1 |
mmeineke |
914 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\chapter{\label{chapt:intro}Introduction and Theoretical Background} |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
\section{\label{introSec:theory}Theoretical Background} |
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
mmeineke |
953 |
The techniques used in the course of this research fall under the two |
10 |
|
|
main classes of molecular simulation: Molecular Dynamics and Monte |
11 |
|
|
Carlo. Molecular Dynamic simulations integrate the equations of motion |
12 |
|
|
for a given system of particles, allowing the researher to gain |
13 |
|
|
insight into the time dependent evolution of a system. Diffusion |
14 |
|
|
phenomena are readily studied with this simulation technique, making |
15 |
|
|
Molecular Dynamics the main simulation technique used in this |
16 |
|
|
research. Other aspects of the research fall under the Monte Carlo |
17 |
|
|
class of simulations. In Monte Carlo, the configuration space |
18 |
|
|
available to the collection of particles is sampled stochastichally, |
19 |
|
|
or randomly. Each configuration is chosen with a given probability |
20 |
|
|
based on the Maxwell Boltzman distribution. These types of simulations |
21 |
|
|
are best used to probe properties of a system that are only dependent |
22 |
|
|
only on the state of the system. Structural information about a system |
23 |
|
|
is most readily obtained through these types of methods. |
24 |
mmeineke |
914 |
|
25 |
mmeineke |
953 |
Although the two techniques employed seem dissimilar, they are both |
26 |
|
|
linked by the overarching principles of Statistical |
27 |
|
|
Thermodynamics. Statistical Thermodynamics governs the behavior of |
28 |
|
|
both classes of simulations and dictates what each method can and |
29 |
|
|
cannot do. When investigating a system, one most first analyze what |
30 |
|
|
thermodynamic properties of the system are being probed, then chose |
31 |
|
|
which method best suits that objective. |
32 |
mmeineke |
914 |
|
33 |
|
|
\subsection{\label{introSec:statThermo}Statistical Thermodynamics} |
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
ergodic hypothesis |
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
enesemble averages |
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
\subsection{\label{introSec:monteCarlo}Monte Carlo Simulations} |
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
mmeineke |
953 |
The Monte Carlo method was developed by Metropolis and Ulam for their |
42 |
|
|
work in fissionable material.\cite{metropolis:1949} The method is so |
43 |
mmeineke |
955 |
named, because it heavily uses random numbers in its |
44 |
|
|
solution.\cite{allen87:csl} The Monte Carlo method allows for the |
45 |
|
|
solution of integrals through the stochastic sampling of the values |
46 |
|
|
within the integral. In the simplest case, the evaluation of an |
47 |
|
|
integral would follow a brute force method of |
48 |
|
|
sampling.\cite{Frenkel1996} Consider the following single dimensional |
49 |
|
|
integral: |
50 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
51 |
|
|
I = f(x)dx |
52 |
|
|
\label{eq:MCex1} |
53 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
54 |
|
|
The equation can be recast as: |
55 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
56 |
|
|
I = (b-a)<f(x)> |
57 |
|
|
\label{eq:MCex2} |
58 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
59 |
|
|
Where $<f(x)>$ is the unweighted average over the interval |
60 |
|
|
$[a,b]$. The calculation of the integral could then be solved by |
61 |
|
|
randomly choosing points along the interval $[a,b]$ and calculating |
62 |
|
|
the value of $f(x)$ at each point. The accumulated average would then |
63 |
|
|
approach $I$ in the limit where the number of trials is infintely |
64 |
|
|
large. |
65 |
mmeineke |
914 |
|
66 |
mmeineke |
955 |
However, in Statistical Mechanics, one is typically interested in |
67 |
|
|
integrals of the form: |
68 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
69 |
|
|
<A> = \frac{A}{exp^{-\beta}} |
70 |
|
|
\label{eq:mcEnsAvg} |
71 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
72 |
|
|
Where $r^N$ stands for the coordinates of all $N$ particles and $A$ is |
73 |
|
|
some observable that is only dependent on position. $<A>$ is the |
74 |
|
|
ensemble average of $A$ as presented in |
75 |
|
|
Sec.~\ref{introSec:statThermo}. Because $A$ is independent of |
76 |
|
|
momentum, the momenta contribution of the integral can be factored |
77 |
|
|
out, leaving the configurational integral. Application of the brute |
78 |
|
|
force method to this system would yield highly inefficient |
79 |
|
|
results. Due to the Boltzman weighting of this integral, most random |
80 |
|
|
configurations will have a near zero contribution to the ensemble |
81 |
|
|
average. This is where a importance sampling comes into |
82 |
|
|
play.\cite{allen87:csl} |
83 |
mmeineke |
914 |
|
84 |
mmeineke |
955 |
Importance Sampling is a method where one selects a distribution from |
85 |
|
|
which the random configurations are chosen in order to more |
86 |
|
|
efficiently calculate the integral.\cite{Frenkel1996} Consider again |
87 |
|
|
Eq.~\ref{eq:MCex1} rewritten to be: |
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
mmeineke |
914 |
\subsection{\label{introSec:md}Molecular Dynamics Simulations} |
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
time averages |
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
time integrating schemes |
96 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
time reversible |
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
symplectic methods |
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Extended ensembles (NVT NPT) |
102 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
constrained dynamics |
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
\section{\label{introSec:chapterLayout}Chapter Layout} |
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
\subsection{\label{introSec:RSA}Random Sequential Adsorption} |
108 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
\subsection{\label{introSec:OOPSE}The OOPSE Simulation Package} |
110 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
\subsection{\label{introSec:bilayers}A Mesoscale Model for Phospholipid Bilayers} |