ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1542 by chrisfen, Thu Oct 7 20:39:44 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 2134 by chrisfen, Fri Mar 25 19:11:49 2005 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 < %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
3   \usepackage{endfloat}
4   \usepackage{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{epsf}
6 < \usepackage{berkeley}
6 > \usepackage{times}
7 > \usepackage{mathptm}
8   \usepackage{setspace}
9   \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
# Line 20 | Line 20
20  
21   \begin{document}
22  
23 < \title{Ice-{\it i}: a simulation-predicted ice polymorph which is more
24 < stable than Ice $I_h$ for point-charge and point-dipole water models}
23 > \title{Computational free energy studies of a new ice polymorph which
24 > exhibits greater stability than Ice I$_h$}
25  
26   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
27 < Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
27 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
28 > University of Notre Dame\\
29   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
30  
31   \date{\today}
# Line 33 | Line 34 | The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs w
34   %\doublespacing
35  
36   \begin{abstract}
37 < The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs which are stable
38 < at low pressures were calculated using thermodynamic integration to a
39 < reference system (the Einstein crystal).  These integrations were
40 < performed for most of the common water models (SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P,
41 < TIP5P, SSD/E, SSD/RF). Ice-{\it i}, a structure we recently observed
42 < crystallizing at room temperature for one of the single-point water
43 < models, was determined to be the stable crystalline state (at 1 atm)
44 < for {\it all} the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were
45 < generated, and phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the
46 < known low-pressure ice structures under all of these water models.
46 < Additionally, potential truncation was shown to have an effect on the
47 < calculated free energies, and can result in altered free energy
48 < landscapes.  Structure factor predictions for the new crystal were
49 < generated and we await experimental confirmation of the existence of
50 < this new polymorph.
37 > The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs were calculated
38 > using thermodynamic integration.  These polymorphs are predicted by
39 > computer simulations using a variety of common water models to be
40 > stable at low pressures.  A recently discovered ice polymorph that has
41 > as yet {\it only} been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
42 > was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
43 > water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
44 > coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
45 > ice structures.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to play
46 > a role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
47   \end{abstract}
48  
49   %\narrowtext
# Line 67 | Line 63 | the limitations of each of the
63   hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
64   choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
65   under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
66 < the limitations of each of the
67 < models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
68 < important properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
69 < energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulty in
70 < these types of studies typically arises from the assortment of
71 < possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a wide range of
72 < pressures and temperatures.  There are currently 13 recognized forms
73 < of ice, and it is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
74 < energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is focused on the
66 > the limitations of
67 > each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two important
68 > properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
69 > particularly for the solid forms of water as these predict the
70 > thermodynamic stability of the various phases.  Water has a
71 > particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different and
72 > stable crystalline structures as the temperature and pressure are
73 > varied.  It is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
74 > energy landscape\cite{Sanz04}; and ideally, research is focused on the
75   phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
76   these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
77 < pressures for the model.
77 > pressures for the model.  
78  
79 < In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
80 < crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime.  This work is
81 < unique in that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at through
82 < crystallization of a computationally efficient water model under
83 < constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization events
84 < are interesting in and of themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}
85 < however, the crystal structure obtained in this case is different from
86 < any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment or
87 < simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure Ice-{\it i}
88 < to indicate its origin in computational simulation. The unit cell
89 < (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}A) consists of eight water molecules that stack in
90 < rows of interlocking water tetramers. Proton ordering can be
91 < accomplished by orienting two of the molecules so that both of their
92 < donated hydrogen bonds are internal to their tetramer
93 < (Fig. \ref{protOrder}). As expected in an ice crystal constructed of
94 < water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those
95 < observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these subunits
96 < appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
97 < crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
98 < open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
99 < diameter. This relatively open overall structure leads to crystals
100 < that are 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense on average than ice $I_h$.
79 > The high-pressure phases of water (ice II - ice X as well as ice XII)
80 > have been studied extensively both experimentally and
81 > computationally. In this paper, standard reference state methods were
82 > applied in the {\it low} pressure regime to evaluate the free energies
83 > for a few known crystalline water polymorphs that might be stable at
84 > these pressures.  This work is unique in that one of the crystal
85 > lattices was arrived at through crystallization of a computationally
86 > efficient water model under constant pressure and temperature
87 > conditions.  Crystallization events are interesting in and of
88 > themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
89 > obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
90 > polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
91 > this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
92 > simulation. The unit cell of Ice-{\it i} and an axially-elongated
93 > variant named Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ both consist of eight water
94 > molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water tetramers as
95 > illustrated in figures \ref{unitcell}A and \ref{unitcell}B.  These
96 > tetramers form a crystal structure similar in appearance to a recent
97 > two-dimensional surface tessellation simulated on silica.\cite{Yang04}
98 > As expected in an ice crystal constructed of water tetramers, the
99 > hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those observed in ice I$_h$,
100 > however the interlocking of these subunits appears to provide
101 > significant stabilization to the overall crystal.  The arrangement of
102 > these tetramers results in octagonal cavities that are typically
103 > greater than 6.3 \AA\ in diameter (Fig. \ref{iCrystal}).  This open
104 > structure leads to crystals that are typically 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less
105 > dense than ice I$_h$.
106  
107   \begin{figure}
108 + \centering
109   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
110 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$,
111 < the elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  The spheres represent the
112 < center-of-mass locations of the water molecules.  The $a$ to $c$
113 < ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
114 < $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.7850c$ respectively.}
113 < \label{iceiCell}
110 > \caption{(A) Unit cells for Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$.  
111 > The spheres represent the center-of-mass locations of the water
112 > molecules.  The $a$ to $c$ ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
113 > i}$^\prime$ are given by 2.1214 and 1.785 respectively.}
114 > \label{unitcell}
115   \end{figure}
116  
117   \begin{figure}
118 + \centering
119   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
120 < \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
121 < down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
122 < octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
123 < less dense than ice $I_h$.}
122 < \label{protOrder}
120 > \caption{A rendering of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
121 > down the (001) crystal face.  The presence of large octagonal pores
122 > leads to a polymorph that is less dense than ice I$_h$.}
123 > \label{iCrystal}
124   \end{figure}
125  
126   Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
127 < minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models we
128 < had investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models,
129 < see our previous work and related
130 < articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
131 < considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
132 < contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
127 > minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
128 > investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
129 > our previous work and related
130 > articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Our earlier results
131 > considered only energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
132 > contributions to the overall free energy.  To address this issue, we
133   have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
134 < thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
135 < and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
136 < and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
137 < observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
138 < SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
139 < from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
140 < common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
141 < field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). It should
142 < be noted that a second version of Ice-{\it i} (Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$)
143 < was used in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The unit
144 < cell of this crystal (Fig. \ref{iceiCell}B) is similar to the Ice-{\it
145 < i} unit it is extended in the direction of the (001) face and
146 < compressed along the other two faces.  There is typically a small
147 < distortion of proton ordered Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ that converts the
148 < normally square tetramer into a rhombus with alternating approximately
149 < 85 and 95 degree angles.  The degree of this distortion is model
149 < dependent and significant enough to split the tetramer diagonal
150 < location peak in the radial distribution function.
134 > thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
135 > I$_c$ and ice I$_h$ (the common low density ice polymorphs) and ice B
136 > (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure observed by
137 > B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b}
138 > This work includes results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i}
139 > was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several common water models
140 > (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field parametrized
141 > single point dipole water model (SSD/RF).  The axially-elongated
142 > variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations involving
143 > SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P.  The square tetramers in Ice-{\it i} distort
144 > in Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ to form a rhombus with alternating 85 and 95
145 > degree angles.  Under SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P, this geometry is better
146 > at forming favorable hydrogen bonds.  The degree of rhomboid
147 > distortion depends on the water model used, but is significant enough
148 > to split a peak in the radial distribution function which corresponds
149 > to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
150  
151   \section{Methods}
152  
153   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
154 < performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics program.\cite{Meineke05}
155   All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
156 < propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method. Details about
156 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method.  Details about
157   the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
158   publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
159  
160 < Thermodynamic integration is an established technique for
161 < determination of free energies of condensed phases of
162 < materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}. This
163 < method, implemented in the same manner illustrated by B\`{a}ez and
164 < Clancy, was utilized to calculate the free energy of several ice
165 < crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E, SSD/RF, and
166 < SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
167 < and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
168 < this same technique in order to determine melting points and to
169 < generate phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
170 < which correspond to a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their
171 < respective temperatures.
172 <
174 < Thermodynamic integration involves a sequence of simulations during
175 < which the system of interest is converted into a reference system for
176 < which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation path
177 < is then integrated in order to determine the free energy difference
178 < between the two states:
160 > Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the Helmholtz free
161 > energies ($A$) of the listed water models at various state points
162 > using the OOPSE molecular dynamics program.\cite{Meineke05}
163 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique that has been
164 > used extensively in the calculation of free energies for condensed
165 > phases of
166 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.  This
167 > method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
168 > interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
169 > energy is known analytically ($A_0$).  The difference in potential
170 > energy between the reference system and the system of interest
171 > ($\Delta V$) is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
172 > difference between the two states:
173   \begin{equation}
174 < \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
181 < )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
174 > A = A_0 + \int_0^1 \left\langle \Delta V \right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda.
175   \end{equation}
176 < where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
177 < transformation parameter that scales the overall
178 < potential. Simulations are distributed strategically along this path
179 < in order to sufficiently sample the regions of greatest change in the
180 < potential. Typical integrations in this study consisted of $\sim$25
188 < simulations ranging from 300 ps (for the unaltered system) to 75 ps
189 < (near the reference state) in length.
176 > Here, $\lambda$ is the parameter that governs the transformation
177 > between the reference system and the system of interest.  For
178 > crystalline phases, an harmonically-restrained (Einsten) crystal is
179 > chosen as the reference state, while for liquid phases, the ideal gas
180 > is taken as the reference state.  
181  
182 < For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
183 < crystal was chosen as the reference system. In an Einstein crystal,
184 < the molecules are restrained at their ideal lattice locations and
185 < orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as applied by B\`{a}ez and
195 < Clancy, the total potential for this reference crystal
196 < ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
182 > In an Einstein crystal, the molecules are restrained at their ideal
183 > lattice locations and orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as
184 > applied by B\`{a}ez and Clancy, the total potential for this reference
185 > crystal ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
186   \begin{equation}
187   V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
188   \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
# Line 201 | Line 190 | respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring}
190   where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
191   the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
192   of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
193 < respectively.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values
194 < of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from
195 < $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
196 < restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
197 < Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
193 > respectively.  These spring constants are typically calculated from
194 > the mean-square displacements of water molecules in an unrestrained
195 > ice crystal at 200 K.  For these studies, $K_\mathrm{v} = 4.29$ kcal
196 > mol$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$, $K_\theta\ = 13.88$ kcal mol$^{-1}$ rad$^{-2}$,
197 > and $K_\omega\ = 17.75$ kcal mol$^{-1}$ rad$^{-2}$.  It is clear from
198 > Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that the values of $\theta$ range from $0$ to
199 > $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition
200 > function for a molecular crystal restrained in this fashion can be
201 > evaluated analytically, and the Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is
202 > given by
203   \begin{eqnarray}
204   A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
205   [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
# Line 221 | Line 215 | potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
215   potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
216  
217   \begin{figure}
218 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
218 > \centering
219 > \includegraphics[width=4in]{rotSpring.eps}
220   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
221   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
222   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
223 < body-frame {\it z}-axis. $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
223 > body-frame {\it z}-axis.  $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
224   constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
225   and $\omega$ directions.}
226   \label{waterSpring}
# Line 237 | Line 232 | molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the mo
232   literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
233   typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
234   interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
235 < molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the most convenient
235 > molecules.  In this study, we applied one of the most convenient
236   methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
237   interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
238   parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
239   results in excellent agreement with other established
240   methods.\cite{Baez95b}
241  
242 < Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
243 < cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA
244 < ). By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
242 > Near the cutoff radius ($0.85 * r_{cut}$), charge, dipole, and
243 > Lennard-Jones interactions were gradually reduced by a cubic switching
244 > function.  By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
245   truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
246 < from harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction
247 < was also investigated on select model systems in a variety of
248 < manners. For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
246 > from harsher truncation schemes.  The effect of a long-range
247 > correction was also investigated on select model systems in a variety
248 > of manners.  For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
249   dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
250   simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
251 < expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P), simulations were
252 < performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9
253 < \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, the effects of utilizing an Ewald
254 < summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing single
255 < configuration calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the
256 < TINKER molecular mechanics software package.\cite{Tinker} The
251 > expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, TIP3P, and SPC/E), simulations were
252 > performed with longer cutoffs of 10.5, 12, 13.5, and 15 \AA\ to
253 > compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results.  Finally, the effects of using
254 > the Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
255 > single configuration Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME)
256 > calculations~\cite{Tinker} for each of the ice polymorphs.  The
257   calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of PME was
258   applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
259   free energy landscape.
260  
261 < \section{Results and discussion}
261 > \section{Results and Discussion}
262  
263 < The free energy of proton-ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
264 < compared with the free energies of proton ordered variants of the
265 < experimentally observed low-density ice polymorphs, $I_h$ and $I_c$,
266 < as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
267 < and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
268 < model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
269 < Ice XI, the experimentally-observed proton-ordered variant of ice
270 < $I_h$, was investigated initially, but was found to be not as stable
271 < as proton disordered or antiferroelectric variants of ice $I_h$. The
272 < proton ordered variant of ice $I_h$ used here is a simple
273 < antiferroelectric version that we devised, and it has an 8 molecule
274 < unit cell similar to other predicted antiferroelectric $I_h$
275 < crystals.\cite{Davidson84} The crystals contained 648 or 1728
276 < molecules for ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000
277 < molecules for ice $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger
278 < crystal sizes were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff
279 < values.
263 > The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
264 > density polymorphs (I$_h$, I$_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
265 > i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
266 > \ref{freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
267 > shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
268 > conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
269 > relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
270 > displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
271 > indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
272 > investigated water models.  With the free energy at these state
273 > points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
274 > state points and to build phase diagrams.  Figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia} is
275 > an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water model.
276 > All other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
277 > between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
278 > indicated from the transition temperatures in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.
279 > It is interesting to note that ice I$_h$ (and ice I$_c$ for that
280 > matter) do not appear in any of the phase diagrams for any of the
281 > models.  For purposes of this study, ice B is representative of the
282 > dense ice polymorphs.  A recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides
283 > details on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures
284 > than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
285  
286   \begin{table*}
287   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
288   \begin{center}
289 <
290 < \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
291 < variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
292 < of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
293 < kcal/mol. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
294 <
295 < \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
296 < \hline
297 < Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i}\\
289 > \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs along
290 > with the calculated melting (or sublimation) and boiling points for
291 > the investigated water models.  All free energy calculations used a
292 > cutoff radius of 9.0 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm.
293 > Units of free energy are kcal/mol, while transition temperature are in
294 > Kelvin.  Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
295 > \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
296   \hline
297 < TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3)\\
298 < TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.33(3)\\
299 < TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & -12.29(2)\\
300 < SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & -13.55(2)\\
301 < SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2)\\
302 < SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & -11.47(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2)\\
297 > Water Model & I$_h$ & I$_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ & $T_m$ (*$T_s$) & $T_b$\\
298 > \hline
299 > TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3) & - & 269(7) & 357(4)\\
300 > TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & - & -12.33(3) & 262(6) & 354(4)\\
301 > TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & - & -12.29(2) & 266(7) & 337(4)\\
302 > SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & - & -13.55(2) & 299(6) & 396(4)\\
303 > SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2) & - & *355(4) & -\\
304 > SSD/RF & -11.96(2) & -11.60(2) & -12.53(3) & -12.79(2) & - & 278(7) & 382(4)\\
305   \end{tabular}
306   \label{freeEnergy}
307   \end{center}
308   \end{minipage}
309   \end{table*}
310  
311 The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
312 that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
313 models studied. With the calculated free energy at these state points,
314 the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points
315 and to build phase diagrams.  Figures
316 \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
317 from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
318 although the crossing points between the phases move to slightly
319 different temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that
320 ice $I$ does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the
321 phase diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice
322 B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by
323 Sanz {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
324 TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
325
311   \begin{figure}
312   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
313   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
314 < regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
314 > regime.  The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
315   the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
316 < experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
316 > experimentally observed forms.  Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
317   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
318 < \label{tp3phasedia}
318 > \label{tp3PhaseDia}
319   \end{figure}
320  
321 < \begin{figure}
322 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
323 < \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
324 < regime. Calculations producing these results were done under an
325 < applied reaction field. It is interesting to note that this
326 < computationally efficient model (over 3 times more efficient than
327 < TIP3P) exhibits phase behavior similar to the less computationally
328 < conservative charge based models.}
329 < \label{ssdrfphasedia}
330 < \end{figure}
321 > Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
322 > favorably with the experimental value of 273 K.  The unfortunate
323 > aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
324 > Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice I$_h$ and the liquid
325 > state.  These results do not contradict other studies.  Studies of ice
326 > I$_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 191 to 238 K
327 > (differences being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and
328 > different ordered and disordered molecular
329 > arrangements).\cite{Nada03,Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
330 > Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 200 K would be
331 > predicted from this work.  However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
332 > calculated to be 262 K, indicating that these simulation based
333 > structures ought to be included in studies probing phase transitions
334 > with this model.  Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
335 > not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does sublime at 355 K.  This
336 > is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over all other
337 > polymorphs for this particular model under these conditions.  While
338 > troubling, this behavior resulted in the spontaneous crystallization
339 > of Ice-{\it i} which led us to investigate this structure.  These
340 > observations provide a warning that simulations of SSD/E as a
341 > ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the risk of
342 > spontaneous crystallization.  However, when a longer cutoff radius is
343 > used, SSD/E prefers the liquid state under standard temperature and
344 > pressure.
345  
347 \begin{table*}
348 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
349 \begin{center}
350
351 \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
352 temperatures at 1 atm for several common water models compared with
353 experiment. The $T_m$ and $T_s$ values from simulation correspond to a
354 transition between Ice-{\it i} (or Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$) and the
355 liquid or gas state.}
356
357 \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
358 \hline
359 Equilibrium Point & TIP3P & TIP4P & TIP5P & SPC/E & SSD/E & SSD/RF & Exp.\\
360 \hline
361 $T_m$ (K)  & 269(4) & 266(5) & 271(4) & 296(3) & - & 278(4) & 273\\
362 $T_b$ (K)  & 357(2) & 354(2) & 337(2) & 396(2) & - & 348(2) & 373\\
363 $T_s$ (K)  & - & - & - & - & 355(2) & - & -\\
364 \end{tabular}
365 \label{meltandboil}
366 \end{center}
367 \end{minipage}
368 \end{table*}
369
370 Table \ref{meltandboil} lists the melting and boiling temperatures
371 calculated from this work. Surprisingly, most of these models have
372 melting points that compare quite favorably with experiment. The
373 unfortunate aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs
374 between Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the
375 liquid state. These results are actually not contrary to previous
376 studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
377 using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
378 being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
379 ordered and disordered molecular
380 arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
381 Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
382 predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
383 calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
384 previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
385 not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it shows a sublimation point
386 at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
387 all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
388 conditions. While troubling, this behavior resulted in spontaneous
389 crystallization of Ice-{\it i} and led us to investigate this
390 structure. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
391 SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
392 risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk lessens when
393 applying a longer cutoff.
394
346   \begin{figure}
347   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
348 < \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for (A) SSD/E, (B)
349 < TIP3P, and (C) SSD/RF with a reaction field. Both SSD/E and TIP3P show
350 < significant cutoff radius dependence of the free energy and appear to
351 < converge when moving to cutoffs greater than 12 \AA. Use of a reaction
352 < field with SSD/RF results in free energies that exhibit minimal cutoff
353 < radius dependence.}
348 > \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
349 > SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
350 > with an added Ewald correction term.  Error for the larger cutoff
351 > points is equivalent to that observed at 9.0\AA\ (see Table
352 > \ref{freeEnergy}).  Data for ice I$_c$ with TIP3P using both 12 and
353 > 13.5 \AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was prone to
354 > distortion and melting at 200 K.  Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ is the form of
355 > Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
356   \label{incCutoff}
357   \end{figure}
358  
359 < Increasing the cutoff radius in simulations of the more
360 < computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
361 < the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
362 < involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
363 < free energy of all the ice polymorphs for the SSD/E and TIP3P models
364 < show a substantial dependence on cutoff radius. In general, there is a
365 < narrowing of the free energy differences while moving to greater
366 < cutoff radii.  As the free energies for the polymorphs converge, the
367 < stability advantage that Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced; however, it
368 < remains the most stable polymorph for both of these models over the
369 < depicted range for both models. This narrowing trend is not
370 < significant in the case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies
371 < calculated with a reaction field present provide, at minimal
372 < computational cost, a more accurate picture of the free energy
373 < landscape in the absence of potential truncation.  Interestingly,
374 < increasing the cutoff radius a mere 1.5 \AA\ with the SSD/E model
375 < destabilizes the Ice-{\it i} polymorph enough that the liquid state is
376 < preferred under standard simulation conditions (298 K and 1
377 < atm). Thus, it is recommended that simulations using this model choose
378 < interaction truncation radii greater than 9 \AA. Considering this
379 < stabilization provided by smaller cutoffs, it is not surprising that
380 < crystallization into Ice-{\it i} was observed with SSD/E.  The choice
381 < of a 9 \AA\ cutoff in the previous simulations gives the Ice-{\it i}
382 < polymorph a greater than 1 kcal/mol lower free energy than the ice
383 < $I_\textrm{h}$ starting configurations.
359 > For the more computationally efficient water models, we have also
360 > investigated the effect of potential trunctaion on the computed free
361 > energies as a function of the cutoff radius.  As seen in
362 > Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
363 > water models lacking a long-range correction show significant cutoff
364 > dependence.  In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
365 > differences while moving to greater cutoff radii.  As the free
366 > energies for the polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that
367 > Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced.  Adjacent to each of these plots are
368 > results for systems with applied or estimated long-range corrections.
369 > SSD/RF was parametrized for use with a reaction field, and the benefit
370 > provided by this computationally inexpensive correction is apparent.
371 > The free energies are largely independent of the size of the reaction
372 > field cavity in this model, so small cutoff radii mimic bulk
373 > calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
374 >
375 > Although TIP3P was paramaterized for use without the Ewald summation,
376 > we have estimated the effect of this method for computing long-range
377 > electrostatics for both TIP3P and SPC/E.  This was accomplished by
378 > calculating the potential energy of identical crystals both with and
379 > without particle mesh Ewald (PME).  Similar behavior to that observed
380 > with reaction field is seen for both of these models.  The free
381 > energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a narrower
382 > range for the various polymorphs.  Like the dipolar water models,
383 > TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the Ice-{\it i}
384 > polymorph.  Crystal preference is much more difficult to determine for
385 > SPC/E.  Without a long-range correction, each of the polymorphs
386 > studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
387 > cutoff radii.  The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
388 > narrows the gap in free energies such that the polymorphs are
389 > isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty.  This suggests that other
390 > conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume simulations, can
391 > influence the polymorph expressed upon crystallization.
392  
393 < To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
433 < long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
434 < was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
435 < inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the correction.
436 < This was accomplished by calculation of the potential energy of
437 < identical crystals both with and without PME.  The free energies for
438 < the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and SPC/E water models are
439 < shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}.  The same trend pointed out through
440 < increase of cutoff radius is observed in these PME results. Ice-{\it
441 < i} is the preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P
442 < and SPC/E water models; however, the narrowing of the free energy
443 < differences between the various solid forms with the SPC/E model is
444 < significant enough that it becomes less clear that it is the most
445 < stable polymorph.  The free energies of Ice-{\it i} and $I_\textrm{c}$
446 < overlap within error, while ice B and $I_\textrm{h}$ are just outside
447 < at t slightly higher free energy.  This indicates that with SPC/E,
448 < Ice-{\it i} might be metastable with all the studied polymorphs,
449 < particularly ice $I_\textrm{c}$. However, these results do not
450 < significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a
451 < stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
452 < phase behavior of water models.
393 > \section{Conclusions}
394  
395 < \begin{table*}
396 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
397 < \begin{center}
395 > In this work, thermodynamic integration was used to determine the
396 > absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs.  The new polymorph,
397 > Ice-{\it i} was observed to be the stable crystalline state for {\it
398 > all} the water models when using a 9.0 \AA\ cutoff.  However, the free
399 > energy partially depends on simulation conditions (particularly on the
400 > choice of long range correction method). Regardless, Ice-{\it i} was
401 > still observered to be a stable polymorph for all of the studied water
402 > models.
403  
404 < \caption{The free energy of the studied ice polymorphs after applying
405 < the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME
406 < long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
404 > So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  As
405 > indicated above, the answer appears to be dependent both on the
406 > conditions and the model used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a
407 > long-range interaction correction, Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
408 > i}$^\prime$ have the lowest free energy of the studied polymorphs with
409 > all the models.  Ideally, crystallization of each model under constant
410 > pressure conditions, as was done with SSD/E, would aid in the
411 > identification of their respective preferred structures.  This work,
412 > however, helps illustrate how studies involving one specific model can
413 > lead to insight about important behavior of others.
414  
415 < \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
416 < \hline
417 < Water Model &  $I_h$ & $I_c$ &  B & Ice-{\it i} \\
418 < \hline
419 < TIP3P  & -11.53(2) & -11.24(3) & -11.51(3) & -11.67(3) \\
420 < SPC/E  & -12.97(2) & -13.00(2) & -12.96(3) & -13.02(2) \\
468 < \end{tabular}
469 < \label{pmeShift}
470 < \end{center}
471 < \end{minipage}
472 < \end{table*}
415 > We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
416 > polarizable or flexible models.  It is entirely possible that the
417 > polarizability of real water makes Ice-{\it i} substantially less
418 > stable than ice I$_h$.  However, the calculations presented above seem
419 > interesting enough to communicate before the role of polarizability
420 > (or flexibility) has been thoroughly investigated.
421  
422 < \section{Conclusions}
423 <
424 < The free energy for proton ordered variants of hexagonal and cubic ice
425 < $I$, ice B, and our recently discovered Ice-{\it i} structure were
426 < calculated under standard conditions for several common water models
427 < via thermodynamic integration. All the water models studied show
428 < Ice-{\it i} to be the minimum free energy crystal structure with a 9
429 < \AA\ switching function cutoff. Calculated melting and boiling points
430 < show surprisingly good agreement with the experimental values;
431 < however, the solid phase at 1 atm is Ice-{\it i}, not ice $I_h$. The
484 < effect of interaction truncation was investigated through variation of
485 < the cutoff radius, use of a reaction field parameterized model, and
486 < estimation of the results in the presence of the Ewald
487 < summation. Interaction truncation has a significant effect on the
488 < computed free energy values, and may significantly alter the free
489 < energy landscape for the more complex multipoint water models. Despite
490 < these effects, these results show Ice-{\it i} to be an important ice
491 < polymorph that should be considered in simulation studies.
492 <
493 < Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all of the
494 < investigated simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible
495 < experimental observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past
496 < and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
497 < regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
498 < of the simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a
499 < name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That
500 < said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
501 < most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
502 < negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
422 > Finally, due to the stability of Ice-{\it i} in the investigated
423 > simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
424 > observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
425 > experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
426 > us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
427 > simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a name for
428 > this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That said, there
429 > are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal
430 > situation for possible observation. These include the negative
431 > pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
432   deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
433 < non-polar molecules.  Figs. \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} contain
434 < our predictions for both the pair distribution function ($g_{OO}(r)$)
435 < and the structure factor ($S(\vec{q})$ for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, and for
436 < ice-{\it i} at a temperature of 77K.  In studies of the high and low
437 < density forms of amorphous ice, ``spurious'' diffraction peaks have
438 < been observed experimentally.\cite{Bizid87} It is possible that a
439 < variant of Ice-{\it i} could explain some of this behavior; however,
440 < we will leave it to our experimental colleagues to make the final
441 < determination on whether this ice polymorph is named appropriately
442 < (i.e. with an imaginary number) or if it can be promoted to Ice-0.
433 > non-polar molecules.  For the purpose of comparison with experimental
434 > results, we have calculated the oxygen-oxygen pair correlation
435 > function, $g_{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$ for the
436 > two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example ice I$_h$ and I$_c$
437 > plots) at 77K, and they are shown in figures \ref{fig:gofr} and
438 > \ref{fig:sofq} respectively.  It is interesting to note that the
439 > structure factors for Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ and Ice-I$_c$ are quite similar.
440 > The primary differences are small peaks at 1.125, 2.29, and 2.53
441 > \AA${-1}$, so particular attention to these regions would be needed
442 > to identify the new {\it i}$^\prime$ variant from the I$_{c}$ variant.
443  
444   \begin{figure}
445 + \centering
446   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
447 < \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice $I_h$, $I_c$,
448 < Ice-{\it i}, and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ calculated from from simulations
449 < of the SSD/RF water model at 77 K.}
447 > \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice I$_h$, I$_c$, and
448 > Ice-{\it i} calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model
449 > at 77 K.  The Ice-{\it i} distribution function was obtained from
450 > simulations composed of TIP4P water.}
451   \label{fig:gofr}
452   \end{figure}
453  
454   \begin{figure}
455 + \centering
456   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
457 < \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, Ice-{\it i},
457 > \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice I$_h$, I$_c$, Ice-{\it i},
458   and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
459   been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
460   width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
# Line 538 | Line 470 | Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR
470  
471   \newpage
472  
473 < \bibliographystyle{jcp}
473 > \bibliographystyle{achemso}
474   \bibliography{iceiPaper}
475  
476  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines