ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/matt_papers/MWTCC03/chuck.tex
Revision: 547
Committed: Wed Jun 4 19:24:02 2003 UTC (21 years ago) by mmeineke
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 21988 byte(s)
Log Message:
updated the logo a little as well as some of the colors

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 mmeineke 544 \documentclass[10pt]{scrartcl}
2     %%
3     %
4     % This is a poster template with latex macros and using
5     % the University of Florida Logo. For further information
6     % on making postscript, resizeing, and printing the poster file
7     % please see web site
8     % http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~pjh/posters/poster_howto_UF.html
9     %
10     % N.B. This format is cribbed from one obtained from the University
11     % of Karlsruhe, so some macro names and parameters are in German
12     % Here is a short glosary:
13     % Breite: width
14     % Hoehe: height
15     % Spalte: column
16     % Kasten: box
17     %
18     % All style files necessary are part of standard TeTeX distribution
19     % On the UF unix cluster you should not need to import these files
20     % specially, as they will be automatically located. If you
21     % run on a local PC however, you will need to locate these files.
22     % At UF try /usr/local/TeTeX...
23     %
24     % P. Hirschfeld 2/11/00
25     %
26     % The recommended procedure is to first generate a ``Special Format" size poster
27     % file, which is relatively easy to manipulate and view. It can be
28     % resized later to A0 (900 x 1100 mm) full poster size, or A4 or Letter size
29     % as desired (see web site). Note the large format printers currently
30     % in use at UF's OIR have max width of about 90cm or 3 ft., but the paper
31     % comes in rolls so the length is variable. See below the specifications
32     % for width and height of various formats. Default in the template is
33     % ``Special Format", with 4 columns.
34     %%
35     %%
36     %% Choose your poster size:
37     %% For printing you will later RESIZE your poster by a factor
38     %% 2*sqrt(2) = 2.828 (for A0)
39     %% 2 = 2.00 (for A1)
40     %%
41     %%
42     \def\breite{452mm} % Gives a 4.1 foot width
43     %%\def\breite{390mm} % Special Format.
44     \def\hoehe{319.2mm} % Scaled by 2.82 this gives 110cm x 90cm
45     \def\anzspalten{5}
46     %%
47     %%\def\breite{420mm} % A3 LANDSCAPE
48     %%\def\hoehe{297mm}
49     %%\def\anzspalten{4}
50     %%
51     %% \def\breite{297mm} % A3 PORTRAIT
52     %% \def\hoehe{420mm}
53     %% \def\anzspalten{3}
54     %%
55     %% \def\breite{210mm} % A4 PORTRAIT
56     %% \def\hoehe{297mm}
57     %% \def\anzspalten{2}
58     %%
59     %%
60     %% Procedure:
61     %% Generate poster.dvi with latex
62     %% Check with Ghostview
63     %% Make a .ps-file with ``dvips -o poster.ps poster''
64     %% Scale it with poster_resize poster.ps S
65     %% where S is scale factor
66     %% for Special Format->A0 S= 2.828 (= 2^(3/2)))
67     %% for Special Format->A1 S= 2 (= 2^(2/2)))
68     %%
69     %% Sizes (European:)
70     %% A3: 29.73 X 42.04 cm
71     %% A1: 59.5 X 84.1 cm
72     %% A0: 84.1 X 118.9 cm
73     %% N.B. The recommended procedure is ``Special Format x 2.82"
74     %% which gives 90cm x 110cm (not quite A0 dimensions).
75     %%
76     %% --------------------------------------------------------------------------
77     %%
78     %% Load the necessary packages
79     %%
80     \usepackage{palatino}
81     \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
82     \usepackage{epsf}
83     \usepackage{graphicx,psfrag,color,pstcol,pst-grad}
84     \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
85     \usepackage{latexsym}
86     \usepackage{calc}
87     \usepackage{multicol}
88    
89     %% My Packages
90     \usepackage{wrapfig}
91    
92     %%
93     %% Define the required numbers, lengths and boxes
94     %%
95     \newsavebox{\dummybox}
96     \newsavebox{\spalten}
97     %\input psfig.sty
98    
99     %%
100     %%
101     \newlength{\bgwidth}\newlength{\bgheight}
102     \setlength\bgheight{\hoehe} \addtolength\bgheight{-1mm}
103     \setlength\bgwidth{\breite} \addtolength\bgwidth{-1mm}
104    
105     \newlength{\kastenwidth}
106    
107     %% Set paper format
108     \setlength\paperheight{\hoehe}
109     \setlength\paperwidth{\breite}
110     \special{papersize=\breite,\hoehe}
111    
112     \topmargin -1in
113     \marginparsep0mm
114     \marginparwidth0mm
115     \headheight0mm
116     \headsep0mm
117    
118    
119     %% Minimal Margins to Make Correct Bounding Box
120     \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-2.44cm}
121     \addtolength{\topmargin}{-3mm}
122     \textwidth\paperwidth
123     \textheight\paperheight
124    
125     %%
126     %%
127     \parindent0cm
128     \parskip1.5ex plus0.5ex minus 0.5ex
129     \pagestyle{empty}
130    
131    
132    
133     \definecolor{ndgold}{rgb}{0.87,0.82,0.59}
134     \definecolor{ndgold2}{rgb}{0.96,0.91,0.63}
135     \definecolor{ndblue}{rgb}{0,0,0.40}
136     \definecolor{recoilcolor}{rgb}{1,0,0}
137     \definecolor{occolor}{rgb}{0,1,0}
138     \definecolor{pink}{rgb}{0,1,1}
139    
140    
141    
142    
143    
144     \def\UberStil{\normalfont\sffamily\bfseries\large}
145     \def\UnterStil{\normalfont\sffamily\small}
146     \def\LabelStil{\normalfont\sffamily\tiny}
147     \def\LegStil{\normalfont\sffamily\tiny}
148    
149     %%
150     %% Define some commands
151     %%
152     \definecolor{JG}{rgb}{0.1,0.9,0.3}
153    
154     \newenvironment{kasten}{%
155     \begin{lrbox}{\dummybox}%
156     \begin{minipage}{0.96\linewidth}}%
157     {\end{minipage}%
158     \end{lrbox}%
159     \raisebox{-\depth}{\psshadowbox[framearc=0.05,framesep=1em]{\usebox{\dummybox}}}\\[0.5em]}
160     \newenvironment{spalte}{%
161     \setlength\kastenwidth{1.2\textwidth}
162     \divide\kastenwidth by \anzspalten
163     \begin{minipage}[t]{\kastenwidth}}{\end{minipage}\hfill}
164    
165     \renewcommand{\emph}[1]{{\color{red}\textbf{#1}}}
166    
167    
168     \def\op#1{\hat{#1}}
169     \begin{document}
170     \bibliographystyle{plain}
171     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
172     %%% Background %%%
173     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
174     {\newrgbcolor{gradbegin}{0.87 0.82 0.59}%
175     \newrgbcolor{gradend}{1 1 1}%{1 1 0.5}%
176     \psframe[fillstyle=gradient,gradend=gradend,%
177     gradbegin=gradbegin,gradmidpoint=0.1](\bgwidth,-\bgheight)}
178     \vfill
179     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
180     %%% Header %%%
181     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
182     \hfill
183     \psshadowbox[fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=ndgold2]{\makebox[0.95\textwidth]{%
184     \hfill
185     \parbox[c]{2cm}{\includegraphics[width=6cm]{nd_mark.eps}}
186     \hfill
187     \parbox[c]{0.8\linewidth}{%
188     \begin{center}
189     \textbf{\Huge {Breathing Mode Dynamics and Elastic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles}}\\[0.5em]
190     \textsc{\LARGE Patrick F. ~Conforti, Megan M. ~Sprague, \underline{Charles F. ~Vardeman~II}, and J. ~Daniel ~Gezelter}\\[0.3em]
191     {\large Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA\\
192     {\tt\ Vardeman.1@nd.edu}
193     }
194     \end{center}}
195     \hfill}}\hfill\mbox{}\\[1.cm]
196     %\vspace*{1.3cm}
197     \begin{lrbox}{\spalten}
198     \parbox[t][\textheight]{1.3\textwidth}{%
199     \vspace*{0.2cm}
200     \hfill
201     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
202     %%% first column %%%
203     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
204     \begin{spalte}
205     \begin{kasten}
206     %
207     %
208     % This begins the first "kasten" or box
209     %
210     %
211     \begin{center}
212     {\large{\color{red} \underline{ABSTRACT} } }
213     \end{center}
214    
215     {\color{ndblue}
216     We present molecular dynamics based calculations of the bulk modulus, heat capacity, and the period of the breathing mode for spherical nanoparticles following excitation by ultrafast laser pulses\cite{Gezelter2003}. The bulk modulus exhibits relatively sharp transitions at both the surface-melting and bulk melting transitions, while the heat capacity shows only a relatively broad transition at the bulk melting temperature. Equilibrium calculations of the heat capacity show that the melting transition is sharper and occurs at a lower temperature than one would observe from an ultrafast experiment\cite{Hartland2003}. We also observe an intriguing splitting in the low-frequency spectra of the nanoparticles and analyze this splitting in terms of Lamb's classical theory of elastic spheres\cite{Lamb1882}. We conclude that the particles either 1) melt during the observation period following laser excitation, or 2) melt an outer shell while maintaining a crystalline core. Both mechanisms for melting are commensurate with our observations.
217     }
218     \end{kasten}
219    
220    
221     \begin{kasten}
222    
223     \begin{center}\psframebox[framearc=0.60,fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=blue]{\makebox[0.99\textwidth]{{{\LARGE 1 \hspace{0.1cm} \color{red} Introduction} }}}\end{center}
224     Nanoparticles exhibit behavior not displayed in bulk because of a relatively high surface area to volume volume ratio.Since the time scale for heating is faster than a single period of the breating mode for spherical nanoparticles, energy due to photons absorbed during ultrafast laser excitation is immediately transfered into thermal excitation of atomic degrees of freedom. This excitation is rapid enough to coherently excite the breathing mode of a spherical nanoparticle. We mimic this excitation using atomistic simulation methods.
225    
226     \end{kasten}
227    
228     \begin{kasten}
229     \section*{2 \hspace{0.1cm} {\color{red} \underline{Simulation Methodology}}}
230     \subsection*{2.1 {\color{blue} Model Construction} }
231     \begin{wrapfigure}[13]{o}{200pt}
232     \includegraphics[scale=0.28]{35K_lattice.eps}
233     \end{wrapfigure}
234     Spherical Au nanoparticles were created in a standard FCC lattice at four different radii [20{\AA} (1926 atoms), 25{\AA} (3884 atoms), 30{\AA} (6602 atoms), and 35{\AA} (10606 atoms)]. To create spherical nanoparticles, a FCC lattice was built at the normal Au lattice spacing (4.08 \AA) and any atoms outside the target radius were excluded.
235     \end{kasten}
236    
237     \begin{kasten}
238 mmeineke 547 \end{spalte}
239     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240     %%% second column %%%
241     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
242     \begin{spalte}
243 mmeineke 544 \subsection*{2.2 {\color{blue} Embedded Atom Method} }
244     Potentials were calculated using the Embedded atom method due to Daw {\it et.al.} \cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97} and mixing rules formulated by Johnson\cite{johnson89}.
245     The {\sc eam} potential has the form:
246     \[
247     V = \sum_{i} F_{i}\left[\rho_{i}\right] + \sum_{i} \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}({\bf r}_{ij})
248     \]
249     where $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction between atoms $i$ and $j$, $F_{i}[\rho_{i}]$ is a embedding function that determines the energy to embedded the positvely-charged core of atom $i$, in a electron density $\rho_{i}$ that is determined by the valence electrons of the surrounding $j$ atoms an has the form:
250     \[
251     \rho_{i} = \sum_{j \neq i} f_{j}({\bf r}_{ij})
252     \]
253     There is a cutoff distance, $r_{cut}$, which limits the summations to the few dozen atoms surrounding atom $i$. In these simulations, a cutoff radius of 10~\AA\ was used.
254    
255    
256     \end{kasten}
257 mmeineke 547
258 mmeineke 544
259    
260    
261    
262     \begin{kasten}
263     \subsection*{2.3 {\color{blue} Simulation Details} }
264     Excitation of Au Nanoparticles were carried out as follows:
265     \begin{enumerate}\itemindent=0.25cm
266     \item A relatively short steepest-decent minimization to relax the lattice.
267     \item Mimic events after ultrafast laser excitation event.
268     \begin{enumerate}\itemindent=0.5cm
269     \item Instantaneous heating by sampling from a Boltzmann Distribution at twice the simulation target temperature. By equipartition, approximately half of the initial kinetic energy disperses into the potential energy of the system.
270     \item A short (10 fs) evolution period with the new velocities.
271     \end{enumerate}
272     \item Evolution in a Cannonical Ensemble using Nos\'{e}-Hoover NVT dynamics at the ta
273     rget temperature for 40 ps.
274     \end{enumerate}
275     \begin{itemize}
276     \item Time intervals of 5 fs were used.
277    
278     \item Target temperatures spanned from 300 K to 1300 K in 100 K intervals.
279     \item Five independent samples were run foreach particle and temperature.
280     \item Simulations were run in parallel using Plimpton's force-decomposition method. \cite{Plimpton93}
281    
282     \end{itemize}
283    
284    
285     \end{kasten}
286    
287     \begin{kasten}
288     \section*{3 \hspace{0.1cm} {\color{red} \underline{Analysis }}}
289     \subsection*{3.1 {\color{blue} Volume Determination}}
290     We are interested in the dynamics of the low-frequency breathing mode of the particles. To study this motion, we need access to accurate measures of both the volume and surface area as a function of time.
291     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{120pt}
292     \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{convex_hull.eps}
293     \end{wrapfigure}
294    
295     \begin{itemize}
296     \item We used the convex hull to determine both volume and surface area as a function of time.
297     \item A convex hull is the smallest convex polyhedron which includes all of the atoms.
298     \item The program qhull was used to compute the convex hull as a function of time.
299     \end{itemize}
300    
301    
302     \end{kasten}
303    
304     \begin{kasten}
305     \subsection*{3.2 {\color{blue} Bulk Modulus}}
306     The bulk modulus, which is the inverse of the compressibility,
307     \[
308     K = \frac{1}{\kappa} = - V \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_{T} = V \left(\frac{\partial^{2} U }{\partial V^{2}}\right)_{T}
309     \]
310     is relatively easily determined when the relationship between the total energy $U$ and volume $V$ of the system are available at a fixed temperature.
311     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{150pt}
312     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{Sample_Ener_vs_Vol_900_35.eps}
313     \end{wrapfigure}
314    
315     Instantaneous heating excites coherent oscillations in the breathing mode allowing us to sample a much wider range of volumes (and energies) then long time equilibrium temperature runs.
316     $K$ was directly calculated for the 30 and 35 \AA\ particles by multiplying the quadratic coefficient obtained from quadratic fits by the average volume of the nanoparticle for the whole run.For the very small particles (20 \AA\ and 25 \AA\ ), the breathing oscillations decohere rapidly, and we were unable to obtain convincing fits.
317    
318     \end{kasten}
319    
320    
321     \end{spalte}
322     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323     %%% third column %%%
324     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325     \begin{spalte}
326    
327     \begin{kasten}
328     \subsection*{3.3 {\color{blue} Bulk Modulus and Heat Capacity }}
329     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{155pt}
330     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{Stacked_bm_cp.eps}
331     \end{wrapfigure}
332     The upper panel shows the temperature dependence of the Bulk Modulus ($K$) for the two larger particles (30 \AA\ and 35 \AA\ ). Notice, there is a dramatic drop in $K$ at temperatures below the bulk melting temperature coinciding with the surface melting transition (the temperature at which the outermost layer of Au atoms are able to move along the surface of the nanoparticle). Note, also, that the peak in $C_p$ coincides with the {\em start} of the peak in the bulk modulus. This indicates that compression of the nanoparticles above $T_{m}$ requires an energetically expensive reformation of the lattice.
333    
334     \end{kasten}
335    
336     \begin{kasten}
337     \subsection*{3.4 {\color{blue} Heat Capacity}}
338     \begin{wrapfigure}[11]{o}{150pt}
339     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{Cp_vs_T.eps}
340     \end{wrapfigure}
341     Another feature of these transient (non-equilibrium) calculations is the width of the peak in the heat capacity. Calculation of $C_{p}$ from longer equilibrium trajectories (300 ps) should indicate {\it sharper} features in $C_{p}$ for the larger particles then those observed in the 40 ps simulation.
342     Since we are initiating and observing the melting process itself in these calculation, the smaller particles melt more rapidly, and thus exhibit sharper features in $C_{p}$.
343    
344    
345     \end{kasten}
346    
347     \begin{kasten}
348     \subsection*{3.5 {\color{blue} Breathing Mode Dynamics}}
349     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{160pt}
350     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{Vol_vs_time.eps}
351     \end{wrapfigure}
352     We present representative samples of the volume vs. time traces for the 20 \AA\ and 35 \AA\ particles at a number of different temperatures. It can be seen that the period of the breathing mode is strongly dependent on temperature, and that the coherent oscillations of the particles' volume are destroyed after only a few ps in the smaller particles, while they live on for 10-20 ps in the larger particles. The de-coherence is also strongly temperature dependent, with the high temperature samples decohering much more rapidly than lower temperatures.
353     \end{kasten}
354    
355     \vspace{0.5cm}
356     \begin{kasten}
357     \subsection*{3.6 {\color{blue} Volume Autocorrelation Function}}
358     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{160pt}
359     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{volcorr.eps}
360     \end{wrapfigure}
361     Although $V$ vs. $t$ traces can say a great deal, computing the autocorrelation function for volume fluctuations gives us more accurate short-time information. Although many traces exhibit a single frequency with decaying amplitude, a number of the samples show distinct beat patterns indicating the presence of multiple frequency components in the breathing motion of the nanoparticles. In particular, the 20 \AA\ particle shows a distinct beat in the volume fluctuations in the 800 K trace.
362    
363     \end{kasten}
364    
365     \end{spalte}
366     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
367     %%% fourth column %%%
368     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
369     \begin{spalte}
370     \begin{kasten}
371     \subsection*{3.7 {\color{blue} Volume Autocorrelation Function}}
372     \begin{wrapfigure}[12]{o}{160pt}
373     \includegraphics[scale=0.30]{Period_vs_T.eps}
374     \end{wrapfigure}
375     The power spectrum of the volume autocorrelation functions does indeed show multiple peaks in the power spectrum. Here we plot the period corresponding to the two lowest frequency peaks. The spectra exhibit a split peak at lower temperatures (which is particularly noticeable in the larger particles). This splitting disappears at intermediate temperatures, but becomes evident again at the higher temperatures.
376    
377     \end{kasten}
378    
379     \vspace{0.5cm}
380     \begin{kasten}
381     \section*{4 \hspace{0.1cm} {\color{red} \underline{Discussion}}}
382     \subsection*{4.1 {\color{blue} Lamb Theory of Elastic Spheres}}
383     Lamb's classical theory of elastic spheres~\cite{Lamb1882} provides a number of possible explanations for the split peak in the vibrational spectrum. The periods of the longitudinal and transverse vibrations in an elastic sphere of radius $R$ are given by:
384     \[
385     \tau_{t} = \frac{2 \pi R}{\theta c_{t}}
386     \hspace{0.1cm} {\text{and}} \hspace{0.1cm}
387     \tau_{l} = \frac{2 \pi R}{\eta c_{l}}
388     \]
389     where $\theta$ and $n$ are obtained from the solutions to the transcendental equations
390     \[
391     \tan \theta = \frac{3 \theta}{3 - \theta^{2}}
392     \hspace{0.1cm} {\text{and}} \hspace{0.1cm}
393     \tan \eta = \frac{4 \eta}{4 - \eta^{2}\frac{c_{l}^{2}}{c_{t}^{2}}}
394     \]
395     $c_{l}$ and $c_{t}$ are the longitudinal and transverse speeds of sound in the material. In an isotropic material, these speeds are simply related to the elastic constants and the density ($\rho$),
396     \[
397     c_{l} = \sqrt{c_{11}/\rho}
398     \hspace{0.1cm}\text{\LARGE{;}}\hspace{0.1cm}
399     c_{t} = \sqrt{c_{44}/\rho}
400     \]
401     In crystalline materials, the speeds depend on the direction of propagation of the wave relative to the crystal plane.\cite{Kittel} We assume the nanoparticles are isotropic (which should be valid only above the melting transition). A more detailed analysis of the lower temperature particles would take the crystal lattice into account.
402     \end{kasten}
403    
404     \begin{kasten}
405     \subsection*{4.2 {\color{blue} Power Spectrum Splitting}}
406     Using experimental values for the elastic constants for 35 \AA\ Au particles at 300K, the low-frequency longitudinal (breathing) mode should have a period of 2.56 ps while the low-frequency transverse (toroidal) mode should have a period of 2.46 ps. Although the actual calculated frequencies in our simulations are off of these values, the difference in the periods (0.1 ps) is nearly identical to the splitting observed room-temperature simulations. This, therefore, may be an explanation for low-temperature splitting.
407     \end{kasten}
408     \begin{kasten}
409     \subsection*{4.3 {\color{blue} Melted and Partially-Melted Particles }}
410     Hartland {\it et al.} have extended the Lamb analysis to include surface stress ($\gamma$)\cite{Hartland2003}. The vibrational period of the breathing mode for liquid droplets may be written
411     \[
412     \tau = \frac{2 R}{c_{l}(l)}
413     \]
414     where $c_{l}(l)$ is the longitudinal speed of sound in the liquid. Using the experimental speed of sound in liquid Au\cite{Iida1988}, a molten 35 \AA\ particle just above $T_{m}$ would have a vibrational period of 2.73 ps, and this would be markedly different from the vibrational period just below $T_{m}$ if the melting transition were sharp.
415     \end{kasten}
416    
417    
418     \end{spalte}
419     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
420     %%% Fifth column %%%
421     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
422     \begin{spalte}
423     \begin{kasten}
424     \subsection*{4.4 {\color{blue} Observations}}
425     From our calculations of $C_{p}$, the complete melting of the particles is {\it not} sharp, and should take longer than the 40 ps observation time. There are wo explanations which are commensurate with our observations.
426     \begin{enumerate}
427     \item The melting may occur at some time partway through observation
428     of the response to instantaneous heating. The early part
429     of the simulation would then show a higher-frequency breathing mode
430     than would be evident during the latter parts of the simulation.
431     \item The melting may take place by softening the outer layers of the
432     particle first, followed by a melting of the core at higher
433     temperatures. The liquid-like outer layer would then contribute a
434     lower frequency component than the interior of the particle.
435     \end{enumerate}
436     \end{kasten}
437    
438     \begin{kasten}
439     \section*{6 \hspace{0.1cm} {\color{red} \underline{Conclusions}}}
440     \begin{itemize}
441     \item
442    
443     \item
444    
445     \item
446    
447     \item
448    
449     \end{itemize}
450     \end{kasten}
451    
452     \vspace{0.5cm}
453     \begin{kasten}
454     \begin{center}
455     {\large{\color{red} \underline{Acknowledgments}}}
456     \end{center}
457     The authors would like to thank Dr. Greg Hartland for a number of helpful discussions. PFC was supported by an REU fellowship from the National Science Foundation. Computational time was provided on the Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B.) cluster under NSF grant DMR 00 79647. MMS, CFV, and JDG acknowledge support under NSF grant CHE-0134881.
458     \end{kasten}
459    
460     \vspace{0.5cm}
461     \begin{kasten}
462     {\small
463     \bibliography{bulk_mod}
464     }
465     \end{kasten}
466     \end{spalte}
467     }
468     \end{lrbox}
469     \resizebox*{0.98\textwidth}{!}{%
470     \usebox{\spalten}}\hfill\mbox{}\vfill
471     \end{document}
472    
473