotsOfWaterPapers} Many of these models have been
72 < used to investigate important physical phenomena like phase
73 < transitions and the hydrophobic effect.\cite{evenMorePapers} With the
74 < advent of numerous differing models, it is only natural that attention
75 < is placed on the properties of the models themselves in an attempt to
76 < clarify their benefits and limitations when applied to a system of
77 < interest.\cite{modelProps} One important but challenging property to
78 < quantify is the free energy, particularly of the solid forms of
79 < water. Difficulty in these types of studies typically arises from the
80 < assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water that water
81 < adopts over a wide range of pressures and temperatures. There are
82 < currently 13 recognized forms of ice, and it is a challenging task to
83 < investigate the entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally,
84 < research is focused on the phases having the lowest free energy,
85 < because these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
86 < pressures for their respective model.
69 > simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
70 > its behavior under varying simulation
71 > conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
72 > These models have been used to investigate important physical
73 > phenomena like phase transitions, molecule transport, and the
74 > hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
75 > choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
76 > under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
77 > the limitations of each of the
78 > models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
79 > important property to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
80 > energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
81 > these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
82 > possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
83 > pressures and temperatures.  There are currently 13 recognized forms
84 > of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
85 > energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
86 > phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
87 > these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
88 > pressures for the model.
89  
90 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to the
91 < study of crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This
92 < work is unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was
93 < arrived at through crystallization of a computationally efficient
94 < water model under constant pressure and temperature
95 < conditions. Crystallization events are interesting in and of
96 < themselves\cite{nucleationStudies}; however, the crystal structure
97 < obtained in this case was different from any previously observed ice
98 < polymorphs, in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} This crystal
99 < was termed Ice-{\it i} in homage to its origin in computational
90 > In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
91 > crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
92 > unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
93 > through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
94 > under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
95 > events are interesting in and of
96 > themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
97 > obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
98 > polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
99 > this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
100   simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
101   water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
102   tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
103 < waters so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
103 > molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
104   their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
105   constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
106   as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
# Line 113 | Line 109 | that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice
109   open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
110   diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
111   that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
112 +
113   \begin{figure}
114 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{unitCell.eps}
115 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-2{\it i}, the elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$ relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-2{\it i}, $a = 1.7850c$.}
114 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
115 > \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
116 > elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  The spheres represent the
117 > center-of-mass locations of the water molecules.  The $a$ to $c$
118 > ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
119 > $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.7850c$ respectively.}
120   \label{iceiCell}
121   \end{figure}
122 +
123   \begin{figure}
124 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{orderedIcei.eps}
124 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
125   \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
126   down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
127   octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
# Line 127 | Line 129 | Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it
129   \label{protOrder}
130   \end{figure}
131  
132 < Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
133 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
134 < being studied (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
135 < see the previous work and related
136 < articles\cite{Fennell04,Ichiye96,Bratko85}). Those results only
137 < consider energetic stabilization and neglect entropic contributions to
138 < the overall free energy. To address this issue, the absolute free
139 < energy of this crystal was calculated using thermodynamic integration
140 < and compared to the free energies of cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ (the
141 < experimental low density ice polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density,
142 < but very stable crystal structure observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in
143 < free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes
144 < results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized
145 < (soft sticky dipole extended, SSD/E) in addition to several common
146 < water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field
147 < parametrized single point dipole water model (soft sticky dipole
148 < reaction field, SSD/RF). In should be noted that a second version of
149 < Ice-{\it i} (Ice-2{\it i}) was used in calculations involving SPC/E,
150 < TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B)
151 < is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit it is extended in the direction of
152 < the (001) face and compressed along the other two faces.
132 > Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
133 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
134 > investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
135 > our previous work and related
136 > articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
137 > considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
138 > contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
139 > absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
140 > thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
141 > and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
142 > and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
143 > observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
144 > SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
145 > from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
146 > common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
147 > field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
148 > be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
149 > in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
150 > this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
151 > it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
152 > the other two faces.
153  
154   \section{Methods}
155  
156   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
157 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
158 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
159 < bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the symplectic DLM
160 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
161 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
157 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
158 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
159 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
160 > the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
161 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
162  
163 < Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
164 < several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
165 < SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
166 < 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
167 < same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
163 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique for
164 > determination of free energies of condensed phases of
165 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}. This
166 > method, implemented in the same manner illustrated by B\`{a}ez and
167 > Clancy, was utilized to calculate the free energy of several ice
168 > crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
169 > SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
170 > and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
171 > this same technique in order to determine melting points and generate
172   phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
173   resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
174   temperatures.
175  
176   A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
177   over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
178 < for which the free energy is known. This transformation path is then
179 < integrated in order to determine the free energy difference between
180 < the two states:
178 > for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
179 > path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
180 > difference between the two states:
181   \begin{equation}
182   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
183   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
184   \end{equation}
185   where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
186   transformation parameter that scales the overall
187 < potential. Simulations are distributed unevenly along this path in
188 < order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
187 > potential. Simulations are distributed strategically along this path
188 > in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
189   potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
190   simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
191   (near the reference state) in length.
192  
193   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
194 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
195 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
196 < molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
197 < and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
198 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
199 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
194 > crystal was chosen as the reference system. In an Einstein crystal,
195 > the molecules are restrained at their ideal lattice locations and
196 > orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as applied by B\`{a}ez and
197 > Clancy, the total potential for this reference crystal
198 > ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
199 > \begin{equation}
200 > V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
201 > \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
202 > \end{equation}
203 > where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
204 > the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
205 > of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
206 > respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
207 > of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
208 > $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
209 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
210 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
211   \begin{eqnarray}
212   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
213   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 202 | Line 219 | where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a
219   )^\frac{1}{2}}\exp(t^2)\mathrm{d}t\right ],
220   \label{ecFreeEnergy}
221   \end{eqnarray}
222 < where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a} In equation
223 < \ref{ecFreeEnergy}, $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and
224 < $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are the spring constants restraining translational
208 < motion and deflection of and rotation around the principle axis of the
209 < molecule respectively (Fig. \ref{waterSpring}), and $E_m$ is the
210 < minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
211 < molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
212 < state.
222 > where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is the minimum
223 > potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
224 >
225   \begin{figure}
226 < \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{rotSpring.eps}
226 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
227   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
228   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
229   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
# Line 221 | Line 233 | Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were mo
233   \label{waterSpring}
234   \end{figure}
235  
236 + In the case of molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the
237 + target reference state.  There are several examples of liquid state
238 + free energy calculations of water models present in the
239 + literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
240 + typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
241 + interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
242 + molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most convenient
243 + methods and integrate over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all interaction
244 + parameters are scaled equally by this transformation parameter.  This
245 + method has been shown to be reversible and provide results in
246 + excellent agreement with other established methods.\cite{Baez95b}
247 +
248   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
249 < cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA ). By
250 < applying this function, these interactions are smoothly truncated,
251 < thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting from
252 < harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction was
253 < also investigated on select model systems in a variety of manners. For
254 < the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed dielectric constant of
255 < 80 was applied in all simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the
256 < least computationally expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P),
257 < simulations were performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to
258 < compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use
259 < of an Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
249 > cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
250 > ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
251 > truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
252 > from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
253 > was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
254 > manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
255 > dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
256 > simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
257 > expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
258 > performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
259 > \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
260 > summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
261   calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
262 < mechanics software package. TINKER was chosen because it can also
263 < propagate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most direct
264 < comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy difference
265 < in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the previous results
241 < in order to predict changes in the free energy landscape.
262 > mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
263 > difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
264 > previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
265 > landscape.
266  
267   \section{Results and discussion}
268  
# Line 248 | Line 272 | Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered var
272   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
273   and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
274   model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
275 < Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
276 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
277 < stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
278 < disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
279 < ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
280 < 8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
281 < ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
282 < $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
275 > Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
276 > $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
277 > as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
278 > proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
279 > antiferroelectric version that has an 8 molecule unit
280 > cell.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules
281 > for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for
282 > ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
283   were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
284  
285   \begin{table*}
# Line 265 | Line 289 | kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF
289   \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
290   variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
291   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
292 < kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
292 > kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
293 > $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
294   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
295 < \hline \\[-7mm]
296 < \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
297 < \hline \\[-3mm]
298 < \ \quad \ TIP3P  & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
299 < \ \quad \ TIP4P  & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
300 < \ \quad \ TIP5P  & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
301 < \ \quad \ SPC/E  & \ \quad \ -12.67 & \ \quad \ -12.96 & \ \quad \ -13.25 & \quad -13.55\\
302 < \ \quad \ SSD/E  & \ \quad \ -11.27 & \ \quad \ -11.19 & \ \quad \ -12.09 & \quad -12.54\\
303 < \ \quad \ SSD/RF & \ \quad \ -11.51 & \ \quad \ NA* & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.29\\
295 > \hline
296 > Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
297 > \hline
298 > TIP3P & -11.41(4) & -11.23(6) & -11.82(5) & -12.30(5)\\
299 > TIP4P & -11.84(5) & -12.04(4) & -12.08(6) & -12.33(6)\\
300 > TIP5P & -11.85(5) & -11.86(4) & -11.96(4) & -12.29(4)\\
301 > SPC/E & -12.67(3) & -12.96(3) & -13.25(5) & -13.55(3)\\
302 > SSD/E & -11.27(3) & -11.19(8) & -12.09(4) & -12.54(4)\\
303 > SSD/RF & -11.51(4) & NA* & -12.08(5) & -12.29(4)\\
304   \end{tabular}
305   \label{freeEnergy}
306   \end{center}
# Line 285 | Line 310 | temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy
310   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
311   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
312   models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
313 < temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
314 < project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
313 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
314 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures
315   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
316   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
317 < only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
318 < temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
319 < does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
320 < diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
321 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
322 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
323 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
317 > although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
318 > different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
319 > ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
320 > phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
321 > B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
322 > Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
323 > TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
324 >
325   \begin{figure}
326   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
327   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
# Line 305 | Line 331 | higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram
331   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
332   \label{tp3phasedia}
333   \end{figure}
334 +
335   \begin{figure}
336   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
337   \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
# Line 321 | Line 348 | temperatures of several common water models compared w
348   \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
349   \begin{center}
350   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
351 < temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
351 > temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
352 > experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
353 > transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
354 > liquid or gas state.}
355   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
356 < \hline \\[-7mm]
357 < \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
358 < \hline \\[-3mm]
359 < \ \ $T_m$ (K)  & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 &  297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
360 < \ \ $T_b$ (K)  & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 &  396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
361 < \ \ $T_s$ (K)  & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - &  - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
356 > \hline
357 > Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
358 > \hline
359 > $T_m$ (K)  & 269(8) & 266(10) & 271(7) & 296(5) & - & 278(7) & 273\\
360 > $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(3) & 337(3) & 396(4) & - & 348(3) & 373\\
361 > $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(3) & - & -\\
362   \end{tabular}
363   \label{meltandboil}
364   \end{center}
# Line 344 | Line 374 | ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the
374   studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
375   using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
376   being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
377 < ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the presence of ice
378 < B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
377 > ordered and disordered molecular
378 > arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
379 > Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
380   predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
381   calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
382   previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
# Line 364 | Line 395 | TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD
395   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
396   TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
397   \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
398 < \AA\. These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into a
399 < liquid. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
398 > \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
399 > liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
400   \label{incCutoff}
401   \end{figure}
402  
# Line 380 | Line 411 | greater than 9 \AA\. This narrowing trend is much more
411   in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
412   simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
413   simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
414 < greater than 9 \AA\. This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
414 > greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
415   case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
416   reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
417   energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
# Line 392 | Line 423 | SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}.
423   correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
424   energy of identical crystals with and without PME using TINKER. The
425   free energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and
426 < SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. TIP4P and TIP5P
427 < are not fully supported in TINKER, so the results for these models
428 < could not be estimated. The same trend pointed out through increase of
429 < cutoff radius is observed in these PME results. Ice-{\it i} is the
430 < preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
431 < water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
432 < differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
433 < narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
434 < Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
435 < with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
436 < do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
437 < is a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying
438 < the phase behavior of water models.
426 > SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend
427 > pointed out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
428 > results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
429 > for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
430 > the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
431 > significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
432 > stable polymorph.  The free energies of Ice-{\it i} and ice B overlap
433 > within error, with ice $I_c$ just outside, indicating that Ice-{\it i}
434 > might be metastable with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$ in
435 > the SPC/E water model. However, these results do not significantly
436 > alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a stable crystal
437 > structure that should be considered when studying the phase behavior
438 > of water models.
439  
440   \begin{table*}
441   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 414 | Line 445 | long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.
445   the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
446   long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
447   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
448 < \hline \\[-7mm]
448 > \hline
449   \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
450 < \hline \\[-3mm]
451 < \ \ TIP3P  & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
452 < \ \ SPC/E  & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
450 > \hline
451 > TIP3P  & -11.53(4) & -11.24(6) & -11.51(5) & -11.67(5)\\
452 > SPC/E  & -12.77(3) & -12.92(3) & -12.96(5) & -13.02(3)\\
453   \end{tabular}
454   \label{pmeShift}
455   \end{center}
# Line 428 | Line 459 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where
459   \section{Conclusions}
460  
461   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
462 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where calculated under
462 > $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
463   standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
464   integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
465   minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
# Line 437 | Line 468 | estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
468   solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
469   interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
470   cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
471 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald summation
472 < correction. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
471 > estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
472 > summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
473   computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
474   energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
475   these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
# Line 446 | Line 477 | experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather
477  
478   Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
479   investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
480 < experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past
480 > experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
481   and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
482 < regime leads the authors to be hesitant in ascribing relevance outside
483 < of computational models, hence the descriptive name presented. That
484 < being said, there are certain experimental conditions that would
485 < provide the most ideal situation for possible observation. These
486 < include the negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small
487 < clusters in vacuum deposition environments, and in clathrate
488 < structures involving small non-polar molecules.
482 > regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
483 > of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
484 > name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
485 > said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
486 > most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
487 > negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
488 > deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
489 > non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
490 > our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
491 > and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
492 > i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of the predicted
493 > S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous solid
494 > water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that could
495 > not be assigned in HDA could correspond to peaks labeled in this
496 > S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
497 > agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
498 > such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
499 > to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this ice polymorph
500 > is named appropriately or if it should be promoted to Ice-0.
501  
502 + \begin{figure}
503 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
504 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$
505 + calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
506 + \label{fig:gofr}
507 + \end{figure}
508 +
509 + \begin{figure}
510 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
511 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
512 + 77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
513 + instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
514 + trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
515 + compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
516 + studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
517 + \label{fig:sofq}
518 + \end{figure}
519 +
520   \section{Acknowledgments}
521   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
522   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines