ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/matt_papers/canidacy_paper/canidacy_paper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/matt_papers/canidacy_paper/canidacy_paper.tex (file contents):
Revision 98 by mmeineke, Sat Aug 24 17:21:16 2002 UTC vs.
Revision 101 by mmeineke, Tue Aug 27 02:32:29 2002 UTC

# Line 128 | Line 128 | The hydrogen bonding of the model is governed by the $
128   kcal/mol}$. $V_{\text{dp}}$ is the dipole potential with
129   $|\mu_{\text{w}}| = 2.35\text{ D}$.
130  
131 < The hydrogen bonding of the model is governed by the $V_{\text{sp}}$ term of the potentail. Its form is as follows:
131 > The hydrogen bonding of the model is governed by the $V_{\text{sp}}$
132 > term of the potentail. Its form is as follows:
133   \begin{equation}
134   V_{\text{sp}}(\mathbf{r}_{i\!j},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
135          \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) =
# Line 165 | Line 166 | vanishes when $\theta_{ij}$ is $0^\circ$ or $180^\circ
166   $w^{x}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
167   is needed because
168   $w_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
169 < vanishes when $\theta_{ij}$ is $0^\circ$ or $180^\circ$. The angles $\theta_{ij}$ and $\phi_{ij}$ are defined by the spherical polar coordinates of the position of sphere $j$ in the reference frame fixed on sphere $i$ with the z-axis alligned with the dipole moment.
169 > vanishes when $\theta_{ij}$ is $0^\circ$ or $180^\circ$. The angles
170 > $\theta_{ij}$ and $\phi_{ij}$ are defined by the spherical polar
171 > coordinates of the position of sphere $j$ in the reference frame fixed
172 > on sphere $i$ with the z-axis alligned with the dipole moment.
173  
174 < Finaly, the  sticky potentail is scaled by a cutoff function, $s(r_{ij})$ that scales smoothly between 0 and 1. It is represented by:
174 > Finaly, the sticky potentail is scaled by a cutoff function,
175 > $s(r_{ij})$ that scales smoothly between 0 and 1. It is represented
176 > by:
177   \begin{equation}
178   s(r_{ij}) =
179          \begin{cases}
# Line 184 | Line 190 | s(r_{ij}) =
190   \subsection{The Phospholipid Model}
191   \label{sec:lipidModel}
192  
193 + \begin{floatingfigure}{90mm}
194 + \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{lipidModel.epsi}
195 + \caption{A representation of the lipid model. $\phi$ is the torsion angle, $\theta$ is the bend angle, $\mu$ is the dipole moment of the head group, and n is the chain length. \vspace{5mm}}
196 + \label{fig:lipidModel}
197 + \end{floatingfigure}
198  
199 + The lipid molecules in our simulations are unified atom models. Figure
200 + \ref{fig:lipidModel} shows a template drawing for one of our
201 + lipids. The Head group of the phospholipid is replaced by a single
202 + Lennard-Jones sphere with a freely oriented dipole placed at it's
203 + center. The magnitude of it's dipole moment is 20.6 D. The tail atoms
204 + are unifed $\text{CH}_2$ and $\text{CH}_3$ atoms and are also modeled
205 + as Lennard-Jones spheres. The total potential for the lipid is
206 + represented by Equation \ref{eq:lipidModelPot}.
207 +
208 + \begin{equation}
209 + V_{\mbox{lipid}} = \overbrace{%
210 +        V_{\text{bend}}(\theta_{ijk}) +%
211 +        V_{\text{tors.}}(\phi_{ijkl})}^{bonded}
212 +        + \overbrace{%
213 +        V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{i\!j}) +
214 +        V_{\text{dp}}(r_{i\!j},\Omega_{i},\Omega_{j})%
215 +        }^{non-bonded}
216 + \label{eq:lipidModelPot}
217 + \end{equation}
218 +
219 + The non bonded interactions, $V_{\text{LJ}}$ and $V_{\text{dp}}$, are
220 + the Lennard-Jones and dipole-dipole interactions respectively. For the
221 + non-bonded potentials, only the bend and the torsional potentials are
222 + calculated. The bond potential is not calculated, and the bond lengths
223 + are constrained via RATTLE.\cite{leach01:mm} The bend potential is of
224 + the form:
225 + \begin{equation}
226 + V_{\text{bend}}(\theta_{ijk}) = k_{\theta}\frac{(\theta_{ijk} - \theta_0)^2}{2}
227 + \label{eq:bendPot}
228 + \end{equation}
229 + Where $k_{\theta}$ sets the stiffness of the bend potential, and $\theta_0$
230 + sets the equilibrium bend angle. The torsion potential was given by:
231 + \begin{equation}
232 + V_{\text{tors.}}(\phi_{ijkl})= \cos(\phi_{ijkl})
233 + \label{eq:torsPot}
234 + \end{equation}
235 + Here, ``blank'' controls the scaling of the torsion potential, and the
236 + $c$ terms are paramterized for the $\cos$ expansion. All parameters
237 + for bonded and non-bonded potentials in the tail atoms were taken from
238 + TraPPE.\cite{Siepmann1998} The bonded interactions for the head atom
239 + were also taken from TraPPE, however it's dipole moment and mass were
240 + based on the properties of ``DMPC?'''s head group. The Lennard-Jones
241 + parameter for the Head group was chosen such that it was roughly twice
242 + the size of a $\text{CH}_3$ atom, and it's well depth was set to be
243 + aproximately equal to that of $\text{CH}_3$.
244 +
245 + \section{Simulations}
246 + \subsection{25 lipids in water}
247 +
248 + \subsection{50 randomly oriented lipids in water}
249 +
250 + \section{Preliminary Results}
251 +
252 + \section{Discussion}
253 +
254 + \section{Future Directions}
255 +
256 +
257 + \pagebreak
258   \bibliographystyle{achemso}
259 < \bibliography{canidacy_paper}
190 < \end{document}
259 > \bibliography{canidacy_paper} \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines