ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3199 by gezelter, Thu Jul 26 19:47:06 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3200 by gezelter, Fri Jul 27 21:59:45 2007 UTC

# Line 271 | Line 271 | d & < & l \\
271   \epsilon^{r} & < & 1
272   \end{array}
273   \end{equation}
274 + A sketch of the various structural elements of our molecular-scale
275 + lipid / solvent model is shown in figure \ref{fig:lipidModel}.  The
276 + actual parameters used in our simulations are given in table
277 + \ref{tab:parameters}.
278  
279   \begin{figure}[htb]
280   \centering
# Line 292 | Line 296 | each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
296   varied between $1.20 d$ and $1.41 d$.  The head groups interact with
297   each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
298   \begin{eqnarray*}
299 < V_{ij} = 4\epsilon \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
299 > V_{ij}(r_{ij}) = 4\epsilon_h \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
300   \left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right],
301   \end{eqnarray*}
302   and dipole-dipole,
303   \begin{eqnarray*}
304 < V_{ij} = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
304 > V_{ij}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
305 > \hat{r}}_{ij})) = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
306   \left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot
307   \hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right]
308   \end{eqnarray*}
# Line 309 | Line 314 | ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and wit
314   For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this
315   case, between spheres and ellipsoids), the spheres are treated as
316   ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and with an well depth
317 < ratio of 1 ($\epsilon^e = \epsilon^s$).  The form of the Gay-Berne
318 < potential we are using was generalized by Cleaver {\it et al.} and is
319 < appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96}
317 > ratio ($\epsilon^r$) of 1 ($\epsilon^e = \epsilon^s$).  The form of
318 > the Gay-Berne potential we are using was generalized by Cleaver {\it
319 > et al.} and is appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial
320 > ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96}
321  
322   The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by
323   Marrink {\it et al.}  in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD)
# Line 329 | Line 335 | lipid simulations}
335   \hline
336    & &  Head & Chain & Solvent \\
337   \hline
338 < $d$ (\AA) & & varied & 4.6 & 4.7 \\
339 < $l$ (\AA) & & 1 & 3 & 1 \\
338 > $d$ (\AA) & & varied & 4.6  & 4.7 \\
339 > $l$ (\AA) & & $= d$ & 13.8 & 4.7 \\
340   $\epsilon^s$ (kcal/mol) & & 0.185 & 1.0 & 0.8 \\
341   $\epsilon_r$ (well-depth aspect ratio)& & 1 & 0.2 &  1 \\
342 < $m$ (amu) & & 196 & 760 & 72.06112 \\
342 > $m$ (amu) & & 196 & 760 & 72.06 \\
343   $\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf I}$ (amu \AA$^2$) & & & & \\
344   \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{xx}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
345   \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{yy}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
# Line 347 | Line 353 | turn off the interactions between a range of $22$ and
353  
354   A switching function has been applied to all potentials to smoothly
355   turn off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA.
356 +
357 + The parameters that were systematically varied in this study were the
358 + size of the head group ($\sigma_h$), the strength of the dipole moment
359 + ($\mu$), and the temperature of the system.  Values for $\sigma_h$
360 + ranged from 5.5 \AA\  to 6.5 \AA\ .  If the width of the tails is
361 + taken to be the unit of length, these head groups correspond to a
362 + range from $1.2 d$ to $1.41 d$.  Since the solvent beads are nearly
363 + identical in diameter to the tail ellipsoids, all distances that
364 + follow will be measured relative to this unit of distance.
365  
366   \section{Experimental Methodology}
367   \label{sec:experiment}
368  
369   To create unbiased bilayers, all simulations were started from two
370 < perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 20 \AA\ gap between the
370 > perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 26 \AA\ gap between the
371   molecular bodies of the upper and lower leaves.  The separated
372   monolayers were evolved in a vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
373   coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a
374   constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of
375 < the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used, and $480-720$ lipid
376 < molecules were present in the simulations depending on the size of the
377 < head beads.  The two monolayers spontaneously collapse into bilayer
378 < structures within 100 ps, and following this collapse, all systems
379 < were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K.
375 > the bilayer. Periodic boundary conditions were used, and $480-720$
376 > lipid molecules were present in the simulations, depending on the size
377 > of the head beads.  In all cases, the two monolayers spontaneously
378 > collapsed into bilayer structures within 100 ps. Following this
379 > collapse, all systems were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K.
380  
381 < The resulting structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$ DPD
381 > The resulting bilayer structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$
382   solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations
383 < were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations with
384 < solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D
385 < anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$
386 < UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in this model, a
387 < timestep of $50$ fs was utilized.  Data collection for structural
388 < properties of the bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run
389 < following the solvent equilibration.  All simulations were performed
390 < using the OOPSE molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
383 > were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations utilizing
384 > the solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) with
385 > $3$D anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension
386 > ($\gamma=0.015$ UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in
387 > this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was utilized with excellent energy
388 > conservation.  Data collection for structural properties of the
389 > bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run following the solvent
390 > equilibration.  All simulations were performed using the OOPSE
391 > molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
392  
393   \section{Results}
394   \label{sec:results}
395  
396   Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is
397 < more corrugated increasing size of the head groups. The surface is
398 < nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$. With
399 < $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface is still flat, the
400 < bilayer starts to splay inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is
401 < connected to the lower leaf with an interdigitated line defect. Two
402 < periodicities with $100$ \AA\ width were observed in the
403 < simulation. This structure is very similiar to the structure observed
404 < by de Vries and Lenz {\it et al.}. The same basic structure is also
405 < observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, but the wavelength of the
406 < surface corrugations depends sensitively on the size of the ``head''
407 < beads. From the undulation spectrum, the corrugation is clearly
392 < non-thermal.
397 > more corrugated with increasing size of the head groups. The surface
398 > is nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20 d$. With $\sigma_h=1.28 d$,
399 > although the surface is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay
400 > inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf
401 > with an interdigitated line defect. Two periodicities with $100$ \AA\
402 > wavelengths were observed in the simulation. This structure is very
403 > similiar to the structure observed by de Vries and Lenz {\it et
404 > al.}. The same basic structure is also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41
405 > d$, but the wavelength of the surface corrugations depends sensitively
406 > on the size of the ``head'' beads. From the undulation spectrum, the
407 > corrugation is clearly non-thermal.
408   \begin{figure}[htb]
409   \centering
410   \includegraphics[width=4in]{phaseCartoon}
# Line 397 | Line 412 | our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}}
412   our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}}
413   \end{figure}
414  
415 < When $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface
416 < morphology. This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled
415 > When $\sigma_h=1.35 d$, we observed another corrugated surface
416 > morphology.  This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled
417   surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower
418   leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several
419   hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together
420   much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper
421   hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge
422 < of lower hemicylinder, the symmetric ripple has no prefered direction.
423 < The corresponding cartoons are shown in Figure
422 > of lower hemicylinder, this ``symmetric'' ripple has no prefered
423 > direction.  The corresponding structures are shown in Figure
424   \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of
425 < different phases. Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} (a) is the flat phase,
426 < (b) is the asymmetric ripple phase corresponding to the lipid
427 < organization when $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$,
428 < and (c) is the symmetric ripple phase observed when
429 < $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$. In symmetric ripple phase, the bilayer is
430 < continuous everywhere on the whole membrane, however, in asymmetric
431 < ripple phase, the bilayer is intermittent domains connected by thin
432 < interdigitated monolayer which consists of upper and lower leaves of
418 < the bilayer.
425 > different phases.  The top panel in figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} is
426 > the flat phase, the middle panel shows the asymmetric ripple phase
427 > corresponding to $\sigma_h = 1.41 d$ and the lower panel shows the
428 > symmetric ripple phase observed when $\sigma_h=1.35 d$. In the
429 > symmetric ripple, the bilayer is continuous over the whole membrane,
430 > however, in asymmetric ripple phase, the bilayer domains are connected
431 > by thin interdigitated monolayers that share molecules between the
432 > upper and lower leaves.
433   \begin{table*}
434   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
435   \begin{center}
436 < \caption{}
436 > \caption{Phases, ripple wavelengths and amplitudes observed as a
437 > function of the ratio between the head beads and the diameters of the
438 > tails.  All lengths are normalized to the diameter of the tail
439 > ellipsoids.}
440   \begin{tabular}{lccc}
441   \hline
442 < $\sigma_h/\sigma_0$ & type of phase & $\lambda/\sigma_0$ & $A/\sigma_0$\\
442 > $\sigma_h / d$ & type of phase & $\lambda / d$ & $A / d$\\
443   \hline
444   1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\
445 < 1.28 & asymmetric flat & 21.7 & N/A \\
445 > 1.28 & asymmetric ripple or flat & 21.7 & N/A \\
446   1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\
447   1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\
448   \end{tabular}
# Line 434 | Line 451 | $\sigma_h/\sigma_0$ & type of phase & $\lambda/\sigma_
451   \end{minipage}
452   \end{table*}
453  
454 < The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda/\sigma_0$,
455 < reduced amplitude $A/\sigma_0$ of the ripples are summerized in Table
456 < \ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ and the amplitude
457 < is $1.5$ for asymmetric ripple and $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These
458 < values are consistent to the experimental results. Note, the
459 < amplitudes are underestimated without the melted tails in our
460 < simulations.
454 > The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda / d$,
455 > reduced amplitude $A / d$ of the ripples are summarized in Table
456 > \ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ molecular bodies
457 > and the amplitude is $1.5$ molecular bodies for asymmetric ripple and
458 > $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These values are consistent to the
459 > experimental results.  Note, that given the lack of structural freedom
460 > in the tails of our model lipids, the amplitudes observed from these
461 > simulations are likely to underestimate of the true amplitudes.
462  
463   \begin{figure}[htb]
464   \centering
# Line 455 | Line 473 | different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:top
473   different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:topView}}
474   \end{figure}
475  
476 < The $P_2$ order paramters (for molecular bodies and head group
477 < dipoles) have been calculated to clarify the ordering in these phases
478 < quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2=0$
479 < implies orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows the
480 < $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group rising with
481 < increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules are
482 < small, the membrane is flat. The dipolar ordering is essentially
483 < frustrated on orientational ordering in this circumstance. Figure
484 < \ref{fig:topView} shows the snapshots of the top view for the flat system
485 < ($\sigma_h=1.20\sigma$) and rippled system
486 < ($\sigma_h=1.41\sigma$). The pointing direction of the dipoles on the
487 < head groups are represented by two colored half spheres from blue to
470 < yellow. For flat surfaces, the system obviously shows frustration on
471 < the dipolar ordering, there are kinks on the edge of defferent
472 < domains. Another reason is that the lipids can move independently in
473 < each monolayer, it is not nessasory for the direction of dipoles on
474 < one leaf is consistant to another layer, which makes total order
475 < parameter is relatively low. With increasing head group size, the
476 < surface is corrugated, and dipoles do not move as freely on the
477 < surface. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer
478 < is dependent upon the position of lipids in another layer, as a
479 < result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is tied
480 < to the symmetry in the other layer. Furthermore, as the membrane
481 < deforms from two to three dimensions due to the corrugation, the
482 < symmetry of the ordering for the dipoles embedded on each leaf is
483 < broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-tail configuration,
484 < and the order parameter increases dramaticaly. However, the total
485 < polarization of the system is still close to zero. This is strong
486 < evidence that the corrugated structure is an antiferroelectric
487 < state. From the snapshot in Figure \ref{}, the dipoles arrange as
488 < arrays along $Y$ axis and fall into head-to-tail configuration in each
489 < line, but every $3$ or $4$ lines of dipoles change their direction
490 < from neighbour lines. The system shows antiferroelectric
491 < charactoristic as a whole. The orientation of the dipolar is always
492 < perpendicular to the ripple wave vector. These results are consistent
493 < with our previous study on dipolar membranes.
476 > Figure \ref{fig:topView} shows snapshots of bird's-eye views of the
477 > flat ($\sigma_h = 1.20 d$) and rippled ($\sigma_h = 1.41, 1.35 d$)
478 > bilayers.  The directions of the dipoles on the head groups are
479 > represented with two colored half spheres: blue (phosphate) and yellow
480 > (amino).  For flat bilayers, the system exhibits signs of
481 > orientational frustration; some disorder in the dipolar chains is
482 > evident with kinks visible at the edges between different ordered
483 > domains.  The lipids can also move independently of lipids in the
484 > opposing leaf, so the ordering of the dipoles on one leaf is not
485 > necessarily consistant with the ordering on the other.  These two
486 > factors keep the total dipolar order parameter relatively low for the
487 > flat phases.
488  
489 + With increasing head group size, the surface becomes corrugated, and
490 + the dipoles cannot move as freely on the surface. Therefore, the
491 + translational freedom of lipids in one layer is dependent upon the
492 + position of lipids in the other layer.  As a result, the ordering of
493 + the dipoles on head groups in one leaf is correlated with the ordering
494 + in the other leaf.  Furthermore, as the membrane deforms due to the
495 + corrugation, the symmetry of the allowed dipolar ordering on each leaf
496 + is broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-to-tail
497 + configuration, and the dipolar order parameter increases dramatically.
498 + However, the total polarization of the system is still close to zero.
499 + This is strong evidence that the corrugated structure is an
500 + antiferroelectric state.   It is also notable that the head-to-tail
501 + arrangement of the dipoles is in a direction perpendicular to the wave
502 + vector for the surface corrugation.  This is a similar finding to what
503 + we observed in our earlier work on the elastic dipolar
504 + membranes.\cite{Sun07}
505 +
506 + The $P_2$ order parameters (for both the molecular bodies and the head
507 + group dipoles) have been calculated to quantify the ordering in these
508 + phases.  $P_2 = 1$ implies a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2 = 0$
509 + implies complete orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2}
510 + shows the $P_2$ order parameter for the head-group dipoles increasing
511 + with increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules
512 + are small, the membrane is nearly flat. The dipolar ordering exhibits
513 + frustrated orientational ordering in this circumstance.
514 +
515   The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of
516 < the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter decreases with
517 < increasing head size. This indicates the surface is more curved with
518 < larger head groups. When the surface is flat, all tails are pointing
519 < in the same direction; in this case, all tails are parallel to the
520 < normal of the surface,(making this structure remindcent of the
521 < $L_{\beta}$ phase. Increasing the size of the heads, results in
522 < rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
516 > the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter {\it decreases}
517 > with increasing head size. This indicates that the surface is more
518 > curved with larger head / tail size ratios. When the surface is flat,
519 > all tails are pointing in the same direction (parallel to the normal
520 > of the surface).  This simplified model appears to be exhibiting a
521 > smectic A fluid phase, similar to the real $L_{\beta}$ phase.  We have
522 > not observed a smectic C gel phase ($L_{\beta'}$) for this model
523 > system.  Increasing the size of the heads, results in rapidly
524 > decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
525  
526   \begin{figure}[htb]
527   \centering
528   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2}
529 < \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the ratio of
530 < $\sigma_h$ to $\sigma_0$.\label{fig:rP2}}
529 > \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a function of the ratio of
530 > $\sigma_h$ to $d$. \label{fig:rP2}}
531   \end{figure}
532  
533   We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines