ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1464 by chrisfen, Wed Sep 15 21:44:27 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1474 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 17 14:56:05 2004 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20  
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{Ice-{\it i}: a novel ice polymorph predicted via computer simulation}
23 > \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 > stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
25  
26   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
# Line 53 | Line 54 | Molecular dynamics is a valuable tool for studying the
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56  
57 < Molecular dynamics is a valuable tool for studying the phase behavior
58 < of systems ranging from small or simple
59 < molecules\cite{Matsumoto02andOthers} to complex biological
60 < species.\cite{bigStuff} Many techniques have been developed to
61 < investigate the thermodynamic properites of model substances,
62 < providing both qualitative and quantitative comparisons between
63 < simulations and experiment.\cite{thermMethods} Investigation of these
64 < properties leads to the development of new and more accurate models,
65 < leading to better understanding and depiction of physical processes
66 < and intricate molecular systems.
57 > Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying the phase
58 > behavior of systems ranging from small or simple molecules to complex
59 > biological species.\cite{Matsumoto02,Li96,Marrink01} Useful techniques
60 > have been developed to investigate the thermodynamic properites of
61 > model substances, providing both qualitative and quantitative
62 > comparisons between simulations and
63 > experiment.\cite{Widom63,Frenkel84} Investigation of these properties
64 > leads to the development of new and more accurate models, leading to
65 > better understanding and depiction of physical processes and intricate
66 > molecular systems.
67  
68   Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
69   simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
70   its behavior under varying simulation
71 < conditions.\cite{Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
71 > conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
72   These models have been used to investigate important physical
73 < phenomena like phase transitions and the hydrophobic
74 < effect.\cite{Yamada02} With the choice of models available, it
75 < is only natural to compare the models under interesting thermodynamic
76 < conditions in an attempt to clarify the limitations of each of the
77 < models.\cite{modelProps} Two important property to quantify are the
78 < Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies, particularly for the solid forms of
79 < water.  Difficulty in these types of studies typically arises from the
80 < assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a
81 < wide range of pressures and temperatures. There are currently 13
82 < recognized forms of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate
83 < the entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is
84 < focused on the phases having the lowest free energy at a given state
85 < point, because these phases will dictate the true transition
86 < temperatures and pressures for their respective model.
73 > phenomena like phase transitions, molecule transport, and the
74 > hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
75 > choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
76 > under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
77 > the limitations of each of the
78 > models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
79 > important property to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
80 > energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
81 > these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
82 > possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
83 > pressures and temperatures.  There are currently 13 recognized forms
84 > of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
85 > energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
86 > phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
87 > these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
88 > pressures for the model.
89  
90 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to the
91 < study of crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This
92 < work is unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was
93 < arrived at through crystallization of a computationally efficient
94 < water model under constant pressure and temperature
95 < conditions. Crystallization events are interesting in and of
96 < themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
97 < obtained in this case was different from any previously observed ice
98 < polymorphs, in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} This crystal
99 < was termed Ice-{\it i} in homage to its origin in computational
90 > In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
91 > crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
92 > unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
93 > through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
94 > under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
95 > events are interesting in and of
96 > themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
97 > obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
98 > polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
99 > this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
100   simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
101   water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
102   tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
103 < waters so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
103 > molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
104   their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
105   constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
106   as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
# Line 109 | Line 112 | that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice
112  
113   \begin{figure}
114   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
115 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-2{\it i}, the elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$ relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-2{\it i}, $a = 1.7850c$.}
115 > \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
116 > elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  The spheres represent the
117 > center-of-mass locations of the water molecules.  The $a$ to $c$
118 > ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
119 > $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.7850c$ respectively.}
120   \label{iceiCell}
121   \end{figure}
122  
# Line 122 | Line 129 | Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it
129   \label{protOrder}
130   \end{figure}
131  
132 < Results in the previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
133 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
134 < being studied (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
135 < see the previous work and related
136 < articles\cite{Fennell04,Ichiye96,Bratko85}). Those results only
137 < consider energetic stabilization and neglect entropic contributions to
138 < the overall free energy. To address this issue, the absolute free
139 < energy of this crystal was calculated using thermodynamic integration
140 < and compared to the free energies of cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ (the
141 < experimental low density ice polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density,
142 < but very stable crystal structure observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in
143 < free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes
144 < results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized
145 < (soft sticky dipole extended, SSD/E) in addition to several common
146 < water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field
147 < parametrized single point dipole water model (soft sticky dipole
148 < reaction field, SSD/RF). In should be noted that a second version of
149 < Ice-{\it i} (Ice-2{\it i}) was used in calculations involving SPC/E,
150 < TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B)
151 < is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit it is extended in the direction of
152 < the (001) face and compressed along the other two faces.
132 > Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
133 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
134 > investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
135 > our previous work and related
136 > articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
137 > considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
138 > contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
139 > absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
140 > thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
141 > and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
142 > and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
143 > observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
144 > SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
145 > from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
146 > common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
147 > field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
148 > be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
149 > in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
150 > this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
151 > it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
152 > the other two faces.
153  
154   \section{Methods}
155  
156   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
157 < performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
158 < molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
159 < bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the symplectic DLM
160 < integration method. Details about the implementation of these
161 < techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
157 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
158 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
159 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
160 > the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
161 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
162  
163 < Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
164 < several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
165 < SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
166 < 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
167 < same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
163 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique for
164 > determination of free energies of condensed phases of
165 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}. This
166 > method, implemented in the same manner illustrated by B\`{a}ez and
167 > Clancy, was utilized to calculate the free energy of several ice
168 > crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
169 > SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
170 > and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
171 > this same technique in order to determine melting points and generate
172   phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
173   resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
174   temperatures.
175  
176   A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
177   over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
178 < for which the free energy is known. This transformation path is then
179 < integrated in order to determine the free energy difference between
180 < the two states:
178 > for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
179 > path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
180 > difference between the two states:
181   \begin{equation}
182   \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
183   )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
184   \end{equation}
185   where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
186   transformation parameter that scales the overall
187 < potential. Simulations are distributed unevenly along this path in
188 < order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
187 > potential. Simulations are distributed strategically along this path
188 > in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
189   potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
190   simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
191   (near the reference state) in length.
192  
193   For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
194 < Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
195 < to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
196 < molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
197 < and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
198 < restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
199 < Energy ({\it A}) is given by
194 > crystal was chosen as the reference system. In an Einstein crystal,
195 > the molecules are restrained at their ideal lattice locations and
196 > orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as applied by B\`{a}ez and
197 > Clancy, the total potential for this reference crystal
198 > ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
199 > \begin{equation}
200 > V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
201 > \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
202 > \end{equation}
203 > where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
204 > the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
205 > of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
206 > respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
207 > of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
208 > $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
209 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
210 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
211   \begin{eqnarray}
212   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
213   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 197 | Line 219 | where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a
219   )^\frac{1}{2}}\exp(t^2)\mathrm{d}t\right ],
220   \label{ecFreeEnergy}
221   \end{eqnarray}
222 < where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a} In equation
223 < \ref{ecFreeEnergy}, $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and
202 < $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are the spring constants restraining translational
203 < motion and deflection of and rotation around the principle axis of the
204 < molecule respectively (Fig. \ref{waterSpring}), and $E_m$ is the
205 < minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
206 < molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
207 < state.
222 > where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is the minimum
223 > potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
224  
225   \begin{figure}
226   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
# Line 217 | Line 233 | Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were mo
233   \label{waterSpring}
234   \end{figure}
235  
236 + In the case of molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the
237 + target reference state.  There are several examples of liquid state
238 + free energy calculations of water models present in the
239 + literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
240 + typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
241 + interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
242 + molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most convenient
243 + methods and integrate over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all interaction
244 + parameters are scaled equally by this transformation parameter.  This
245 + method has been shown to be reversible and provide results in
246 + excellent agreement with other established methods.\cite{Baez95b}
247 +
248   Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
249   cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
250   ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
251 < truncated, thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting
251 > truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
252   from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
253   was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
254   manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
# Line 231 | Line 259 | mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} TINKER was ch
259   \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
260   summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
261   calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
262 < mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} TINKER was chosen because it
235 < can also propagate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most
236 < direct comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy
262 > mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
263   difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
264 < previous results in order to predict changes in the free energy
264 > previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
265   landscape.
266  
267   \section{Results and discussion}
# Line 246 | Line 272 | Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered var
272   as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
273   and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
274   model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
275 < Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
276 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
277 < stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
278 < disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
279 < ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
280 < 8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
281 < ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
282 < $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
283 < were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
275 > Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
276 > $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
277 > as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
278 > proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
279 > antiferroelectric version that we divised, and it has an 8 molecule
280 > unit cell similar to other predicted antiferroelectric $I_h$
281 > crystals.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728
282 > molecules for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000
283 > molecules for ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger
284 > crystal sizes were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff
285 > values.
286  
287   \begin{table*}
288   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 263 | Line 291 | kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF
291   \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
292   variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
293   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
294 < kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
294 > kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
295 > $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
296   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
297   \hline
298 < \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \  & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
298 > Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
299   \hline
300 < \ \quad \ TIP3P  & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
301 < \ \quad \ TIP4P  & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
302 < \ \quad \ TIP5P  & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
303 < \ \quad \ SPC/E  & \ \quad \ -12.67 & \ \quad \ -12.96 & \ \quad \ -13.25 & \quad -13.55\\
304 < \ \quad \ SSD/E  & \ \quad \ -11.27 & \ \quad \ -11.19 & \ \quad \ -12.09 & \quad -12.54\\
305 < \ \quad \ SSD/RF & \ \quad \ -11.51 & \ \quad \ NA* & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.29\\
300 > TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3)\\
301 > TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.33(3)\\
302 > TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & -12.29(2)\\
303 > SPC/E & -12.67(2) & -12.96(2) & -13.25(3) & -13.55(2)\\
304 > SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2)\\
305 > SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & NA* & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
306   \end{tabular}
307   \label{freeEnergy}
308   \end{center}
# Line 283 | Line 312 | temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy
312   The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
313   that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
314   models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
315 < temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
316 < project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
315 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
316 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures
317   \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
318   from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
319 < only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
320 < temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
321 < does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
322 < diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
323 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
324 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
325 < TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
319 > although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
320 > different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
321 > ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
322 > phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
323 > B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
324 > Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
325 > TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
326  
327   \begin{figure}
328   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
# Line 321 | Line 350 | temperatures of several common water models compared w
350   \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
351   \begin{center}
352   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
353 < temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
353 > temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
354 > experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
355 > transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
356 > liquid or gas state.}
357   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
358   \hline
359 < \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
359 > Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
360   \hline
361 < \ \ $T_m$ (K)  & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 &  297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
362 < \ \ $T_b$ (K)  & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 &  396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
363 < \ \ $T_s$ (K)  & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - &  - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
361 > $T_m$ (K)  & 269(4) & 266(5) & 271(4) & 296(3) & - & 278(4) & 273\\
362 > $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(2) & 337(2) & 396(2) & - & 348(2) & 373\\
363 > $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(2) & - & -\\
364   \end{tabular}
365   \label{meltandboil}
366   \end{center}
# Line 344 | Line 376 | ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the
376   studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
377   using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
378   being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
379 < ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the presence of ice
380 < B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
379 > ordered and disordered molecular
380 > arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
381 > Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
382   predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
383   calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
384   previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
# Line 364 | Line 397 | TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD
397   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
398   TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
399   \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
400 < \AA\. These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into a
401 < liquid. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
400 > \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
401 > liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
402   \label{incCutoff}
403   \end{figure}
404  
# Line 380 | Line 413 | greater than 9 \AA\. This narrowing trend is much more
413   in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
414   simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
415   simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
416 < greater than 9 \AA\. This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
416 > greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
417   case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
418   reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
419   energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
# Line 392 | Line 425 | SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}.
425   correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
426   energy of identical crystals with and without PME using TINKER. The
427   free energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and
428 < SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. TIP4P and TIP5P
429 < are not fully supported in TINKER, so the results for these models
430 < could not be estimated. The same trend pointed out through increase of
431 < cutoff radius is observed in these PME results. Ice-{\it i} is the
432 < preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
433 < water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
434 < differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
435 < narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
436 < Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
437 < with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
438 < do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
439 < is a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying
440 < the phase behavior of water models.
428 > SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend
429 > pointed out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
430 > results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
431 > for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
432 > the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
433 > significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
434 > stable polymorph with the SPC/E model.  The free energies of Ice-{\it
435 > i} and ice B nearly overlap within error, with ice $I_c$ just outside
436 > as well, indicating that Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with respect
437 > to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$ with SPC/E. However, these results do
438 > not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is
439 > a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
440 > phase behavior of water models.
441  
442   \begin{table*}
443   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 417 | Line 450 | long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.
450   \hline
451   \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
452   \hline
453 < \ \ TIP3P  & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
454 < \ \ SPC/E  & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
453 > TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3)\\
454 > SPC/E  & -12.77(2) & -12.92(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2)\\
455   \end{tabular}
456   \label{pmeShift}
457   \end{center}
# Line 428 | Line 461 | $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where
461   \section{Conclusions}
462  
463   The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
464 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} where calculated under
464 > $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
465   standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
466   integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
467   minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
# Line 437 | Line 470 | estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
470   solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
471   interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
472   cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
473 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald summation
474 < correction. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
473 > estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
474 > summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
475   computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
476   energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
477   these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
# Line 446 | Line 479 | experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather
479  
480   Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
481   investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
482 < experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past
482 > experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
483   and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
484 < regime leads the authors to be hesitant in ascribing relevance outside
485 < of computational models, hence the descriptive name presented. That
486 < being said, there are certain experimental conditions that would
487 < provide the most ideal situation for possible observation. These
488 < include the negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small
489 < clusters in vacuum deposition environments, and in clathrate
490 < structures involving small non-polar molecules.
484 > regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
485 > of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
486 > name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
487 > said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
488 > most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
489 > negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
490 > deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
491 > non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
492 > our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
493 > and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
494 > i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of the predicted
495 > S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous solid
496 > water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that could
497 > not be assigned in HDA could correspond to peaks labeled in this
498 > S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
499 > agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
500 > such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
501 > to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this ice polymorph
502 > is named appropriately or if it should be promoted to Ice-0.
503  
504 + \begin{figure}
505 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
506 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$
507 + calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
508 + \label{fig:gofr}
509 + \end{figure}
510 +
511 + \begin{figure}
512 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
513 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
514 + 77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
515 + instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
516 + trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
517 + compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
518 + studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
519 + \label{fig:sofq}
520 + \end{figure}
521 +
522   \section{Acknowledgments}
523   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
524   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines