ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mattDisertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mattDisertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 980 by mmeineke, Sat Jan 24 03:09:15 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1001 by mmeineke, Sat Jan 31 22:10:21 2004 UTC

# Line 30 | Line 30 | which method best suits that objective.
30   thermodynamic properties of the system are being probed, then chose
31   which method best suits that objective.
32  
33 < \subsection{\label{introSec:statThermo}Statistical Thermodynamics}
33 > \subsection{\label{introSec:statThermo}Statistical Mechanics}
34  
35 < ergodic hypothesis
35 > The following section serves as a brief introduction to some of the
36 > Statistical Mechanics concepts present in this dissertation.  What
37 > follows is a brief derivation of Blotzman weighted statistics, and an
38 > explanation of how one can use the information to calculate an
39 > observable for a system.  This section then concludes with a brief
40 > discussion of the ergodic hypothesis and its relevance to this
41 > research.
42  
43 < enesemble averages
43 > \subsection{\label{introSec:boltzman}Boltzman weighted statistics}
44 >
45 > Consider a system, $\gamma$, with some total energy,, $E_{\gamma}$.
46 > Let $\Omega(E_{gamma})$ represent the number of degenerate ways
47 > $\boldsymbol{\Gamma}$, the collection of positions and conjugate
48 > momenta of system $\gamma$, can be configured to give
49 > $E_{\gamma}$. Further, if $\gamma$ is in contact with a bath system
50 > where energy is exchanged between the two systems, $\Omega(E)$, where
51 > $E$ is the total energy of both systems, can be represented as
52 > \begin{equation}
53 > eq here
54 > \label{introEq:SM1}
55 > \end{equation}
56 > Or additively as
57 > \begin{equation}
58 > eq here
59 > \label{introEq:SM2}
60 > \end{equation}
61 >
62 > The solution to Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM2} maximizes the number of
63 > degenerative configurations in $E$. \cite{fix}
64 > This gives
65 > \begin{equation}
66 > eq here
67 > \label{introEq:SM3}
68 > \end{equation}
69 > Where $E_{\text{bath}}$ is $E-E_{\gamma}$, and
70 > $\frac{partialE_{\text{bath}}}{\partial E_{\gamma}}$ is
71 > $-1$. Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM3} becomes
72 > \begin{equation}
73 > eq here
74 > \label{introEq:SM4}
75 > \end{equation}
76 >
77 > At this point, one can draw a relationship between the maximization of
78 > degeneracy in Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM3} and the second law of
79 > thermodynamics.  Namely, that for a closed system, entropy wil
80 > increase for an irreversible process.\cite{fix} Here the
81 > process is the partitioning of energy among the two systems.  This
82 > allows the following definition of entropy:
83 > \begin{equation}
84 > eq here
85 > \label{introEq:SM5}
86 > \end{equation}
87 > Where $k_B$ is the Boltzman constant.  Having defined entropy, one can
88 > also define the temperature of the system using the relation
89 > \begin{equation}
90 > eq here
91 > \label{introEq:SM6}
92 > \end{equation}
93 > The temperature in the system $\gamma$ is then
94 > \begin{equation}
95 > eq here
96 > \label{introEq:SM7}
97 > \end{equation}
98 > Applying this to Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM4} gives the following
99 > \begin{equation}
100 > eq here
101 > \label{introEq:SM8}
102 > \end{equation}
103 > Showing that the partitioning of energy between the two systems is
104 > actually a process of thermal equilibration. \cite{fix}
105 >
106 > An application of these results is to formulate the form of an
107 > expectation value of an observable, $A$, in the canonical ensemble. In
108 > the canonical ensemble, the number of particles, $N$, the volume, $V$,
109 > and the temperature, $T$, are all held constant while the energy, $E$,
110 > is allowed to fluctuate. Returning to the previous example, the bath
111 > system is now an infinitly large thermal bath, whose exchange of
112 > energy with the system $\gamma$ holds teh temperature constant.  The
113 > partitioning of energy in the bath system is then related to the total
114 > energy of both systems and the fluctuations in $E_{\gamma}}$:
115 > \begin{equation}
116 > eq here
117 > \label{introEq:SM9}
118 > \end{equation}
119 > As for the expectation value, it can be defined
120 > \begin{equation}
121 > eq here
122 > \label{introEq:SM10}
123 > \end{eequation}
124 > Where $\int_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}} d\Boldsymbol{\Gamma}$ denotes an
125 > integration over all accessable phase space, $P_{\gamma}$ is the
126 > probability of being in a given phase state and
127 > $A(\boldsymbol{\Gamma})$ is some observable that is a function of the
128 > phase state.
129 >
130 > Because entropy seeks to maximize the number of degenerate states at a
131 > given energy, the probability of being in a particular state in
132 > $\gamma$ will be directly proportional to the number of allowable
133 > states the coupled system is able to assume. Namely,
134 > \begin{equation}
135 > eq here
136 > \label{introEq:SM11}
137 > \end{equation}
138 > With $E_{\gamma} \lE$, $\ln \Omega$ can be expanded in a Taylor series:
139 > \begin{equation}
140 > eq here
141 > \label{introEq:SM12}
142 > \end{equation}
143 > Higher order terms are omitted as $E$ is an infinite thermal
144 > bath. Further, using Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM7}, Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM11} can
145 > be rewritten:
146 > \begin{equation}
147 > eq here
148 > \label{introEq:SM13}
149 > \end{equation}
150 > Where $\ln \Omega(E)$ has been factored out of the porpotionality as a
151 > constant.  Normalizing the probability ($\int_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}}
152 > d\boldsymbol{\Gamma} P_{\gamma} =1$ gives
153 > \begin{equation}
154 > eq here
155 > \label{introEq:SM14}
156 > \end{equation}
157 > This result is the standard Boltzman statistical distribution.
158 > Applying it to Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM10} one can obtain the following relation for ensemble averages:
159 > \begin{equation}
160 > eq here
161 > \label{introEq:SM15}
162 > \end{equation}
163 >
164 > \subsection{\label{introSec:ergodic}The Ergodic Hypothesis}
165 >
166 > One last important consideration is that of ergodicity. Ergodicity is
167 > the assumption that given an infinite amount of time, a system will
168 > visit every available point in phase space.\cite{fix} For most
169 > systems, this is a valid assumption, except in cases where the system
170 > may be trapped in a local feature (\emph{i.~e.~glasses}). When valid,
171 > ergodicity allows the unification of a time averaged observation and
172 > an ensemble averged one. If an observation is averaged over a
173 > sufficiently long time, the system is assumed to visit all
174 > appropriately available points in phase space, giving a properly
175 > weighted statistical average. This allows the researcher freedom of
176 > choice when deciding how best to measure a given observable.  When an
177 > ensemble averaged approach seems most logical, the Monte Carlo
178 > techniques described in Sec.~\ref{introSec:MC} can be utilized.
179 > Conversely, if a problem lends itself to a time averaging approach,
180 > the Molecular Dynamics techniques in Sec.~\ref{introSec:MD} can be
181 > employed.
182  
183   \subsection{\label{introSec:monteCarlo}Monte Carlo Simulations}
184  
# Line 243 | Line 387 | researcher is interested.  If the observabvles depend
387  
388   The choice of when to use molecular dynamics over Monte Carlo
389   techniques, is normally decided by the observables in which the
390 < researcher is interested.  If the observabvles depend on momenta in
390 > researcher is interested.  If the observables depend on momenta in
391   any fashion, then the only choice is molecular dynamics in some form.
392   However, when the observable is dependent only on the configuration,
393   then most of the time Monte Carlo techniques will be more efficent.
# Line 306 | Line 450 | the surface. \cite{fix} For a cubic system of 1000 par
450  
451   Another consideration one must resolve, is that in a given simulation
452   a disproportionate number of the particles will feel the effects of
453 < the surface. \cite{fix} For a cubic system of 1000 particles arranged
453 > the surface.\cite{fix} For a cubic system of 1000 particles arranged
454   in a $10x10x10$ cube, 488 particles will be exposed to the surface.
455   Unless one is simulating an isolated particle group in a vacuum, the
456   behavior of the system will be far from the desired bulk
457   charecteristics.  To offset this, simulations employ the use of
458 < periodic boundary images. \cite{fix}
458 > periodic boundary images.\cite{fix}
459  
460   The technique involves the use of an algorithm that replicates the
461   simulation box on an infinite lattice in cartesian space.  Any given
# Line 329 | Line 473 | calculation. \cite{fix} In a simultation with periodic
473   cutoff radius be employed.  Using a cutoff radius improves the
474   efficiency of the force evaluation, as particles farther than a
475   predetermined distance, $fix$, are not included in the
476 < calculation. \cite{fix} In a simultation with periodic images, $fix$
476 > calculation.\cite{fix} In a simultation with periodic images, $fix$
477   has a maximum value of $fix$.  Fig.~\ref{fix} illustrates how using an
478   $fix$ larger than this value, or in the extreme limit of no $fix$ at
479   all, the corners of the simulation box are unequally weighted due to
# Line 383 | Line 527 | with a velocity reformulation of teh Verlet method. \c
527   order of $\Delta t^4$.
528  
529   In practice, however, the simulations in this research were integrated
530 < with a velocity reformulation of teh Verlet method. \cite{allen87:csl}
530 > with a velocity reformulation of teh Verlet method.\cite{allen87:csl}
531   \begin{equation}
532   eq here
533   \label{introEq:MDvelVerletPos}
# Line 406 | Line 550 | It can be shown, \cite{Frenkel1996} that although the
550   therefore increases, but does not guarantee the ``correctness'' or the
551   integrated trajectory.
552  
553 < It can be shown, \cite{Frenkel1996} that although the Verlet algorithm
553 > It can be shown,\cite{Frenkel1996} that although the Verlet algorithm
554   does not rigorously preserve the actual Hamiltonian, it does preserve
555   a pseudo-Hamiltonian which shadows the real one in phase space.  This
556   pseudo-Hamiltonian is proveably area-conserving as well as time
# Line 572 | Line 716 | symplectic and time reversible.
716   unitary and symplectic, the entire integration scheme is also
717   symplectic and time reversible.
718  
719 < \section{\label{introSec:chapterLayout}Chapter Layout}
719 > \section{\label{introSec:layout}Dissertation Layout}
720  
721 < \subsection{\label{introSec:RSA}Random Sequential Adsorption}
721 > This dissertation is divided as follows:Chapt.~\ref{chapt:RSA}
722 > presents the random sequential adsorption simulations of related
723 > pthalocyanines on a gold (111) surface. Chapt.~\ref{chapt:OOPSE}
724 > is about the writing of the molecular dynamics simulation package
725 > {\sc oopse}, Chapt.~\ref{chapt:lipid} regards the simulations of
726 > phospholipid bilayers using a mesoscale model, and lastly,
727 > Chapt.~\ref{chapt:conclusion} concludes this dissertation with a
728 > summary of all results. The chapters are arranged in chronological
729 > order, and reflect the progression of techniques I employed during my
730 > research.  
731  
732 < \subsection{\label{introSec:OOPSE}The OOPSE Simulation Package}
732 > The chapter concerning random sequential adsorption
733 > simulations is a study in applying the principles of theoretical
734 > research in order to obtain a simple model capaable of explaining the
735 > results.  My advisor, Dr. Gezelter, and I were approached by a
736 > colleague, Dr. Lieberman, about possible explanations for partial
737 > coverge of a gold surface by a particular compound of hers. We
738 > suggested it might be due to the statistical packing fraction of disks
739 > on a plane, and set about to simulate this system.  As the events in
740 > our model were not dynamic in nature, a Monte Carlo method was
741 > emplyed.  Here, if a molecule landed on the surface without
742 > overlapping another, then its landing was accepted.  However, if there
743 > was overlap, the landing we rejected and a new random landing location
744 > was chosen.  This defined our acceptance rules and allowed us to
745 > construct a Markov chain whose limiting distribution was the surface
746 > coverage in which we were interested.
747  
748 < \subsection{\label{introSec:bilayers}A Mesoscale Model for
749 < Phospholipid Bilayers}
748 > The following chapter, about the simulation package {\sc oopse},
749 > describes in detail the large body of scientific code that had to be
750 > written in order to study phospholipid bilayer.  Although there are
751 > pre-existing molecular dynamic simulation packages available, none
752 > were capable of implementing the models we were developing.{\sc oopse}
753 > is a unique package capable of not only integrating the equations of
754 > motion in cartesian space, but is also able to integrate the
755 > rotational motion of rigid bodies and dipoles.  Add to this the
756 > ability to perform calculations across parallel processors and a
757 > flexible script syntax for creating systems, and {\sc oopse} becomes a
758 > very powerful scientific instrument for the exploration of our model.
759 >
760 > Bringing us to Chapt.~\ref{chapt:lipid}. Using {\sc oopse}, I have been
761 > able to parametrize a mesoscale model for phospholipid simulations.
762 > This model retains information about solvent ordering about the
763 > bilayer, as well as information regarding the interaction of the
764 > phospholipid head groups' dipole with each other and the surrounding
765 > solvent.  These simulations give us insight into the dynamic events
766 > that lead to the formation of phospholipid bilayers, as well as
767 > provide the foundation for future exploration of bilayer phase
768 > behavior with this model.  
769 >
770 > Which leads into the last chapter, where I discuss future directions
771 > for both{\sc oopse} and this mesoscale model.  Additionally, I will
772 > give a summary of results for this dissertation.
773 >
774 >

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines