ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3264 by gezelter, Thu Oct 18 21:07:03 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3270 by xsun, Fri Oct 26 22:19:44 2007 UTC

# Line 25 | Line 25 | of lipid membranes}
25   \bibliographystyle{achemso}
26  
27   \title{Dipolar ordering in the ripple phases of molecular-scale models
28 < of lipid membranes}
28 > of lipid membranes}
29   \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
30   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
31   University of Notre Dame, \\
# Line 75 | Line 75 | within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87} The X-ray diffract
75   experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
76   hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
77   phase.  This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
78 < within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87} The X-ray diffraction work by
78 > within the gel phase,~\cite{Cevc87} although Tenchov {\it et al.} have
79 > recently observed near-hexagonal packing in some phosphatidylcholine
80 > (PC) gel phases.\cite{Tenchov2001} The X-ray diffraction work by
81   Katsaras {\it et al.} showed that a rich phase diagram exhibiting both
82   {\it asymmetric} and {\it symmetric} ripples is possible for lecithin
83   bilayers.\cite{Katsaras00}
# Line 83 | Line 85 | a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other
85   A number of theoretical models have been presented to explain the
86   formation of the ripple phase. Marder {\it et al.} used a
87   curvature-dependent Landau-de~Gennes free-energy functional to predict
88 < a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other related continuum
89 < models predict higher fluidity in convex regions and that concave
90 < portions of the membrane correspond to more solid-like regions.
91 < Carlson and Sethna used a packing-competition model (in which head
92 < groups and chains have competing packing energetics) to predict the
93 < formation of a ripple-like phase.  Their model predicted that the
94 < high-curvature portions have lower-chain packing and correspond to
95 < more fluid-like regions.  Goldstein and Leibler used a mean-field
96 < approach with a planar model for {\em inter-lamellar} interactions to
97 < predict rippling in multilamellar phases.~\cite{Goldstein88} McCullough
98 < and Scott proposed that the {\em anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor
99 < interactions} coupled to hydrophobic constraining forces which
100 < restrict height differences between nearest neighbors is the origin of
101 < the ripple phase.~\cite{McCullough90} Lubensky and MacKintosh
102 < introduced a Landau theory for tilt order and curvature of a single
103 < membrane and concluded that {\em coupling of molecular tilt to membrane
104 < curvature} is responsible for the production of
105 < ripples.~\cite{Lubensky93} Misbah, Duplat and Houchmandzadeh proposed
106 < that {\em inter-layer dipolar interactions} can lead to ripple
107 < instabilities.~\cite{Misbah98} Heimburg presented a {\em coexistence
108 < model} for ripple formation in which he postulates that fluid-phase
109 < line defects cause sharp curvature between relatively flat gel-phase
110 < regions.~\cite{Heimburg00} Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of
111 < polar head groups could be valuable in trying to understand bilayer
112 < phase formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations
113 < of lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large head groups
88 > a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other related
89 > continuum models predict higher fluidity in convex regions and that
90 > concave portions of the membrane correspond to more solid-like
91 > regions.  Carlson and Sethna used a packing-competition model (in
92 > which head groups and chains have competing packing energetics) to
93 > predict the formation of a ripple-like phase.  Their model predicted
94 > that the high-curvature portions have lower-chain packing and
95 > correspond to more fluid-like regions.  Goldstein and Leibler used a
96 > mean-field approach with a planar model for {\em inter-lamellar}
97 > interactions to predict rippling in multilamellar
98 > phases.~\cite{Goldstein88} McCullough and Scott proposed that the {\em
99 > anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor interactions} coupled to
100 > hydrophobic constraining forces which restrict height differences
101 > between nearest neighbors is the origin of the ripple
102 > phase.~\cite{McCullough90} Lubensky and MacKintosh introduced a Landau
103 > theory for tilt order and curvature of a single membrane and concluded
104 > that {\em coupling of molecular tilt to membrane curvature} is
105 > responsible for the production of ripples.~\cite{Lubensky93} Misbah,
106 > Duplat and Houchmandzadeh proposed that {\em inter-layer dipolar
107 > interactions} can lead to ripple instabilities.~\cite{Misbah98}
108 > Heimburg presented a {\em coexistence model} for ripple formation in
109 > which he postulates that fluid-phase line defects cause sharp
110 > curvature between relatively flat gel-phase regions.~\cite{Heimburg00}
111 > Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of polar head groups could
112 > be valuable in trying to understand bilayer phase
113 > formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations of
114 > lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large head groups
115   and molecular tilt with respect to the membrane normal vector can
116 < cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02}
116 > cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02} Recently, Kranenburg and Smit
117 > described the formation of symmetric ripple-like structures using a
118 > coarse grained solvent-head-tail bead model.\cite{Kranenburg2005}
119 > Their lipids consisted of a short chain of head beads tied to the two
120 > longer ``chains''.
121  
122   In contrast, few large-scale molecular modeling studies have been
123   done due to the large size of the resulting structures and the time
# Line 342 | Line 349 | For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ell
349   along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
350   pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.  
351  
352 + Since the charge separation distance is so large in zwitterionic head
353 + groups (like the PC head groups), it would also be possible to use
354 + either point charges or a ``split dipole'' approximation,
355 + \begin{equation}
356 + V_{ij}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
357 + \hat{r}}_{ij})) = \frac{1}{{4\pi \epsilon_0 }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i  \cdot \mu _j }}{{R_{ij}^3 }} -
358 + \frac{{3\left( {\mu _i  \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i  \cdot
359 + r_{ij} } \right)}}{{R_{ij}^5 }}} \right]
360 + \end{equation}
361 + where $\mu _i$ and $\mu _j$ are the dipole moments of sites $i$ and
362 + $j$, $r_{ij}$ is vector between the two sites, and $R_{ij}$ is given
363 + by,
364 + \begin{equation}
365 + R_{ij}  = \sqrt {r_{ij}^2  + \frac{{d_i^2 }}{4} + \frac{{d_j^2
366 + }}{4}}.
367 + \end{equation}
368 + Here, $d_i$ and $d_j$ are effect charge separation distances
369 + associated with each of the two dipolar sites. This approximation to
370 + the multipole expansion maintains the fast fall-off of the multipole
371 + potentials but lacks the normal divergences when two polar groups get
372 + close to one another.
373 +
374   For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this
375   case, between spheres and ellipsoids), the spheres are treated as
376   ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and with an well depth
# Line 350 | Line 379 | The solvent model in our simulations is identical to o
379   et al.} and is appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial
380   ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96}
381  
382 < The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by
383 < Marrink {\it et al.}  in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD)
384 < simulation of lipid bilayers.\cite{Marrink04} This solvent bead is a
385 < single site that represents four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has
386 < comparable density and diffusive behavior to liquid water.  However,
387 < since there are no electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent
388 < model cannot replicate the dielectric properties of water.
382 > The solvent model in our simulations is similar to the one used by
383 > Marrink {\it et al.}  in their coarse grained simulations of lipid
384 > bilayers.\cite{Marrink04} The solvent bead is a single site that
385 > represents four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has comparable
386 > density and diffusive behavior to liquid water.  However, since there
387 > are no electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent model cannot
388 > replicate the dielectric properties of water.  Note that although we
389 > are using larger cutoff and switching radii than Marrink {\it et al.},
390 > our solvent density at 300 K remains at 0.944 g cm$^{-3}$, and the
391 > solvent diffuses at 0.43 $\AA^2 ps^{-1}$ (roughly twice as fast as
392 > liquid water).
393  
394   \begin{table*}
395   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 414 | Line 447 | $3$D anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tensio
447   solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations
448   were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations utilizing
449   the solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) with
450 < $3$D anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension
450 > $3$D anisotropic coupling, and small constant surface tension
451   ($\gamma=0.015$ N/m). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in
452   this model, a time step of $50$ fs was utilized with excellent energy
453   conservation.  Data collection for structural properties of the
454   bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run following the solvent
455 < equilibration.  All simulations were performed using the OOPSE
456 < molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
455 > equilibration.  Orientational correlation functions and diffusion
456 > constants were computed from 30 ns simulations in the microcanonical
457 > (NVE) ensemble using the average volume from the end of the constant
458 > pressure and surface tension runs.  The timestep on these final
459 > molecular dynamics runs was 25 fs.  No appreciable changes in phase
460 > structure were noticed upon switching to a microcanonical ensemble.
461 > All simulations were performed using the {\sc oopse} molecular
462 > modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
463  
464   A switching function was applied to all potentials to smoothly turn
465 < off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA.
465 > off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA.  The
466 > switching function was the standard (cubic) function,
467 > \begin{equation}
468 > s(r) =
469 >        \begin{cases}
470 >        1 & \text{if $r \le r_{\text{sw}}$},\\
471 >        \frac{(r_{\text{cut}} + 2r - 3r_{\text{sw}})(r_{\text{cut}} - r)^2}
472 >        {(r_{\text{cut}} - r_{\text{sw}})^3}
473 >        & \text{if $r_{\text{sw}} < r \le r_{\text{cut}}$}, \\
474 >        0 & \text{if $r > r_{\text{cut}}$.}
475 >        \end{cases}
476 > \label{eq:dipoleSwitching}
477 > \end{equation}
478  
479   \section{Results}
480   \label{sec:results}
# Line 734 | Line 785 | strength of the head group dipole moment
785   ($\mu$).\label{fig:phaseDiagram}}
786   \end{figure}
787  
788 <
789 < We have also computed orientational diffusion constants for the head
790 < groups from the relaxation of the second-order Legendre polynomial
791 < correlation function,
792 < \begin{eqnarray}
793 < C_{\ell}(t) & = & \langle P_{\ell}\left({\bf \mu}_{i}(t) \cdot {\bf
794 < \mu}_{i}(0) \right) \rangle  \\ \\
795 < & \approx & e^{-\ell(\ell + 1) \theta t},
796 < \end{eqnarray}
797 < of the head group dipoles.  In this last line, we have used a simple
798 < ``Debye''-like model for the relaxation of the correlation function,
799 < specifically in the case when $\ell = 2$.   The computed orientational
800 < diffusion constants are given in table \ref{tab:relaxation}.  The
801 < notable feature we observe is that the orientational diffusion
802 < constant for the head group exhibits an order of magnitude decrease
803 < upon entering the rippled phase.  Our orientational correlation times
804 < are substantially in excess of those provided by...
788 > We have computed translational diffusion constants for lipid molecules
789 > from the mean-square displacement,
790 > \begin{equation}
791 > D = \lim_{t\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle {|\left({\bf r}_{i}(t) - {\bf r}_{i}(0) \right)|}^2 \rangle,
792 > \end{equation}
793 > of the lipid bodies. Translational diffusion constants for the
794 > different head-to-tail size ratios (all at 300 K) are shown in table
795 > \ref{tab:relaxation}.  We have also computed orientational correlation
796 > times for the head groups from fits of the second-order Legendre
797 > polynomial correlation function,
798 > \begin{equation}
799 > C_{\ell}(t)  =  \langle P_{\ell}\left({\bf \mu}_{i}(t) \cdot {\bf
800 > \mu}_{i}(0) \right)
801 > \end{equation}
802 > of the head group dipoles.  The orientational correlation functions
803 > appear to have multiple components in their decay: a fast ($12 \pm 2$
804 > ps) decay due to librational motion of the head groups, as well as
805 > moderate ($\tau^h_{\rm mid}$) and slow ($\tau^h_{\rm slow}$)
806 > components.  The fit values for the moderate and slow correlation
807 > times are listed in table \ref{tab:relaxation}.  Standard deviations
808 > in the fit time constants are quite large (on the order of the values
809 > themselves).
810  
811 + Sparrman and Westlund used a multi-relaxation model for NMR lineshapes
812 + observed in gel, fluid, and ripple phases of DPPC and obtained
813 + estimates of a correlation time for water translational diffusion
814 + ($\tau_c$) of 20 ns.\cite{Sparrman2003} This correlation time
815 + corresponds to water bound to small regions of the lipid membrane.
816 + They further assume that the lipids can explore only a single period
817 + of the ripple (essentially moving in a nearly one-dimensional path to
818 + do so), and the correlation time can therefore be used to estimate a
819 + value for the translational diffusion constant of $2.25 \times
820 + 10^{-11} m^2 s^{-1}$.  The translational diffusion constants we obtain
821 + are in reasonable agreement with this experimentally determined
822 + value. However, the $T_2$ relaxation times obtained by Sparrman and
823 + Westlund are consistent with P-N vector reorientation timescales of
824 + 2-5 ms.  This is substantially slower than even the slowest component
825 + we observe in the decay of our orientational correlation functions.
826 + Other than the dipole-dipole interactions, our head groups have no
827 + shape anisotropy which would force them to move as a unit with
828 + neighboring molecules.  This would naturally lead to P-N reorientation
829 + times that are too fast when compared with experimental measurements.
830  
831   \begin{table*}
832   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
833   \begin{center}
834 < \caption{Rotational diffusion constants for the head groups
835 < ($\theta_h$) and molecular bodies ($\theta_b$) as a function of the
836 < head-to-body width ratio.  The orientational mobility of the head
837 < groups experiences an {\it order of magnitude decrease} upon entering
838 < the rippled phase, which suggests that the rippling is tied to a
839 < freezing out of head group orientational freedom.  Uncertainties in
840 < the last digit are indicated by the values in parentheses.}
841 < \begin{tabular}{lcc}
834 > \caption{Fit values for the rotational correlation times for the head
835 > groups ($\tau^h$) and molecular bodies ($\tau^b$) as well as the
836 > translational diffusion constants for the molecule as a function of
837 > the head-to-body width ratio (all at 300 K).  In all of the phases,
838 > the head group correlation functions decay with an fast librational
839 > contribution ($12 \pm 1$ ps).  There are additional moderate
840 > ($\tau^h_{\rm mid}$) and slow $\tau^h_{\rm slow}$ contributions to
841 > orientational decay that depend strongly on the phase exhibited by the
842 > lipids.  The symmetric ripple phase ($\sigma_h / d = 1.35$) appears to
843 > exhibit the slowest molecular reorientation.}
844 > \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
845   \hline
846 < $\sigma_h / d$ & $\theta_h (\mu s^{-1})$ & $\theta_b (1/fs)$ \\
846 > $\sigma_h / d$ & $\tau^h_{\rm mid} (ns)$ & $\tau^h_{\rm
847 > slow} (\mu s)$ & $\tau_b (\mu s)$ & $D (\times 10^{-11} m^2 s^{-1})$ \\
848   \hline
849 < 1.20 & $0.206(1) $ & $0.0175(5) $ \\
850 < 1.28 & $0.179(2) $ & $0.055(2)  $ \\
851 < 1.35 & $0.025(1) $ & $0.195(3)  $ \\
852 < 1.41 & $0.023(1) $ & $0.024(3)  $ \\
849 > 1.20 & $0.4$ &  $9.6$ & $9.5$ & $0.43(1)$ \\
850 > 1.28 & $2.0$ & $13.5$ & $3.0$ & $5.91(3)$ \\
851 > 1.35 & $3.2$ &  $4.0$ & $0.9$ & $3.42(1)$ \\
852 > 1.41 & $0.3$ & $23.8$ & $6.9$ & $7.16(1)$ \\
853   \end{tabular}
854   \label{tab:relaxation}
855   \end{center}
# Line 800 | Line 879 | Dipolar head groups are key for the maintaining the bi
879   is convex.  These structures are held together by the extremely strong
880   and directional interactions between the head groups.
881  
882 < Dipolar head groups are key for the maintaining the bilayer structures
883 < exhibited by this model.  The dipoles are likely to form head-to-tail
884 < configurations even in flat configurations, but the temperatures are
885 < high enough that vortex defects become prevalent in the flat phase.
886 < The flat phase we observed therefore appears to be substantially above
887 < the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature for a planar system of
888 < dipoles with this set of parameters.  For this reason, it would be
889 < interesting to observe the thermal behavior of the flat phase at
890 < substantially lower temperatures.
882 > The attractive forces holding the bilayer together could either be
883 > non-directional (as in the work of Kranenburg and
884 > Smit),\cite{Kranenburg2005} or directional (as we have utilized in
885 > these simulations).  The dipolar head groups are key for the
886 > maintaining the bilayer structures exhibited by this particular model;
887 > reducing the strength of the dipole has the tendency to make the
888 > rippled phase disappear.  The dipoles are likely to form attractive
889 > head-to-tail configurations even in flat configurations, but the
890 > temperatures are high enough that vortex defects become prevalent in
891 > the flat phase.  The flat phase we observed therefore appears to be
892 > substantially above the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature for
893 > a planar system of dipoles with this set of parameters.  For this
894 > reason, it would be interesting to observe the thermal behavior of the
895 > flat phase at substantially lower temperatures.
896  
897   One feature of this model is that an energetically favorable
898   orientational ordering of the dipoles can be achieved by forming

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines