| 1 |
mmeineke |
95 |
\documentclass[11pt]{article} |
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx} |
| 4 |
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath} |
| 5 |
|
|
\usepackage{amssymb} |
| 6 |
|
|
\usepackage[ref]{overcite} |
| 7 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
\pagestyle{plain} |
| 11 |
|
|
\pagenumbering{arabic} |
| 12 |
|
|
\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm |
| 13 |
|
|
\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt |
| 14 |
|
|
\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in |
| 15 |
|
|
\brokenpenalty=10000 |
| 16 |
|
|
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2} |
| 17 |
|
|
\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note |
| 18 |
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
\begin{document} |
| 21 |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
\title{A Mesoscale Model for Phospholipid Simulations} |
| 23 |
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
|
\author{Matthew A. Meineke\\ |
| 25 |
|
|
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ |
| 26 |
|
|
University of Notre Dame\\ |
| 27 |
|
|
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556} |
| 28 |
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
|
\date{\today} |
| 30 |
|
|
\maketitle |
| 31 |
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
|
\section{Background and Research Goals} |
| 33 |
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
|
\section{Methodology} |
| 35 |
|
|
|
| 36 |
|
|
\subsection{Length Scale Simplifications} |
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
The length scale simplifications are aimed at increaseing the number |
| 39 |
|
|
of molecules simulated without drastically increasing the |
| 40 |
|
|
computational cost of the system. This is done by a combination of |
| 41 |
|
|
substituting less expensive interactions for expensive ones and |
| 42 |
|
|
decreasing the number of interaction sites per molecule. Namely, |
| 43 |
|
|
charge distributions are replaced with dipoles, and unified atoms are |
| 44 |
|
|
used in place of water and phospholipid head groups. |
| 45 |
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
|
The replacement of charge distributions with dipoles allows us to |
| 47 |
|
|
replace an interaction that has a relatively long range, $\frac{1}{r}$ |
| 48 |
|
|
for the charge charge potential, with that of a relitively short |
| 49 |
|
|
range, $\frac{1}{r^{3}}$ for dipole - dipole potentials |
| 50 |
|
|
(Equations~\ref{eq:dipolePot} and \ref{eq:chargePot}). This allows us |
| 51 |
|
|
to use computaional simplifications algorithms such as Verlet neighbor |
| 52 |
|
|
lists,\cite{allen87:csl} which gives computaional scaling by $N$. This |
| 53 |
|
|
is in comparison to the Ewald sum\cite{leach01:mm} needed to compute |
| 54 |
|
|
the charge - charge interactions which scales at best by $N |
| 55 |
|
|
\ln N$. |
| 56 |
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
| 58 |
|
|
V^{\text{dp}}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i}, |
| 59 |
|
|
\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \biggl[ |
| 60 |
|
|
\frac{\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\mu}_{j}}{r^{3}_{ij}} |
| 61 |
|
|
- |
| 62 |
|
|
\frac{3(\boldsymbol{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) % |
| 63 |
|
|
(\boldsymbol{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) }{r^{5}_{ij}} \biggr] |
| 64 |
|
|
\label{eq:dipolePot} |
| 65 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
| 66 |
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
| 68 |
|
|
V^{\text{ch}}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = \frac{q_{i}q_{j}}% |
| 69 |
|
|
{4\pi\epsilon_{0} r_{ij}} |
| 70 |
|
|
\label{eq:chargePot} |
| 71 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
| 72 |
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
|
The second step taken to simplify the number of calculationsis to |
| 74 |
|
|
incorporate unified models for groups of atoms. In the case of water, |
| 75 |
|
|
we use the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model developed by |
| 76 |
|
|
Ichiye\cite{Liu96} (Section~\ref{sec:ssdModel}). For the phospholipids, a |
| 77 |
|
|
unified head atom with a dipole will replace the atoms in the head |
| 78 |
|
|
group, while unified $\text{CH}_2$ and $\text{CH}_3$ atoms will |
| 79 |
|
|
replace the alkanes in the tails (Section~\ref{sec:lipidModel}). |
| 80 |
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
|
\subsection{Time Scale Simplifications} |
| 83 |
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
\subsection{The Soft Sticky Water Model} |
| 85 |
|
|
\label{sec:ssdModel} |
| 86 |
|
|
|
| 87 |
|
|
\subsection{The Phospholipid Model} |
| 88 |
|
|
\label{sec:lipidModel} |
| 89 |
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
|
| 91 |
|
|
\bibliographystyle{achemso} |
| 92 |
|
|
\bibliography{canidacy_paper} |
| 93 |
|
|
\end{document} |
