ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3264 by gezelter, Thu Oct 18 21:07:03 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3268 by gezelter, Mon Oct 22 21:00:13 2007 UTC

# Line 733 | Line 733 | strength of the head group dipole moment
733   strength of the head group dipole moment
734   ($\mu$).\label{fig:phaseDiagram}}
735   \end{figure}
736
736  
737 < We have also computed orientational diffusion constants for the head
738 < groups from the relaxation of the second-order Legendre polynomial
739 < correlation function,
737 > We have computed translational diffusion constants for lipid molecules
738 > from the mean-square displacement,
739 > \begin{equation}
740 > D = \lim_{t\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle {|\left({\bf r}_{i}(t) - {\bf r}_{i}(0) \right)|}^2 \rangle,
741 > \end{equation}
742 > of the lipid bodies. Translational diffusion constants for the
743 > different head-to-tail size ratios (all at 300 K) are shown in table
744 > \ref{tab:relaxation}.  We have also computed orientational diffusion
745 > constants for the head groups from the relaxation of the second-order
746 > Legendre polynomial correlation function,
747   \begin{eqnarray}
748   C_{\ell}(t) & = & \langle P_{\ell}\left({\bf \mu}_{i}(t) \cdot {\bf
749   \mu}_{i}(0) \right) \rangle  \\ \\
750   & \approx & e^{-\ell(\ell + 1) \theta t},
751   \end{eqnarray}
752 < of the head group dipoles.  In this last line, we have used a simple
753 < ``Debye''-like model for the relaxation of the correlation function,
754 < specifically in the case when $\ell = 2$.   The computed orientational
755 < diffusion constants are given in table \ref{tab:relaxation}.  The
756 < notable feature we observe is that the orientational diffusion
757 < constant for the head group exhibits an order of magnitude decrease
758 < upon entering the rippled phase.  Our orientational correlation times
753 < are substantially in excess of those provided by...
752 > of the head group dipoles.  In this last line, we have assumed a
753 > simple Debye-like model for the relaxation of the correlation
754 > function, specifically in the case when $\ell = 2$.  The computed
755 > orientational diffusion constants are given in table
756 > \ref{tab:relaxation}.   We observe that the head group orientational diffusion
757 > constant exhibits an order of magnitude decrease upon entering the
758 > rippled phase.  
759  
760 + Sparrman and Westlund used $T_1$ and $T_2$ measurements in analyzing
761 + NMR lineshapes for gel, fluid, and ripple phases and obtained
762 + estimates of a correlation time for water translational diffusion
763 + ($\tau_c$) of 20 ns.\cite{Sparrman2003} This correlation time
764 + corresponds to water bound to small regions of the lipid membrane.
765 + Sparrman and Westlund further assume that the lipids can explore only
766 + a single period of the ripple (essentially moving in an almost
767 + one-dimensional path to do so), and the correlation time can therefore
768 + be used to estimate a value for the translational diffusion constant
769 + of $2.25 \times 10^{-11} m^2 s^{-1}$.  The translational diffusion
770 + constants we obtain are in reasonable agreement with this
771 + experimentally determined value.
772  
773 + Our orientational correlation times are substantially in excess of
774 + those provided by.
775 +
776 +
777   \begin{table*}
778   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
779   \begin{center}
780   \caption{Rotational diffusion constants for the head groups
781 < ($\theta_h$) and molecular bodies ($\theta_b$) as a function of the
782 < head-to-body width ratio.  The orientational mobility of the head
781 > ($\theta_h$) and molecular bodies ($\theta_b$) as well as the
782 > translational diffusion coefficients for the molecule as a function of
783 > the head-to-body width ratio.  The orientational mobility of the head
784   groups experiences an {\it order of magnitude decrease} upon entering
785   the rippled phase, which suggests that the rippling is tied to a
786   freezing out of head group orientational freedom.  Uncertainties in
787   the last digit are indicated by the values in parentheses.}
788 < \begin{tabular}{lcc}
788 > \begin{tabular}{lccc}
789   \hline
790 < $\sigma_h / d$ & $\theta_h (\mu s^{-1})$ & $\theta_b (1/fs)$ \\
790 > $\sigma_h / d$ & $\theta_h (\mu s^{-1})$ & $\theta_b (1/fs)$ & $D (
791 > \times 10^{-11} m^2 s^{-1})$ \\
792   \hline
793 < 1.20 & $0.206(1) $ & $0.0175(5) $ \\
794 < 1.28 & $0.179(2) $ & $0.055(2)  $ \\
795 < 1.35 & $0.025(1) $ & $0.195(3)  $ \\
796 < 1.41 & $0.023(1) $ & $0.024(3)  $ \\
793 > 1.20 & $0.206(1) $ & $0.0175(5) $ & $0.43(1)$ \\
794 > 1.28 & $0.179(2) $ & $0.055(2)  $ & $5.91(3)$ \\
795 > 1.35 & $0.025(1) $ & $0.195(3)  $ & $3.42(1)$ \\
796 > 1.41 & $0.023(1) $ & $0.024(3)  $ & $7.16(1)$ \\
797   \end{tabular}
798   \label{tab:relaxation}
799   \end{center}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines