ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1474 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 17 14:56:05 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1475 by gezelter, Fri Sep 17 15:49:25 2004 UTC

# Line 33 | Line 33 | The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36 < The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low pressure regime
37 < were calculated using thermodynamic integration.  These integrations
38 < were done for most of the common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a
39 < structure we recently observed to be stable in one of the single-point
40 < water models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1
41 < atm) for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
36 > The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs which are stable
37 > at low pressures were calculated using thermodynamic integration to a
38 > reference system (the Einstein crystal).  These integrations were
39 > performed for most of the common water models (SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P,
40 > TIP5P, SSD/E, SSD/RF). Ice-{\it i}, a structure we recently observed
41 > crystallizing at room temperature for one of the single-point water
42 > models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1 atm)
43 > for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
44   generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
45 < known low-pressure ice structures under all of the common water
46 < models.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an
47 < effect on the calculated free energies, and can result in altered free
48 < energy landscapes.
45 > known low-pressure ice structures under all of these water models.
46 > Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an effect on the
47 > calculated free energies, and can result in altered free energy
48 > landscapes.  Structure factor for the new crystal were generated and
49 > we await experimental confirmation of the existence of this new
50 > polymorph.  
51   \end{abstract}
52  
53   %\narrowtext
# Line 54 | Line 58 | Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying
58  
59   \section{Introduction}
60  
57 Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying the phase
58 behavior of systems ranging from small or simple molecules to complex
59 biological species.\cite{Matsumoto02,Li96,Marrink01} Useful techniques
60 have been developed to investigate the thermodynamic properites of
61 model substances, providing both qualitative and quantitative
62 comparisons between simulations and
63 experiment.\cite{Widom63,Frenkel84} Investigation of these properties
64 leads to the development of new and more accurate models, leading to
65 better understanding and depiction of physical processes and intricate
66 molecular systems.
67
61   Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
62   simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
63   its behavior under varying simulation
64 < conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
64 > conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04,Amoeba,POL3}
65   These models have been used to investigate important physical
66 < phenomena like phase transitions, molecule transport, and the
66 > phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
67   hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
68   choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
69   under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
70   the limitations of each of the
71   models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
72 < important property to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
72 > important properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
73   energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
74   these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
75   possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
# Line 84 | Line 77 | these phases will dictate the true transition temperat
77   of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
78   energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
79   phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
80 < these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
80 > these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
81   pressures for the model.
82  
83   In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
84   crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
85 < unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
86 < through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
87 < under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
88 < events are interesting in and of
89 < themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
90 < obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
91 < polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
92 < this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
93 < simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
94 < water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
95 < tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
96 < molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
97 < their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
98 < constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
99 < as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
100 < subunits appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
85 > unique in that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at through
86 > crystallization of a computationally efficient water model under
87 > constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization events
88 > are interesting in and of themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}
89 > however, the crystal structure obtained in this case is different from
90 > any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment or
91 > simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure Ice-{\it i}
92 > to indicate its origin in computational simulation. The unit cell
93 > (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight water molecules that stack in
94 > rows of interlocking water tetramers. Proton ordering can be
95 > accomplished by orienting two of the molecules so that both of their
96 > donated hydrogen bonds are internal to their tetramer
97 > (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal constructed of
98 > water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those
99 > observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these subunits
100 > appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
101   crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
102   open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
103   diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
# Line 131 | Line 124 | investigated (for discussions on these single point di
124  
125   Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
126   minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
127 < investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
128 < our previous work and related
127 > had investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
128 > see our previous work and related
129   articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
130   considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
131 < contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
132 < absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
131 > contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
132 > have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
133   thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
134   and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
135   and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
# Line 145 | Line 138 | be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^
138   from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
139   common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
140   field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
141 < be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
142 < in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
143 < this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
144 < it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
145 < the other two faces.
141 > be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was
142 > used in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell
143 > of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i}
144 > unit it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed
145 > along the other two faces.
146  
147   \section{Methods}
148  
# Line 168 | Line 161 | this same technique in order to determine melting poin
161   crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
162   SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
163   and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
164 < this same technique in order to determine melting points and generate
165 < phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 < resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
167 < temperatures.
164 > this same technique in order to determine melting points and to
165 > generate phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
166 > which correspond to a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their
167 > respective temperatures.
168  
169 < A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
170 < over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
171 < for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
172 < path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
173 < difference between the two states:
169 > Thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations during
170 > which the system of interest is converted into a reference system for
171 > which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation path
172 > is then integrated in order to determine the free energy difference
173 > between the two states:
174   \begin{equation}
175   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
176   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
# Line 239 | Line 232 | molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most
232   literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
233   typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
234   interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
235 < molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most convenient
236 < methods and integrate over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all interaction
237 < parameters are scaled equally by this transformation parameter.  This
238 < method has been shown to be reversible and provide results in
239 < excellent agreement with other established methods.\cite{Baez95b}
235 > molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the most convenient
236 > methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
237 > interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
238 > parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
239 > results in excellent agreement with other established
240 > methods.\cite{Baez95b}
241  
242   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
243   cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
# Line 256 | Line 250 | performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to com
250   simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
251   expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
252   performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
253 < \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
254 < summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
255 < calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
256 < mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
257 < difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
258 < previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
259 < landscape.
253 > \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, the effects of utilizing an Ewald
254 > summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing single
255 > configuration calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the
256 > TINKER molecular mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The
257 > calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of PME was
258 > applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
259 > free energy landscape.
260  
261   \section{Results and discussion}
262  
263 < The free energy of proton ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
263 > The free energy of proton-ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
264   compared with the free energies of proton ordered variants of the
265   experimentally observed low-density ice polymorphs, $I_h$ and $I_c$,
266   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
# Line 276 | Line 270 | antiferroelectric version that we divised, and it has
270   $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
271   as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
272   proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
273 < antiferroelectric version that we divised, and it has an 8 molecule
273 > antiferroelectric version that we devised, and it has an 8 molecule
274   unit cell similar to other predicted antiferroelectric $I_h$
275   crystals.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728
276   molecules for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000
# Line 311 | Line 305 | models studied. With the free energy at these state po
305  
306   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
307   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
308 < models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
309 < Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
310 < to build phase diagrams.  Figures
308 > models studied. With the calculated free energy at these state points,
309 > the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points
310 > and to build phase diagrams.  Figures
311   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
312   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
313 < although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
313 > although the crossing points between the phases move to slightly
314   different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
315   ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
316   phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
317   B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
318   Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
319 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
319 > TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
320  
321   \begin{figure}
322   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
# Line 385 | Line 379 | conditions. While troubling, this behavior turned out
379   not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it shows a sublimation point
380   at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
381   all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
382 < conditions. While troubling, this behavior turned out to be
383 < advantageous in that it facilitated the spontaneous crystallization of
384 < Ice-{\it i}. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
382 > conditions. While troubling, this behavior resulted in spontaneous
383 > crystallization of Ice-{\it i} and led us to investigate this
384 > structure. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
385   SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
386 < risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk changes when
386 > risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk lessens when
387   applying a longer cutoff.
388  
389   \begin{figure}
# Line 423 | Line 417 | energy of identical crystals with and without PME usin
417   was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
418   inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the
419   correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
420 < energy of identical crystals with and without PME using TINKER. The
421 < free energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and
422 < SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend
423 < pointed out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
420 > energy of identical crystals both with and without PME. The free
421 > energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and SPC/E
422 > water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend pointed
423 > out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
424   results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
425   for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
426   the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
# Line 461 | Line 455 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were c
455   \section{Conclusions}
456  
457   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
458 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
459 < standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
460 < integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
461 < minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
462 < function cutoff. Calculated melting and boiling points show
463 < surprisingly good agreement with the experimental values; however, the
464 < solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
465 < interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
466 < cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
458 > $I$, ice B, and our recently discovered Ice-{\it i} structure were
459 > calculated under standard conditions for several common water models
460 > via thermodynamic integration. All the water models studied show
461 > Ice-{\it i} to be the minimum free energy crystal structure with a 9
462 > \AA\ switching function cutoff. Calculated melting and boiling points
463 > show surprisingly good agreement with the experimental values;
464 > however, the solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The
465 > effect of interaction truncation was investigated through variation of
466 > the cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
467   estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
468   summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
469   computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
# Line 477 | Line 471 | Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all m
471   these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
472   polymorph that should be considered in simulation studies.
473  
474 < Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
475 < investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
474 > Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all of the
475 > investigated simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible
476   experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
477   and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
478   regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
# Line 491 | Line 485 | i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of
485   non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
486   our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
487   and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
488 < i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of the predicted
489 < S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous solid
490 < water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that could
491 < not be assigned in HDA could correspond to peaks labeled in this
488 > i} at a temperature of 77K.  In our initial comparison of the
489 > predicted S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous
490 > solid water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that
491 > could not be assigned in an early report on high-density amorphous
492 > (HDA) ice could correspond to peaks labeled in this
493   S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
494   agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
495   such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
496 < to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this ice polymorph
497 < is named appropriately or if it should be promoted to Ice-0.
496 > to our experimental colleagues to make the final determination on
497 > whether this ice polymorph is named appropriately (i.e. with an
498 > imaginary number) or if it can be promoted to Ice-0.
499  
500   \begin{figure}
501   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines