--- trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex	2004/09/17 15:49:25	1475
+++ trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex	2004/09/20 20:57:46	1479
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Brat
 Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
 simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
 its behavior under varying simulation
-conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04,Amoeba,POL3}
+conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
 These models have been used to investigate important physical
 phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
 hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
@@ -484,34 +484,30 @@ and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ a
 deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
 non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
 our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
-and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
-i} at a temperature of 77K.  In our initial comparison of the
-predicted S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous
-solid water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that
-could not be assigned in an early report on high-density amorphous
-(HDA) ice could correspond to peaks labeled in this
-S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
-agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
-such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
-to our experimental colleagues to make the final determination on
-whether this ice polymorph is named appropriately (i.e. with an
-imaginary number) or if it can be promoted to Ice-0.
+and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, and for
+ice-{\it i} at a temperature of 77K.  In studies of the high and low
+density forms of amorphous ice, ``spurious'' diffraction peaks have
+been observed experimentally.\cite{Bizid87} It is possible that a
+variant of Ice-{\it i} could explain some of this behavior; however,
+we will leave it to our experimental colleagues to make the final
+determination on whether this ice polymorph is named appropriately
+(i.e. with an imaginary number) or if it can be promoted to Ice-0.
 
 \begin{figure}
 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
-\caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ 
-calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
+\caption{Radial distribution functions of ice $I_h$, $I_c$, 
+Ice-{\it i}, and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ calculated from from simulations
+of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
 \label{fig:gofr}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}
 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
-\caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
-77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
-instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
-trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
-compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
-studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
+\caption{Predicted structure factors for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, Ice-{\it i},
+ and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
+ been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
+ width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
+ simulations.}
 \label{fig:sofq}
 \end{figure}
 
