ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1453 by chrisfen, Mon Sep 13 18:39:53 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1906 by chrisfen, Thu Jan 6 21:00:26 2005 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
3 < %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 < %\usepackage{endfloat}
2 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 > \usepackage{endfloat}
4   \usepackage{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{epsf}
6   \usepackage{berkeley}
7 < %\usepackage{setspace}
8 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
7 > \usepackage{setspace}
8 > \usepackage{tabularx}
9   \usepackage{graphicx}
10 < %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
11 < %\pagestyle{plain}
12 < %\pagenumbering{arabic}
13 < %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
14 < %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
15 < %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
16 < %\brokenpenalty=10000
10 > \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
11 > \pagestyle{plain}
12 > \pagenumbering{arabic}
13 > \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
14 > \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
15 > \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
16 > \brokenpenalty=10000
17 > \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
18 > \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
19  
19 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20
20   \begin{document}
21  
22 < \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomolous Ice}
22 > \title{Computational free energy studies of a new ice polymorph which
23 > exhibits greater stability than Ice $I_h$}
24  
25 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
26 < \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
27 <
28 < \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
25 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
26 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
27 > University of Notre Dame\\
28   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29  
30   \date{\today}
31  
32 < %\maketitle
32 > \maketitle
33   %\doublespacing
34  
35   \begin{abstract}
36 + The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs were calculated
37 + using thermodynamic integration.  These polymorphs are predicted by
38 + computer simulations using a variety of common water models to be
39 + stable at low pressures.  A recently discovered ice polymorph that has
40 + as yet {\it only} been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
41 + was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
42 + water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
43 + coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
44 + ice structures.  Additionally, potential truncation was shown to play
45 + a role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
46   \end{abstract}
47  
39 \maketitle
40
41 \newpage
42
48   %\narrowtext
49  
50   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 48 | Line 53 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
53  
54   \section{Introduction}
55  
56 + Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
57 + simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
58 + its behavior under varying simulation
59 + conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
60 + These models have been used to investigate important physical
61 + phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
62 + hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
63 + choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
64 + under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
65 + the limitations of
66 + each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two important
67 + properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
68 + particularly for the solid forms of water as these predict the
69 + thermodynamic stability of the various phases.  Water has a
70 + particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different and
71 + stable crystalline structures as the temperature and pressure are
72 + varied.  It is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
73 + energy landscape\cite{Sanz04}; and ideally, research is focused on the
74 + phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
75 + these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
76 + pressures for the model.  
77 +
78 + The high-pressure phases of water (ice II - ice X as well as ice XII)
79 + have been studied extensively both experimentally and
80 + computationally. In this paper, standard reference state methods were
81 + applied in the {\it low} pressure regime to evaluate the free energies
82 + for a few known crystalline water polymorphs that might be stable at
83 + these pressures.  This work is unique in that one of the crystal
84 + lattices was arrived at through crystallization of a computationally
85 + efficient water model under constant pressure and temperature
86 + conditions.  Crystallization events are interesting in and of
87 + themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
88 + obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
89 + polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
90 + this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
91 + simulation. The unit cell of Ice-{\it i} and an axially-elongated
92 + variant named Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ both consist of eight water
93 + molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water tetramers as
94 + illustrated in figures \ref{unitcell}A and \ref{unitcell}B.  These
95 + tetramers form a crystal structure similar in appearance to a recent
96 + two-dimensional surface tessellation simulated on silica.\cite{Yang04}
97 + As expected in an ice crystal constructed of water tetramers, the
98 + hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those observed in ice $I_h$,
99 + however the interlocking of these subunits appears to provide
100 + significant stabilization to the overall crystal.  The arrangement of
101 + these tetramers results in surrounding open octagonal cavities that
102 + are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in diameter
103 + (Fig. \ref{iCrystal}).  This open structure leads to crystals that
104 + are typically 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense than ice $I_h$.
105 +
106 + \begin{figure}
107 + \centering
108 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{unitCell.eps}
109 + \caption{(A) Unit cells for Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$.  
110 + The spheres represent the center-of-mass locations of the water
111 + molecules.  The $a$ to $c$ ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
112 + i}$^\prime$ are given by 2.1214 and 1.785 respectively.}
113 + \label{unitcell}
114 + \end{figure}
115 +
116 + \begin{figure}
117 + \centering
118 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orderedIcei.eps}
119 + \caption{A rendering of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
120 + down the (001) crystal face.  The presence of large octagonal pores
121 + leads to a polymorph that is less dense than ice $I_h$.}
122 + \label{iCrystal}
123 + \end{figure}
124 +
125 + Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
126 + minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
127 + investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
128 + our previous work and related
129 + articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Our earlier results
130 + considered only energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
131 + contributions to the overall free energy.  To address this issue, we
132 + have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
133 + thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
134 + $I_c$ and ice $I_h$ (the common low density ice polymorphs) and ice B
135 + (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure observed by
136 + B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b}
137 + This work includes results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i}
138 + was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several common water models
139 + (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field parametrized
140 + single point dipole water model (SSD/RF).  The axially-elongated
141 + variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations involving
142 + SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P.  The square tetramers in Ice-{\it i} distort
143 + in Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ to form a rhombus with alternating 85 and 95
144 + degree angles.  Under SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P, this geometry is better
145 + at forming favorable hydrogen bonds.  The degree of rhomboid
146 + distortion depends on the water model used, but is significant enough
147 + to split a peak in the radial distribution function which corresponds
148 + to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
149 +
150   \section{Methods}
151  
152 < \section{Results and discussion}
152 > Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
153 > performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics program.\cite{Meineke05}
154 > All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
155 > propagated using the symplectic DLM integration method.  Details about
156 > the implementation of this technique can be found in a recent
157 > publication.\cite{Dullweber1997}
158 >
159 > Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the Helmholtz free
160 > energies ($A$) of the listed water models at various state points
161 > using the OOPSE molecular dynamics program.\cite{Meineke05}
162 > Thermodynamic integration is an established technique that has been
163 > used extensively in the calculation of free energies for condensed
164 > phases of
165 > materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.  This
166 > method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
167 > interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
168 > energy is known analytically ($A_0$).  The difference in potential
169 > energy between the reference system and the system of interest
170 > ($\Delta V$) is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
171 > difference between the two states:
172 > \begin{equation}
173 > A = A_0 + \int_0^1 \left\langle \Delta V \right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda.
174 > \end{equation}
175 > Here, $\lambda$ is the parameter that governs the transformation
176 > between the reference system and the system of interest.  For
177 > crystalline phases, an harmonically-restrained (Einsten) crystal is
178 > chosen as the reference state, while for liquid phases, the ideal gas
179 > is taken as the reference state.  
180 >
181 > In an Einstein crystal, the molecules are restrained at their ideal
182 > lattice locations and orientations. Using harmonic restraints, as
183 > applied by B\`{a}ez and Clancy, the total potential for this reference
184 > crystal ($V_\mathrm{EC}$) is the sum of all the harmonic restraints,
185 > \begin{equation}
186 > V_\mathrm{EC} = \frac{K_\mathrm{v}r^2}{2} + \frac{K_\theta\theta^2}{2} +
187 > \frac{K_\omega\omega^2}{2},
188 > \end{equation}
189 > where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
190 > the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
191 > of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
192 > respectively.  These spring constants are typically calculated from
193 > the mean-square displacements of water molecules in an unrestrained
194 > ice crystal at 200 K.  For these studies, $K_\mathrm{r} = 4.29$ kcal
195 > mol$^{-1}$, $K_\theta\ = 13.88$ kcal mol$^{-1}$, and $K_\omega\ =
196 > 17.75$ kcal mol$^{-1}$.  It is clear from Fig. \ref{waterSpring} that
197 > the values of $\theta$ range from $0$ to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges
198 > from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition function for a molecular crystal
199 > restrained in this fashion can be evaluated analytically, and the
200 > Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is given by
201 > \begin{eqnarray}
202 > A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
203 > [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
204 > )^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{B}kT}{h^2}\right
205 > )^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{C}kT}{h^2}\right
206 > )^\frac{1}{2}\right ] \nonumber \\ &-& kT\ln \left [\frac{kT}{2(\pi
207 > K_\omega K_\theta)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\exp\left
208 > (-\frac{kT}{2K_\theta}\right)\int_0^{\left (\frac{kT}{2K_\theta}\right
209 > )^\frac{1}{2}}\exp(t^2)\mathrm{d}t\right ],
210 > \label{ecFreeEnergy}
211 > \end{eqnarray}
212 > where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is the minimum
213 > potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
214 >
215 > \begin{figure}
216 > \centering
217 > \includegraphics[width=4in]{rotSpring.eps}
218 > \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
219 > $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
220 > z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
221 > body-frame {\it z}-axis.  $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
222 > constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
223 > and $\omega$ directions.}
224 > \label{waterSpring}
225 > \end{figure}
226 >
227 > In the case of molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the
228 > target reference state.  There are several examples of liquid state
229 > free energy calculations of water models present in the
230 > literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
231 > typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
232 > interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
233 > molecules.  In this study, we applied one of the most convenient
234 > methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
235 > interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
236 > parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
237 > results in excellent agreement with other established
238 > methods.\cite{Baez95b}
239  
240 + Near the cutoff radius ($0.85 * r_{cut}$), charge, dipole, and
241 + Lennard-Jones interactions were gradually reduced by a cubic switching
242 + function.  By applying this function, these interactions are smoothly
243 + truncated, thereby avoiding the poor energy conservation which results
244 + from harsher truncation schemes.  The effect of a long-range
245 + correction was also investigated on select model systems in a variety
246 + of manners.  For the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed
247 + dielectric constant of 80 was applied in all
248 + simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the least computationally
249 + expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, TIP3P, and SPC/E), simulations were
250 + performed with longer cutoffs of 10.5, 12, 13.5, and 15 \AA\ to
251 + compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results.  Finally, the effects of using
252 + the Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
253 + single configuration Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME)
254 + calculations~\cite{Tinker} for each of the ice polymorphs.  The
255 + calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of PME was
256 + applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
257 + free energy landscape.
258 +
259 + \section{Results and Discussion}
260 +
261 + The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
262 + density polymorphs ($I_h$, $I_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
263 + i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
264 + \ref{freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
265 + shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
266 + conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
267 + relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
268 + displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
269 + indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
270 + investigated water models.  With the free energy at these state
271 + points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
272 + state points and to build phase diagrams.  Figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia} is
273 + an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water model.
274 + All other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
275 + between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
276 + indicated from the transition temperatures in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.
277 + It is interesting to note that ice $I_h$ (and ice $I_c$ for that
278 + matter) do not appear in any of the phase diagrams for any of the
279 + models.  For purposes of this study, ice B is representative of the
280 + dense ice polymorphs.  A recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides
281 + details on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures
282 + than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
283 +
284 + \begin{table*}
285 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
286 + \begin{center}
287 + \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs along
288 + with the calculated melting (or sublimation) and boiling points for
289 + the investigated water models.  All free energy calculations used a
290 + cutoff radius of 9.0 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm.
291 + Units of free energy are kcal/mol, while transition temperature are in
292 + Kelvin.  Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
293 + \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
294 + \hline
295 + Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ & $T_m$ (*$T_s$) & $T_b$\\
296 + \hline
297 + TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3) & - & 269(4) & 357(2)\\
298 + TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & - & -12.33(3) & 266(5) & 354(2)\\
299 + TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & - & -12.29(2) & 271(4) & 337(2)\\
300 + SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & - & -13.55(2) & 296(3) & 396(2)\\
301 + SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2) & - & *355(2) & -\\
302 + SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & -11.47(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2) & - & 278(4) & 349(2)\\
303 + \end{tabular}
304 + \label{freeEnergy}
305 + \end{center}
306 + \end{minipage}
307 + \end{table*}
308 +
309 + \begin{figure}
310 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
311 + \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
312 + regime.  The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
313 + the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
314 + experimentally observed forms.  Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
315 + higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
316 + \label{tp3PhaseDia}
317 + \end{figure}
318 +
319 + Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
320 + favorably with the experimental value of 273 K.  The unfortunate
321 + aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
322 + Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the liquid
323 + state.  These results do not contradict other studies.  Studies of ice
324 + $I_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K
325 + (differences being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and
326 + different ordered and disordered molecular
327 + arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
328 + Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
329 + predicted from this work.  However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
330 + calculated to be 265 K, indicating that these simulation based
331 + structures ought to be included in studies probing phase transitions
332 + with this model.  Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
333 + not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does sublime at 355 K.  This
334 + is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over all other
335 + polymorphs for this particular model under these conditions.  While
336 + troubling, this behavior resulted in the spontaneous crystallization
337 + of Ice-{\it i} which led us to investigate this structure.  These
338 + observations provide a warning that simulations of SSD/E as a
339 + ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the risk of
340 + spontaneous crystallization.  However, when a longer cutoff radius is
341 + used, SSD/E prefers the liquid state under standard temperature and
342 + pressure.
343 +
344 + \begin{figure}
345 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
346 + \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
347 + SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
348 + with an added Ewald correction term.  Error for the larger cutoff
349 + points is equivalent to that observed at 9.0\AA\ (see Table
350 + \ref{freeEnergy}).  Data for ice I$_c$ with TIP3P using both 12 and
351 + 13.5 \AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was prone to
352 + distortion and melting at 200 K.  Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ is the form of
353 + Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
354 + \label{incCutoff}
355 + \end{figure}
356 +
357 + For the more computationally efficient water models, we have also
358 + investigated the effect of potential trunctaion on the computed free
359 + energies as a function of the cutoff radius.  As seen in
360 + Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
361 + water models lacking a long-range correction show significant cutoff
362 + dependence.  In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
363 + differences while moving to greater cutoff radii.  As the free
364 + energies for the polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that
365 + Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced.  Adjacent to each of these plots are
366 + results for systems with applied or estimated long-range corrections.
367 + SSD/RF was parametrized for use with a reaction field, and the benefit
368 + provided by this computationally inexpensive correction is apparent.
369 + The free energies are largely independent of the size of the reaction
370 + field cavity in this model, so small cutoff radii mimic bulk
371 + calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
372 +
373 + Although TIP3P was paramaterized for use without the Ewald summation,
374 + we have estimated the effect of this method for computing long-range
375 + electrostatics for both TIP3P and SPC/E.  This was accomplished by
376 + calculating the potential energy of identical crystals both with and
377 + without particle mesh Ewald (PME).  Similar behavior to that observed
378 + with reaction field is seen for both of these models.  The free
379 + energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a narrower
380 + range for the various polymorphs.  Like the dipolar water models,
381 + TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the Ice-{\it i}
382 + polymorph.  Crystal preference is much more difficult to determine for
383 + SPC/E.  Without a long-range correction, each of the polymorphs
384 + studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
385 + cutoff radii.  The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
386 + narrows the gap in free energies such that the polymorphs are
387 + isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty.  This suggests that other
388 + conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume simulations, can
389 + influence the polymorph expressed upon crystallization.
390 +
391   \section{Conclusions}
392  
393 + In this report, thermodynamic integration was used to determine the
394 + absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs.  Of the studied
395 + crystal forms, Ice-{\it i} was observed to be the stable crystalline
396 + state for {\it all} the water models when using a 9.0 \AA\
397 + intermolecular interaction cutoff.  Through investigation of possible
398 + interaction truncation methods, the free energy was shown to be
399 + partially dependent on simulation conditions; however, Ice-{\it i} was
400 + still observered to be a stable polymorph of the studied water models.
401 +
402 + So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  As
403 + indicated above, the answer appears to be dependent both on the
404 + conditions and the model used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a
405 + long-range interaction correction, Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it
406 + i}$^\prime$ have the lowest free energy of the studied polymorphs with
407 + all the models.  Ideally, crystallization of each model under constant
408 + pressure conditions, as was done with SSD/E, would aid in the
409 + identification of their respective preferred structures.  This work,
410 + however, helps illustrate how studies involving one specific model can
411 + lead to insight about important behavior of others.  In general, the
412 + above results support the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a
413 + stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying the
414 + phase behavior of water models.
415 +
416 + We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
417 + polarizable or flexible models.  It is entirely possible that the
418 + polarizability of real water makes Ice-{\it i} substantially less
419 + stable than ice $I_h$.  However, the calculations presented above seem
420 + interesting enough to communicate before the role of polarizability
421 + (or flexibility) has been thoroughly investigated.
422 +
423 + Finally, due to the stability of Ice-{\it i} in the investigated
424 + simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
425 + observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
426 + experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
427 + us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
428 + simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a name for
429 + this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That said, there
430 + are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal
431 + situation for possible observation. These include the negative
432 + pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
433 + deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
434 + non-polar molecules.  For experimental comparison purposes, example
435 + $g_{OO}(r)$ and $S(\vec{q})$ plots were generated for the two Ice-{\it
436 + i} variants (along with example ice $I_h$ and $I_c$ plots) at 77K, and
437 + they are shown in figures \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq}
438 + respectively.
439 +
440 + \begin{figure}
441 + \centering
442 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
443 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice $I_h$, $I_c$, and
444 + Ice-{\it i} calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model
445 + at 77 K.  The Ice-{\it i} distribution function was obtained from
446 + simulations composed of TIP4P water.}
447 + \label{fig:gofr}
448 + \end{figure}
449 +
450 + \begin{figure}
451 + \centering
452 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
453 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, Ice-{\it i},
454 + and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
455 + been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
456 + width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
457 + simulations.}
458 + \label{fig:sofq}
459 + \end{figure}
460 +
461   \section{Acknowledgments}
462   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
463   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
464 < the Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster under NSF grant
465 < DMR-0079647.
464 > the Notre Dame High Performance Computing Cluster and the Notre Dame
465 > Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR-0079647).
466  
467   \newpage
468  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines