ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3195 by gezelter, Wed Jul 25 20:04:04 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3196 by gezelter, Wed Jul 25 21:39:35 2007 UTC

# Line 130 | Line 130 | the ripple formation can be found in section
130   the ripple formation can be found in section
131   \ref{sec:discussion}.
132  
133 < \section{Methodology and Model}
133 > \section{Computational Model}
134   \label{sec:method}
135  
136   Our simple molecular-scale lipid model for studying the ripple phase
# Line 271 | Line 271 | potentials to smoothly turn off the interactions betwe
271   \end{eqnarray*}
272   the strength parameter has been adjusted as suggested by Cleaver {\it
273   et al.}\cite{Cleaver96}  A switching function has been applied to all
274 < potentials to smoothly turn off the interactions between a range of  $22$ \AA\ and $25$ \AA.
274 > potentials to smoothly turn off the interactions between a range of  $22$  and $25$ \AA.
275  
276 < The model of the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of
277 < ``DPD'' water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one
278 < sphere.
276 > The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by XXX
277 > in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation of lipid
278 > bilayers.]cite{XXX} This solvent bead is a single site that represents
279 > four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has comparable density and
280 > diffusive behavior to liquid water.  However, since there are no
281 > electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent model cannot
282 > replicate the dielectric properties of water.
283  
284   \begin{figure}[htb]
285   \centering
286 < \includegraphics[height=4in]{lipidModel}
286 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{2lipidModel}
287   \caption{The parameters defining the behavior of the lipid
288   models. $\sigma_h / \sigma_0$ is the ratio of the head group to body
289 < diameter.  Molecular bodies all had an aspect ratio of 3.0.  The
290 < dipolar strength (and the temperature and pressure) wer the only other
291 < parameters that wer varied systematically.\label{fig:lipidModel}}
289 > diameter.  Molecular bodies had a fixed aspect ratio of 3.0.  The
290 > solvent model was a simplified 4-water bead ($\sigma_w = 1.02
291 > \sigma_0$) that has been used in other coarse-grained (DPD) simulations.
292 > The dipolar strength (and the temperature and pressure) were the only
293 > other parameters that were varied
294 > systematically.\label{fig:lipidModel}}
295   \end{figure}
296  
297 < \section{Experiment}
297 > \section{Experimental Methodology}
298   \label{sec:experiment}
299  
300 < To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time
301 < behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulations were started from two
302 < separate monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
300 > To create unbiased bilayers, all simulations were started from two
301 > perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 20 \AA\ gap between the
302 > molecular bodies of the upper and lower leaves.  The separated
303 > monolayers were evolved in a vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
304   coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a
305   constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of
306 < the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used. There were $480-720$ lipid
307 < molecules in the simulations depending on the size of the head
308 < beads. All the simulations were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$
309 < K. The resulting structures were solvated in water ($6$ DPD
310 < water/lipid molecule). These configurations were relaxed for another
303 < $30$ ns relaxation. All simulations with water were carried out at
304 < constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and
305 < constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Given the absence of fast
306 < degrees of freedom in this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was
307 < utilized. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE
308 < package\cite{Meineke05}.
306 > the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used, and $480-720$ lipid
307 > molecules were present in the simulations depending on the size of the
308 > head beads.  The two monolayers spontaneously collapse into bilayer
309 > structures within 100 ps, and following this collapse, all systems
310 > were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K.
311  
312 < \section{Results and Analysis}
312 > The resulting structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$ DPD
313 > solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations
314 > were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations with
315 > solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D
316 > anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$
317 > UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in this model, a
318 > timestep of $50$ fs was utilized.  Data collection for structural
319 > properties of the bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run
320 > following the solvent equilibration.  All simulations were performed
321 > using the OOPSE molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
322 >
323 > \section{Results}
324   \label{sec:results}
325  
326   Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines