1 |
%\documentclass[aps,pre,twocolumn,amssymb,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4} |
2 |
\documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4} |
3 |
\usepackage{amsmath} |
4 |
\usepackage{amssymb} |
5 |
\usepackage{graphicx} |
6 |
|
7 |
\begin{document} |
8 |
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}} |
9 |
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}} |
10 |
|
11 |
%\bibliographystyle{aps} |
12 |
|
13 |
\title{Dipolar Ordering in Molecular-scale Models of the Ripple Phase |
14 |
in Lipid Membranes} |
15 |
\author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter} |
16 |
\email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu} |
17 |
\affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\ |
18 |
University of Notre Dame, \\ |
19 |
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556} |
20 |
|
21 |
\date{\today} |
22 |
|
23 |
\begin{abstract} |
24 |
The ripple phase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers has never been |
25 |
completely explained. |
26 |
\end{abstract} |
27 |
|
28 |
\pacs{} |
29 |
\maketitle |
30 |
|
31 |
\section{Introduction} |
32 |
\label{sec:Int} |
33 |
Fully hydrated lipids will aggregate spontaneously to form bilayers |
34 |
which exhibit a variety of phases depending on their temperatures and |
35 |
compositions. Among these phases, a periodic rippled phase |
36 |
($P_{\beta'}$) appears as an intermediate phase between the gel |
37 |
($L_\beta$) and fluid ($L_{\alpha}$) phases for relatively pure |
38 |
phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers. The ripple phase has attracted |
39 |
substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most |
40 |
structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the |
41 |
X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron |
42 |
microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} Recently, Kaasgaard {\it |
43 |
et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase |
44 |
morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The |
45 |
experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional |
46 |
hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple |
47 |
phase. This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing |
48 |
within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87} |
49 |
|
50 |
A number of theoretical models have been presented to explain the |
51 |
formation of the ripple phase. Marder {\it et al.} used a |
52 |
curvature-dependent Landau-de Gennes free-energy functional to predict |
53 |
a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other related continuum |
54 |
models predict higher fluidity in convex regions and that concave |
55 |
portions of the membrane correspond to more solid-like regions. |
56 |
Carlson and Sethna used a packing-competition model (in which head |
57 |
groups and chains have competing packing energetics) to predict the |
58 |
formation of a ripple-like phase. Their model predicted that the |
59 |
high-curvature portions have lower-chain packing and correspond to |
60 |
more fluid-like regions. Goldstein and Leibler used a mean-field |
61 |
approach with a planar model for {\em inter-lamellar} interactions to |
62 |
predict rippling in multilamellar phases.~\cite{Goldstein88} McCullough |
63 |
and Scott proposed that the {\em anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor |
64 |
interactions} coupled to hydrophobic constraining forces which |
65 |
restrict height differences between nearest neighbors is the origin of |
66 |
the ripple phase.~\cite{McCullough90} Lubensky and MacKintosh |
67 |
introduced a Landau theory for tilt order and curvature of a single |
68 |
membrane and concluded that {\em coupling of molecular tilt to membrane |
69 |
curvature} is responsible for the production of |
70 |
ripples.~\cite{Lubensky93} Misbah, Duplat and Houchmandzadeh proposed |
71 |
that {\em inter-layer dipolar interactions} can lead to ripple |
72 |
instabilities.~\cite{Misbah98} Heimburg presented a {\em coexistence |
73 |
model} for ripple formation in which he postulates that fluid-phase |
74 |
line defects cause sharp curvature between relatively flat gel-phase |
75 |
regions.~\cite{Heimburg00} Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of |
76 |
polar head groups could be valuable in trying to understand bilayer |
77 |
phase formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations |
78 |
of lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large headgroups |
79 |
and molecular tilt with respect to the membrane normal vector can |
80 |
cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02} |
81 |
|
82 |
In contrast, few large-scale molecular modelling studies have been |
83 |
done due to the large size of the resulting structures and the time |
84 |
required for the phases of interest to develop. With all-atom (and |
85 |
even unified-atom) simulations, only one period of the ripple can be |
86 |
observed and only for timescales in the range of 10-100 ns. One of |
87 |
the most interesting molecular simulations was carried out by De Vries |
88 |
{\it et al.}~\cite{deVries05}. According to their simulation results, |
89 |
the ripple consists of two domains, one resembling the gel bilayer, |
90 |
while in the other, the two leaves of the bilayer are fully |
91 |
interdigitated. The mechanism for the formation of the ripple phase |
92 |
suggested by their work is a packing competition between the head |
93 |
groups and the tails of the lipid molecules.\cite{Carlson87} Recently, |
94 |
the ripple phase has also been studied by Lenz and Schmid using Monte |
95 |
Carlo simulations.\cite{Lenz07} Their structures are similar to the De |
96 |
Vries {\it et al.} structures except that the connection between the |
97 |
two leaves of the bilayer is a narrow interdigitated line instead of |
98 |
the fully interdigitated domain. The symmetric ripple phase was also |
99 |
observed by Lenz {\it et al.}, and their work supports other claims |
100 |
that the mismatch between the size of the head group and tail of the |
101 |
lipid molecules is the driving force for the formation of the ripple |
102 |
phase. Ayton and Voth have found significant undulations in |
103 |
zero-surface-tension states of membranes simulated via dissipative |
104 |
particle dynamics, but their results are consistent with purely |
105 |
thermal undulations.~\cite{Ayton02} |
106 |
|
107 |
Although the organization of the tails of lipid molecules are |
108 |
addressed by these molecular simulations and the packing competition |
109 |
between headgroups and tails is strongly implicated as the primary |
110 |
driving force for ripple formation, questions about the ordering of |
111 |
the head groups in ripple phase has not been settled. |
112 |
|
113 |
In a recent paper, we presented a simple ``web of dipoles'' spin |
114 |
lattice model which provides some physical insight into relationship |
115 |
between dipolar ordering and membrane buckling.\cite{Sun2007} We found |
116 |
that dipolar elastic membranes can spontaneously buckle, forming |
117 |
ripple-like topologies. The driving force for the buckling in dipolar |
118 |
elastic membranes the antiferroelectric ordering of the dipoles, and |
119 |
this was evident in the ordering of the dipole director axis |
120 |
perpendicular to the wave vector of the surface ripples. A similiar |
121 |
phenomenon has also been observed by Tsonchev {\it et al.} in their |
122 |
work on the spontaneous formation of dipolar peptide chains into |
123 |
curved nano-structures.\cite{Tsonchev04,Tsonchev04II} |
124 |
|
125 |
In this paper, we construct a somewhat more realistic molecular-scale |
126 |
lipid model than our previous ``web of dipoles'' and use molecular |
127 |
dynamics simulations to elucidate the role of the head group dipoles |
128 |
in the formation and morphology of the ripple phase. We describe our |
129 |
model and computational methodology in section \ref{sec:method}. |
130 |
Details on the simulations are presented in section |
131 |
\ref{sec:experiment}, with results following in section |
132 |
\ref{sec:results}. A final discussion of the role of dipolar heads in |
133 |
the ripple formation can be found in section |
134 |
\ref{sec:discussion}. |
135 |
|
136 |
\section{Computational Model} |
137 |
\label{sec:method} |
138 |
|
139 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
140 |
\centering |
141 |
\includegraphics[width=4in]{lipidModels} |
142 |
\caption{Three different representations of DPPC lipid molecules, |
143 |
including the chemical structure, an atomistic model, and the |
144 |
head-body ellipsoidal coarse-grained model used in this |
145 |
work.\label{fig:lipidModels}} |
146 |
\end{figure} |
147 |
|
148 |
Our simple molecular-scale lipid model for studying the ripple phase |
149 |
is based on two facts: one is that the most essential feature of lipid |
150 |
molecules is their amphiphilic structure with polar head groups and |
151 |
non-polar tails. Another fact is that the majority of lipid molecules |
152 |
in the ripple phase are relatively rigid (i.e. gel-like) which makes |
153 |
some fraction of the details of the chain dynamics negligible. Figure |
154 |
\ref{fig:lipidModels} shows the molecular strucure of a DPPC |
155 |
molecule, as well as atomistic and molecular-scale representations of |
156 |
a DPPC molecule. The hydrophilic character of the head group is |
157 |
largely due to the separation of charge between the nitrogen and |
158 |
phosphate groups. The zwitterionic nature of the PC headgroups leads |
159 |
to abnormally large dipole moments (as high as 20.6 D), and this |
160 |
strongly polar head group interacts strongly with the solvating water |
161 |
layers immediately surrounding the membrane. The hydrophobic tail |
162 |
consists of fatty acid chains. In our molecular scale model, lipid |
163 |
molecules have been reduced to these essential features; the fatty |
164 |
acid chains are represented by an ellipsoid with a dipolar ball |
165 |
perched on one end to represent the effects of the charge-separated |
166 |
head group. In real PC lipids, the direction of the dipole is |
167 |
nearly perpendicular to the tail, so we have fixed the direction of |
168 |
the point dipole rigidly in this orientation. |
169 |
|
170 |
The ellipsoidal portions of the model interact via the Gay-Berne |
171 |
potential which has seen widespread use in the liquid crystal |
172 |
community. Ayton and Voth have also used Gay-Berne ellipsoids for |
173 |
modelling large length-scale properties of lipid |
174 |
bilayers.\cite{Ayton01} In its original form, the Gay-Berne potential |
175 |
was a single site model for the interactions of rigid ellipsoidal |
176 |
molecules.\cite{Gay81} It can be thought of as a modification of the |
177 |
Gaussian overlap model originally described by Berne and |
178 |
Pechukas.\cite{Berne72} The potential is constructed in the familiar |
179 |
form of the Lennard-Jones function using orientation-dependent |
180 |
$\sigma$ and $\epsilon$ parameters, |
181 |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
182 |
V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat |
183 |
r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, |
184 |
{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, |
185 |
{\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^{12} |
186 |
-\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, |
187 |
{\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right] |
188 |
\label{eq:gb} |
189 |
\end{eqnarray*} |
190 |
|
191 |
The range $(\sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf |
192 |
\hat{r}}_{ij}))$, and strength $(\epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf |
193 |
\hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}))$ parameters |
194 |
are dependent on the relative orientations of the two molecules (${\bf |
195 |
\hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}$) as well as the direction of the |
196 |
intermolecular separation (${\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}$). $\sigma$ and |
197 |
$\sigma_0$ are also governed by shape mixing and anisotropy variables, |
198 |
\begin {equation} |
199 |
\begin{array}{rcl} |
200 |
\sigma_0 & = & \sqrt{d_i^2 + d_j^2} \\ \\ |
201 |
\chi & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 - |
202 |
d_j^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 + d_i^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 + |
203 |
d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2} \\ \\ |
204 |
\alpha^2 & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 + |
205 |
d_i^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 - d_j^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 + |
206 |
d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2}, |
207 |
\end{array} |
208 |
\end{equation} |
209 |
where $l$ and $d$ describe the length and width of each uniaxial |
210 |
ellipsoid. These shape anisotropy parameters can then be used to |
211 |
calculate the range function, |
212 |
\begin {equation} |
213 |
\sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) = \sigma_{0} |
214 |
\left[ 1- \left\{ \frac{ \chi \alpha^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf |
215 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi \alpha^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf |
216 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf |
217 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf |
218 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi^2 |
219 |
\left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\} |
220 |
\right]^{-1/2} |
221 |
\end{equation} |
222 |
|
223 |
Gay-Berne ellipsoids also have an energy scaling parameter, |
224 |
$\epsilon^s$, which describes the well depth for two identical |
225 |
ellipsoids in a {\it side-by-side} configuration. Additionaly, a well |
226 |
depth aspect ratio, $\epsilon^r = \epsilon^e / \epsilon^s$, describes |
227 |
the ratio between the well depths in the {\it end-to-end} and |
228 |
side-by-side configurations. As in the range parameter, a set of |
229 |
mixing and anisotropy variables can be used to describe the well |
230 |
depths for dissimilar particles, |
231 |
\begin {eqnarray*} |
232 |
\epsilon_0 & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^s_i * \epsilon^s_j} \\ \\ |
233 |
\epsilon^r & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^r_i * \epsilon^r_j} \\ \\ |
234 |
\chi' & = & \frac{1 - (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}}{1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}} |
235 |
\\ \\ |
236 |
\alpha'^2 & = & \left[1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}\right]^{-1} |
237 |
\end{eqnarray*} |
238 |
The form of the strength function is somewhat complicated, |
239 |
\begin {eqnarray*} |
240 |
\epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}, {\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) & = & |
241 |
\epsilon_{0} \epsilon_{1}^{\nu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}) |
242 |
\epsilon_{2}^{\mu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf |
243 |
\hat{r}}_{ij}) \\ \\ |
244 |
\epsilon_{1}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}) & = & |
245 |
\left[1-\chi^{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf |
246 |
\hat{u}}_{j})^{2}\right]^{-1/2} \\ \\ |
247 |
\epsilon_{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) & |
248 |
= & |
249 |
1 - \left\{ \frac{ \chi' \alpha'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf |
250 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi' \alpha'^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf |
251 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf |
252 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf |
253 |
\hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi'^2 |
254 |
\left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\}, |
255 |
\end {eqnarray*} |
256 |
although many of the quantities and derivatives are identical with |
257 |
those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \onlinecite{Luckhurst90} |
258 |
has a particularly good explanation of the choice of the Gay-Berne |
259 |
parameters $\mu$ and $\nu$ for modeling liquid crystal molecules. An |
260 |
excellent overview of the computational methods that can be used to |
261 |
efficiently compute forces and torques for this potential can be found |
262 |
in Ref. \onlinecite{Golubkov06} |
263 |
|
264 |
The choices of parameters we have used in this study correspond to a |
265 |
shape anisotropy of 3 for the chain portion of the molecule. In |
266 |
principle, this could be varied to allow for modeling of longer or |
267 |
shorter chain lipid molecules. For these prolate ellipsoids, we have: |
268 |
\begin{equation} |
269 |
\begin{array}{rcl} |
270 |
d & < & l \\ |
271 |
\epsilon^{r} & < & 1 |
272 |
\end{array} |
273 |
\end{equation} |
274 |
A sketch of the various structural elements of our molecular-scale |
275 |
lipid / solvent model is shown in figure \ref{fig:lipidModel}. The |
276 |
actual parameters used in our simulations are given in table |
277 |
\ref{tab:parameters}. |
278 |
|
279 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
280 |
\centering |
281 |
\includegraphics[width=4in]{2lipidModel} |
282 |
\caption{The parameters defining the behavior of the lipid |
283 |
models. $l / d$ is the ratio of the head group to body diameter. |
284 |
Molecular bodies had a fixed aspect ratio of 3.0. The solvent model |
285 |
was a simplified 4-water bead ($\sigma_w \approx d$) that has been |
286 |
used in other coarse-grained (DPD) simulations. The dipolar strength |
287 |
(and the temperature and pressure) were the only other parameters that |
288 |
were varied systematically.\label{fig:lipidModel}} |
289 |
\end{figure} |
290 |
|
291 |
To take into account the permanent dipolar interactions of the |
292 |
zwitterionic head groups, we place fixed dipole moments $\mu_{i}$ at |
293 |
one end of the Gay-Berne particles. The dipoles are oriented at an |
294 |
angle $\theta = \pi / 2$ relative to the major axis. These dipoles |
295 |
are protected by a head ``bead'' with a range parameter which we have |
296 |
varied between $1.20 d$ and $1.41 d$. The head groups interact with |
297 |
each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones, |
298 |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
299 |
V_{ij}(r_{ij}) = 4\epsilon_h \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} - |
300 |
\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right], |
301 |
\end{eqnarray*} |
302 |
and dipole-dipole, |
303 |
\begin{eqnarray*} |
304 |
V_{ij}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf |
305 |
\hat{r}}_{ij})) = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} |
306 |
\left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot |
307 |
\hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right] |
308 |
\end{eqnarray*} |
309 |
potentials. |
310 |
In these potentials, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing |
311 |
along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector |
312 |
pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. |
313 |
|
314 |
For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this |
315 |
case, between spheres and ellipsoids), the spheres are treated as |
316 |
ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and with an well depth |
317 |
ratio ($\epsilon^r$) of 1 ($\epsilon^e = \epsilon^s$). The form of |
318 |
the Gay-Berne potential we are using was generalized by Cleaver {\it |
319 |
et al.} and is appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial |
320 |
ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96} |
321 |
|
322 |
The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by |
323 |
Marrink {\it et al.} in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) |
324 |
simulation of lipid bilayers.\cite{Marrink04} This solvent bead is a single |
325 |
site that represents four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has |
326 |
comparable density and diffusive behavior to liquid water. However, |
327 |
since there are no electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent |
328 |
model cannot replicate the dielectric properties of water. |
329 |
\begin{table*} |
330 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
331 |
\begin{center} |
332 |
\caption{Potential parameters used for molecular-scale coarse-grained |
333 |
lipid simulations} |
334 |
\begin{tabular}{llccc} |
335 |
\hline |
336 |
& & Head & Chain & Solvent \\ |
337 |
\hline |
338 |
$d$ (\AA) & & varied & 4.6 & 4.7 \\ |
339 |
$l$ (\AA) & & $= d$ & 13.8 & 4.7 \\ |
340 |
$\epsilon^s$ (kcal/mol) & & 0.185 & 1.0 & 0.8 \\ |
341 |
$\epsilon_r$ (well-depth aspect ratio)& & 1 & 0.2 & 1 \\ |
342 |
$m$ (amu) & & 196 & 760 & 72.06 \\ |
343 |
$\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf I}$ (amu \AA$^2$) & & & & \\ |
344 |
\multicolumn{2}c{$I_{xx}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\ |
345 |
\multicolumn{2}c{$I_{yy}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\ |
346 |
\multicolumn{2}c{$I_{zz}$} & 0 & 9000 & N/A \\ |
347 |
$\mu$ (Debye) & & varied & 0 & 0 \\ |
348 |
\end{tabular} |
349 |
\label{tab:parameters} |
350 |
\end{center} |
351 |
\end{minipage} |
352 |
\end{table*} |
353 |
|
354 |
A switching function has been applied to all potentials to smoothly |
355 |
turn off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA. |
356 |
|
357 |
The parameters that were systematically varied in this study were the |
358 |
size of the head group ($\sigma_h$), the strength of the dipole moment |
359 |
($\mu$), and the temperature of the system. Values for $\sigma_h$ |
360 |
ranged from 5.5 \AA\ to 6.5 \AA\ . If the width of the tails is |
361 |
taken to be the unit of length, these head groups correspond to a |
362 |
range from $1.2 d$ to $1.41 d$. Since the solvent beads are nearly |
363 |
identical in diameter to the tail ellipsoids, all distances that |
364 |
follow will be measured relative to this unit of distance. |
365 |
|
366 |
\section{Experimental Methodology} |
367 |
\label{sec:experiment} |
368 |
|
369 |
To create unbiased bilayers, all simulations were started from two |
370 |
perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 26 \AA\ gap between the |
371 |
molecular bodies of the upper and lower leaves. The separated |
372 |
monolayers were evolved in a vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure |
373 |
coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a |
374 |
constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of |
375 |
the bilayer. Periodic boundary conditions were used, and $480-720$ |
376 |
lipid molecules were present in the simulations, depending on the size |
377 |
of the head beads. In all cases, the two monolayers spontaneously |
378 |
collapsed into bilayer structures within 100 ps. Following this |
379 |
collapse, all systems were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K. |
380 |
|
381 |
The resulting bilayer structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$ |
382 |
solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations |
383 |
were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations utilizing |
384 |
the solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) with |
385 |
$3$D anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension |
386 |
($\gamma=0.015$ UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in |
387 |
this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was utilized with excellent energy |
388 |
conservation. Data collection for structural properties of the |
389 |
bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run following the solvent |
390 |
equilibration. All simulations were performed using the OOPSE |
391 |
molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05} |
392 |
|
393 |
\section{Results} |
394 |
\label{sec:results} |
395 |
|
396 |
Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is |
397 |
more corrugated with increasing size of the head groups. The surface |
398 |
is nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20 d$. With $\sigma_h=1.28 d$, |
399 |
although the surface is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay |
400 |
inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf |
401 |
with an interdigitated line defect. Two periodicities with $100$ \AA\ |
402 |
wavelengths were observed in the simulation. This structure is very |
403 |
similiar to the structure observed by de Vries and Lenz {\it et |
404 |
al.}. The same basic structure is also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41 |
405 |
d$, but the wavelength of the surface corrugations depends sensitively |
406 |
on the size of the ``head'' beads. From the undulation spectrum, the |
407 |
corrugation is clearly non-thermal. |
408 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
409 |
\centering |
410 |
\includegraphics[width=4in]{phaseCartoon} |
411 |
\caption{A sketch to discribe the structure of the phases observed in |
412 |
our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}} |
413 |
\end{figure} |
414 |
|
415 |
When $\sigma_h=1.35 d$, we observed another corrugated surface |
416 |
morphology. This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled |
417 |
surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower |
418 |
leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several |
419 |
hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together |
420 |
much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper |
421 |
hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge |
422 |
of lower hemicylinder, this ``symmetric'' ripple has no prefered |
423 |
direction. The corresponding structures are shown in Figure |
424 |
\ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of |
425 |
different phases. The top panel in figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} is |
426 |
the flat phase, the middle panel shows the asymmetric ripple phase |
427 |
corresponding to $\sigma_h = 1.41 d$ and the lower panel shows the |
428 |
symmetric ripple phase observed when $\sigma_h=1.35 d$. In the |
429 |
symmetric ripple, the bilayer is continuous over the whole membrane, |
430 |
however, in asymmetric ripple phase, the bilayer domains are connected |
431 |
by thin interdigitated monolayers that share molecules between the |
432 |
upper and lower leaves. |
433 |
\begin{table*} |
434 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
435 |
\begin{center} |
436 |
\caption{Phases, ripple wavelengths and amplitudes observed as a |
437 |
function of the ratio between the head beads and the diameters of the |
438 |
tails. All lengths are normalized to the diameter of the tail |
439 |
ellipsoids.} |
440 |
\begin{tabular}{lccc} |
441 |
\hline |
442 |
$\sigma_h / d$ & type of phase & $\lambda / d$ & $A / d$\\ |
443 |
\hline |
444 |
1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\ |
445 |
1.28 & asymmetric ripple or flat & 21.7 & N/A \\ |
446 |
1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\ |
447 |
1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\ |
448 |
\end{tabular} |
449 |
\label{tab:property} |
450 |
\end{center} |
451 |
\end{minipage} |
452 |
\end{table*} |
453 |
|
454 |
The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda / d$, |
455 |
reduced amplitude $A / d$ of the ripples are summarized in Table |
456 |
\ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ molecular bodies |
457 |
and the amplitude is $1.5$ molecular bodies for asymmetric ripple and |
458 |
$2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These values are consistent to the |
459 |
experimental results. Note, that given the lack of structural freedom |
460 |
in the tails of our model lipids, the amplitudes observed from these |
461 |
simulations are likely to underestimate of the true amplitudes. |
462 |
|
463 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
464 |
\centering |
465 |
\includegraphics[width=4in]{topDown} |
466 |
\caption{Top views of the flat (upper), asymmetric ripple (middle), |
467 |
and symmetric ripple (lower) phases. Note that the head-group dipoles |
468 |
have formed head-to-tail chains in all three of these phases, but in |
469 |
the two rippled phases, the dipolar chains are all aligned |
470 |
{\it perpendicular} to the direction of the ripple. The flat membrane |
471 |
has multiple point defects in the dipolar orientational ordering, and |
472 |
the dipolar ordering on the lower leaf of the bilayer can be in a |
473 |
different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:topView}} |
474 |
\end{figure} |
475 |
|
476 |
Figure \ref{fig:topView} shows snapshots of bird's-eye views of the |
477 |
flat ($\sigma_h = 1.20 d$) and rippled ($\sigma_h = 1.41, 1.35 d$) |
478 |
bilayers. The directions of the dipoles on the head groups are |
479 |
represented with two colored half spheres: blue (phosphate) and yellow |
480 |
(amino). For flat bilayers, the system exhibits signs of |
481 |
orientational frustration; some disorder in the dipolar chains is |
482 |
evident with kinks visible at the edges between different ordered |
483 |
domains. The lipids can also move independently of lipids in the |
484 |
opposing leaf, so the ordering of the dipoles on one leaf is not |
485 |
necessarily consistant with the ordering on the other. These two |
486 |
factors keep the total dipolar order parameter relatively low for the |
487 |
flat phases. |
488 |
|
489 |
With increasing head group size, the surface becomes corrugated, and |
490 |
the dipoles cannot move as freely on the surface. Therefore, the |
491 |
translational freedom of lipids in one layer is dependent upon the |
492 |
position of lipids in the other layer. As a result, the ordering of |
493 |
the dipoles on head groups in one leaf is correlated with the ordering |
494 |
in the other leaf. Furthermore, as the membrane deforms due to the |
495 |
corrugation, the symmetry of the allowed dipolar ordering on each leaf |
496 |
is broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-to-tail |
497 |
configuration, and the dipolar order parameter increases dramatically. |
498 |
However, the total polarization of the system is still close to zero. |
499 |
This is strong evidence that the corrugated structure is an |
500 |
antiferroelectric state. It is also notable that the head-to-tail |
501 |
arrangement of the dipoles is in a direction perpendicular to the wave |
502 |
vector for the surface corrugation. This is a similar finding to what |
503 |
we observed in our earlier work on the elastic dipolar |
504 |
membranes.\cite{Sun07} |
505 |
|
506 |
The $P_2$ order parameters (for both the molecular bodies and the head |
507 |
group dipoles) have been calculated to quantify the ordering in these |
508 |
phases. $P_2 = 1$ implies a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2 = 0$ |
509 |
implies complete orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2} |
510 |
shows the $P_2$ order parameter for the head-group dipoles increasing |
511 |
with increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules |
512 |
are small, the membrane is nearly flat. The dipolar ordering exhibits |
513 |
frustrated orientational ordering in this circumstance. |
514 |
|
515 |
The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of |
516 |
the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter {\it decreases} |
517 |
with increasing head size. This indicates that the surface is more |
518 |
curved with larger head / tail size ratios. When the surface is flat, |
519 |
all tails are pointing in the same direction (parallel to the normal |
520 |
of the surface). This simplified model appears to be exhibiting a |
521 |
smectic A fluid phase, similar to the real $L_{\beta}$ phase. We have |
522 |
not observed a smectic C gel phase ($L_{\beta'}$) for this model |
523 |
system. Increasing the size of the heads, results in rapidly |
524 |
decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies. |
525 |
|
526 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
527 |
\centering |
528 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2} |
529 |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a function of the ratio of |
530 |
$\sigma_h$ to $d$. \label{fig:rP2}} |
531 |
\end{figure} |
532 |
|
533 |
We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the |
534 |
structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole. |
535 |
Figure \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with |
536 |
increasing strength of the dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head |
537 |
group are more ordered by increase in the strength of the interaction |
538 |
between heads and are more disordered by decreasing the interaction |
539 |
stength. When the interaction between the heads is weak enough, the |
540 |
bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules are solvated |
541 |
directly in the water. The critial value of the strength of the dipole |
542 |
depends on the head size. The perfectly flat surface melts at $5$ |
543 |
$0.03$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt at $8$ $0.04$ |
544 |
$0.03$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ $0.04$ |
545 |
debye. The ordering of the tails is the same as the ordering of the |
546 |
dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface is already |
547 |
perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much until the |
548 |
strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order parameter |
549 |
decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further |
550 |
increased. The head groups of the lipid molecules are brought closer |
551 |
by stronger interactions between them. For a flat surface, a large |
552 |
amount of free volume between the head groups is available, but when |
553 |
the head groups are brought closer, the tails will splay outward, |
554 |
forming an inverse micelle. When $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, the $P_2$ |
555 |
order parameter decreases slightly after the strength of the dipole is |
556 |
increased to $16$ debye. For rippled surfaces, there is less free |
557 |
volume available between the head groups. Therefore there is little |
558 |
effect on the structure of the membrane due to increasing dipolar |
559 |
strength. However, the increase of the $P_2$ order parameter implies |
560 |
the membranes are flatten by the increase of the strength of the |
561 |
dipole. Unlike other systems that melt directly when the interaction |
562 |
is weak enough, for $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane |
563 |
melts into itself first. The upper leaf of the bilayer becomes totally |
564 |
interdigitated with the lower leaf. This is different behavior than |
565 |
what is exhibited with the interdigitated lines in the rippled phase |
566 |
where only one interdigitated line connects the two leaves of bilayer. |
567 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
568 |
\centering |
569 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2} |
570 |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the strength of the |
571 |
dipole.\label{fig:sP2}} |
572 |
\end{figure} |
573 |
|
574 |
Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameter on |
575 |
temperature. The behavior of the $P_2$ order paramter is |
576 |
straightforward. Systems are more ordered at low temperature, and more |
577 |
disordered at high temperatures. When the temperature is high enough, |
578 |
the membranes are instable. For flat surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$ |
579 |
and $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$), when the temperature is increased to |
580 |
$310$, the $P_2$ order parameter increases slightly instead of |
581 |
decreases like ripple surface. This is an evidence of the frustration |
582 |
of the dipolar ordering in each leaf of the lipid bilayer, at low |
583 |
temperature, the systems are locked in a local minimum energy state, |
584 |
with increase of the temperature, the system can jump out the local |
585 |
energy well to find the lower energy state which is the longer range |
586 |
orientational ordering. Like the dipolar ordering of the flat |
587 |
surfaces, the ordering of the tails of the lipid molecules for ripple |
588 |
membranes ($\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$) also |
589 |
show some nonthermal characteristic. With increase of the temperature, |
590 |
the $P_2$ order parameter decreases firstly, and increases afterward |
591 |
when the temperature is greater than $290 K$. The increase of the |
592 |
$P_2$ order parameter indicates a more ordered structure for the tails |
593 |
of the lipid molecules which corresponds to a more flat surface. Since |
594 |
our model lacks the detailed information on lipid tails, we can not |
595 |
simulate the fluid phase with melted fatty acid chains. Moreover, the |
596 |
formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase also depends on the |
597 |
organization of fatty groups on tails. |
598 |
\begin{figure}[htb] |
599 |
\centering |
600 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2} |
601 |
\caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of |
602 |
temperature.\label{fig:tP2}} |
603 |
\end{figure} |
604 |
|
605 |
\section{Discussion} |
606 |
\label{sec:discussion} |
607 |
|
608 |
\newpage |
609 |
\bibliography{mdripple} |
610 |
\end{document} |