ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mattDisertation/lipid.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mattDisertation/lipid.tex (file contents):
Revision 1061 by mmeineke, Fri Feb 20 17:52:57 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1087 by mmeineke, Fri Mar 5 22:16:34 2004 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4 | In the past 10 years, computer speeds have allowed for
4  
5   \section{\label{lipidSec:Intro}Introduction}
6  
7 < In the past 10 years, computer speeds have allowed for the atomistic
8 < simulation of phospholipid bilayers.  These simulations have ranged
9 < from simulation of the gel phase ($L_{\beta}$) of
7 > In the past 10 years, increasing computer speeds have allowed for the
8 > atomistic simulation of phospholipid bilayers for increasingly
9 > relevant lengths of time.  These simulations have ranged from
10 > simulation of the gel phase ($L_{\beta}$) of
11   dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC),\cite{lindahl00} to the
12   spontaneous aggregation of DPPC molecules into fluid phase
13   ($L_{\alpha}$) bilayers.\cite{marrink01} With the exception of a few
14   ambitious
15   simulations,\cite{marrink01:undulation,marrink:2002,lindahl00} most
16 < investigations are limited to 64 to 256
16 > investigations are limited to a range of 64 to 256
17   phospholipids.\cite{lindahl00,sum:2003,venable00,gomez:2003,smondyrev:1999,marrink01}
18 < This is due to the expense of the computer calculations involved when
19 < performing these simulations.  To properly hydrate a bilayer, one
18 > The expense of the force calculations involved when performing these
19 > simulations limits the system size. To properly hydrate a bilayer, one
20   typically needs 25 water molecules for every lipid, bringing the total
21   number of atoms simulated to roughly 8,000 for a system of 64 DPPC
22   molecules. Added to the difficulty is the electrostatic nature of the
23 < phospholipid head groups and water, requiring the computationally
24 < expensive Ewald sum or its slightly faster derivative particle mesh
25 < Ewald sum.\cite{nina:2002,norberg:2000,patra:2003} These factors all
26 < limit the potential size and time lengths of bilayer simulations.
23 > phospholipid head groups and water, requiring either the
24 > computationally expensive Ewald sum or the faster, particle mesh Ewald
25 > sum.\cite{nina:2002,norberg:2000,patra:2003} These factors all limit
26 > the system size and time scales of bilayer simulations.
27  
28   Unfortunately, much of biological interest happens on time and length
29 < scales infeasible with current simulation. One such example is the
30 < observance of a ripple phase ($P_{\beta^{\prime}}$) between the
31 < $L_{\beta}$ and $L_{\alpha}$ phases of certain phospholipid
32 < bilayers.\cite{katsaras00,sengupta00} These ripples are shown to
33 < have periodicity on the order of 100-200~$\mbox{\AA}$. A simulation on
34 < this length scale would have approximately 1,300 lipid molecules with
35 < an additional 25 water molecules per lipid to fully solvate the
36 < bilayer. A simulation of this size is impractical with current
37 < atomistic models.
29 > scales well beyond the range of current simulation technology. One
30 > such example is the observance of a ripple phase
31 > ($P_{\beta^{\prime}}$) between the $L_{\beta}$ and $L_{\alpha}$ phases
32 > of certain phospholipid bilayers.\cite{katsaras00,sengupta00} These
33 > ripples are shown to have periodicity on the order of
34 > 100-200~$\mbox{\AA}$. A simulation on this length scale would have
35 > approximately 1,300 lipid molecules with an additional 25 water
36 > molecules per lipid to fully solvate the bilayer. A simulation of this
37 > size is impractical with current atomistic models.
38  
39 < Another class of simulations to consider, are those dealing with the
40 < diffusion of molecules through a bilayer.  Due to the fluid-like
41 < properties of a lipid membrane, not all diffusion across the membrane
42 < happens at pores.  Some molecules of interest may incorporate
43 < themselves directly into the membrane.  Once here, they may possess an
44 < appreciable waiting time (on the order of 10's to 100's of
45 < nanoseconds) within the bilayer. Such long simulation times are
46 < difficulty to obtain when integrating the system with atomistic
46 < detail.
39 > The time and length scale limitations are most striking in transport
40 > phenomena.  Due to the fluid-like properties of a lipid membrane, not
41 > all diffusion across the membrane happens at pores.  Some molecules of
42 > interest may incorporate themselves directly into the membrane.  Once
43 > here, they may possess an appreciable waiting time (on the order of
44 > 10's to 100's of nanoseconds) within the bilayer. Such long simulation
45 > times are nearly impossible to obtain when integrating the system with
46 > atomistic detail.
47  
48 < Addressing these issues, several schemes have been proposed.  One
48 > To address these issues, several schemes have been proposed.  One
49   approach by Goetz and Liposky\cite{goetz98} is to model the entire
50   system as Lennard-Jones spheres. Phospholipids are represented by
51   chains of beads with the top most beads identified as the head
# Line 68 | Line 68 | than Coulombic ($\frac{1}{r^3}$ versus $\frac{1}{r}$),
68   interactions small.  What sets this model apart, however, is the use
69   of dipoles to represent the electrostatic nature of the
70   phospholipids. The dipole electrostatic interaction is shorter range
71 < than Coulombic ($\frac{1}{r^3}$ versus $\frac{1}{r}$), eliminating the
72 < need for a costly Ewald sum.  
71 > than Coulombic ($\frac{1}{r^3}$ versus $\frac{1}{r}$), and eliminates
72 > the need for a costly Ewald sum.
73  
74   Another key feature of this model, is the use of a dipolar water model
75   to represent the solvent. The soft sticky dipole ({\sc ssd}) water
# Line 77 | Line 77 | deformation around a non-polar entity, \emph{i.e.}~the
77   effects, but also contains a short range correction for hydrogen
78   bonding. In this way the systems in this research mimic the entropic
79   contribution to the hydrophobic effect due to hydrogen-bond network
80 < deformation around a non-polar entity, \emph{i.e.}~the phospholipid.
80 > deformation around a non-polar entity, \emph{i.e.}~the phospholipid
81 > molecules.
82  
83   The following is an outline of this chapter.
84 < Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Methods} is an introduction to the lipid model
85 < used in these simulations.  As well as clarification about the water
86 < model and integration techniques.  The various simulation setups
87 < explored in this research are outlined in
88 < Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:ExpSetup}. Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Results} and
89 < Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Discussion} give a summary of the results and
90 < interpretation of those results respectively.  Finally, the
90 < conclusions of this chapter are presented in
91 < Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Conclusion}.
84 > Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Methods} is an introduction to the lipid model used
85 > in these simulations, as well as clarification about the water model
86 > and integration techniques. The various simulations explored in this
87 > research are outlined in
88 > Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:ExpSetup}. Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:resultsDis} gives a
89 > summary and interpretation of the results.  Finally, the conclusions
90 > of this chapter are presented in Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Conclusion}.
91  
92   \section{\label{lipidSec:Methods}Methods}
93  
# Line 109 | Line 108 | modeled by unified atom beads.  They are free of parti
108   contains a single dipole of magnitude $|\boldsymbol{\mu}|$, where
109   $|\boldsymbol{\mu}|$ can be varied to mimic the charge separation of a
110   given phospholipid head group.  The atoms of the tail region are
111 < modeled by unified atom beads.  They are free of partial charges or
112 < dipoles, containing only Lennard-Jones interaction sites at their
113 < centers of mass.  As with the head groups, their potentials can be
114 < scaled by $\sigma_{\text{tail}}$ and $\epsilon_{\text{tail}}$.
111 > modeled by beads representing multiple methyl groups.  They are free
112 > of partial charges or dipoles, and contain only Lennard-Jones
113 > interaction sites at their centers of mass.  As with the head groups,
114 > their potentials can be scaled by $\sigma_{\text{tail}}$ and
115 > $\epsilon_{\text{tail}}$.
116  
117   The long range interactions between lipids are given by the following:
118   \begin{equation}
# Line 129 | Line 129 | V_{\text{dipole}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_
129          \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) = \frac{|\mu_i||\mu_j|}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r_{ij}^{3}} \biggl[
130          \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{j}
131          -
132 <        \frac{3(\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) %
133 <                (\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_j \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) }
134 <                {r^{2}_{ij}} \biggr]
132 >        3(\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{ij}) %
133 >                (\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_j \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{ij} \biggr]
134   \label{lipidEq:dipolePot}
135   \end{equation}
136   Where $V_{\text{LJ}}$ is the Lennard-Jones potential and
# Line 140 | Line 139 | bead$i$ and pointing towards bead $j$.  Vectors $\math
139   parameters which scale the length and depth of the interaction
140   respectively, and $r_{ij}$ is the distance between beads $i$ and $j$.
141   In $V_{\text{dipole}}$, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is the vector starting at
142 < bead$i$ and pointing towards bead $j$.  Vectors $\mathbf{\Omega}_i$
142 > bead $i$ and pointing towards bead $j$.  Vectors $\mathbf{\Omega}_i$
143   and $\mathbf{\Omega}_j$ are the orientational degrees of freedom for
144   beads $i$ and $j$.  $|\mu_i|$ is the magnitude of the dipole moment of
145   $i$, and $\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i$ is the standard unit orientation
146 < vector of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$.
146 > vector rotated with Euler angles: $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$.
147  
148   The model also allows for the bonded interactions bends, and torsions.
149   The bond between two beads on a chain is of fixed length, and is
# Line 159 | Line 158 | $theta$ is now the angle the dipole makes with respect
158   (Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}). In addition, we have placed a
159   ``ghost'' bend on the phospholipid head. The ghost bend adds a
160   potential to keep the dipole pointed along the bilayer surface, where
161 < $theta$ is now the angle the dipole makes with respect to the {\sc
162 < head}-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ bond vector. The torsion potential is given
163 < by:
161 > $\theta$ is now the angle the dipole makes with respect to the {\sc
162 > head}-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ bond vector
163 > (Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:ghostBend}). The torsion potential is given by:
164   \begin{equation}
165   V_{\text{torsion}}(\phi) =  
166          k_3 \cos^3 \phi + k_2 \cos^2 \phi + k_1 \cos \phi + k_0
# Line 175 | Line 174 | All simulations presented here use a two chained lipid
174   same bond, bend, or torsion.  However, internal interactions not
175   directly involved in a bonded pair are calculated.
176  
177 + \begin{figure}
178 + \centering
179 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ghostBendFig.eps}
180 + \caption[Depiction of the ``ghost'' bend]{The ``ghost'' bend is a bend potential added to constrain the motion of the dipole on the {\sc head} group. The potential follows Eq.~\ref{lipidEq:bendPot} where $\theta$ is now the angle that the dipole makes with the {\sc head}-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ bond vector.}
181 + \label{lipidFig:ghostBend}
182 + \end{figure}
183 +
184   All simulations presented here use a two chained lipid as pictured in
185   Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}.  The chains are both eight beads long,
186   and their mass and Lennard Jones parameters are summarized in
# Line 237 | Line 243 | Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:Ensembles}.
243   performed in an orthorhombic periodic box with a thermostat on
244   velocities, and an independent barostat on each Cartesian axis $x$,
245   $y$, and $z$.  This is the $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$. ensemble described in
246 < Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:Ensembles}.
246 > Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:integrate}.
247  
248  
249   \subsection{\label{lipidSec:ExpSetup}Experimental Setup}
# Line 259 | Line 265 | waters desired to solvate each lipid, and a fudge fact
265   estimate for the number of waters each lipid would displace in a
266   simulation box. A target number of waters was then defined which
267   included the number of waters each lipid would displace, the number of
268 < waters desired to solvate each lipid, and a fudge factor to pad the
269 < initialization.
268 > waters desired to solvate each lipid, and a factor to pad the
269 > initial box with a few extra water molecules.
270  
271   Next, a cubic simulation box was created that contained at least the
272   target number of waters in an FCC lattice (the lattice was for ease of
273   placement).  What followed was a RSA simulation similar to those of
274   Chapt.~\ref{chapt:RSA}. The lipids were sequentially given a random
275   position and orientation within the box.  If a lipid's position caused
276 < atomic overlap with any previously adsorbed lipid, its position and
277 < orientation were rejected, and a new random adsorption site was
276 > atomic overlap with any previously placed lipid, its position and
277 > orientation were rejected, and a new random placement site was
278   attempted. The RSA simulation proceeded until all phospholipids had
279 < been adsorbed.  After adsorption, all water molecules with locations
280 < that overlapped with the atomic coordinates of the lipids were
281 < removed.
279 > been adsorbed.  After placement of all lipid molecules, water
280 > molecules with locations that overlapped with the atomic coordinates
281 > of the lipids were removed.
282  
283 < Finally, water molecules were removed one by one at random until the
284 < desired number of waters per lipid was reached.  The typical low final
285 < density for these initial configurations was not a problem, as the box
286 < would shrink to an appropriate size within the first 50~ps of a
287 < simulation in the $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$ ensemble.
283 > Finally, water molecules were removed at random until the desired
284 > number of waters per lipid was reached.  The typical low final density
285 > for these initial configurations was not a problem, as the box shrinks
286 > to an appropriate size within the first 50~ps of a simulation in the
287 > $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$ ensemble.
288  
289 < \subsection{\label{lipidSec:Configs}The simulation configurations}
289 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:Configs}Configurations}
290  
291 < Table ~\ref{lipidTable:simNames} summarizes the names and important
292 < details of the simulations.  The B set of simulations were all started
293 < in an ordered bilayer and observed over a period of 10~ns. Simulation
294 < RL was integrated for approximately 20~ns starting from a random
295 < configuration as an example of spontaneous bilayer aggregation.
296 < Lastly, simulation RH was also started from a random configuration,
297 < but with a lesser water content and higher temperature to show the
298 < spontaneous aggregation of an inverted hexagonal lamellar phase.
291 > The first class of simulations were started from ordered
292 > bilayers. They were all configurations consisting of 60 lipid
293 > molecules with 30 lipids on each leaf, and were hydrated with 1620
294 > {\sc ssd} molecules. The original configuration was assembled
295 > according to Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:ExpSetup} and simulated for a length
296 > of 10~ns at 300~K. The other temperature runs were started from a
297 > frame 7~ns into the 300~K simulation. Their temperatures were reset
298 > with the thermostating algorithm in the $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$
299 > integrator. All of the temperature variants were also run for 10~ns,
300 > with only the last 5~ns being used for accumulation of statistics.
301 >
302 > The second class of simulations were two configurations started from
303 > randomly dispersed lipids in a ``gas'' of water. The first
304 > ($\text{R}_{\text{I}}$) was a simulation containing 72 lipids with
305 > 1800 {\sc ssd} molecules simulated at 300~K. The second
306 > ($\text{R}_{\text{II}}$) was 90 lipids with 1350 {\sc ssd} molecules
307 > simulated at 350~K. Both simulations were integrated for more than
308 > 20~ns, and illustrate the spontaneous aggregation of the lipid model
309 > into phospholipid macro-structures: $\text{R}_{\text{I}}$ into a
310 > bilayer, and $\text{R}_{\text{II}}$ into a inverted rod.
311 >
312 > \section{\label{lipidSec:resultsDis}Results and Discussion}
313 >
314 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:diffusion}Lateral Diffusion Constants}
315 >
316 > The lateral diffusion constant, $D_L$, is the constant characterizing
317 > the diffusive motion of the lipid within the plane of the bilayer. It
318 > is given by the following Einstein relation valid at long
319 > times:\cite{allen87:csl}
320 > \begin{equation}
321 > 2tD_L = \frac{1}{2}\langle |\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)|^2\rangle
322 > \end{equation}
323 > Where $\mathbf{r}(t)$ is the position of the lipid at time $t$, and is
324 > constrained to lie within a plane. For the bilayer simulations the
325 > plane of constrained motion was that perpendicular to the bilayer
326 > normal, namely the $xy$-plane.
327 >
328 > Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:diffusionFig} shows the lateral diffusion constants
329 > as a function of temperature. There is a definite increase in the
330 > lateral diffusion with higher temperatures, which is exactly what one
331 > would expect with greater fluidity of the chains. However, the
332 > diffusion constants are all two orders of magnitude smaller than those
333 > typical of DPPC.\cite{Cevc87} This is counter-intuitive as the DPPC
334 > molecule is sterically larger and heavier than our model. This could
335 > be an indication that our model's chains are too interwoven and hinder
336 > the motion of the lipid, or that a simplification in the model's
337 > forces has led to a slowing of diffusive behavior within the
338 > bilayer. In contrast, the diffusion constant of the {\sc ssd} water,
339 > $9.84\times 10^{-6}\,\text{cm}^2/\text{s}$, compares favorably with
340 > that of bulk water ($2.2999\times
341 > 10^{-5}\,\text{cm}^2/\text{s}$\cite{Holz00}).
342 >
343 > \begin{figure}
344 > \centering
345 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{diffusionFig.eps}
346 > \caption[The lateral diffusion constants versus temperature]{The lateral diffusion constants for the bilayers as a function of temperature.}
347 > \label{lipidFig:diffusionFig}
348 > \end{figure}
349 >
350 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:densProf}Density Profile}
351 >
352 > Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:densityProfile} illustrates the densities of the
353 > atoms in the bilayer systems normalized by the bulk density as a
354 > function of distance from the center of the box. The profile is taken
355 > along the bilayer normal, in this case the $z$ axis. The profile at
356 > 270~K shows several structural features that are largely smoothed out
357 > by 300~K. The left peak for the {\sc head} atoms is split at 270~K,
358 > implying that some freezing of the structure might already be occurring
359 > at this temperature. From the dynamics, the tails at this temperature
360 > are very much fluid, but the profile could indicate that a phase
361 > transition may simply be beyond the length scale of the current
362 > simulation. In all profiles, the water penetrates almost
363 > 5~$\mbox{\AA}$ into the bilayer, completely solvating the {\sc head}
364 > atoms. The $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$ atoms although mainly centered at the
365 > middle of the bilayer, show appreciable penetration into the head
366 > group region. This indicates that the chains have enough mobility to
367 > bend back upward to allow the ends to explore areas around the {\sc
368 > head} atoms. It is unlikely that this is penetration from a lipid of
369 > the opposite face, as the lipids are only 12~$\mbox{\AA}$ in length,
370 > and the typical leaf spacing as measured from the {\sc head-head}
371 > spacing in the profile is 17.5~$\mbox{\AA}$.
372 >
373 > \begin{figure}
374 > \centering
375 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{densityProfile.eps}
376 > \caption[The density profile of the lipid bilayers]{The density profile of the lipid bilayers along the bilayer normal. The black lines are the {\sc head} atoms, red lines are the {\sc ch} atoms, green lines are the $\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ atoms, blue lines are the $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$ atoms, and the magenta lines are the {\sc ssd} atoms.}
377 > \label{lipidFig:densityProfile}
378 > \end{figure}
379 >
380 >
381 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:scd}$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ Order Parameters}
382 >
383 > The $\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order parameter is often reported in
384 > the experimental characterizations of phospholipids. It is obtained
385 > through deuterium NMR, and measures the ordering of the carbon
386 > deuterium bond in relation to the bilayer normal at various points
387 > along the chains. In our model, there are no explicit hydrogens, but
388 > the order parameter can be written in terms of the carbon ordering at
389 > each point in the chain:\cite{egberts88}
390 > \begin{equation}
391 > S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}  = \frac{2}{3}S_{xx} + \frac{1}{3}S_{yy}
392 > \label{lipidEq:scd1}
393 > \end{equation}
394 > Where $S_{ij}$ is given by:
395 > \begin{equation}
396 > S_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}\Bigl\langle(3\cos\Theta_i\cos\Theta_j
397 >        - \delta_{ij})\Bigr\rangle
398 > \label{lipidEq:scd2}
399 > \end{equation}
400 > Here, $\Theta_i$ is the angle the $i$th axis in the reference frame of
401 > the carbon atom makes with the bilayer normal. The brackets denote an
402 > average over time and molecules. The carbon atom axes are defined:
403 > $\mathbf{\hat{z}}\rightarrow$ vector from $C_{n-1}$ to $C_{n+1}$;
404 > $\mathbf{\hat{y}}\rightarrow$ vector that is perpendicular to $z$ and
405 > in the plane through $C_{n-1}$, $C_{n}$, and $C_{n+1}$;
406 > $\mathbf{\hat{x}}\rightarrow$ vector perpendicular to
407 > $\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ and $\mathbf{\hat{z}}$.
408 >
409 > The order parameter has a range of $[1,-\frac{1}{2}]$. A value of 1
410 > implies full order aligned to the bilayer axis, 0 implies full
411 > disorder, and $-\frac{1}{2}$ implies full order perpendicular to the
412 > bilayer axis. The {\sc cd} bond vector for carbons near the head group
413 > are usually ordered perpendicular to the bilayer normal, with tails
414 > farther away tending toward disorder. This makes the order parameter
415 > negative for most carbons, and as such $|S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}|$ is more
416 > commonly reported than $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$.
417 >
418 > Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:scdFig} shows the $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order
419 > parameters for the bilayer system at 300~K. There is no appreciable
420 > difference in the plots for the various temperatures, however, there
421 > is a larger difference between our models ordering, and that of
422 > DMPC. As our values are closer to $-\frac{1}{2}$, this implies more
423 > ordering perpendicular to the normal than in a real system. This is
424 > due to the model having only one carbon group separating the chains
425 > from the top of the lipid. In DMPC, with the flexibility inherent in a
426 > multiple atom head group, as well as a glycerol linkage between the
427 > head group and the acyl chains, there is more loss of ordering by the
428 > point when the chains start.
429 >
430 > \begin{figure}
431 > \centering
432 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{scdFig.eps}
433 > \caption[$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order parameter for our model]{A comparison of $|\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}|$ between our model (blue) and DMPC\cite{petrache00} (black) near 300~K.}
434 > \label{lipidFig:scdFig}
435 > \end{figure}
436 >
437 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:p2Order}$P_2$ Order Parameter}
438 >
439 > The $P_2$ order parameter allows us to measure the amount of
440 > directional ordering that exists in the bilayer. Each lipid molecule
441 > can be thought of as a cylindrical tube with the head group at the
442 > top. If all of the cylinders are perfectly aligned, the $P_2$ order
443 > parameter will be $1.0$. If the cylinders are completely dispersed,
444 > the $P_2$ order parameter will be 0. For a collection of unit vectors,
445 > the $P_2$ order parameter can be solved via the following
446 > method.\cite{zannoni94}
447 >
448 > Define an ordering matrix $\mathbf{Q}$, such that,
449 > \begin{equation}
450 > \mathbf{Q} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N %
451 >        \begin{pmatrix} %
452 >        u_{ix}u_{ix}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{ix}u_{iy} & u_{ix}u_{iz} \\
453 >        u_{iy}u_{ix} & u_{iy}u_{iy}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{iy}u_{iz} \\
454 >        u_{iz}u_{ix} & u_{iz}u_{iy} & u_{iz}u_{iz}-\frac{1}{3} %
455 >        \end{pmatrix}
456 > \label{lipidEq:po1}
457 > \end{equation}
458 > Where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
459 > $\mathbf{\hat{u}}_i$, and the sum over $i$ averages over the whole
460 > collection of unit vectors. This allows the matrix element
461 > $Q_{\alpha\beta}$ to be written:
462 > \begin{equation}
463 > Q_{\alpha\beta} = \langle u_{\alpha}u_{\beta} -
464 >        \frac{1}{3}\delta_{\alpha\beta} \rangle
465 > \label{lipidEq:po2}
466 > \end{equation}
467 >
468 > Having constructed the matrix, diagonalizing $\mathbf{Q}$ yields three
469 > eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The eigenvector associated with the
470 > largest eigenvalue, $\lambda_{\text{max}}$, is the director for the
471 > system of unit vectors. The director is the average direction all of
472 > the unit vectors are pointing. The $P_2$ order parameter is then
473 > simply
474 > \begin{equation}
475 > \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}
476 > \label{lipidEq:po3}
477 > \end{equation}
478 >
479 > Table~\ref{lipidTab:blSummary} summarizes the $P_2$ values for the
480 > bilayers, as well as the dipole orientations. The unit vector for the
481 > lipid molecules was defined by finding the moment of inertia for each
482 > lipid, then setting $\mathbf{\hat{u}}$ to point along the axis of
483 > minimum inertia. For the {\sc head} atoms, the unit vector simply
484 > pointed in the same direction as the dipole moment. For the lipid
485 > molecules, the ordering was consistent across all temperatures, with
486 > the director pointed along the $z$ axis of the box. More
487 > interestingly, is the high degree of ordering the dipoles impose on
488 > the {\sc head} atoms. The directors for the dipoles consistently
489 > pointed along the plane of the bilayer, with the directors
490 > anti-aligned on the top and bottom leaf.
491 >
492 > \begin{table}
493 > \caption[Structural properties of the bilayers]{Bilayer Structural properties as a function of temperature.}
494 > \label{lipidTab:blSummary}
495 > \begin{center}
496 > \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
497 > \hline
498 > Temperature (K) & $\langle L_{\perp}\rangle$ ($\mbox{\AA}$) & %
499 >        $\langle A_{\parallel}\rangle$ ($\mbox{\AA}^2$) & %
500 >        $\langle P_2\rangle_{\text{Lipid}}$ & %
501 >        $\langle P_2\rangle_{\text{{\sc head}}}$ \\ \hline
502 > 270 & 18.1 & 58.1 & 0.253 & 0.494 \\ \hline
503 > 275 & 17.2 & 56.7 & 0.295 & 0.514 \\ \hline
504 > 277 & 16.9 & 58.0 & 0.301 & 0.541 \\ \hline
505 > 280 & 17.4 & 58.0 & 0.274 & 0.488 \\ \hline
506 > 285 & 16.9 & 57.6 & 0.270 & 0.616 \\ \hline
507 > 290 & 17.0 & 57.6 & 0.263 & 0.534 \\ \hline
508 > 293 & 17.5 & 58.0 & 0.227 & 0.643 \\ \hline
509 > 300 & 16.9 & 57.6 & 0.315 & 0.536 \\ \hline
510 > \end{tabular}
511 > \end{center}
512 > \end{table}
513 >
514 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:miscData}Further Bilayer Data}
515 >
516 > Also summarized in Table~\ref{lipidTab:blSummary}, are the bilayer
517 > thickness and area per lipid. The bilayer thickness was measured from
518 > the peak to peak {\sc head} atom distance in the density profiles. The
519 > area per lipid data compares favorably with values typically seen for
520 > DMPC (60.0~$\mbox{\AA}^2$ at 303~K)\cite{petrache00}. Although are
521 > values are lower this is most likely due to the shorter chain length
522 > of our model (8 versus 14 for DMPC).
523 >
524 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:randBilayer}Bilayer Aggregation}
525 >
526 > A very important accomplishment for our model is its ability to
527 > spontaneously form bilayers from a randomly dispersed starting
528 > configuration. Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:blImage} shows an image sequence for
529 > the bilayer aggregation. After 3.0~ns, the basic form of the bilayer
530 > can already be seen. By 7.0~ns, the bilayer has a lipid bridge
531 > stretched across the simulation box to itself that will turn out to be
532 > very long lived ($\sim$20~ns), as well as a water pore, that will
533 > persist for the length of the current simulation. At 24~ns, the lipid
534 > bridge is dispersed, and the bilayer is still integrating the lipid
535 > molecules from the bridge into itself, and has still been unable to
536 > disperse the water pore.
537 >
538 > \begin{figure}
539 > \centering
540 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bLayerImage.eps}
541 > \caption[Image sequence of the bilayer aggregation]{Image sequence of the bilayer aggregation. The blue beads are the {\sc head} atoms the grey beads are the chains, and the red and white bead are the water molecules. A box has been drawn around the periodic image.}
542 > \label{lipidFig:blImage}
543 > \end{figure}
544 >
545 > \subsection{\label{lipidSec:randIrod}Inverted Rod Aggregation}
546 >
547 > Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:iRimage} shows a second aggregation sequence
548 > simulated in this research. Here the fraction of water had been
549 > significantly decreased to observe how the model would respond. After
550 > 1.5~ns, The main body of water in the system has already collected
551 > into a central water channel. By 10.0~ns, the channel has widened
552 > slightly, but there are still many sub channels permeating the lipid
553 > macro-structure. At 23.0~ns, the central water channel has stabilized
554 > and several smaller water channels have been absorbed to main
555 > one. However, there are still several other channels that persist
556 > through the lipid structure.
557 >
558 > \begin{figure}
559 > \centering
560 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iRodImage.eps}
561 > \caption[Image sequence of the inverted rod aggregation]{Image sequence of the inverted rod aggregation. color scheme is the same as in Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:blImage}.}
562 > \label{lipidFig:iRimage}
563 > \end{figure}
564 >
565 > \section{\label{lipidSec:Conclusion}Conclusion}
566 >
567 > We have presented a phospholipid model capable of spontaneous
568 > aggregation into a bilayer and an inverted rod structure. The time
569 > scales of the macro-molecular aggregations are in excess of 24~ns. In
570 > addition the model's bilayer properties have been explored over a
571 > range of temperatures through prefabricated bilayers. No freezing
572 > transition is seen in the temperature range of our current
573 > simulations. However, structural information from the lowest
574 > temperature may imply that a freezing event is on a much longer time
575 > scale than that explored in this current research. Further studies of
576 > this system could extend the time length of the simulations at the low
577 > temperatures to observe whether lipid crystallization occurs within the
578 > framework of this model.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines