ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1474 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 17 14:56:05 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 2133 by chrisfen, Thu Mar 24 19:35:08 2005 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 < %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
3   \usepackage{endfloat}
4   \usepackage{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{epsf}
6 < \usepackage{berkeley}
6 > \usepackage{times}
7 > \usepackage{mathptm}
8   \usepackage{setspace}
9   \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
# Line 20 | Line 20
20  
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 < stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
23 > \title{Computational free energy studies of a new ice polymorph which
24 > exhibits greater stability than Ice I$_h$}
25  
26   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 < Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
28 > University of Notre Dame\\
29   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
30  
31   \date{\today}
# Line 33 | Line 34 | The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low
34   %\doublespacing
35  
36   \begin{abstract}
37 < The free energies of several ice polymorphs in the low pressure regime
38 < were calculated using thermodynamic integration.  These integrations
39 < were done for most of the common water models. Ice-{\it i}, a
40 < structure we recently observed to be stable in one of the single-point
41 < water models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1
42 < atm) for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
43 < generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
44 < known low-pressure ice structures under all of the common water
45 < models.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an
46 < effect on the calculated free energies, and can result in altered free
46 < energy landscapes.
37 > The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs were calculated
38 > using thermodynamic integration.  These polymorphs are predicted by
39 > computer simulations using a variety of common water models to be
40 > stable at low pressures.  A recently discovered ice polymorph that has
41 > as yet {\it only} been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
42 > was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
43 > water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
44 > coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
45 > ice structures.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to play
46 > a role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
47   \end{abstract}
48  
49   %\narrowtext
# Line 54 | Line 54 | Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56  
57 Computer simulations are a valuable tool for studying the phase
58 behavior of systems ranging from small or simple molecules to complex
59 biological species.\cite{Matsumoto02,Li96,Marrink01} Useful techniques
60 have been developed to investigate the thermodynamic properites of
61 model substances, providing both qualitative and quantitative
62 comparisons between simulations and
63 experiment.\cite{Widom63,Frenkel84} Investigation of these properties
64 leads to the development of new and more accurate models, leading to
65 better understanding and depiction of physical processes and intricate
66 molecular systems.
67
57   Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
58   simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
59   its behavior under varying simulation
60 < conditions.\cite{Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Liu96,Berendsen98,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
60 > conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
61   These models have been used to investigate important physical
62 < phenomena like phase transitions, molecule transport, and the
62 > phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
63   hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
64   choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
65   under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
66 < the limitations of each of the
67 < models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
68 < important property to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
69 < energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
70 < these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
71 < possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
72 < pressures and temperatures.  There are currently 13 recognized forms
73 < of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
74 < energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
66 > the limitations of
67 > each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two important
68 > properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
69 > particularly for the solid forms of water as these predict the
70 > thermodynamic stability of the various phases.  Water has a
71 > particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different and
72 > stable crystalline structures as the temperature and pressure are
73 > varied.  It is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
74 > energy landscape\cite{Sanz04}; and ideally, research is focused on the
75   phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
76 < these phases will dictate the true transition temperatures and
77 < pressures for the model.
76 > these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
77 > pressures for the model.  
78  
79 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
80 < crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
81 < unique in the fact that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at
82 < through crystallization of a computationally efficient water model
83 < under constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization
84 < events are interesting in and of
85 < themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however, the crystal structure
79 > The high-pressure phases of water (ice II - ice X as well as ice XII)
80 > have been studied extensively both experimentally and
81 > computationally. In this paper, standard reference state methods were
82 > applied in the {\it low} pressure regime to evaluate the free energies
83 > for a few known crystalline water polymorphs that might be stable at
84 > these pressures.  This work is unique in that one of the crystal
85 > lattices was arrived at through crystallization of a computationally
86 > efficient water model under constant pressure and temperature
87 > conditions.  Crystallization events are interesting in and of
88 > themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
89   obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
90   polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
91   this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
92 < simulation. The unit cell (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight
93 < water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water
94 < tetramers. Proton ordering can be accomplished by orienting two of the
95 < molecules so that both of their donated hydrogen bonds are internal to
96 < their tetramer (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal
97 < constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
98 < as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
99 < subunits appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
100 < crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
101 < open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
102 < diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
103 < that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
92 > simulation. The unit cell of Ice-{\it i} and an axially-elongated
93 > variant named Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ both consist of eight water
94 > molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water tetramers as
95 > illustrated in figures \ref{unitcell}A and \ref{unitcell}B.  These
96 > tetramers form a crystal structure similar in appearance to a recent
97 > two-dimensional surface tessellation simulated on silica.\cite{Yang04}
98 > As expected in an ice crystal constructed of water tetramers, the
99 > hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those observed in ice I$_h$,
100 > however the interlocking of these subunits appears to provide
101 > significant stabilization to the overall crystal.  The arrangement of
102 > these tetramers results in octagonal cavities that are typically
103 > greater than 6.3 \AA\ in diameter (Fig. \ref{iCrystal}).  This open
104 > structure leads to crystals that are typically 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less
105 > dense than ice I$_h$.
106  
107   \begin{figure}
108 + \centering
109   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
110 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
111 < elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  The spheres represent the
112 < center-of-mass locations of the water molecules.  The $a$ to $c$
113 < ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
114 < $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.7850c$ respectively.}
120 < \label{iceiCell}
110 > \caption{(A) Unit cells for Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$.  
111 > The spheres represent the center-of-mass locations of the water
112 > molecules.  The $a$ to $c$ ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
113 > i}$^\prime$ are given by 2.1214 and 1.785 respectively.}
114 > \label{unitcell}
115   \end{figure}
116  
117   \begin{figure}
118 + \centering
119   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
120 < \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
121 < down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
122 < octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
123 < less dense than ice $I_h$.}
129 < \label{protOrder}
120 > \caption{A rendering of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
121 > down the (001) crystal face.  The presence of large octagonal pores
122 > leads to a polymorph that is less dense than ice I$_h$.}
123 > \label{iCrystal}
124   \end{figure}
125  
126   Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
127 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
127 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
128   investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
129   our previous work and related
130 < articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
131 < considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
132 < contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, the
133 < absolute free energy of this crystal was calculated using
134 < thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
135 < and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
136 < and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
137 < observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
138 < SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
139 < from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
140 < common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
141 < field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
142 < be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-$i^\prime$) was used
143 < in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit cell of
144 < this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it i} unit
145 < it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and compressed along
146 < the other two faces.
130 > articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Our earlier results
131 > considered only energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
132 > contributions to the overall free energy.  To address this issue, we
133 > have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
134 > thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
135 > I$_c$ and ice I$_h$ (the common low density ice polymorphs) and ice B
136 > (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure observed by
137 > B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b}
138 > This work includes results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i}
139 > was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several common water models
140 > (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field parametrized
141 > single point dipole water model (SSD/RF).  The axially-elongated
142 > variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations involving
143 > SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P.  The square tetramers in Ice-{\it i} distort
144 > in Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ to form a rhombus with alternating 85 and 95
145 > degree angles.  Under SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P, this geometry is better
146 > at forming favorable hydrogen bonds.  The degree of rhomboid
147 > distortion depends on the water model used, but is significant enough
148 > to split a peak in the radial distribution function which corresponds
149 > to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
150  
151   \section{Methods}
152  
153   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
154 < performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics program.\cite{Meineke05}
155   All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
156 < propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
156 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method.  Details about
157   the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
158   publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
159  
160 < Thermodynamic integration is an established technique for
161 < determination of free energies of condensed phases of
162 < materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}. This
163 < method, implemented in the same manner illustrated by B\`{a}ez and
164 < Clancy, was utilized to calculate the free energy of several ice
165 < crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
166 < SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
167 < and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
168 < this same technique in order to determine melting points and generate
169 < phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
170 < resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
171 < temperatures.
175 <
176 < A single thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations
177 < over which the system of interest is converted into a reference system
178 < for which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation
179 < path is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
160 > Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the Helmholtz free
161 > energies ($A$) of the listed water models at various state points
162 > using the OOPSE molecular dynamics program.\cite{Meineke05}
163 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique that has been
164 > used extensively in the calculation of free energies for condensed
165 > phases of
166 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.  This
167 > method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
168 > interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
169 > energy is known analytically ($A_0$).  The difference in potential
170 > energy between the reference system and the system of interest
171 > ($\Delta V$) is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
172   difference between the two states:
173   \begin{equation}
174 < \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
183 < )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
174 > A = A_0 + \int_0^1 \left\langle \Delta V \right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda.
175   \end{equation}
176 < where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
177 < transformation parameter that scales the overall
178 < potential. Simulations are distributed strategically along this path
179 < in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
180 < potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
190 < simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
191 < (near the reference state) in length.
176 > Here, $\lambda$ is the parameter that governs the transformation
177 > between the reference system and the system of interest.  For
178 > crystalline phases, an harmonically-restrained (Einsten) crystal is
179 > chosen as the reference state, while for liquid phases, the ideal gas
180 > is taken as the reference state.  
181  
182 < For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
183 < crystal was chosen as the reference system. In an Einstein crystal,
184 < the molecules are restrained at their ideal lattice locations and
185 < orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as applied by B\`{a}ez and
197 < Clancy, the total potential for this reference crystal
198 < ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
182 > In an Einstein crystal, the molecules are restrained at their ideal
183 > lattice locations and orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as
184 > applied by B\`{a}ez and Clancy, the total potential for this reference
185 > crystal ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
186   \begin{equation}
187   V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
188   \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
# Line 203 | Line 190 | respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring}
190   where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
191   the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
192   of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
193 < respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
194 < of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
195 < $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
196 < restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
197 < Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
193 > respectively.  These spring constants are typically calculated from
194 > the mean-square displacements of water molecules in an unrestrained
195 > ice crystal at 200 K.  For these studies, $K_\mathrm{v} = 4.29$ kcal
196 > mol$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$, $K_\theta\ = 13.88$ kcal mol$^{-1}$ rad$^{-2}$,
197 > and $K_\omega\ = 17.75$ kcal mol$^{-1}$ rad$^{-2}$.  It is clear from
198 > Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values of $\theta$ range from $0$ to
199 > $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition
200 > function for a molecular crystal restrained in this fashion can be
201 > evaluated analytically, and the Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is
202 > given by
203   \begin{eqnarray}
204   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
205   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 223 | Line 215 | potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
215   potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
216  
217   \begin{figure}
218 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
218 > \centering
219 > \includegraphics[width=4in]{rotSpring.eps}
220   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
221   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
222   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
223 < body-frame {\it z}-axis. $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
223 > body-frame {\it z}-axis.  $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
224   constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
225   and $\omega$ directions.}
226   \label{waterSpring}
# Line 239 | Line 232 | molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most
232   literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
233   typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
234   interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
235 < molecules.  In this study, we apply of one of the most convenient
236 < methods and integrate over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all interaction
237 < parameters are scaled equally by this transformation parameter.  This
238 < method has been shown to be reversible and provide results in
239 < excellent agreement with other established methods.\cite{Baez95b}
235 > molecules.  In this study, we applied one of the most convenient
236 > methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
237 > interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
238 > parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
239 > results in excellent agreement with other established
240 > methods.\cite{Baez95b}
241  
242 < Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
243 < cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
244 < ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
242 > Near the cutoff radius ($0.85 * r_{cut}$), charge, dipole, and
243 > Lennard-Jones interactions were gradually reduced by a cubic switching
244 > function.  By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
245   truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
246 < from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
247 < was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
248 < manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
246 > from harsher truncation schemes.  The effect of a long-range
247 > correction was also investigated on select model systems in a variety
248 > of manners.  For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
249   dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
250   simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
251 < expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
252 < performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
253 < \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use of an Ewald
254 < summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
255 < calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
256 < mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy
257 < difference in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the
258 < previous results in order to predict changes to the free energy
259 < landscape.
251 > expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, TIP3P, and SPC/E), simulations were
252 > performed with longer cutoffs of 10.5, 12, 13.5, and 15 \AA\ to
253 > compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results.  Finally, the effects of using
254 > the Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
255 > single configuration Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME)
256 > calculations~\cite{Tinker} for each of the ice polymorphs.  The
257 > calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of PME was
258 > applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
259 > free energy landscape.
260  
261 < \section{Results and discussion}
261 > \section{Results and Discussion}
262  
263 < The free energy of proton ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
264 < compared with the free energies of proton ordered variants of the
265 < experimentally observed low-density ice polymorphs, $I_h$ and $I_c$,
266 < as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
267 < and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
268 < model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
269 < Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
270 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
271 < as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
272 < proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
273 < antiferroelectric version that we divised, and it has an 8 molecule
274 < unit cell similar to other predicted antiferroelectric $I_h$
275 < crystals.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728
276 < molecules for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000
277 < molecules for ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger
278 < crystal sizes were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff
279 < values.
263 > The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
264 > density polymorphs (I$_h$, I$_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
265 > i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
266 > \ref{freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
267 > shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
268 > conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
269 > relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
270 > displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
271 > indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
272 > investigated water models.  With the free energy at these state
273 > points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
274 > state points and to build phase diagrams.  Figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia} is
275 > an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water model.
276 > All other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
277 > between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
278 > indicated from the transition temperatures in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.
279 > It is interesting to note that ice I$_h$ (and ice I$_c$ for that
280 > matter) do not appear in any of the phase diagrams for any of the
281 > models.  For purposes of this study, ice B is representative of the
282 > dense ice polymorphs.  A recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides
283 > details on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures
284 > than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
285  
286   \begin{table*}
287   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
289 \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
288   \begin{center}
289 < \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
290 < variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
291 < of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
292 < kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
293 < $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
294 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
289 > \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs along
290 > with the calculated melting (or sublimation) and boiling points for
291 > the investigated water models.  All free energy calculations used a
292 > cutoff radius of 9.0 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm.
293 > Units of free energy are kcal/mol, while transition temperature are in
294 > Kelvin.  Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
295 > \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
296   \hline
297 < Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
297 > Water Model & I$_h$ & I$_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ & $T_m$ (*$T_s$) & $T_b$\\
298   \hline
299 < TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3)\\
300 < TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.33(3)\\
301 < TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & -12.29(2)\\
302 < SPC/E & -12.67(2) & -12.96(2) & -13.25(3) & -13.55(2)\\
303 < SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2)\\
304 < SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & NA* & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
299 > TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3) & - & 269(4) & 357(2)\\
300 > TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & - & -12.33(3) & 266(5) & 354(2)\\
301 > TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & - & -12.29(2) & 271(4) & 337(2)\\
302 > SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & - & -13.55(2) & 296(3) & 396(2)\\
303 > SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2) & - & *355(2) & -\\
304 > SSD/RF & -11.96(2) & -11.60(2) & -12.53(3) & -12.79(2) & - & 287(4) & 382(2)\\
305   \end{tabular}
306   \label{freeEnergy}
307   \end{center}
308   \end{minipage}
309   \end{table*}
310  
312 The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
313 that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
314 models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
315 Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
316 to build phase diagrams.  Figures
317 \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
318 from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
319 although the crossing points between the phases exist at slightly
320 different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
321 ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
322 phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
323 B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
324 Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
325 TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
326
311   \begin{figure}
312   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
313   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
314 < regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
314 > regime.  The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
315   the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
316 < experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
316 > experimentally observed forms.  Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
317   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
318 < \label{tp3phasedia}
318 > \label{tp3PhaseDia}
319   \end{figure}
320  
321 < \begin{figure}
322 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
323 < \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
324 < regime. Calculations producing these results were done under an
325 < applied reaction field. It is interesting to note that this
326 < computationally efficient model (over 3 times more efficient than
327 < TIP3P) exhibits phase behavior similar to the less computationally
328 < conservative charge based models.}
345 < \label{ssdrfphasedia}
346 < \end{figure}
347 <
348 < \begin{table*}
349 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
350 < \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
351 < \begin{center}
352 < \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
353 < temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
354 < experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
355 < transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
356 < liquid or gas state.}
357 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
358 < \hline
359 < Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
360 < \hline
361 < $T_m$ (K)  & 269(4) & 266(5) & 271(4) & 296(3) & - & 278(4) & 273\\
362 < $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(2) & 337(2) & 396(2) & - & 348(2) & 373\\
363 < $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(2) & - & -\\
364 < \end{tabular}
365 < \label{meltandboil}
366 < \end{center}
367 < \end{minipage}
368 < \end{table*}
369 <
370 < Table \ref{meltandboil} lists the melting and boiling temperatures
371 < calculated from this work. Surprisingly, most of these models have
372 < melting points that compare quite favorably with experiment. The
373 < unfortunate aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs
374 < between Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the
375 < liquid state. These results are actually not contrary to previous
376 < studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
377 < using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
378 < being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
379 < ordered and disordered molecular
321 > Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
322 > favorably with the experimental value of 273 K.  The unfortunate
323 > aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
324 > Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice I$_h$ and the liquid
325 > state.  These results do not contradict other studies.  Studies of ice
326 > I$_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K
327 > (differences being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and
328 > different ordered and disordered molecular
329   arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
330   Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
331 < predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
332 < calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
333 < previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
334 < not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it shows a sublimation point
335 < at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
336 < all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
337 < conditions. While troubling, this behavior turned out to be
338 < advantageous in that it facilitated the spontaneous crystallization of
339 < Ice-{\it i}. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
340 < SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
341 < risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk changes when
342 < applying a longer cutoff.
331 > predicted from this work.  However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
332 > calculated to be 265 K, indicating that these simulation based
333 > structures ought to be included in studies probing phase transitions
334 > with this model.  Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
335 > not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does sublime at 355 K.  This
336 > is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over all other
337 > polymorphs for this particular model under these conditions.  While
338 > troubling, this behavior resulted in the spontaneous crystallization
339 > of Ice-{\it i} which led us to investigate this structure.  These
340 > observations provide a warning that simulations of SSD/E as a
341 > ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the risk of
342 > spontaneous crystallization.  However, when a longer cutoff radius is
343 > used, SSD/E prefers the liquid state under standard temperature and
344 > pressure.
345  
346   \begin{figure}
347   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
348 < \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
349 < TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
350 < \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
351 < \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
352 < liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
348 > \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
349 > SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
350 > with an added Ewald correction term.  Error for the larger cutoff
351 > points is equivalent to that observed at 9.0\AA\ (see Table
352 > \ref{freeEnergy}).  Data for ice I$_c$ with TIP3P using both 12 and
353 > 13.5 \AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was prone to
354 > distortion and melting at 200 K.  Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ is the form of
355 > Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
356   \label{incCutoff}
357   \end{figure}
358  
359 < Increasing the cutoff radius in simulations of the more
360 < computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
361 < the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
362 < involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
363 < free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substantial dependence on
364 < cutoff radius. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
365 < differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. Interestingly, by
366 < increasing the cutoff radius, the free energy gap was narrowed enough
367 < in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
368 < simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
369 < simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
370 < greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
371 < case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
372 < reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
373 < energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
359 > For the more computationally efficient water models, we have also
360 > investigated the effect of potential trunctaion on the computed free
361 > energies as a function of the cutoff radius.  As seen in
362 > Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
363 > water models lacking a long-range correction show significant cutoff
364 > dependence.  In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
365 > differences while moving to greater cutoff radii.  As the free
366 > energies for the polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that
367 > Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced.  Adjacent to each of these plots are
368 > results for systems with applied or estimated long-range corrections.
369 > SSD/RF was parametrized for use with a reaction field, and the benefit
370 > provided by this computationally inexpensive correction is apparent.
371 > The free energies are largely independent of the size of the reaction
372 > field cavity in this model, so small cutoff radii mimic bulk
373 > calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
374 >
375 > Although TIP3P was paramaterized for use without the Ewald summation,
376 > we have estimated the effect of this method for computing long-range
377 > electrostatics for both TIP3P and SPC/E.  This was accomplished by
378 > calculating the potential energy of identical crystals both with and
379 > without particle mesh Ewald (PME).  Similar behavior to that observed
380 > with reaction field is seen for both of these models.  The free
381 > energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a narrower
382 > range for the various polymorphs.  Like the dipolar water models,
383 > TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the Ice-{\it i}
384 > polymorph.  Crystal preference is much more difficult to determine for
385 > SPC/E.  Without a long-range correction, each of the polymorphs
386 > studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
387 > cutoff radii.  The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
388 > narrows the gap in free energies such that the polymorphs are
389 > isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty.  This suggests that other
390 > conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume simulations, can
391 > influence the polymorph expressed upon crystallization.
392  
393 < To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
422 < long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
423 < was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
424 < inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the
425 < correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
426 < energy of identical crystals with and without PME using TINKER. The
427 < free energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and
428 < SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend
429 < pointed out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
430 < results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
431 < for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
432 < the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
433 < significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
434 < stable polymorph with the SPC/E model.  The free energies of Ice-{\it
435 < i} and ice B nearly overlap within error, with ice $I_c$ just outside
436 < as well, indicating that Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with respect
437 < to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$ with SPC/E. However, these results do
438 < not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is
439 < a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
440 < phase behavior of water models.
393 > \section{Conclusions}
394  
395 < \begin{table*}
396 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
397 < \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
398 < \begin{center}
399 < \caption{The free energy of the studied ice polymorphs after applying
400 < the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
401 < long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
402 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
450 < \hline
451 < \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
452 < \hline
453 < TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3)\\
454 < SPC/E  & -12.77(2) & -12.92(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2)\\
455 < \end{tabular}
456 < \label{pmeShift}
457 < \end{center}
458 < \end{minipage}
459 < \end{table*}
395 > In this work, thermodynamic integration was used to determine the
396 > absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs.  The new polymorph,
397 > Ice-{\it i} was observed to be the stable crystalline state for {\it
398 > all} the water models when using a 9.0 \AA\ cutoff.  However, the free
399 > energy partially depends on simulation conditions (particularly on the
400 > choice of long range correction method). Regardless, Ice-{\it i} was
401 > still observered to be a stable polymorph for all of the studied water
402 > models.
403  
404 < \section{Conclusions}
404 > So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  As
405 > indicated above, the answer appears to be dependent both on the
406 > conditions and the model used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a
407 > long-range interaction correction, Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
408 > i}$^\prime$ have the lowest free energy of the studied polymorphs with
409 > all the models.  Ideally, crystallization of each model under constant
410 > pressure conditions, as was done with SSD/E, would aid in the
411 > identification of their respective preferred structures.  This work,
412 > however, helps illustrate how studies involving one specific model can
413 > lead to insight about important behavior of others.
414  
415 < The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
416 < $I$, ice B, and recently discovered Ice-{\it i} were calculated under
417 < standard conditions for several common water models via thermodynamic
418 < integration. All the water models studied show Ice-{\it i} to be the
419 < minimum free energy crystal structure in the with a 9 \AA\ switching
420 < function cutoff. Calculated melting and boiling points show
469 < surprisingly good agreement with the experimental values; however, the
470 < solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The effect of
471 < interaction truncation was investigated through variation of the
472 < cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
473 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
474 < summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
475 < computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
476 < energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
477 < these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
478 < polymorph that should be considered in simulation studies.
415 > We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
416 > polarizable or flexible models.  It is entirely possible that the
417 > polarizability of real water makes Ice-{\it i} substantially less
418 > stable than ice I$_h$.  However, the calculations presented above seem
419 > interesting enough to communicate before the role of polarizability
420 > (or flexibility) has been thoroughly investigated.
421  
422 < Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all manner of
423 < investigated simulation examples, the question arises as to possible
424 < experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
425 < and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
426 < regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
427 < of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
428 < name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
429 < said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
430 < most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
431 < negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
422 > Finally, due to the stability of Ice-{\it i} in the investigated
423 > simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
424 > observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
425 > experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
426 > us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
427 > simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a name for
428 > this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That said, there
429 > are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal
430 > situation for possible observation. These include the negative
431 > pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
432   deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
433 < non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
434 < our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
435 < and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_c$ and for ice-{\it
436 < i} at a temperature of 77K.  In a quick comparison of the predicted
437 < S(q) for Ice-{\it i} and experimental studies of amorphous solid
438 < water, it is possible that some of the ``spurious'' peaks that could
439 < not be assigned in HDA could correspond to peaks labeled in this
440 < S(q).\cite{Bizid87} It should be noted that there is typically poor
441 < agreement on crystal densities between simulation and experiment, so
442 < such peak comparisons should be made with caution.  We will leave it
501 < to our experimental colleagues to determine whether this ice polymorph
502 < is named appropriately or if it should be promoted to Ice-0.
433 > non-polar molecules.  For the purpose of comparison with experimental
434 > results, we have calculated the oxygen-oxygen pair correlation
435 > function, $g_{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$ for the
436 > two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example ice I$_h$ and I$_c$
437 > plots) at 77K, and they are shown in figures \ref{fig:gofr} and
438 > \ref{fig:sofq} respectively.  It is interesting to note that the
439 > structure factors for Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ and Ice-I$_c$ are quite similar.
440 > The primary differences are small peaks at 1.125, 2.29, and 2.53
441 > \AA${-1}$, so particular attention to these regions would be needed
442 > to identify the new {\it i}$^\prime$ variant from the I$_{c}$ variant.
443  
444   \begin{figure}
445 + \centering
446   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
447 < \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$
448 < calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
447 > \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice I$_h$, I$_c$, and
448 > Ice-{\it i} calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model
449 > at 77 K.  The Ice-{\it i} distribution function was obtained from
450 > simulations composed of TIP4P water.}
451   \label{fig:gofr}
452   \end{figure}
453  
454   \begin{figure}
455 + \centering
456   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
457 < \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice $I_c$ at
458 < 77 K.  The raw structure factors have been convoluted with a gaussian
459 < instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$ width) to compensate for the
460 < trunction effects in our finite size simulations. The labeled peaks
461 < compared favorably with ``spurious'' peaks observed in experimental
518 < studies of amorphous solid water.\cite{Bizid87}}
457 > \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice I$_h$, I$_c$, Ice-{\it i},
458 > and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
459 > been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
460 > width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
461 > simulations.}
462   \label{fig:sofq}
463   \end{figure}
464  
# Line 527 | Line 470 | Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR
470  
471   \newpage
472  
473 < \bibliographystyle{jcp}
473 > \bibliographystyle{achemso}
474   \bibliography{iceiPaper}
475  
476  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines