8 |
|
|
9 |
|
%\bibliographystyle{aps} |
10 |
|
|
11 |
< |
\title{} |
11 |
> |
\title{Dipolar Ordering of the Ripple Phase in Lipid Membranes} |
12 |
|
\author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter} |
13 |
|
\email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu} |
14 |
|
\affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\ |
24 |
|
\pacs{} |
25 |
|
\maketitle |
26 |
|
|
27 |
+ |
\section{Introduction} |
28 |
+ |
\label{sec:Int} |
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
As one of the most important components in the formation of the |
31 |
+ |
biomembrane, lipid molecules attracted numerous studies in the past |
32 |
+ |
several decades. Due to their amphiphilic structure, when dispersed in |
33 |
+ |
water, lipids can self-assemble to construct a bilayer structure. The |
34 |
+ |
phase behavior of lipid membrane is well understood. The gel-fluid |
35 |
+ |
phase transition is known as main phase transition. However, there is |
36 |
+ |
an intermediate phase between gel and fluid phase for some lipid (like |
37 |
+ |
phosphatidycholine (PC)) membranes. This intermediate phase |
38 |
+ |
distinguish itself from other phases by its corrugated membrane |
39 |
+ |
surface, therefore this phase is termed ``ripple'' ($P_{\beta '}$) |
40 |
+ |
phase. The phase transition between gel-fluid and ripple phase is |
41 |
+ |
called pretransition. Since the pretransition usually occurs in room |
42 |
+ |
temperature, there might be some important biofuntions carried by the |
43 |
+ |
ripple phase for the living organism. |
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+ |
The ripple phase is observed experimentally by x-ray diffraction |
46 |
+ |
~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00}, freeze-fracture electron microscopy |
47 |
+ |
(FFEM)~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96}, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) |
48 |
+ |
recently~\cite{Kaasgaard03}. The experimental studies suggest two |
49 |
+ |
kinds of ripple structures: asymmetric (sawtooth like) and symmetric |
50 |
+ |
(sinusoidal like) ripple phases. Substantial number of theoretical |
51 |
+ |
explaination applied on the formation of the ripple |
52 |
+ |
phases~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}. |
53 |
+ |
In contrast, few molecular modelling have been done due to the large |
54 |
+ |
size of the resulting structures and the time required for the phases |
55 |
+ |
of interest to develop. One of the interesting molecular simulations |
56 |
+ |
was carried out by De Vries and Marrink {\it et |
57 |
+ |
al.}~\cite{deVries05}. According to their dynamic simulation results, |
58 |
+ |
the ripple consists of two domains, one is gel bilayer, and in the |
59 |
+ |
other domain, the upper and lower leaves of the bilayer are fully |
60 |
+ |
interdigitated. The mechanism of the formation of the ripple phase in |
61 |
+ |
their work suggests the theory that the packing competition between |
62 |
+ |
head group and tail of lipid molecules is the driving force for the |
63 |
+ |
formation of the ripple phase~\cite{Carlson87}. Recently, the ripple |
64 |
+ |
phase is also studied by using monte carlo simulation~\cite{Lenz07}, |
65 |
+ |
the ripple structure is similar to the results of Marrink except that |
66 |
+ |
the connection of the upper and lower leaves of the bilayer is an |
67 |
+ |
interdigitated line instead of the fully interdigitated |
68 |
+ |
domain. Furthermore, the symmetric ripple phase was also observed in |
69 |
+ |
their work. They claimed the mismatch between the size of the head |
70 |
+ |
group and tail of the lipid molecules is the driving force for the |
71 |
+ |
formation of the ripple phase. |
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+ |
Although the organizations of the tails of lipid molecules are |
74 |
+ |
addressed by these molecular simulations, the ordering of the head |
75 |
+ |
group in ripple phase is still not settlement. We developed a simple |
76 |
+ |
``web of dipoles'' spin lattice model which provides some physical |
77 |
+ |
insight in our previous studies~\cite{Sun2007}, we found the dipoles |
78 |
+ |
on head groups of the lipid molecules are ordered in an |
79 |
+ |
antiferroelectric state. The similiar phenomenon is also observed by |
80 |
+ |
Tsonchev {\it et al.} when they studied the formation of the |
81 |
+ |
nanotube\cite{Tsonchev04}. |
82 |
+ |
|
83 |
+ |
In this paper, we made a more realistic coarse-grained lipid model to |
84 |
+ |
understand the primary driving force for membrane corrugation and to |
85 |
+ |
elucidate the organization of the anisotropic interacting head group |
86 |
+ |
via molecular dynamics simulation. We will talk about our model and |
87 |
+ |
methodology in section \ref{sec:method}, and details of the simulation |
88 |
+ |
in section \ref{sec:experiment}. The results are shown in section |
89 |
+ |
\ref{sec:results}. At last, we will discuss the results in section |
90 |
+ |
\ref{sec:discussion}. |
91 |
+ |
|
92 |
+ |
\section{Methodology and Model} |
93 |
+ |
\label{sec:method} |
94 |
+ |
|
95 |
|
Our idea for developing a simple and reasonable lipid model to study |
96 |
< |
the ripple pahse of lipid bilayers is based on two facts: one is that |
96 |
> |
the ripple phase of lipid bilayers is based on two facts: one is that |
97 |
|
the most essential feature of lipid molecules is their amphiphilic |
98 |
|
structure with polar head groups and non-polar tails. Another fact is |
99 |
|
that dominant numbers of lipid molecules are very rigid in ripple |
100 |
< |
phase which allows the details of the lipid molecules neglectable. In |
101 |
< |
our model, lipid molecules are represented by rigid bodies made of one |
102 |
< |
head sphere with a point dipole sitting on it and one ellipsoid tail, |
103 |
< |
the direction of the dipole is fixed to be perpendicular to the |
104 |
< |
tail. The breadth and length of tail are $\sigma_0$, $3\sigma_0$. The |
105 |
< |
diameter of heads varies from $1.20\sigma_0$ to $1.41\sigma_0$. The |
106 |
< |
model of the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of |
107 |
< |
``DPD'' water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one |
108 |
< |
sphere. |
100 |
> |
phase which allows the details of the lipid molecules neglectable. The |
101 |
> |
lipid model is shown in Figure \ref{fig:lipidMM}. Figure |
102 |
> |
\ref{fig:lipidMM}a shows the molecular strucure of a DPPC molecule. The |
103 |
> |
hydrophilic character of the head group is the effect of the strong |
104 |
> |
dipole composed by a positive charge sitting on the nitrogen and a |
105 |
> |
negative charge on the phosphate. The hydrophobic tail consists of |
106 |
> |
fatty acid chains. In our model shown in Figure \ref{fig:lipidMM}b, |
107 |
> |
lipid molecules are represented by rigid bodies made of one head |
108 |
> |
sphere with a point dipole sitting on it and one ellipsoid tail, the |
109 |
> |
direction of the dipole is fixed to be perpendicular to the tail. The |
110 |
> |
breadth and length of tail are $\sigma_0$, $3\sigma_0$. The diameter |
111 |
> |
of heads varies from $1.20\sigma_0$ to $1.41\sigma_0$. The model of |
112 |
> |
the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of ``DPD'' |
113 |
> |
water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one sphere. |
114 |
|
|
115 |
+ |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
116 |
+ |
\centering |
117 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lipidMM} |
118 |
+ |
\caption{The molecular structure of a DPPC molecule and the |
119 |
+ |
coars-grained model for PC molecules.\label{fig:lipidMM}} |
120 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
121 |
|
|
122 |
< |
Spheres interact each other with Lennard-Jones potential, ellipsoids |
123 |
< |
interact each other with Gay-Berne potential, dipoles interact each |
124 |
< |
other with typical dipole potential, spheres interact ellipsoids with |
125 |
< |
LJ-GB potential. All potentials are truncated at $25$ \AA and shifted |
126 |
< |
at $22$ \AA. |
122 |
> |
Spheres interact each other with Lennard-Jones potential |
123 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
124 |
> |
V_{ij} = 4\epsilon \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} - |
125 |
> |
\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right] |
126 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
127 |
> |
here, $\sigma_0$ is diameter of the spherical particle. $r_{ij}$ is |
128 |
> |
the distance between two spheres. $\epsilon$ is the well depth. |
129 |
> |
Dipoles interact each other with typical dipole potential |
130 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
131 |
> |
V_{ij} = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} |
132 |
> |
\left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot |
133 |
> |
\hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right] |
134 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
135 |
> |
In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing |
136 |
> |
along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector |
137 |
> |
pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. Identical |
138 |
> |
ellipsoids interact each other with Gay-Berne potential. |
139 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
140 |
> |
V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat |
141 |
> |
r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, |
142 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, |
143 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^{12} |
144 |
> |
-\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, |
145 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right] |
146 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
147 |
> |
where $\sigma_0 = \sqrt 2\sigma_s$, and orietation-dependent range |
148 |
> |
parameter is given by |
149 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
150 |
> |
\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) = |
151 |
> |
{\sigma_{0}} \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\chi\left[\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} |
152 |
> |
\cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat |
153 |
> |
u}_j})^2}{1+\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} + |
154 |
> |
\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} |
155 |
> |
\cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot |
156 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right] \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} |
157 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
158 |
> |
and the strength anisotropy function is, |
159 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
160 |
> |
\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) = |
161 |
> |
{\epsilon^\nu}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat |
162 |
> |
u}_j}){\epsilon'^\mu}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, |
163 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) |
164 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
165 |
> |
with $\nu$ and $\mu$ being adjustable exponent, and |
166 |
> |
$\epsilon({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})$, |
167 |
> |
$\epsilon'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat |
168 |
> |
r}_{ij}})$ defined as |
169 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
170 |
> |
\epsilon({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}) = |
171 |
> |
\epsilon_0\left[1-\chi^2({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat |
172 |
> |
u}_j})^2\right]^{-\frac{1}{2}} |
173 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
174 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
175 |
> |
\epsilon'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) = |
176 |
> |
1-\frac{1}{2}\chi'\left[\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat |
177 |
> |
u}_i} + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat |
178 |
> |
u}_j})^2}{1+\chi'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} + |
179 |
> |
\frac{({\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} |
180 |
> |
\cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi'({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot |
181 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right] |
182 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
183 |
> |
the diameter dependent parameter $\chi$ is given by |
184 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
185 |
> |
\chi = \frac{({\sigma_s}^2 - |
186 |
> |
{\sigma_e}^2)}{({\sigma_s}^2 + {\sigma_e}^2)} |
187 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
188 |
> |
and the well depth dependent parameter $\chi'$ is given by |
189 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
190 |
> |
\chi' = \frac{({\epsilon_s}^{\frac{1}{\mu}} - |
191 |
> |
{\epsilon_e}^{\frac{1}{\mu}})}{({\epsilon_s}^{\frac{1}{\mu}} + |
192 |
> |
{\epsilon_e}^{\frac{1}{\mu}})} |
193 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
194 |
> |
$\sigma_s$ is the side-by-side width, and $\sigma_e$ is the end-to-end |
195 |
> |
length. $\epsilon_s$ is the side-by-side well depth, and $\epsilon_e$ |
196 |
> |
is the end-to-end well depth. For the interaction between |
197 |
> |
nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this case, between spheres and |
198 |
> |
ellipsoids), the range parameter is generalized as\cite{Cleaver96} |
199 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
200 |
> |
\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}}) = |
201 |
> |
{\sigma_{0}} \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\chi\left[\frac{(\alpha{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} |
202 |
> |
\cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} + \alpha^{-1}{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat |
203 |
> |
u}_j})^2}{1+\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} + |
204 |
> |
\frac{(\alpha{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} - \alpha^{-1}{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}} |
205 |
> |
\cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j})^2}{1-\chi({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot |
206 |
> |
{\mathbf{\hat u}_j})} \right] \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} |
207 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
208 |
> |
where $\alpha$ is given by |
209 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
210 |
> |
\alpha^2 = |
211 |
> |
\left[\frac{\left({\sigma_e}_i^2-{\sigma_s}_i^2\right)\left({\sigma_e}_j^2+{\sigma_s}_i^2\right)}{\left({\sigma_e}_j^2-{\sigma_s}_j^2\right)\left({\sigma_e}_i^2+{\sigma_s}_j^2\right)} |
212 |
> |
\right]^{\frac{1}{2}} |
213 |
> |
\end{eqnarray*} |
214 |
> |
the strength parameter is adjusted by the suggestion of |
215 |
> |
\cite{Cleaver96}. All potentials are truncated at $25$ \AA\ and |
216 |
> |
shifted at $22$ \AA. |
217 |
|
|
218 |
+ |
\section{Experiment} |
219 |
+ |
\label{sec:experiment} |
220 |
|
|
221 |
< |
To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time range |
222 |
< |
behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulaitons were started from two |
223 |
< |
sepetated monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure |
224 |
< |
coupling, length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed to prevent |
225 |
< |
the shrinkage of the simulation boxes due to the free volume outside |
226 |
< |
of the bilayer, and a constant surface tension was applied to enable |
227 |
< |
the fluctuation of the surface. Periodic boundaries were used. There |
228 |
< |
were $480-720$ lipid molecules in simulations according to different |
229 |
< |
size of the heads. All the simulations were stablized for $100$ ns at |
230 |
< |
$300$ K. The resulted structures were solvated in the water (about |
60 |
< |
$6$ DPD water/lipid molecule) as the initial configurations for another |
221 |
> |
To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time |
222 |
> |
behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulations were started from two |
223 |
> |
separate monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure |
224 |
> |
coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a |
225 |
> |
constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of |
226 |
> |
the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used. There were $480-720$ lipid |
227 |
> |
molecules in the simulations depending on the size of the head |
228 |
> |
beads. All the simulations were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ |
229 |
> |
K. The resulting structures were solvated in water ($6$ DPD |
230 |
> |
water/lipid molecule). These configurations were relaxed for another |
231 |
|
$30$ ns relaxation. All simulations with water were carried out at |
232 |
< |
constant pressure ($P=1$bar) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and |
233 |
< |
constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Time step was |
234 |
< |
$50$ fs. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE package. |
235 |
< |
|
236 |
< |
|
67 |
< |
Snap shots show that the membrane is more corrugated with increasing |
68 |
< |
the size of the head groups. The surface is nearly perfect flat when |
69 |
< |
$\sigma_h$ is $1.20\sigma_0$. At $1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface |
70 |
< |
is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay inward, the upper leaf of |
71 |
< |
the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf with a interdigitated line |
72 |
< |
defect. Two periodicities with $100$\AA width were observed in the |
73 |
< |
simulation. This structure is very similiar to OTHER PAPER. The same |
74 |
< |
structure was also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$. However, the |
75 |
< |
surface of the membrane is corrugated, and the periodicity of the |
76 |
< |
connection between upper and lower leaf membrane is shorter. From the |
77 |
< |
undulation spectrum of the surface (the exact form is in OUR PREVIOUS |
78 |
< |
PAPER), the corrugation is non-thermal fluctuation, and we are |
79 |
< |
confident to identify it as the ripple phase. The width of one ripple |
80 |
< |
is about $71$ \AA, and amplitude is about $7$ \AA. When |
81 |
< |
$\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface with |
82 |
< |
$79$ \AA width and $10$ \AA amplitude. This structure is different to |
83 |
< |
the previous rippled surface, there is no connection between upper and |
84 |
< |
lower leaf of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken to |
85 |
< |
several curved pieces, the broken position is mounted into the center |
86 |
< |
of opposite piece in another leaf. Unlike another corrugated surface |
87 |
< |
in which the upper leaf of the surface is always connected to the |
88 |
< |
lower leaf from one direction, this ripple of this surface is |
89 |
< |
isotropic. Therefore, we claim this is a symmetric ripple phase. |
232 |
> |
constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and |
233 |
> |
constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Given the absence of fast |
234 |
> |
degrees of freedom in this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was |
235 |
> |
utilized. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE |
236 |
> |
package\cite{Meineke05}. |
237 |
|
|
238 |
+ |
\section{Results and Analysis} |
239 |
+ |
\label{sec:results} |
240 |
|
|
241 |
< |
The $P_2$ order paramter is calculated to understand the phase |
242 |
< |
behavior quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfect ordered structure, and |
243 |
< |
$P_2=0$ means a random structure. The method can be found in OUR |
244 |
< |
PAPER. Fig. shows $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group |
245 |
< |
raises with increasing the size of the head group. When head of lipid |
246 |
< |
molecule is small, the membrane is flat and shows strong two |
247 |
< |
dimensional characters, dipoles are frustrated on orientational |
248 |
< |
ordering in this circumstance. Another reason is that the lipids can |
249 |
< |
move independently in each monolayer, it is not nessasory for the |
250 |
< |
direction of dipoles on one leaf is consistant to another layer, which |
251 |
< |
makes total order parameter is relatively low. With increasing the |
252 |
< |
size of head group, the surface is being more corrugated, dipoles are |
253 |
< |
not allowed to move freely on the surface, they are |
254 |
< |
localized. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer |
241 |
> |
Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is |
242 |
> |
more corrugated increasing size of the head groups. The surface is |
243 |
> |
nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$. With |
244 |
> |
$\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface is still flat, the |
245 |
> |
bilayer starts to splay inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is |
246 |
> |
connected to the lower leaf with an interdigitated line defect. Two |
247 |
> |
periodicities with $100$ \AA\ width were observed in the |
248 |
> |
simulation. This structure is very similiar to the structure observed |
249 |
> |
by de Vries and Lenz {\it et al.}. The same basic structure is also |
250 |
> |
observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, but the wavelength of the |
251 |
> |
surface corrugations depends sensitively on the size of the ``head'' |
252 |
> |
beads. From the undulation spectrum, the corrugation is clearly |
253 |
> |
non-thermal. |
254 |
> |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
255 |
> |
\centering |
256 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{phaseCartoon} |
257 |
> |
\caption{A sketch to discribe the structure of the phases observed in |
258 |
> |
our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}} |
259 |
> |
\end{figure} |
260 |
> |
|
261 |
> |
When $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface |
262 |
> |
morphology. This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled |
263 |
> |
surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower |
264 |
> |
leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several |
265 |
> |
hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together |
266 |
> |
much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper |
267 |
> |
hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge |
268 |
> |
of lower hemicylinder, the symmetric ripple has no prefered direction. |
269 |
> |
The corresponding cartoons are shown in Figure |
270 |
> |
\ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of |
271 |
> |
different phases. Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} (a) is the flat phase, |
272 |
> |
(b) is the asymmetric ripple phase corresponding to the lipid |
273 |
> |
organization when $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, |
274 |
> |
and (c) is the symmetric ripple phase observed when |
275 |
> |
$\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$. In symmetric ripple phase, the bilayer is |
276 |
> |
continuous everywhere on the whole membrane, however, in asymmetric |
277 |
> |
ripple phase, the bilayer is intermittent domains connected by thin |
278 |
> |
interdigitated monolayer which consists of upper and lower leaves of |
279 |
> |
the bilayer. |
280 |
> |
\begin{table*} |
281 |
> |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
282 |
> |
\begin{center} |
283 |
> |
\caption{} |
284 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lccc} |
285 |
> |
\hline |
286 |
> |
$\sigma_h/\sigma_0$ & type of phase & $\lambda/\sigma_0$ & $A/\sigma_0$\\ |
287 |
> |
\hline |
288 |
> |
1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\ |
289 |
> |
1.28 & asymmetric flat & 21.7 & N/A \\ |
290 |
> |
1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\ |
291 |
> |
1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\ |
292 |
> |
\end{tabular} |
293 |
> |
\label{tab:property} |
294 |
> |
\end{center} |
295 |
> |
\end{minipage} |
296 |
> |
\end{table*} |
297 |
> |
|
298 |
> |
The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda/\sigma_0$, |
299 |
> |
reduced amplitude $A/\sigma_0$ of the ripples are summerized in Table |
300 |
> |
\ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ and the amplitude |
301 |
> |
is $1.5$ for asymmetric ripple and $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These |
302 |
> |
values are consistent to the experimental results. Note, the |
303 |
> |
amplitudes are underestimated without the melted tails in our |
304 |
> |
simulations. |
305 |
> |
|
306 |
> |
The $P_2$ order paramters (for molecular bodies and head group |
307 |
> |
dipoles) have been calculated to clarify the ordering in these phases |
308 |
> |
quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2=0$ |
309 |
> |
implies orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows the |
310 |
> |
$P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group rising with |
311 |
> |
increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules are |
312 |
> |
small, the membrane is flat. The dipolar ordering is essentially |
313 |
> |
frustrated on orientational ordering in this circumstance. Another |
314 |
> |
reason is that the lipids can move independently in each monolayer, it |
315 |
> |
is not nessasory for the direction of dipoles on one leaf is |
316 |
> |
consistant to another layer, which makes total order parameter is |
317 |
> |
relatively low. With increasing head group size, the surface is |
318 |
> |
corrugated, and dipoles do not move as freely on the |
319 |
> |
surface. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer |
320 |
|
is dependent upon the position of lipids in another layer, as a |
321 |
< |
result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is |
322 |
< |
consistant to the symmetry in another layer. Furthermore, the membrane |
323 |
< |
tranlates from a two dimensional system to a three dimensional system |
324 |
< |
by the corrugation, the symmetry of the ordering for the two |
325 |
< |
dimensional dipoles on the head group of lipid molecules is broken, on |
326 |
< |
a distorted lattice, dipoles are ordered on a head to tail energy |
327 |
< |
state, the order parameter is increased dramaticly. However, the total |
328 |
< |
polarization of the system is close to zero, which is a strong |
329 |
< |
evidence it is a antiferroelectric state. The orientation of the |
330 |
< |
dipole ordering is alway perpendicular to the ripple vector. These |
331 |
< |
results are consistant to our previous study on similar system. The |
118 |
< |
ordering of the tails are opposite to the ordering of the dipoles on |
119 |
< |
head group, the $P_2$ order parameter decreases with increasing the |
120 |
< |
size of head. This indicates the surface is more curved with larger |
121 |
< |
head. When surface is flat, all tails are pointing to the same |
122 |
< |
direction, in this case, all tails are parallal to the normal of the |
123 |
< |
surface, which shares the same structure with $L_{\beta}$ phase. For the |
124 |
< |
size of head being $1.28\sigma_0$, the surface starts to splay inward, |
125 |
< |
however, the surface is still flat, therefore, although the order |
126 |
< |
parameter is lower, it still indicates a very flat surface. Further |
127 |
< |
increasing the size of the head, the order parameter drops dramaticly, |
128 |
< |
the surface is rippled. |
321 |
> |
result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is tied |
322 |
> |
to the symmetry in the other layer. Furthermore, as the membrane |
323 |
> |
deforms from two to three dimensions due to the corrugation, the |
324 |
> |
symmetry of the ordering for the dipoles embedded on each leaf is |
325 |
> |
broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-tail configuration, |
326 |
> |
and the order parameter increases dramaticaly. However, the total |
327 |
> |
polarization of the system is still close to zero. This is strong |
328 |
> |
evidence that the corrugated structure is an antiferroelectric |
329 |
> |
state. The orientation of the dipolar is always perpendicular to the |
330 |
> |
ripple wave vector. These results are consistent with our previous |
331 |
> |
study on dipolar membranes. |
332 |
|
|
333 |
+ |
The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of |
334 |
+ |
the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter decreases with |
335 |
+ |
increasing head size. This indicates the surface is more curved with |
336 |
+ |
larger head groups. When the surface is flat, all tails are pointing |
337 |
+ |
in the same direction; in this case, all tails are parallel to the |
338 |
+ |
normal of the surface,(making this structure remindcent of the |
339 |
+ |
$L_{\beta}$ phase. Increasing the size of the heads, results in |
340 |
+ |
rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies. |
341 |
+ |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
342 |
+ |
\centering |
343 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2} |
344 |
+ |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the ratio of |
345 |
+ |
$\sigma_h$ to $\sigma_0$.\label{fig:rP2}} |
346 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
347 |
|
|
348 |
< |
We studied the effects of interaction between head groups on the |
349 |
< |
structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole. The |
350 |
< |
fig. shows the $P_2$ order parameter changing with strength of the |
351 |
< |
dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head group are more ordered with |
352 |
< |
increasing the interaction between heads and more disordered with |
353 |
< |
decreasing the interaction between heads. When the interaction between |
354 |
< |
heads is weak enough, the bilayer structure is not persisted any more, |
355 |
< |
all lipid molecules are melted in the water. The critial value of the |
356 |
< |
strength of the dipole is various for different system. The perfect |
357 |
< |
flat surface melts at $5$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt |
358 |
< |
at $8$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ debye. This |
359 |
< |
indicates that the flat phase is the most stable state, the asymmetric |
360 |
< |
ripple phase is second stalbe state, and the symmetric ripple phase is |
361 |
< |
the most unstable state. The ordering of the tails is the same as the |
362 |
< |
ordering of the dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface |
363 |
< |
is already perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much |
364 |
< |
until the strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order |
365 |
< |
parameter decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further |
366 |
< |
increased. The head group of the lipid molecules are brought closer by |
367 |
< |
strenger interaction between them. For a flat surface, a mount of free |
368 |
< |
volume between head groups is available, when the head groups are |
369 |
< |
brought closer, the surface will splay outward to be a inverse |
370 |
< |
micelle. For rippled surfaces, there is few free volume available on |
371 |
< |
between the head groups, they can be closer, therefore there are |
372 |
< |
little effect on the structure of the membrane. Another interesting |
373 |
< |
fact, unlike other systems melting directly when the interaction is |
374 |
< |
weak enough, for $\sigma_h$ is $1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane |
375 |
< |
melts into itself first, the upper leaf of the bilayer is totally |
376 |
< |
interdigitated with the lower leaf, this is different with the |
377 |
< |
interdigitated lines in rippled phase where only one interdigitated |
378 |
< |
line connects the two leaves of bilayer. |
348 |
> |
We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the |
349 |
> |
structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole. |
350 |
> |
Figure \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with |
351 |
> |
increasing strength of the dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head |
352 |
> |
group are more ordered by increase in the strength of the interaction |
353 |
> |
between heads and are more disordered by decreasing the interaction |
354 |
> |
stength. When the interaction between the heads is weak enough, the |
355 |
> |
bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules are solvated |
356 |
> |
directly in the water. The critial value of the strength of the dipole |
357 |
> |
depends on the head size. The perfectly flat surface melts at $5$ |
358 |
> |
debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt at $8$ debye, the |
359 |
> |
symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ debye. The ordering of the |
360 |
> |
tails is the same as the ordering of the dipoles except for the flat |
361 |
> |
phase. Since the surface is already perfect flat, the order parameter |
362 |
> |
does not change much until the strength of the dipole is $15$ |
363 |
> |
debye. However, the order parameter decreases quickly when the |
364 |
> |
strength of the dipole is further increased. The head groups of the |
365 |
> |
lipid molecules are brought closer by stronger interactions between |
366 |
> |
them. For a flat surface, a large amount of free volume between the |
367 |
> |
head groups is available, but when the head groups are brought closer, |
368 |
> |
the tails will splay outward, forming an inverse micelle. For rippled |
369 |
> |
surfaces, there is less free volume available between the head |
370 |
> |
groups. Therefore there is little effect on the structure of the |
371 |
> |
membrane due to increasing dipolar strength. Unlike other systems that |
372 |
> |
melt directly when the interaction is weak enough, for |
373 |
> |
$\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane melts into itself |
374 |
> |
first. The upper leaf of the bilayer becomes totally interdigitated |
375 |
> |
with the lower leaf. This is different behavior than what is exhibited |
376 |
> |
with the interdigitated lines in the rippled phase where only one |
377 |
> |
interdigitated line connects the two leaves of bilayer. |
378 |
> |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
379 |
> |
\centering |
380 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2} |
381 |
> |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the strength of the |
382 |
> |
dipole.\label{fig:sP2}} |
383 |
> |
\end{figure} |
384 |
|
|
385 |
+ |
Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameter on |
386 |
+ |
temperature. The behavior of the $P_2$ order paramter is |
387 |
+ |
straightforward. Systems are more ordered at low temperature, and more |
388 |
+ |
disordered at high temperatures. When the temperature is high enough, |
389 |
+ |
the membranes are instable. Since our model lacks the detailed |
390 |
+ |
information on lipid tails, we can not simulate the fluid phase with |
391 |
+ |
melted fatty acid chains. Moreover, the formation of the tilted |
392 |
+ |
$L_{\beta'}$ phase also depends on the organization of fatty groups on |
393 |
+ |
tails. |
394 |
+ |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
395 |
+ |
\centering |
396 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2} |
397 |
+ |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of |
398 |
+ |
temperature.\label{fig:tP2}} |
399 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
400 |
|
|
401 |
< |
Fig. shows the changing of the order parameter with temperature. The |
402 |
< |
behavior of the $P_2$ orderparamter is straightforword. Systems are |
166 |
< |
more ordered at low temperature, and more disordered at high |
167 |
< |
temperature. When the temperature is high enough, the membranes are |
168 |
< |
discontinuted. The structures are stable during the changing of the |
169 |
< |
temperature. Since our model lacks the detail information for tails of |
170 |
< |
lipid molecules, we did not simulate the fluid phase with a melted |
171 |
< |
fatty chains. Moreover, the formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase |
172 |
< |
also depends on the organization of fatty groups on tails, we did not |
173 |
< |
observe it either. |
401 |
> |
\section{Discussion} |
402 |
> |
\label{sec:discussion} |
403 |
|
|
404 |
|
\bibliography{mdripple} |
405 |
|
\end{document} |