ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1488 by chrisfen, Tue Sep 21 20:17:12 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1555 by chrisfen, Mon Oct 11 20:14:35 2004 UTC

# Line 201 | Line 201 | respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring}
201   where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
202   the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
203   of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
204 < respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
205 < of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
206 < $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
204 > respectively.  These spring constants are typically calculated from
205 > the mean-square displacements of water molecules in an unrestrained
206 > ice crystal at 200 K.  For these studies, $K_\mathrm{r} = 4.29$ kcal
207 > mol$^{-1}$, $K_\theta\ = 13.88$ kcal mol$^{-1}$, and $K_\omega\ =
208 > 17.75$ kcal mol$^{-1}$.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that
209 > the values of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges
210 > from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
211   restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
212   Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
213   \begin{eqnarray}
# Line 285 | Line 289 | values.
289  
290   \begin{table*}
291   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
288 \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
292   \begin{center}
293 +
294   \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
295   variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
296   of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
297 < kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses. *Ice
298 < $I_c$ rapidly converts to a liquid at 200 K with the SSD/RF model.}
299 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
297 > kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
298 >
299 > \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
300   \hline
301   Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
302   \hline
303   TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3)\\
304   TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.33(3)\\
305   TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & -12.29(2)\\
306 < SPC/E & -12.67(2) & -12.96(2) & -13.25(3) & -13.55(2)\\
306 > SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & -13.55(2)\\
307   SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2)\\
308 < SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & NA* & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
308 > SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & -11.47(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
309   \end{tabular}
310   \label{freeEnergy}
311   \end{center}
# Line 346 | Line 350 | conservative charge based models.}
350  
351   \begin{table*}
352   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
349 \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
353   \begin{center}
354 +
355   \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
356   temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
357   experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
358   transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
359   liquid or gas state.}
360 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c  c  c }
360 >
361 > \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
362   \hline
363 < Equilibria Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
363 > Equilibrium Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
364   \hline
365   $T_m$ (K)  & 269(4) & 266(5) & 271(4) & 296(3) & - & 278(4) & 273\\
366   $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(2) & 337(2) & 396(2) & - & 348(2) & 373\\
# Line 394 | Line 399 | TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD
399   \begin{figure}
400   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
401   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
402 < TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF. Data points omitted include SSD/E: $I_c$ 12
403 < \AA\, TIP3P: $I_c$ 12 \AA\ and B 12 \AA\, and SSD/RF: $I_c$ 9
404 < \AA . These crystals are unstable at 200 K and rapidly convert into
405 < liquids. The connecting lines are qualitative visual aid.}
402 > TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF with a reaction field. Both SSD/E and TIP3P show
403 > significant cutoff radius dependence of the free energy and appear to
404 > converge when moving to cutoffs greater than 12 \AA. Use of a reaction
405 > field with SSD/RF results in free energies that exhibit minimal cutoff
406 > radius dependence.}
407   \label{incCutoff}
408   \end{figure}
409  
# Line 405 | Line 411 | free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substanti
411   computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
412   the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
413   involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
414 < free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substantial dependence on
415 < cutoff radius. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
416 < differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. Interestingly, by
417 < increasing the cutoff radius, the free energy gap was narrowed enough
418 < in the SSD/E model that the liquid state is preferred under standard
419 < simulation conditions (298 K and 1 atm). Thus, it is recommended that
420 < simulations using this model choose interaction truncation radii
421 < greater than 9 \AA\ . This narrowing trend is much more subtle in the
422 < case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies calculated with a
423 < reaction field present provide a more accurate picture of the free
424 < energy landscape in the absence of potential truncation.
414 > free energy of all the ice polymorphs for the SSD/E and TIP3P models
415 > show a substantial dependence on cutoff radius. In general, there is a
416 > narrowing of the free energy differences while moving to greater
417 > cutoff radii.  As the free energies for the polymorphs converge, the
418 > stability advantage that Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced; however, it
419 > remains the most stable polymorph for both of these models over the
420 > depicted range for both models. This narrowing trend is not
421 > significant in the case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies
422 > calculated with a reaction field present provide, at minimal
423 > computational cost, a more accurate picture of the free energy
424 > landscape in the absence of potential truncation.  Interestingly,
425 > increasing the cutoff radius a mere 1.5 \AA\ with the SSD/E model
426 > destabilizes the Ice-{\it i} polymorph enough that the liquid state is
427 > preferred under standard simulation conditions (298 K and 1
428 > atm). Thus, it is recommended that simulations using this model choose
429 > interaction truncation radii greater than 9 \AA. Considering this
430 > stabilization provided by smaller cutoffs, it is not surprising that
431 > crystallization into Ice-{\it i} was observed with SSD/E.  The choice
432 > of a 9 \AA\ cutoff in the previous simulations gives the Ice-{\it i}
433 > polymorph a greater than 1 kcal/mol lower free energy than the ice
434 > $I_\textrm{h}$ starting configurations.
435  
436   To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
437   long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
438   was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
439 < inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the
440 < correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
441 < energy of identical crystals both with and without PME. The free
442 < energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and SPC/E
443 < water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. The same trend pointed
444 < out through increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME
445 < results. Ice-{\it i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions
446 < for both the TIP3P and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of
447 < the free energy differences between the various solid forms is
439 > inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the correction.
440 > This was accomplished by calculation of the potential energy of
441 > identical crystals both with and without PME.  The free energies for
442 > the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and SPC/E water models are
443 > shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}.  The same trend pointed out through
444 > increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME results. Ice-{\it
445 > i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P
446 > and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of the free energy
447 > differences between the various solid forms with the SPC/E model is
448   significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
449 < stable polymorph with the SPC/E model.  The free energies of Ice-{\it
450 < i} and ice B nearly overlap within error, with ice $I_c$ just outside
451 < as well, indicating that Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with respect
452 < to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$ with SPC/E. However, these results do
453 < not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is
454 < a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
449 > stable polymorph.  The free energies of Ice-{\it i} and $I_\textrm{c}$
450 > overlap within error, while ice B and $I_\textrm{h}$ are just outside
451 > at t slightly higher free energy.  This indicates that with SPC/E,
452 > Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with all the studied polymorphs,
453 > particularly ice $I_\textrm{c}$. However, these results do not
454 > significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a
455 > stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
456   phase behavior of water models.
457  
458   \begin{table*}
459   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
443 \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
460   \begin{center}
461 +
462   \caption{The free energy of the studied ice polymorphs after applying
463   the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
464   long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
465 < \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
465 >
466 > \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
467   \hline
468 < \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
468 > Water Model &  $I_h$ & $I_c$ &  B & Ice-{\it i} \\
469   \hline
470 < TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3)\\
471 < SPC/E  & -12.77(2) & -12.92(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2)\\
470 > TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3) \\
471 > SPC/E  & -12.97(2) & -13.00(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2) \\
472   \end{tabular}
473   \label{pmeShift}
474   \end{center}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines