ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/langevin/langevin.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/langevin/langevin.tex (file contents):
Revision 3341 by gezelter, Wed Feb 6 22:34:50 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 3352 by gezelter, Fri Feb 29 22:02:46 2008 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
2 > %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint,amsmath,amssymb,endfloats]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 \usepackage{endfloat}
4   \usepackage{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{amssymb}
6   \usepackage{times}
7   \usepackage{mathptmx}
8   \usepackage{setspace}
9 < \usepackage{tabularx}
9 > \usepackage{endfloat}
10 > %\usepackage{tabularx}
11   \usepackage{graphicx}
12 < \usepackage{booktabs}
13 < \usepackage{bibentry}
14 < \usepackage{mathrsfs}
12 > %\usepackage{booktabs}
13 > %\usepackage{bibentry}
14 > %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
15   \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
16   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
17   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
18   9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
19 < \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 >
20   \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note
21  
22   \begin{document}
23  
24 < \title{An algorithm for performing Langevin dynamics on rigid bodies of arbitrary shape }
24 > \title{Langevin dynamics for rigid bodies of arbitrary shape}
25  
26 < \author{Xiuquan Sun, Teng Lin and J. Daniel Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail:
27 < gezelter@nd.edu} \\
28 < Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
26 > \author{Xiuquan Sun, Teng Lin and J. Daniel
27 > Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
28 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
29   University of Notre Dame\\
30   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
31  
32   \date{\today}
33  
34 \maketitle \doublespacing
34  
35 < \begin{abstract}
35 > \maketitle
36  
37 +
38 +
39 + \begin{abstract}
40 + We present an algorithm for carrying out Langevin dynamics simulations
41 + on complex rigid bodies by incorporating the hydrodynamic resistance
42 + tensors for arbitrary shapes into an advanced symplectic integration
43 + scheme.  The integrator gives quantitative agreement with both
44 + analytic and approximate hydrodynamic theories for a number of model
45 + rigid bodies, and works well at reproducing the solute dynamical
46 + properties (diffusion constants, and orientational relaxation times)
47 + obtained from explicitly-solvated simulations.
48   \end{abstract}
49  
50   \newpage
51  
52 +
53 +
54   %\narrowtext
55  
56   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57   %                          BODY OF TEXT
58   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59  
60 + \begin{doublespace}
61 +
62   \section{Introduction}
63  
64   %applications of langevin dynamics
65 < Langevin dynamics, which mimics a simple heat bath with stochastic and
65 > Langevin dynamics, which mimics a heat bath using both stochastic and
66   dissipative forces, has been applied in a variety of situations as an
67   alternative to molecular dynamics with explicit solvent molecules.
68   The stochastic treatment of the solvent allows the use of simulations
69 < with substantially longer time and length scales.  In general, the
69 > with substantially longer time and length scales. In general, the
70   dynamic and structural properties obtained from Langevin simulations
71   agree quite well with similar properties obtained from explicit
72   solvent simulations.
# Line 61 | Line 75 | solvent simulations.\cite{Shen2002} By applying Langev
75   study of met-enkephalin in which Langevin simulations predicted
76   dynamical properties that were largely in agreement with explicit
77   solvent simulations.\cite{Shen2002} By applying Langevin dynamics with
78 < the UNRES model, Liow and his coworkers suggest that protein folding
78 > the UNRES model, Liwo and his coworkers suggest that protein folding
79   pathways can be explored within a reasonable amount of
80   time.\cite{Liwo2005}
81  
# Line 76 | Line 90 | between the native and denatured states.\cite{HuseyinK
90   folding/unfolding studies and discovered a higher free energy barrier
91   between the native and denatured states.\cite{HuseyinKaya07012005}
92  
93 < Because of its stability against noise, Langevin dynamics has also
80 < proven useful for studying remagnetization processes in various
81 < systems.\cite{Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003} [Check: For
82 < instance, the oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from
83 < Langevin dynamics has the same peak frequencies for different wave
84 < vectors, which recovers the property of magnetic excitations in small
85 < finite structures.\cite{Berkov2005a}]
86 <
87 < In typical LD simulations, the friction and random forces on
93 > In typical LD simulations, the friction and random ($f_r$) forces on
94   individual atoms are taken from Stokes' law,
95   \begin{eqnarray}
96 < m \dot{v}(t) & = & -\nabla U(x) - \xi m v(t) + R(t) \\
97 < \langle R(t) \rangle & = & 0 \\
98 < \langle R(t) R(t') \rangle & = & 2 k_B T \xi m \delta(t - t')
96 > m \dot{v}(t) & = & -\nabla U(x) - \xi m v(t) + f_r(t) \notag \\
97 > \langle f_r(t) \rangle & = & 0 \\
98 > \langle f_r(t) f_r(t') \rangle & = & 2 k_B T \xi m \delta(t - t') \notag
99   \end{eqnarray}
100 < where $\xi \approx 6 \pi \eta a$.  Here $\eta$ is the viscosity of the
101 < implicit solvent, and $a$ is the hydrodynamic radius of the atom.
100 > where $\xi \approx 6 \pi \eta \rho$.  Here $\eta$ is the viscosity of the
101 > implicit solvent, and $\rho$ is the hydrodynamic radius of the atom.
102  
103   The use of rigid substructures,\cite{Chun:2000fj}
104 < coarse-graining,\cite{Ayton01,Golubkov06,Orlandi:2006fk,SunGezelter08}
105 < and ellipsoidal representations of protein side chains~\cite{Fogolari:1996lr}
106 < has made the use of the Stokes-Einstein approximation problematic.  A
107 < rigid substructure moves as a single unit with orientational as well
108 < as translational degrees of freedom.  This requires a more general
109 < treatment of the hydrodynamics than the spherical approximation
110 < provides.  The atoms involved in a rigid or coarse-grained structure
111 < should properly have solvent-mediated interactions with each
112 < other. The theory of interactions {\it between} bodies moving through
113 < a fluid has been developed over the past century and has been applied
114 < to simulations of Brownian
115 < motion.\cite{FIXMAN:1986lr,Ramachandran1996}
104 > coarse-graining,\cite{Ayton01,Golubkov06,Orlandi:2006fk,SunX._jp0762020}
105 > and ellipsoidal representations of protein side
106 > chains~\cite{Fogolari:1996lr} has made the use of the Stokes-Einstein
107 > approximation problematic.  A rigid substructure moves as a single
108 > unit with orientational as well as translational degrees of freedom.
109 > This requires a more general treatment of the hydrodynamics than the
110 > spherical approximation provides.  Also, the atoms involved in a rigid
111 > or coarse-grained structure have solvent-mediated interactions with
112 > each other, and these interactions are ignored if all atoms are
113 > treated as separate spherical particles.  The theory of interactions
114 > {\it between} bodies moving through a fluid has been developed over
115 > the past century and has been applied to simulations of Brownian
116 > motion.\cite{FIXMAN:1986lr,Ramachandran1996}
117  
118 < In order to account for the diffusion anisotropy of arbitrarily-shaped
119 < particles, Fernandes and Garc\'{i}a de la Torre improved the original
120 < Brownian dynamics simulation algorithm~\cite{Ermak1978,Allison1991} by
118 > In order to account for the diffusion anisotropy of complex shapes,
119 > Fernandes and Garc\'{i}a de la Torre improved an earlier Brownian
120 > dynamics simulation algorithm~\cite{Ermak1978,Allison1991} by
121   incorporating a generalized $6\times6$ diffusion tensor and
122   introducing a rotational evolution scheme consisting of three
123   consecutive rotations.\cite{Fernandes2002} Unfortunately, biases are
# Line 121 | Line 128 | dynamics (IBD) was proposed to address this issue by a
128   assumption of zero average acceleration is not always true for
129   cooperative motion which is common in proteins. An inertial Brownian
130   dynamics (IBD) was proposed to address this issue by adding an
131 < inertial correction term.\cite{Beard2000} As a complement to IBD which
132 < has a lower bound in time step because of the inertial relaxation
133 < time, long-time-step inertial dynamics (LTID) can be used to
134 < investigate the inertial behavior of linked polymer segments in a low
135 < friction regime.\cite{Beard2000} LTID can also deal with the
131 > inertial correction term.\cite{Beard2000} As a complement to IBD,
132 > which has a lower bound in time step because of the inertial
133 > relaxation time, long-time-step inertial dynamics (LTID) can be used
134 > to investigate the inertial behavior of linked polymer segments in a
135 > low friction regime.\cite{Beard2000} LTID can also deal with the
136   rotational dynamics for nonskew bodies without translation-rotation
137   coupling by separating the translation and rotation motion and taking
138 < advantage of the analytical solution of hydrodynamics
138 > advantage of the analytical solution of hydrodynamic
139   properties. However, typical nonskew bodies like cylinders and
140   ellipsoids are inadequate to represent most complex macromolecular
141 < assemblies.  There is therefore a need for incorporating the
142 < hydrodynamics of complex (and potentially skew) rigid bodies in the
143 < library of methods available for performing Langevin simulations.
141 > assemblies. Therefore, the goal of this work is to adapt some of the
142 > hydrodynamic methodologies developed to treat Brownian motion of
143 > complex assemblies into a Langevin integrator for rigid bodies with
144 > arbitrary shapes.
145  
146   \subsection{Rigid Body Dynamics}
147   Rigid bodies are frequently involved in the modeling of large
148   collections of particles that move as a single unit.  In molecular
149   simulations, rigid bodies have been used to simplify protein-protein
150   docking,\cite{Gray2003} and lipid bilayer
151 < simulations.\cite{SunGezelter08} Many of the water models in common
151 > simulations.\cite{SunX._jp0762020} Many of the water models in common
152   use are also rigid-body
153   models,\cite{Jorgensen83,Berendsen81,Berendsen87} although they are
154 < typically evolved using constraints rather than rigid body equations
155 < of motion.
154 > typically evolved in molecular dynamics simulations using constraints
155 > rather than rigid body equations of motion.
156  
157   Euler angles are a natural choice to describe the rotational degrees
158   of freedom.  However, due to $\frac{1}{\sin \theta}$ singularities, the
# Line 169 | Line 177 | necessary.  By introducing a conjugate momentum to the
177   In order to develop a stable and efficient integration scheme that
178   preserves most constants of the motion, symplectic propagators are
179   necessary.  By introducing a conjugate momentum to the rotation matrix
180 < $Q$ and re-formulating Hamilton's equations, a symplectic
180 > ${\bf Q}$ and re-formulating Hamilton's equations, a symplectic
181   orientational integrator, RSHAKE,\cite{Kol1997} was proposed to evolve
182   rigid bodies on a constraint manifold by iteratively satisfying the
183 < orthogonality constraint $Q^T Q = 1$.  An alternative method using the
184 < quaternion representation was developed by Omelyan.\cite{Omelyan1998}
185 < However, both of these methods are iterative and suffer from some
186 < related inefficiencies. A symplectic Lie-Poisson integrator for rigid
187 < bodies developed by Dullweber {\it et al.}\cite{Dullweber1997} removes
188 < most of the limitations mentioned above and is therefore the basis for
189 < our Langevin integrator.
183 > orthogonality constraint ${\bf Q}^T {\bf Q} = 1$.  An alternative
184 > method using the quaternion representation was developed by
185 > Omelyan.\cite{Omelyan1998} However, both of these methods are
186 > iterative and suffer from some related inefficiencies. A symplectic
187 > Lie-Poisson integrator for rigid bodies developed by Dullweber {\it et
188 > al.}\cite{Dullweber1997} removes most of the limitations mentioned
189 > above and is therefore the basis for our Langevin integrator.
190  
191   The goal of the present work is to develop a Langevin dynamics
192   algorithm for arbitrary-shaped rigid particles by integrating an
# Line 226 | Line 234 | body-fixed angular velocity ($\mathbf{\omega}$),
234   \end{equation}
235  
236   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:resistanceTensorRegular}\textbf{The Resistance Tensor for Regular Shapes}}
237 < For a spherical body under ``stick'' boundary conditions, the
238 < translational and rotational friction tensors can be calculated from
239 < Stokes' law,\cite{stokes}
237 > For a  spherical body under ``stick'' boundary conditions,
238 > the translational and rotational friction tensors can be calculated
239 > from Stokes' law,
240   \begin{equation}
241 + \label{eq:StokesTranslation}
242   \Xi^{tt}  = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
243 <   {6\pi \eta R} & 0 & 0  \\
244 <   0 & {6\pi \eta R} & 0  \\
245 <   0 & 0 & {6\pi \eta R}  \\
243 >   {6\pi \eta \rho} & 0 & 0  \\
244 >   0 & {6\pi \eta \rho} & 0  \\
245 >   0 & 0 & {6\pi \eta \rho}  \\
246   \end{array} \right)
247   \end{equation}
248   and
249   \begin{equation}
250 + \label{eq:StokesRotation}
251   \Xi^{rr}  = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
252 <   {8\pi \eta R^3 } & 0 & 0  \\
253 <   0 & {8\pi \eta R^3 } & 0  \\
254 <   0 & 0 & {8\pi \eta R^3 }  \\
252 >   {8\pi \eta \rho^3 } & 0 & 0  \\
253 >   0 & {8\pi \eta \rho^3 } & 0  \\
254 >   0 & 0 & {8\pi \eta \rho^3 }  \\
255   \end{array} \right)
256   \end{equation}
257 < where $\eta$ is the viscosity of the solvent and $R$ is the
258 < hydrodynamic radius.
257 > where $\eta$ is the viscosity of the solvent and $\rho$ is the
258 > hydrodynamic radius.  The presence of the rotational resistance tensor
259 > implies that the spherical body has internal structure and
260 > orientational degrees of freedom that must be propagated in time.  For
261 > non-structured spherical bodies (i.e. the atoms in a traditional
262 > molecular dynamics simulation) these degrees of freedom do not exist.
263  
264   Other non-spherical shapes, such as cylinders and ellipsoids, are
265   widely used as references for developing new hydrodynamic theories,
# Line 316 | Line 330 | its net velocity
330   The frictional force felt by the $i^\mathrm{th}$ bead is proportional to
331   its net velocity
332   \begin{equation}
333 < {\bf F}_i  = \zeta_i {\bf v}_i  - \zeta _i \sum\limits_{j \ne i} {{\bf T}_{ij} {\bf F}_j }.
333 > {\bf F}_i  = \xi_i {\bf v}_i  - \xi_i \sum\limits_{j \ne i} {{\bf T}_{ij} {\bf F}_j }.
334   \label{introEquation:tensorExpression}
335   \end{equation}
336   Eq. (\ref{introEquation:tensorExpression}) defines the two-point
# Line 324 | Line 338 | order expression for beads of different hydrodynamic r
338   solutions to this equation, including the simple solution given by
339   Oseen and Burgers in 1930 for two beads of identical radius.  A second
340   order expression for beads of different hydrodynamic radii was
341 < introduced by Rotne and Prager\cite{Rotne1969} and improved by
341 > introduced by Rotne and Prager,\cite{Rotne1969} and improved by
342   Garc\'{i}a de la Torre and Bloomfield,\cite{Torre1977}
343   \begin{equation}
344   {\bf T}_{ij}  = \frac{1}{{8\pi \eta R_{ij} }}\left[ {\left( {{\bf I} +
345 < \frac{{{\bf R}_{ij} {\bf R}_{ij}^T }}{{R_{ij}^2 }}} \right) + \frac{{\sigma
346 < _i^2  + \sigma _j^2 }}{{R_{ij}^2 }}\left( {\frac{{\bf I}}{3} -
345 > \frac{{{\bf R}_{ij} {\bf R}_{ij}^T }}{{R_{ij}^2 }}} \right) + \frac{{\rho
346 > _i^2  + \rho_j^2 }}{{R_{ij}^2 }}\left( {\frac{{\bf I}}{3} -
347   \frac{{{\bf R}_{ij} {\bf R}_{ij}^T }}{{R_{ij}^2 }}} \right)} \right].
348   \label{introEquation:RPTensorNonOverlapped}
349   \end{equation}
350   Here ${\bf R}_{ij}$ is the distance vector between beads $i$ and $j$.  Both
351   the Oseen-Burgers tensor and
352   Eq.~\ref{introEquation:RPTensorNonOverlapped} have an assumption that
353 < the beads do not overlap ($R_{ij} \ge \sigma _i + \sigma _j$).
353 > the beads do not overlap ($R_{ij} \ge \rho_i + \rho_j$).
354  
355   To calculate the resistance tensor for a body represented as the union
356   of many non-overlapping beads, we first pick an arbitrary origin $O$
# Line 389 | Line 403 | total volume of the beads that contribute to the hydro
403   additive correction uses the solvent viscosity ($\eta$) as well as the
404   total volume of the beads that contribute to the hydrodynamic model,
405   \begin{equation}
406 < V = \frac{4 \pi}{3} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \sigma_i^3,
406 > V = \frac{4 \pi}{3} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \rho_i^3,
407   \end{equation}
408 < where $\sigma_i$ is the radius of bead $i$.  This correction term was
408 > where $\rho_i$ is the radius of bead $i$.  This correction term was
409   rigorously tested and compared with the analytical results for
410   two-sphere and ellipsoidal systems by Garc\'{i}a de la Torre and
411   Rodes.\cite{Torre:1983lr}
# Line 454 | Line 468 | beads that sit on lattice sites that are outside the v
468   to be the bead diameter, so that adjacent beads are touching, but do
469   not overlap. To make a shape corresponding to the rigid structure,
470   beads that sit on lattice sites that are outside the van der Waals
471 < radii of any atoms comprising the rigid body are excluded from the
472 < calculation.
471 > radii of all of the atoms comprising the rigid body are excluded from
472 > the calculation.
473  
474   For large structures, most of the beads will be deep within the rigid
475   body and will not contribute to the hydrodynamic tensor.  In the {\it
# Line 467 | Line 481 | members.
481   truncation can still produce bead assemblies with thousands of
482   members.
483  
484 < If all of the atoms comprising the rigid substructure are spherical
485 < and non-overlapping, the tensor in
484 > If all of the {\it atoms} comprising the rigid substructure are
485 > spherical and non-overlapping, the tensor in
486   Eq.~(\ref{introEquation:RPTensorNonOverlapped}) may be used directly
487   using the atoms themselves as the hydrodynamic beads.  This is a
488   variant of the {\it bead model} approach of Carrasco and Garc\'{i}a de
489 < la Torre.\cite{Carrasco1999} In this case, the size of the ${\bf B}$ matrix
490 < can be quite small, and the calculation of the hydrodynamic tensor is
491 < straightforward.
489 > la Torre.\cite{Carrasco1999} In this case, the size of the ${\bf B}$
490 > matrix can be quite small, and the calculation of the hydrodynamic
491 > tensor is straightforward.
492  
493   In general, the inversion of the ${\bf B}$ matrix is the most
494   computationally demanding task.  This inversion is done only once for
495 < each type of rigid structure.  We have been using straightforward
496 < LU-decomposition to solve the linear system and obtain the elements of
497 < ${\bf C}$. Once ${\bf C}$ has been obtained, the location of the
495 > each type of rigid structure.  We have used straightforward
496 > LU-decomposition to solve the linear system and to obtain the elements
497 > of ${\bf C}$. Once ${\bf C}$ has been obtained, the location of the
498   center of resistance ($R$) is found and the resistance tensor at this
499   point is calculated.  The $3 \times 1$ vector giving the location of
500   the rigid body's center of resistance and the $6 \times 6$ resistance
501 < tensor are stored for use in the Langevin dynamics calculation.  Note
502 < that these quantities depend on solvent viscosity and temperature and
503 < must be recomputed if different simulation conditions are required.
501 > tensor are then stored for use in the Langevin dynamics calculation.
502 > These quantities depend on solvent viscosity and temperature and must
503 > be recomputed if different simulation conditions are required.
504  
505   \section{Langevin Dynamics for Rigid Particles of Arbitrary Shape\label{LDRB}}
506  
# Line 502 | Line 516 | Eq.~\ref{LDGeneralizedForm} consists of three generali
516   ${\bf V} =
517   \left\{{\bf v},{\bf \omega}\right\}$. The right side of
518   Eq.~\ref{LDGeneralizedForm} consists of three generalized forces: a
519 < system force (${\bf F}_{s}$), a frictional or dissipative force
520 < (${\bf F}_{f}$) and stochastic force (${\bf F}_{r}$). While the
521 < evolution of the system in Newtonian mechanics is typically done in
522 < the lab frame, it is convenient to handle the dynamics of rigid bodies
523 < in body-fixed frames. Thus the friction and random forces on each
519 > system force (${\bf F}_{s}$), a frictional or dissipative force (${\bf
520 > F}_{f}$) and a stochastic force (${\bf F}_{r}$). While the evolution
521 > of the system in Newtonian mechanics is typically done in the lab
522 > frame, it is convenient to handle the dynamics of rigid bodies in
523 > body-fixed frames. Thus the friction and random forces on each
524   substructure are calculated in a body-fixed frame and may converted
525   back to the lab frame using that substructure's rotation matrix (${\bf
526   Q}$):
# Line 554 | Line 568 | obtain the square root matrix of the resistance tensor
568   \Xi_R = {\bf S} {\bf S}^{T},
569   \label{eq:Cholesky}
570   \end{equation}
571 < where ${\bf S}$ is a lower triangular matrix.\cite{SchlickBook} A
571 > where ${\bf S}$ is a lower triangular matrix.\cite{Schlick2002} A
572   vector with the statistics required for the random force can then be
573   obtained by multiplying ${\bf S}$ onto a random 6-vector ${\bf Z}$ which
574   has elements chosen from a Gaussian distribution, such that:
# Line 585 | Line 599 | frame, we consider the equation of motion for the angu
599   frame, we consider the equation of motion for the angular momentum
600   (${\bf j}$) in the body-fixed frame
601   \begin{equation}
602 < \dot{\bf j}(t) = \tau^{~b}(t)
602 > \frac{\partial}{\partial t}{\bf j}(t) = \tau^{~b}(t)
603   \end{equation}
604   Embedding the friction and random forces into the the total force and
605   torque, one can integrate the Langevin equations of motion for a rigid
# Line 755 | Line 769 | was one solute model and 1929 solvent molecules presen
769   We performed reference microcanonical simulations with explicit
770   solvents for each of the different model system.  In each case there
771   was one solute model and 1929 solvent molecules present in the
772 < simulation box.  All simulations were equilibrated using a
772 > simulation box.  All simulations were equilibrated for 5 ns using a
773   constant-pressure and temperature integrator with target values of 300
774   K for the temperature and 1 atm for pressure.  Following this stage,
775 < further equilibration and sampling was done in a microcanonical
776 < ensemble.  Since the model bodies are typically quite massive, we were
777 < able to use a time step of 25 fs.
775 > further equilibration (5 ns) and sampling (10 ns) was done in a
776 > microcanonical ensemble.  Since the model bodies are typically quite
777 > massive, we were able to use a time step of 25 fs.
778  
779   The model systems studied used both Lennard-Jones spheres as well as
780   uniaxial Gay-Berne ellipoids. In its original form, the Gay-Berne
781   potential was a single site model for the interactions of rigid
782 < ellipsoidal molecules.\cite{Gay81} It can be thought of as a
782 > ellipsoidal molecules.\cite{Gay1981} It can be thought of as a
783   modification of the Gaussian overlap model originally described by
784   Berne and Pechukas.\cite{Berne72} The potential is constructed in the
785   familiar form of the Lennard-Jones function using
# Line 794 | Line 808 | end-to-end} and side-by-side configurations.  Details
808   Additionally, a well depth aspect ratio, $\epsilon^r = \epsilon^e /
809   \epsilon^s$, describes the ratio between the well depths in the {\it
810   end-to-end} and side-by-side configurations.  Details of the potential
811 < are given elsewhere,\cite{Luckhurst90,Golubkov06,SunGezelter08} and an
811 > are given elsewhere,\cite{Luckhurst90,Golubkov06,SunX._jp0762020} and an
812   excellent overview of the computational methods that can be used to
813   efficiently compute forces and torques for this potential can be found
814   in Ref. \citen{Golubkov06}
# Line 829 | Line 843 | used the Einstein form of the pressure correlation fun
843   \int_{t_0}^{t_0 + t} P_{xz}(t') dt' \right)^2 \right\rangle_{t_0}.
844   \label{eq:shear}
845   \end{equation}
846 < A similar form exists for the bulk viscosity
847 < \begin{equation}
834 < \kappa = \lim_{t->\infty} \frac{V}{2 k_B T} \frac{d}{dt} \left\langle \left(
835 < \int_{t_0}^{t_0 + t}
836 < \left(P\left(t'\right)-\left\langle P \right\rangle \right)dt'
837 < \right)^2 \right\rangle_{t_0}.
838 < \end{equation}
839 < Alternatively, the shear viscosity can also be calculated using a
840 < Green-Kubo formula with the off-diagonal pressure tensor correlation function,
841 < \begin{equation}
842 < \eta = \frac{V}{k_B T} \int_0^{\infty} \left\langle P_{xz}(t_0) P_{xz}(t_0
843 < + t) \right\rangle_{t_0} dt,
844 < \end{equation}
845 < although this method converges extremely slowly and is not practical
846 < for obtaining viscosities from molecular dynamics simulations.
846 > which converges much more rapidly in molecular dynamics simulations
847 > than the traditional Green-Kubo formula.
848  
849   The Langevin dynamics for the different model systems were performed
850   at the same temperature as the average temperature of the
# Line 869 | Line 870 | body-fixed reference frame at $t=0$.  With an isotropi
870   compute the diffusive behavior for motion parallel to each body-fixed
871   axis by projecting the displacement of the particle onto the
872   body-fixed reference frame at $t=0$.  With an isotropic solvent, as we
873 < have used in this study, there are differences between the three
874 < diffusion constants, but these must converge to the same value at
875 < longer times.  Translational diffusion constants for the different
876 < shaped models are shown in table \ref{tab:translation}.
873 > have used in this study, there may be differences between the three
874 > diffusion constants at short times, but these must converge to the
875 > same value at longer times.  Translational diffusion constants for the
876 > different shaped models are shown in table \ref{tab:translation}.
877  
878   In general, the three eigenvalues ($D_1, D_2, D_3$) of the rotational
879   diffusion tensor (${\bf D}_{rr}$) measure the diffusion of an object
# Line 952 | Line 953 | The Stokes-Einstein behavior of large spherical partic
953   an arbitrary value of 0.8 kcal/mol.  
954  
955   The Stokes-Einstein behavior of large spherical particles in
956 < hydrodynamic flows is well known, giving translational friction
957 < coefficients of $6 \pi \eta R$ (stick boundary conditions) and
958 < rotational friction coefficients of $8 \pi \eta R^3$.  Recently,
959 < Schmidt and Skinner have computed the behavior of spherical tag
960 < particles in molecular dynamics simulations, and have shown that {\it
961 < slip} boundary conditions ($\Xi_{tt} = 4 \pi \eta R$) may be more
962 < appropriate for molecule-sized spheres embedded in a sea of spherical
963 < solvent particles.\cite{Schmidt:2004fj,Schmidt:2003kx}
956 > hydrodynamic flows with ``stick'' boundary conditions is well known,
957 > and is given in Eqs. (\ref{eq:StokesTranslation}) and
958 > (\ref{eq:StokesRotation}).  Recently, Schmidt and Skinner have
959 > computed the behavior of spherical tag particles in molecular dynamics
960 > simulations, and have shown that {\it slip} boundary conditions
961 > ($\Xi_{tt} = 4 \pi \eta \rho$) may be more appropriate for
962 > molecule-sized spheres embedded in a sea of spherical solvent
963 > particles.\cite{Schmidt:2004fj,Schmidt:2003kx}
964  
965   Our simulation results show similar behavior to the behavior observed
966   by Schmidt and Skinner.  The diffusion constant obtained from our
# Line 984 | Line 985 | constant,\cite{Berne90}
985   can be combined to give a single translational diffusion
986   constant,\cite{Berne90}
987   \begin{equation}
988 < D = \frac{k_B T}{6 \pi \eta a} G(\rho),
988 > D = \frac{k_B T}{6 \pi \eta a} G(s),
989   \label{Dperrin}
990   \end{equation}
991   as well as a single rotational diffusion coefficient,
992   \begin{equation}
993 < \Theta = \frac{3 k_B T}{16 \pi \eta a^3} \left\{ \frac{(2 - \rho^2)
994 < G(\rho) - 1}{1 - \rho^4} \right\}.
993 > \Theta = \frac{3 k_B T}{16 \pi \eta a^3} \left\{ \frac{(2 - s^2)
994 > G(s) - 1}{1 - s^4} \right\}.
995   \label{ThetaPerrin}
996   \end{equation}
997 < In these expressions, $G(\rho)$ is a function of the axial ratio
998 < ($\rho = b / a$), which for prolate ellipsoids, is
997 > In these expressions, $G(s)$ is a function of the axial ratio
998 > ($s = b / a$), which for prolate ellipsoids, is
999   \begin{equation}
1000 < G(\rho) = (1- \rho^2)^{-1/2} \ln \left\{ \frac{1 + (1 -
1000 < \rho^2)^{1/2}}{\rho} \right\}
1000 > G(s) = (1- s^2)^{-1/2} \ln \left\{ \frac{1 + (1 - s^2)^{1/2}}{s} \right\}
1001   \label{GPerrin}
1002   \end{equation}
1003   Again, there is some uncertainty about the correct boundary conditions
# Line 1022 | Line 1022 | model for the ellipsoid.
1022   exact treatment of the diffusion tensor as well as the rough-shell
1023   model for the ellipsoid.
1024  
1025 < The translational diffusion constants from the microcanonical simulations
1026 < agree well with the predictions of the Perrin model, although the rotational
1027 < correlation times are a factor of 2 shorter than expected from hydrodynamic
1028 < theory.  One explanation for the slower rotation
1029 < of explicitly-solvated ellipsoids is the possibility that solute-solvent
1030 < collisions happen at both ends of the solute whenever the principal
1031 < axis of the ellipsoid is turning. In the upper portion of figure
1032 < \ref{fig:explanation} we sketch a physical picture of this explanation.
1033 < Since our Langevin integrator is providing nearly quantitative agreement with
1034 < the Perrin model, it also predicts orientational diffusion for ellipsoids that
1035 < exceed explicitly solvated correlation times by a factor of two.
1025 > The translational diffusion constants from the microcanonical
1026 > simulations agree well with the predictions of the Perrin model,
1027 > although the {\it rotational} correlation times are a factor of 2
1028 > shorter than expected from hydrodynamic theory.  One explanation for
1029 > the slower rotation of explicitly-solvated ellipsoids is the
1030 > possibility that solute-solvent collisions happen at both ends of the
1031 > solute whenever the principal axis of the ellipsoid is turning. In the
1032 > upper portion of figure \ref{fig:explanation} we sketch a physical
1033 > picture of this explanation.  Since our Langevin integrator is
1034 > providing nearly quantitative agreement with the Perrin model, it also
1035 > predicts orientational diffusion for ellipsoids that exceed explicitly
1036 > solvated correlation times by a factor of two.
1037  
1038   \subsection{Rigid dumbbells}
1039   Perhaps the only {\it composite} rigid body for which analytic
# Line 1158 | Line 1159 | used recently as models for lipid
1159  
1160   Spherical heads perched on the ends of Gay-Berne ellipsoids have been
1161   used recently as models for lipid
1162 < molecules.\cite{SunGezelter08,Ayton01} A reference system composed of
1162 > molecules.\cite{SunX._jp0762020,Ayton01} A reference system composed of
1163   a single lipid rigid body embedded in a sea of 1929 solvent particles
1164   was created and run under a microcanonical ensemble.  The resulting
1165   viscosity of this mixture was 0.349 centipoise (as estimated using
# Line 1176 | Line 1177 | the explicit solvent simulations for this model system
1177   hydrodynamic tensor) are essentially quantitative when compared with
1178   the explicit solvent simulations for this model system.  
1179  
1180 < \subsection{Summary}
1181 < According to our simulations, the Langevin rigid-body integrator we
1182 < have developed is a reliable way to replace explicit solvent
1183 < simulations in cases where the detailed solute-solvent interactions do
1184 < not greatly impact the forces on the solute.  In cases where the
1185 < dielectric screening of the solvent, or specific solute-solvent
1186 < interactions become important for structural or dynamic features of
1187 < the solute molecule, this integrator may be less useful.  However, for
1188 < the kinds of coarse-grained modeling that have become popular in
1189 < recent years, this integrator may prove itself to be quite valuable.
1180 > \subsection{Summary of comparisons with explicit solvent simulations}
1181 > The Langevin rigid-body integrator we have developed is a reliable way
1182 > to replace explicit solvent simulations in cases where the detailed
1183 > solute-solvent interactions do not greatly impact the behavior of the
1184 > solute.  As such, it has the potential to greatly increase the length
1185 > and time scales of coarse grained simulations of large solvated
1186 > molecules.  In cases where the dielectric screening of the solvent, or
1187 > specific solute-solvent interactions become important for structural
1188 > or dynamic features of the solute molecule, this integrator may be
1189 > less useful.  However, for the kinds of coarse-grained modeling that
1190 > have become popular in recent years (ellipsoidal side chains, rigid
1191 > bodies, and molecular-scale models), this integrator may prove itself
1192 > to be quite valuable.
1193  
1194   \begin{figure}
1195   \centering
# Line 1211 | Line 1215 | theoretical predictions, and Langevin simulations (wit
1215   \caption{Translational diffusion constants (D) for the model systems
1216   calculated using microcanonical simulations (with explicit solvent),
1217   theoretical predictions, and Langevin simulations (with implicit solvent).
1218 < Analytical solutions for the exactly-solved hydrodynamics models are
1219 < from Refs. \citen{Einstein05} (sphere), \citen{Perrin1934} and \citen{Perrin1936}
1218 > Analytical solutions for the exactly-solved hydrodynamics models are obtained
1219 > from: Stokes' law (sphere), and Refs. \citen{Perrin1934} and \citen{Perrin1936}
1220   (ellipsoid), \citen{Stimson:1926qy} and \citen{Davis:1969uq}
1221   (dumbbell). The other model systems have no known analytic solution.
1222 < All  diffusion constants are reported in units of $10^{-3}$ cm$^2$ / ps (=
1222 > All diffusion constants are reported in units of $10^{-3}$ cm$^2$ / ps (=
1223   $10^{-4}$ \AA$^2$  / fs). }
1224   \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
1225   \hline
# Line 1268 | Line 1272 | lipid     & 0.349  & 78.0 & &      & rough shell & 76.
1272  
1273   \section{Application: A rigid-body lipid bilayer}
1274  
1275 < The Langevin dynamics integrator was applied to study the formation of
1276 < corrugated structures emerging from simulations of the coarse grained
1277 < lipid molecular models presented above.  The initial configuration is
1278 < taken from our molecular dynamics studies on lipid bilayers with
1279 < lennard-Jones sphere solvents. The solvent molecules were excluded
1280 < from the system, and the experimental value for the viscosity of water
1281 < at 20C ($\eta = 1.00$ cp) was used to mimic the hydrodynamic effects
1282 < of the solvent.  The absence of explicit solvent molecules and the
1283 < stability of the integrator allowed us to take timesteps of 50 fs.  A
1284 < total simulation run time of 100 ns was sampled.
1285 < Fig. \ref{fig:bilayer} shows the configuration of the system after 100
1286 < ns, and the ripple structure remains stable during the entire
1287 < trajectory.  Compared with using explicit bead-model solvent
1288 < molecules, the efficiency of the simulation has increased by an order
1289 < of magnitude.
1275 > To test the accuracy and efficiency of the new integrator, we applied
1276 > it to study the formation of corrugated structures emerging from
1277 > simulations of the coarse grained lipid molecular models presented
1278 > above.  The initial configuration is taken from earlier molecular
1279 > dynamics studies on lipid bilayers which had used spherical
1280 > (Lennard-Jones) solvent particles and moderate (480 solvated lipid
1281 > molecules) system sizes.\cite{SunX._jp0762020} the solvent molecules
1282 > were excluded from the system and the box was replicated three times
1283 > in the x- and y- axes (giving a single simulation cell containing 4320
1284 > lipids).  The experimental value for the viscosity of water at 20C
1285 > ($\eta = 1.00$ cp) was used with the Langevin integrator to mimic the
1286 > hydrodynamic effects of the solvent.  The absence of explicit solvent
1287 > molecules and the stability of the integrator allowed us to take
1288 > timesteps of 50 fs. A simulation run time of 30 ns was sampled to
1289 > calculate structural properties.  Fig. \ref{fig:bilayer} shows the
1290 > configuration of the system after 30 ns.  Structural properties of the
1291 > bilayer (e.g. the head and body $P_2$ order parameters) are nearly
1292 > identical to those obtained via solvated molecular dynamics. The
1293 > ripple structure remained stable during the entire trajectory.
1294 > Compared with using explicit bead-model solvent molecules, the 30 ns
1295 > trajectory for 4320 lipids with the Langevin integrator is now {\it
1296 > faster} on the same hardware than the same length trajectory was for
1297 > the 480-lipid system previously studied.
1298  
1299   \begin{figure}
1300   \centering
1301   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bilayer}
1302   \caption[Snapshot of a bilayer of rigid-body models for lipids]{A
1303 < snapshot of a bilayer composed of rigid-body models for lipid
1303 > snapshot of a bilayer composed of 4320 rigid-body models for lipid
1304   molecules evolving using the Langevin integrator described in this
1305   work.} \label{fig:bilayer}
1306   \end{figure}
1307  
1308   \section{Conclusions}
1309  
1310 < We have presented a new Langevin algorithm by incorporating the
1311 < hydrodynamics properties of arbitrary shaped molecules into an
1312 < advanced symplectic integration scheme. Further studies in systems
1313 < involving banana shaped molecules illustrated that the dynamic
1314 < properties could be preserved by using this new algorithm as an
1315 < implicit solvent model.
1310 > We have presented a new algorithm for carrying out Langevin dynamics
1311 > simulations on complex rigid bodies by incorporating the hydrodynamic
1312 > resistance tensors for arbitrary shapes into an advanced symplectic
1313 > integration scheme.  The integrator gives quantitative agreement with
1314 > both analytic and approximate hydrodynamic theories, and works
1315 > reasonably well at reproducing the solute dynamical properties
1316 > (diffusion constants, and orientational relaxation times) from
1317 > explicitly-solvated simulations.  For the cases where there are
1318 > discrepancies between our Langevin integrator and the explicit solvent
1319 > simulations, two features of molecular simulations help explain the
1320 > differences.
1321  
1322 + First, the use of ``stick'' boundary conditions for molecular-sized
1323 + solutes in a sea of similarly-sized solvent particles may be
1324 + problematic.  We are certainly not the first group to notice this
1325 + difference between hydrodynamic theories and explicitly-solvated
1326 + molecular
1327 + simulations.\cite{Schmidt:2004fj,Schmidt:2003kx,Ravichandran:1999fk,TANG:1993lr}
1328 + The problem becomes particularly noticable in both the translational
1329 + diffusion of the spherical particles and the rotational diffusion of
1330 + the ellipsoids.  In both of these cases it is clear that the
1331 + approximations that go into hydrodynamics are the source of the error,
1332 + and not the integrator itself.
1333  
1334 + Second, in the case of structures which have substantial surface area
1335 + that is inaccessible to solvent particles, the hydrodynamic theories
1336 + (and the Langevin integrator) may overestimate the effects of solvent
1337 + friction because they overestimate the exposed surface area of the
1338 + rigid body.  This is particularly noticable in the rotational
1339 + diffusion of the dumbbell model.  We believe that given a solvent of
1340 + known radius, it may be possible to modify the rough shell approach to
1341 + place beads on solvent-accessible surface, instead of on the geometric
1342 + surface defined by the van der Waals radii of the components of the
1343 + rigid body.  Further work to confirm the behavior of this new
1344 + approximation is ongoing.
1345 +
1346   \section{Acknowledgments}
1347   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
1348   Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. T.L. also acknowledges the
1349 < financial support from center of applied mathematics at University
1350 < of Notre Dame.
1349 > financial support from Center of Applied Mathematics at University of
1350 > Notre Dame.
1351 >
1352 > \end{doublespace}
1353   \newpage
1354  
1355 < \bibliographystyle{jcp}
1355 > \bibliographystyle{jcp2}
1356   \bibliography{langevin}
1315
1357   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines