ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3147 by xsun, Mon Jun 25 21:16:17 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3174 by xsun, Fri Jul 13 22:01:52 2007 UTC

# Line 8 | Line 8
8  
9   %\bibliographystyle{aps}
10  
11 < \title{}
11 > \title{Dipolar Ordering of the Ripple Phase in Lipid Membranes}
12   \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter}
13   \email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
14   \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
# Line 24 | Line 24 | Our idea for developing a simple and reasonable lipid
24   \pacs{}
25   \maketitle
26  
27 + \section{Introduction}
28 + \label{sec:Int}
29 +
30 + As one of the most important components in the formation of the
31 + biomembrane, lipid molecules attracted numerous studies in the past
32 + several decades. Due to their amphiphilic structure, when dispersed in
33 + water, lipids can self-assemble to construct a bilayer structure. The
34 + phase behavior of lipid membrane is well understood. The gel-fluid
35 + phase transition is known as main phase transition. However, there is
36 + an intermediate phase between gel and fluid phase for some lipid (like
37 + phosphatidycholine (PC)) membranes. This intermediate phase
38 + distinguish itself from other phases by its corrugated membrane
39 + surface, therefore this phase is termed ``ripple'' ($P_{\beta '}$)
40 + phase. The phase transition between gel-fluid and ripple phase is
41 + called pretransition. Since the pretransition usually occurs in room
42 + temperature, there might be some important biofuntions carried by the
43 + ripple phase for the living organism.
44 +
45 + The ripple phase is observed experimentally by x-ray diffraction
46 + ~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00}, freeze-fracture electron microscopy
47 + (FFEM)~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96}, and atomic force microscopy (AFM)
48 + recently~\cite{Kaasgaard03}. The experimental studies suggest two
49 + kinds of ripple structures: asymmetric (sawtooth like) and symmetric
50 + (sinusoidal like) ripple phases. Substantial number of theoretical
51 + explaination applied on the formation of the ripple
52 + phases~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}.
53 + In contrast, few molecular modelling have been done due to the large
54 + size of the resulting structures and the time required for the phases
55 + of interest to develop. One of the interesting molecular simulations
56 + was carried out by De Vries and Marrink {\it et
57 + al.}~\cite{deVries05}. According to their dynamic simulation results,
58 + the ripple consists of two domains, one is gel bilayer, and in the
59 + other domain, the upper and lower leaves of the bilayer are fully
60 + interdigitated. The mechanism of the formation of the ripple phase in
61 + their work suggests the theory that the packing competition between
62 + head group and tail of lipid molecules is the driving force for the
63 + formation of the ripple phase~\cite{Carlson87}. Recently, the ripple
64 + phase is also studied by using monte carlo simulation~\cite{Lenz07},
65 + the ripple structure is similar to the results of Marrink except that
66 + the connection of the upper and lower leaves of the bilayer is an
67 + interdigitated line instead of the fully interdigitated
68 + domain. Furthermore, the symmetric ripple phase was also observed in
69 + their work. They claimed the mismatch between the size of the head
70 + group and tail of the lipid molecules is the driving force for the
71 + formation of the ripple phase.
72 +
73 + Although the organizations of the tails of lipid molecules are
74 + addressed by these molecular simulations, the ordering of the head
75 + group in ripple phase is still not settlement. We developed a simple
76 + ``web of dipoles'' spin lattice model which provides some physical
77 + insight in our previous studies~\cite{Sun2007}, we found the dipoles
78 + on head groups of the lipid molecules are ordered in an
79 + antiferroelectric state. The similiar phenomenon is also observed by
80 + Tsonchev {\it et al.} when they studied the formation of the
81 + nanotube\cite{Tsonchev04}.
82 +
83 + In this paper, we made a more realistic coarse-grained lipid model to
84 + understand the primary driving force for membrane corrugation and to
85 + elucidate the organization of the anisotropic interacting head group
86 + via molecular dynamics simulation. We will talk about our model and
87 + methodology in section \ref{sec:method}, and details of the simulation
88 + in section \ref{sec:experiment}. The results are shown in section
89 + \ref{sec:results}. At last, we will discuss the results in section
90 + \ref{sec:discussion}.
91 +
92 + \section{Methodology and Model}
93 + \label{sec:method}
94 +
95   Our idea for developing a simple and reasonable lipid model to study
96 < the ripple pahse of lipid bilayers is based on two facts: one is that
96 > the ripple phase of lipid bilayers is based on two facts: one is that
97   the most essential feature of lipid molecules is their amphiphilic
98   structure with polar head groups and non-polar tails. Another fact is
99   that dominant numbers of lipid molecules are very rigid in ripple
100 < phase which allows the details of the lipid molecules neglectable. In
101 < our model, lipid molecules are represented by rigid bodies made of one
102 < head sphere with a point dipole sitting on it and one ellipsoid tail,
103 < the direction of the dipole is fixed to be perpendicular to the
104 < tail. The breadth and length of tail are $\sigma_0$, $3\sigma_0$. The
105 < diameter of heads varies from $1.20\sigma_0$ to $1.41\sigma_0$.  The
106 < model of the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of
107 < ``DPD'' water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one
108 < sphere.
100 > phase which allows the details of the lipid molecules neglectable. The
101 > lipid model is shown in Figure \ref{fig:lipidMM}. Figure
102 > \ref{fig:lipidMM}a shows the molecular strucure of a DPPC molecule. The
103 > hydrophilic character of the head group is the effect of the strong
104 > dipole composed by a positive charge sitting on the nitrogen and a
105 > negative charge on the phosphate. The hydrophobic tail consists of
106 > fatty acid chains. In our model shown in Figure \ref{fig:lipidMM}b,
107 > lipid molecules are represented by rigid bodies made of one head
108 > sphere with a point dipole sitting on it and one ellipsoid tail, the
109 > direction of the dipole is fixed to be perpendicular to the tail. The
110 > breadth and length of tail are $\sigma_0$, $3\sigma_0$. The diameter
111 > of heads varies from $1.20\sigma_0$ to $1.41\sigma_0$.  The model of
112 > the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of ``DPD''
113 > water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one sphere.
114  
115 + \begin{figure}[htb]
116 + \centering
117 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lipidMM}
118 + \caption{The molecular structure of a DPPC molecule and the
119 + coars-grained model for PC molecules.\label{fig:lipidMM}}
120 + \end{figure}
121  
122 < Spheres interact each other with Lennard-Jones potential, ellipsoids
123 < interact each other with Gay-Berne potential, dipoles interact each
124 < other with typical dipole potential, spheres interact ellipsoids with
125 < LJ-GB potential. All potentials are truncated at $25$ \AA and shifted
126 < at $22$ \AA.
122 > Spheres interact each other with Lennard-Jones potential
123 > \begin{eqnarray*}
124 > V_{ij} = 4\epsilon \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
125 > \left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right]
126 > \end{eqnarray*}
127 > here, $\sigma_0$ is diameter of the spherical particle. $r_{ij}$ is
128 > the distance between two spheres. $\epsilon$ is the well depth.
129 > Dipoles interact each other with typical dipole potential
130 > \begin{eqnarray*}
131 > V_{ij} = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
132 > \left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot
133 > \hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right]
134 > \end{eqnarray*}
135 > In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
136 > along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
137 > pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. Identical
138 > ellipsoids interact each other with Gay-Berne potential.
139 > \begin{eqnarray*}
140 > V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat
141 > r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
142 > {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i},
143 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^{12}
144 > -\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
145 > {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right]
146 > \end{eqnarray*}
147 > where $\sigma_0 = \sqrt 2\sigma_s$, and orietation-dependent range
148 > parameter is given by
149 > \begin{eqnarray*}
150 > \sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) =
151 > {\sigma_{0}} \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\chi\left[\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}
152 > \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
153 > u}_j})^2}{1+\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} +
154 > \frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}
155 > \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot
156 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right] \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}
157 > \end{eqnarray*}
158 > and the strength anisotropy function is,
159 > \begin{eqnarray*}
160 > \epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) =
161 > {\epsilon^\nu}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat
162 > u}_j}){\epsilon'^\mu}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
163 > {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})
164 > \end{eqnarray*}
165 > with $\nu$ and $\mu$ being adjustable exponent, and
166 > $\epsilon({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})$,
167 > $\epsilon'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat
168 > r}_{ij}})$ defined as
169 > \begin{eqnarray*}
170 > \epsilon({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}) =
171 > \epsilon_0\left[1-\chi^2({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
172 > u}_j})^2\right]^{-\frac{1}{2}}
173 > \end{eqnarray*}
174 > \begin{eqnarray*}
175 > \epsilon'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) =
176 > 1-\frac{1}{2}\chi'\left[\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
177 > u}_i} + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
178 > u}_j})^2}{1+\chi'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} +
179 > \frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}
180 > \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot
181 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right]
182 > \end{eqnarray*}
183 > the diameter dependent parameter $\chi$ is given by
184 > \begin{eqnarray*}
185 > \chi = \frac{({\sigma_s}^2 -
186 > {\sigma_e}^2)}{({\sigma_s}^2 + {\sigma_e}^2)}
187 > \end{eqnarray*}
188 > and the well depth dependent parameter $\chi'$ is given by
189 > \begin{eqnarray*}
190 > \chi' = \frac{({\epsilon_s}^{\frac{1}{\mu}} -
191 > {\epsilon_e}^{\frac{1}{\mu}})}{({\epsilon_s}^{\frac{1}{\mu}} +
192 > {\epsilon_e}^{\frac{1}{\mu}})}
193 > \end{eqnarray*}
194 > $\sigma_s$ is the side-by-side width, and $\sigma_e$ is the end-to-end
195 > length. $\epsilon_s$ is the side-by-side well depth, and $\epsilon_e$
196 > is the end-to-end well depth. For the interaction between
197 > nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this case, between spheres and
198 > ellipsoids), the range parameter is generalized as\cite{Cleaver96}
199 > \begin{eqnarray*}
200 > \sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) =
201 > {\sigma_{0}} \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\chi\left[\frac{(\alpha{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}
202 > \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} + \alpha^{-1}{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
203 > u}_j})^2}{1+\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} +
204 > \frac{(\alpha{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - \alpha^{-1}{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}
205 > \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot
206 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right] \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}
207 > \end{eqnarray*}
208 > where $\alpha$ is given by
209 > \begin{eqnarray*}
210 > \alpha^2 =
211 > \left[\frac{\left({\sigma_e}_i^2-{\sigma_s}_i^2\right)\left({\sigma_e}_j^2+{\sigma_s}_i^2\right)}{\left({\sigma_e}_j^2-{\sigma_s}_j^2\right)\left({\sigma_e}_i^2+{\sigma_s}_j^2\right)}
212 > \right]^{\frac{1}{2}}
213 > \end{eqnarray*}
214 > the strength parameter is adjusted by the suggestion of
215 > \cite{Cleaver96}. All potentials are truncated at $25$ \AA\ and
216 > shifted at $22$ \AA.
217  
218 + \section{Experiment}
219 + \label{sec:experiment}
220  
221 < To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time range
222 < behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulaitons were started from two
223 < sepetated monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
224 < coupling, length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed to prevent
225 < the shrinkage of the simulation boxes due to the free volume outside
226 < of the bilayer, and a constant surface tension was applied to enable
227 < the fluctuation of the surface. Periodic boundaries were used. There
228 < were $480-720$ lipid molecules in simulations according to different
229 < size of the heads. All the simulations were stablized for $100$ ns at
230 < $300$ K. The resulted structures were solvated in the water (about
60 < $6$ DPD water/lipid molecule) as the initial configurations for another
221 > To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time
222 > behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulations were started from two
223 > separate monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
224 > coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a
225 > constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of
226 > the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used. There were $480-720$ lipid
227 > molecules in the simulations depending on the size of the head
228 > beads. All the simulations were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$
229 > K. The resulting structures were solvated in water ($6$ DPD
230 > water/lipid molecule). These configurations were relaxed for another
231   $30$ ns relaxation. All simulations with water were carried out at
232 < constant pressure ($P=1$bar) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and
233 < constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Time step was
234 < $50$ fs. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE package.
235 <
236 <
67 < Snap shots show that the membrane is more corrugated with increasing
68 < the size of the head groups. The surface is nearly perfect flat when
69 < $\sigma_h$ is $1.20\sigma_0$. At $1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface
70 < is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay inward, the upper leaf of
71 < the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf with a interdigitated line
72 < defect. Two periodicities with $100$\AA width were observed in the
73 < simulation. This structure is very similiar to OTHER PAPER. The same
74 < structure was also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$. However, the
75 < surface of the membrane is corrugated, and the periodicity of the
76 < connection between upper and lower leaf membrane is shorter. From the
77 < undulation spectrum of the surface (the exact form is in OUR PREVIOUS
78 < PAPER), the corrugation is non-thermal fluctuation, and we are
79 < confident to identify it as the ripple phase. The width of one ripple
80 < is about $71$ \AA, and amplitude is about $7$ \AA. When
81 < $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface with
82 < $79$ \AA width and $10$ \AA amplitude. This structure is different to
83 < the previous rippled surface, there is no connection between upper and
84 < lower leaf of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken to
85 < several curved pieces, the broken position is mounted into the center
86 < of opposite piece in another leaf. Unlike another corrugated surface
87 < in which the upper leaf of the surface is always connected to the
88 < lower leaf from one direction, this ripple of this surface is
89 < isotropic. Therefore, we claim this is a symmetric ripple phase.
232 > constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and
233 > constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Given the absence of fast
234 > degrees of freedom in this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was
235 > utilized. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE
236 > package\cite{Meineke05}.
237  
238 + \section{Results and Analysis}
239 + \label{sec:results}
240  
241 < The $P_2$ order paramter is calculated to understand the phase
242 < behavior quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfect ordered structure, and
243 < $P_2=0$ means a random structure. The method can be found in OUR
244 < PAPER. Fig. shows $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group
245 < raises with increasing the size of the head group. When head of lipid
246 < molecule is small, the membrane is flat and shows strong two
247 < dimensional characters, dipoles are frustrated on orientational
248 < ordering in this circumstance. Another reason is that the lipids can
249 < move independently in each monolayer, it is not nessasory for the
250 < direction of dipoles on one leaf is consistant to another layer, which
251 < makes total order parameter is relatively low. With increasing the
252 < size of head group, the surface is being more corrugated, dipoles are
253 < not allowed to move freely on the surface, they are
254 < localized. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer
241 > Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is
242 > more corrugated increasing size of the head groups. The surface is
243 > nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$. With
244 > $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface is still flat, the
245 > bilayer starts to splay inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is
246 > connected to the lower leaf with an interdigitated line defect. Two
247 > periodicities with $100$ \AA\ width were observed in the
248 > simulation. This structure is very similiar to the structure observed
249 > by de Vries and Lenz {\it et al.}. The same basic structure is also
250 > observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, but the wavelength of the
251 > surface corrugations depends sensitively on the size of the ``head''
252 > beads. From the undulation spectrum, the corrugation is clearly
253 > non-thermal.
254 > \begin{figure}[htb]
255 > \centering
256 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{phaseCartoon}
257 > \caption{A sketch to discribe the structure of the phases observed in
258 > our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}}
259 > \end{figure}
260 >
261 > When $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface
262 > morphology. This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled
263 > surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower
264 > leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several
265 > hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together
266 > much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper
267 > hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge
268 > of lower hemicylinder, the symmetric ripple has no prefered direction.
269 > The corresponding cartoons are shown in Figure
270 > \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of
271 > different phases. Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} (a) is the flat phase,
272 > (b) is the asymmetric ripple phase corresponding to the lipid
273 > organization when $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$,
274 > and (c) is the symmetric ripple phase observed when
275 > $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$. In symmetric ripple phase, the bilayer is
276 > continuous everywhere on the whole membrane, however, in asymmetric
277 > ripple phase, the bilayer is intermittent domains connected by thin
278 > interdigitated monolayer which consists of upper and lower leaves of
279 > the bilayer.
280 > \begin{table*}
281 > \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
282 > \begin{center}
283 > \caption{}
284 > \begin{tabular}{lccc}
285 > \hline
286 > $\sigma_h/\sigma_0$ & type of phase & $\lambda/\sigma_0$ & $A/\sigma_0$\\
287 > \hline
288 > 1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\
289 > 1.28 & asymmetric flat & 21.7 & N/A \\
290 > 1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\
291 > 1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\
292 > \end{tabular}
293 > \label{tab:property}
294 > \end{center}
295 > \end{minipage}
296 > \end{table*}
297 >
298 > The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda/\sigma_0$,
299 > reduced amplitude $A/\sigma_0$ of the ripples are summerized in Table
300 > \ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ and the amplitude
301 > is $1.5$ for asymmetric ripple and $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These
302 > values are consistent to the experimental results. Note, the
303 > amplitudes are underestimated without the melted tails in our
304 > simulations.
305 >
306 > The $P_2$ order paramters (for molecular bodies and head group
307 > dipoles) have been calculated to clarify the ordering in these phases
308 > quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2=0$
309 > implies orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows the
310 > $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group rising with
311 > increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules are
312 > small, the membrane is flat. The dipolar ordering is essentially
313 > frustrated on orientational ordering in this circumstance. Another
314 > reason is that the lipids can move independently in each monolayer, it
315 > is not nessasory for the direction of dipoles on one leaf is
316 > consistant to another layer, which makes total order parameter is
317 > relatively low. With increasing head group size, the surface is
318 > corrugated, and dipoles do not move as freely on the
319 > surface. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer
320   is dependent upon the position of lipids in another layer, as a
321 < result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is
322 < consistant to the symmetry in another layer. Furthermore, the membrane
323 < tranlates from a two dimensional system to a three dimensional system
324 < by the corrugation, the symmetry of the ordering for the two
325 < dimensional dipoles on the head group of lipid molecules is broken, on
326 < a distorted lattice, dipoles are ordered on a head to tail energy
327 < state, the order parameter is increased dramaticly. However, the total
328 < polarization of the system is close to zero, which is a strong
329 < evidence it is a antiferroelectric state. The orientation of the
330 < dipole ordering is alway perpendicular to the ripple vector. These
331 < results are consistant to our previous study on similar system. The
118 < ordering of the tails are opposite to the ordering of the dipoles on
119 < head group, the $P_2$ order parameter decreases with increasing the
120 < size of head. This indicates the surface is more curved with larger
121 < head. When surface is flat, all tails are pointing to the same
122 < direction, in this case, all tails are parallal to the normal of the
123 < surface, which shares the same structure with $L_{\beta}$ phase. For the
124 < size of head being $1.28\sigma_0$, the surface starts to splay inward,
125 < however, the surface is still flat, therefore, although the order
126 < parameter is lower, it still indicates a very flat surface. Further
127 < increasing the size of the head, the order parameter drops dramaticly,
128 < the surface is rippled.
321 > result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is tied
322 > to the symmetry in the other layer. Furthermore, as the membrane
323 > deforms from two to three dimensions due to the corrugation, the
324 > symmetry of the ordering for the dipoles embedded on each leaf is
325 > broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-tail configuration,
326 > and the order parameter increases dramaticaly. However, the total
327 > polarization of the system is still close to zero. This is strong
328 > evidence that the corrugated structure is an antiferroelectric
329 > state. The orientation of the dipolar is always perpendicular to the
330 > ripple wave vector. These results are consistent with our previous
331 > study on dipolar membranes.
332  
333 + The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of
334 + the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter decreases with
335 + increasing head size. This indicates the surface is more curved with
336 + larger head groups. When the surface is flat, all tails are pointing
337 + in the same direction; in this case, all tails are parallel to the
338 + normal of the surface,(making this structure remindcent of the
339 + $L_{\beta}$ phase. Increasing the size of the heads, results in
340 + rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
341 + \begin{figure}[htb]
342 + \centering
343 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2}
344 + \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the ratio of
345 + $\sigma_h$ to $\sigma_0$.\label{fig:rP2}}
346 + \end{figure}
347  
348 < We studied the effects of interaction between head groups on the
349 < structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole. The
350 < fig. shows the $P_2$ order parameter changing with strength of the
351 < dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head group are more ordered with
352 < increasing the interaction between heads and more disordered with
353 < decreasing the interaction between heads. When the interaction between
354 < heads is weak enough, the bilayer structure is not persisted any more,
355 < all lipid molecules are melted in the water. The critial value of the
356 < strength of the dipole is various for different system. The perfect
357 < flat surface melts at $5$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt
358 < at $8$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ debye. This
359 < indicates that the flat phase is the most stable state, the asymmetric
360 < ripple phase is second stalbe state, and the symmetric ripple phase is
361 < the most unstable state. The ordering of the tails is the same as the
362 < ordering of the dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface
363 < is already perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much
364 < until the strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order
365 < parameter decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further
366 < increased. The head group of the lipid molecules are brought closer by
367 < strenger interaction between them. For a flat surface, a mount of free
368 < volume between head groups is available, when the head groups are
369 < brought closer, the surface will splay outward to be a inverse
370 < micelle. For rippled surfaces, there is few free volume available on
371 < between the head groups, they can be closer, therefore there are
372 < little effect on the structure of the membrane. Another interesting
373 < fact, unlike other systems melting directly when the interaction is
374 < weak enough, for $\sigma_h$ is $1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane
375 < melts into itself first, the upper leaf of the bilayer is totally
376 < interdigitated with the lower leaf, this is different with the
377 < interdigitated lines in rippled phase where only one interdigitated
378 < line connects the two leaves of bilayer.
348 > We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the
349 > structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole.
350 > Figure \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with
351 > increasing strength of the dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head
352 > group are more ordered by increase in the strength of the interaction
353 > between heads and are more disordered by decreasing the interaction
354 > stength. When the interaction between the heads is weak enough, the
355 > bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules are solvated
356 > directly in the water. The critial value of the strength of the dipole
357 > depends on the head size. The perfectly flat surface melts at $5$
358 > debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt at $8$ debye, the
359 > symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ debye. The ordering of the
360 > tails is the same as the ordering of the dipoles except for the flat
361 > phase. Since the surface is already perfect flat, the order parameter
362 > does not change much until the strength of the dipole is $15$
363 > debye. However, the order parameter decreases quickly when the
364 > strength of the dipole is further increased. The head groups of the
365 > lipid molecules are brought closer by stronger interactions between
366 > them. For a flat surface, a large amount of free volume between the
367 > head groups is available, but when the head groups are brought closer,
368 > the tails will splay outward, forming an inverse micelle. For rippled
369 > surfaces, there is less free volume available between the head
370 > groups. Therefore there is little effect on the structure of the
371 > membrane due to increasing dipolar strength. Unlike other systems that
372 > melt directly when the interaction is weak enough, for
373 > $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane melts into itself
374 > first. The upper leaf of the bilayer becomes totally interdigitated
375 > with the lower leaf. This is different behavior than what is exhibited
376 > with the interdigitated lines in the rippled phase where only one
377 > interdigitated line connects the two leaves of bilayer.
378 > \begin{figure}[htb]
379 > \centering
380 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2}
381 > \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the strength of the
382 > dipole.\label{fig:sP2}}
383 > \end{figure}
384  
385 + Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameter on
386 + temperature. The behavior of the $P_2$ order paramter is
387 + straightforward. Systems are more ordered at low temperature, and more
388 + disordered at high temperatures. When the temperature is high enough,
389 + the membranes are instable. Since our model lacks the detailed
390 + information on lipid tails, we can not simulate the fluid phase with
391 + melted fatty acid chains. Moreover, the formation of the tilted
392 + $L_{\beta'}$ phase also depends on the organization of fatty groups on
393 + tails.
394 + \begin{figure}[htb]
395 + \centering
396 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2}
397 + \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of
398 + temperature.\label{fig:tP2}}
399 + \end{figure}
400  
401 < Fig. shows the changing of the order parameter with temperature. The
402 < behavior of the $P_2$ orderparamter is straightforword. Systems are
166 < more ordered at low temperature, and more disordered at high
167 < temperature. When the temperature is high enough, the membranes are
168 < discontinuted. The structures are stable during the changing of the
169 < temperature. Since our model lacks the detail information for tails of
170 < lipid molecules, we did not simulate the fluid phase with a melted
171 < fatty chains. Moreover, the formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase
172 < also depends on the organization of fatty groups on tails, we did not
173 < observe it either.
401 > \section{Discussion}
402 > \label{sec:discussion}
403  
404   \bibliography{mdripple}
405   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines