ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1830 by chrisfen, Wed Dec 1 17:44:08 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1831 by chrisfen, Thu Dec 2 14:23:11 2004 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20  
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 < stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
23 > \title{Free Energy Analysis of Simulated Ice Polymorphs Using Simple
24 > Dipolar and Charge Based Water Models}
25  
26   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
# Line 457 | Line 457 | within error, indicating that other conditions, such a
457   studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
458   cutoff conditions.  The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
459   narrows the sequences of free energies so much that they often overlap
460 < within error, indicating that other conditions, such as cell volume in
461 < microcanonical simulations, can influence the chosen polymorph upon
462 < crystallization.  All of these results support the finding that the
463 < Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a stable crystal structure that should be
464 < considered when studying the phase behavior of water models.
460 > within error (see Table \ref{spcecut}), indicating that other
461 > conditions, such as cell volume in microcanonical simulations, can
462 > influence the chosen polymorph upon crystallization.  All of these
463 > results support the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a stable
464 > crystal structure that should be considered when studying the phase
465 > behavior of water models.
466  
467   \begin{table*}
468   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 473 | Line 474 | Cutoff (\AA) &  $I_h$ & $I_c$ &  B & Ice-{\it i} \\
474  
475   \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
476   \hline
477 < Cutoff (\AA) &  $I_h$ & $I_c$ &  B & Ice-{\it i} \\
477 > Cutoff (\AA) & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} \\
478   \hline
479   9.0   & -12.98(2) & -13.00(2) & -12.97(3) & -13.02(2) \\
480   10.5  & -13.13(3) & -13.09(4) & -13.17(3) & -13.11(2) \\
# Line 481 | Line 482 | Cutoff (\AA) &  $I_h$ & $I_c$ &  B & Ice-{\it i} \\
482   13.5  & -13.02(2) & -13.02(2) & -13.08(2) & -13.07(2) \\
483   15.0  & -13.11(4) & -12.97(2) & -13.09(2) & -12.95(2) \\
484   \end{tabular}
485 < \label{pmeShift}
485 > \label{spcecut}
486   \end{center}
487   \end{minipage}
488   \end{table*}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines