ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3147 by xsun, Mon Jun 25 21:16:17 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3202 by gezelter, Wed Aug 1 16:07:12 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[aps,pre,twocolumn,amssymb,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
2 > %\documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb]{revtex4}
3 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
4 > \usepackage{times}
5 > \usepackage{mathptm}
6 > \usepackage{tabularx}
7 > \usepackage{setspace}
8 > \usepackage{amsmath}
9 > \usepackage{amssymb}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 + \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 + \pagestyle{plain}
13 + \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 + \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 + \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 + \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 + \brokenpenalty=10000
18 + \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 + \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
21   \begin{document}
22 < \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
23 < \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
22 > %\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
23 > %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
24  
25 < %\bibliographystyle{aps}
25 > \bibliographystyle{achemso}
26  
27 < \title{}
28 < \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter}
29 < \email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
30 < \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
31 < University of Notre Dame, \\
27 > \title{Dipolar Ordering in Molecular-scale Models of the Ripple Phase
28 > in Lipid Membranes}
29 > \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
30 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
31 > University of Notre Dame, \\
32   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
33  
34 + %\email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
35 +
36   \date{\today}
37  
38 < \begin{abstract}
38 > \maketitle
39  
40 + \begin{abstract}
41 + The ripple phase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers has never been
42 + completely explained.
43   \end{abstract}
44  
45 < \pacs{}
25 < \maketitle
45 > %\maketitle
46  
47 < Our idea for developing a simple and reasonable lipid model to study
48 < the ripple pahse of lipid bilayers is based on two facts: one is that
49 < the most essential feature of lipid molecules is their amphiphilic
50 < structure with polar head groups and non-polar tails. Another fact is
51 < that dominant numbers of lipid molecules are very rigid in ripple
52 < phase which allows the details of the lipid molecules neglectable. In
53 < our model, lipid molecules are represented by rigid bodies made of one
54 < head sphere with a point dipole sitting on it and one ellipsoid tail,
55 < the direction of the dipole is fixed to be perpendicular to the
56 < tail. The breadth and length of tail are $\sigma_0$, $3\sigma_0$. The
57 < diameter of heads varies from $1.20\sigma_0$ to $1.41\sigma_0$.  The
58 < model of the solvent in our simulations is inspired by the idea of
59 < ``DPD'' water. Every four water molecules are reprsented by one
60 < sphere.
47 > \section{Introduction}
48 > \label{sec:Int}
49 > Fully hydrated lipids will aggregate spontaneously to form bilayers
50 > which exhibit a variety of phases depending on their temperatures and
51 > compositions. Among these phases, a periodic rippled phase
52 > ($P_{\beta'}$) appears as an intermediate phase between the gel
53 > ($L_\beta$) and fluid ($L_{\alpha}$) phases for relatively pure
54 > phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers.  The ripple phase has attracted
55 > substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
56 > structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
57 > X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
58 > microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} Recently, Kaasgaard {\it
59 > et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase
60 > morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
61 > experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
62 > hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
63 > phase.  This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
64 > within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87}
65  
66 + A number of theoretical models have been presented to explain the
67 + formation of the ripple phase. Marder {\it et al.} used a
68 + curvature-dependent Landau-de Gennes free-energy functional to predict
69 + a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other related continuum
70 + models predict higher fluidity in convex regions and that concave
71 + portions of the membrane correspond to more solid-like regions.
72 + Carlson and Sethna used a packing-competition model (in which head
73 + groups and chains have competing packing energetics) to predict the
74 + formation of a ripple-like phase.  Their model predicted that the
75 + high-curvature portions have lower-chain packing and correspond to
76 + more fluid-like regions.  Goldstein and Leibler used a mean-field
77 + approach with a planar model for {\em inter-lamellar} interactions to
78 + predict rippling in multilamellar phases.~\cite{Goldstein88} McCullough
79 + and Scott proposed that the {\em anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor
80 + interactions} coupled to hydrophobic constraining forces which
81 + restrict height differences between nearest neighbors is the origin of
82 + the ripple phase.~\cite{McCullough90} Lubensky and MacKintosh
83 + introduced a Landau theory for tilt order and curvature of a single
84 + membrane and concluded that {\em coupling of molecular tilt to membrane
85 + curvature} is responsible for the production of
86 + ripples.~\cite{Lubensky93} Misbah, Duplat and Houchmandzadeh proposed
87 + that {\em inter-layer dipolar interactions} can lead to ripple
88 + instabilities.~\cite{Misbah98} Heimburg presented a {\em coexistence
89 + model} for ripple formation in which he postulates that fluid-phase
90 + line defects cause sharp curvature between relatively flat gel-phase
91 + regions.~\cite{Heimburg00} Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of
92 + polar head groups could be valuable in trying to understand bilayer
93 + phase formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations
94 + of lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large headgroups
95 + and molecular tilt with respect to the membrane normal vector can
96 + cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02}
97  
98 < Spheres interact each other with Lennard-Jones potential, ellipsoids
99 < interact each other with Gay-Berne potential, dipoles interact each
100 < other with typical dipole potential, spheres interact ellipsoids with
101 < LJ-GB potential. All potentials are truncated at $25$ \AA and shifted
102 < at $22$ \AA.
98 > In contrast, few large-scale molecular modelling studies have been
99 > done due to the large size of the resulting structures and the time
100 > required for the phases of interest to develop.  With all-atom (and
101 > even unified-atom) simulations, only one period of the ripple can be
102 > observed and only for timescales in the range of 10-100 ns.  One of
103 > the most interesting molecular simulations was carried out by De Vries
104 > {\it et al.}~\cite{deVries05}. According to their simulation results,
105 > the ripple consists of two domains, one resembling the gel bilayer,
106 > while in the other, the two leaves of the bilayer are fully
107 > interdigitated.  The mechanism for the formation of the ripple phase
108 > suggested by their work is a packing competition between the head
109 > groups and the tails of the lipid molecules.\cite{Carlson87} Recently,
110 > the ripple phase has also been studied by Lenz and Schmid using Monte
111 > Carlo simulations.\cite{Lenz07} Their structures are similar to the De
112 > Vries {\it et al.} structures except that the connection between the
113 > two leaves of the bilayer is a narrow interdigitated line instead of
114 > the fully interdigitated domain.  The symmetric ripple phase was also
115 > observed by Lenz {\it et al.}, and their work supports other claims
116 > that the mismatch between the size of the head group and tail of the
117 > lipid molecules is the driving force for the formation of the ripple
118 > phase. Ayton and Voth have found significant undulations in
119 > zero-surface-tension states of membranes simulated via dissipative
120 > particle dynamics, but their results are consistent with purely
121 > thermal undulations.~\cite{Ayton02}
122  
123 + Although the organization of the tails of lipid molecules are
124 + addressed by these molecular simulations and the packing competition
125 + between headgroups and tails is strongly implicated as the primary
126 + driving force for ripple formation, questions about the ordering of
127 + the head groups in ripple phase has not been settled.
128  
129 < To make the simulations less expensive and to observe long-time range
130 < behavior of the lipid membranes, all simulaitons were started from two
131 < sepetated monolayers in the vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
132 < coupling, length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed to prevent
133 < the shrinkage of the simulation boxes due to the free volume outside
134 < of the bilayer, and a constant surface tension was applied to enable
135 < the fluctuation of the surface. Periodic boundaries were used. There
136 < were $480-720$ lipid molecules in simulations according to different
137 < size of the heads. All the simulations were stablized for $100$ ns at
138 < $300$ K. The resulted structures were solvated in the water (about
139 < $6$ DPD water/lipid molecule) as the initial configurations for another
61 < $30$ ns relaxation. All simulations with water were carried out at
62 < constant pressure ($P=1$bar) by $3$D anisotropic coupling, and
63 < constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$). Time step was
64 < $50$ fs. Simulations were performed by using OOPSE package.
129 > In a recent paper, we presented a simple ``web of dipoles'' spin
130 > lattice model which provides some physical insight into relationship
131 > between dipolar ordering and membrane buckling.\cite{Sun2007} We found
132 > that dipolar elastic membranes can spontaneously buckle, forming
133 > ripple-like topologies.  The driving force for the buckling in dipolar
134 > elastic membranes the antiferroelectric ordering of the dipoles, and
135 > this was evident in the ordering of the dipole director axis
136 > perpendicular to the wave vector of the surface ripples.  A similiar
137 > phenomenon has also been observed by Tsonchev {\it et al.} in their
138 > work on the spontaneous formation of dipolar peptide chains into
139 > curved nano-structures.\cite{Tsonchev04,Tsonchev04II}
140  
141 + In this paper, we construct a somewhat more realistic molecular-scale
142 + lipid model than our previous ``web of dipoles'' and use molecular
143 + dynamics simulations to elucidate the role of the head group dipoles
144 + in the formation and morphology of the ripple phase.  We describe our
145 + model and computational methodology in section \ref{sec:method}.
146 + Details on the simulations are presented in section
147 + \ref{sec:experiment}, with results following in section
148 + \ref{sec:results}.  A final discussion of the role of dipolar heads in
149 + the ripple formation can be found in section
150 + \ref{sec:discussion}.
151  
152 < Snap shots show that the membrane is more corrugated with increasing
153 < the size of the head groups. The surface is nearly perfect flat when
69 < $\sigma_h$ is $1.20\sigma_0$. At $1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface
70 < is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay inward, the upper leaf of
71 < the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf with a interdigitated line
72 < defect. Two periodicities with $100$\AA width were observed in the
73 < simulation. This structure is very similiar to OTHER PAPER. The same
74 < structure was also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$. However, the
75 < surface of the membrane is corrugated, and the periodicity of the
76 < connection between upper and lower leaf membrane is shorter. From the
77 < undulation spectrum of the surface (the exact form is in OUR PREVIOUS
78 < PAPER), the corrugation is non-thermal fluctuation, and we are
79 < confident to identify it as the ripple phase. The width of one ripple
80 < is about $71$ \AA, and amplitude is about $7$ \AA. When
81 < $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface with
82 < $79$ \AA width and $10$ \AA amplitude. This structure is different to
83 < the previous rippled surface, there is no connection between upper and
84 < lower leaf of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken to
85 < several curved pieces, the broken position is mounted into the center
86 < of opposite piece in another leaf. Unlike another corrugated surface
87 < in which the upper leaf of the surface is always connected to the
88 < lower leaf from one direction, this ripple of this surface is
89 < isotropic. Therefore, we claim this is a symmetric ripple phase.
152 > \section{Computational Model}
153 > \label{sec:method}
154  
155 + \begin{figure}[htb]
156 + \centering
157 + \includegraphics[width=4in]{lipidModels}
158 + \caption{Three different representations of DPPC lipid molecules,
159 + including the chemical structure, an atomistic model, and the
160 + head-body ellipsoidal coarse-grained model used in this
161 + work.\label{fig:lipidModels}}
162 + \end{figure}
163  
164 < The $P_2$ order paramter is calculated to understand the phase
165 < behavior quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfect ordered structure, and
166 < $P_2=0$ means a random structure. The method can be found in OUR
167 < PAPER. Fig. shows $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group
168 < raises with increasing the size of the head group. When head of lipid
169 < molecule is small, the membrane is flat and shows strong two
170 < dimensional characters, dipoles are frustrated on orientational
171 < ordering in this circumstance. Another reason is that the lipids can
172 < move independently in each monolayer, it is not nessasory for the
173 < direction of dipoles on one leaf is consistant to another layer, which
174 < makes total order parameter is relatively low. With increasing the
175 < size of head group, the surface is being more corrugated, dipoles are
176 < not allowed to move freely on the surface, they are
177 < localized. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer
178 < is dependent upon the position of lipids in another layer, as a
179 < result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is
180 < consistant to the symmetry in another layer. Furthermore, the membrane
181 < tranlates from a two dimensional system to a three dimensional system
182 < by the corrugation, the symmetry of the ordering for the two
183 < dimensional dipoles on the head group of lipid molecules is broken, on
184 < a distorted lattice, dipoles are ordered on a head to tail energy
113 < state, the order parameter is increased dramaticly. However, the total
114 < polarization of the system is close to zero, which is a strong
115 < evidence it is a antiferroelectric state. The orientation of the
116 < dipole ordering is alway perpendicular to the ripple vector. These
117 < results are consistant to our previous study on similar system. The
118 < ordering of the tails are opposite to the ordering of the dipoles on
119 < head group, the $P_2$ order parameter decreases with increasing the
120 < size of head. This indicates the surface is more curved with larger
121 < head. When surface is flat, all tails are pointing to the same
122 < direction, in this case, all tails are parallal to the normal of the
123 < surface, which shares the same structure with $L_{\beta}$ phase. For the
124 < size of head being $1.28\sigma_0$, the surface starts to splay inward,
125 < however, the surface is still flat, therefore, although the order
126 < parameter is lower, it still indicates a very flat surface. Further
127 < increasing the size of the head, the order parameter drops dramaticly,
128 < the surface is rippled.
164 > Our simple molecular-scale lipid model for studying the ripple phase
165 > is based on two facts: one is that the most essential feature of lipid
166 > molecules is their amphiphilic structure with polar head groups and
167 > non-polar tails. Another fact is that the majority of lipid molecules
168 > in the ripple phase are relatively rigid (i.e. gel-like) which makes
169 > some fraction of the details of the chain dynamics negligible.  Figure
170 > \ref{fig:lipidModels} shows the molecular strucure of a DPPC
171 > molecule, as well as atomistic and molecular-scale representations of
172 > a DPPC molecule.  The hydrophilic character of the head group is
173 > largely due to the separation of charge between the nitrogen and
174 > phosphate groups.  The zwitterionic nature of the PC headgroups leads
175 > to abnormally large dipole moments (as high as 20.6 D), and this
176 > strongly polar head group interacts strongly with the solvating water
177 > layers immediately surrounding the membrane.  The hydrophobic tail
178 > consists of fatty acid chains.  In our molecular scale model, lipid
179 > molecules have been reduced to these essential features; the fatty
180 > acid chains are represented by an ellipsoid with a dipolar ball
181 > perched on one end to represent the effects of the charge-separated
182 > head group.  In real PC lipids, the direction of the dipole is
183 > nearly perpendicular to the tail, so we have fixed the direction of
184 > the point dipole rigidly in this orientation.  
185  
186 + The ellipsoidal portions of the model interact via the Gay-Berne
187 + potential which has seen widespread use in the liquid crystal
188 + community.  Ayton and Voth have also used Gay-Berne ellipsoids for
189 + modelling large length-scale properties of lipid
190 + bilayers.\cite{Ayton01} In its original form, the Gay-Berne potential
191 + was a single site model for the interactions of rigid ellipsoidal
192 + molecules.\cite{Gay81} It can be thought of as a modification of the
193 + Gaussian overlap model originally described by Berne and
194 + Pechukas.\cite{Berne72} The potential is constructed in the familiar
195 + form of the Lennard-Jones function using orientation-dependent
196 + $\sigma$ and $\epsilon$ parameters,
197 + \begin{equation*}
198 + V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat
199 + r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
200 + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i},
201 + {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^{12}
202 + -\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
203 + {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right]
204 + \label{eq:gb}
205 + \end{equation*}
206  
207 < We studied the effects of interaction between head groups on the
208 < structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole. The
209 < fig. shows the $P_2$ order parameter changing with strength of the
210 < dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head group are more ordered with
211 < increasing the interaction between heads and more disordered with
212 < decreasing the interaction between heads. When the interaction between
213 < heads is weak enough, the bilayer structure is not persisted any more,
214 < all lipid molecules are melted in the water. The critial value of the
215 < strength of the dipole is various for different system. The perfect
216 < flat surface melts at $5$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt
217 < at $8$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ debye. This
218 < indicates that the flat phase is the most stable state, the asymmetric
219 < ripple phase is second stalbe state, and the symmetric ripple phase is
220 < the most unstable state. The ordering of the tails is the same as the
221 < ordering of the dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface
222 < is already perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much
223 < until the strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order
224 < parameter decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further
225 < increased. The head group of the lipid molecules are brought closer by
226 < strenger interaction between them. For a flat surface, a mount of free
227 < volume between head groups is available, when the head groups are
228 < brought closer, the surface will splay outward to be a inverse
229 < micelle. For rippled surfaces, there is few free volume available on
230 < between the head groups, they can be closer, therefore there are
231 < little effect on the structure of the membrane. Another interesting
232 < fact, unlike other systems melting directly when the interaction is
233 < weak enough, for $\sigma_h$ is $1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane
234 < melts into itself first, the upper leaf of the bilayer is totally
235 < interdigitated with the lower leaf, this is different with the
160 < interdigitated lines in rippled phase where only one interdigitated
161 < line connects the two leaves of bilayer.
207 > The range $(\sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
208 > \hat{r}}_{ij}))$, and strength $(\epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf
209 > \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}))$ parameters
210 > are dependent on the relative orientations of the two molecules (${\bf
211 > \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}$) as well as the direction of the
212 > intermolecular separation (${\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}$).  $\sigma$ and
213 > $\sigma_0$ are also governed by shape mixing and anisotropy variables,
214 > \begin {eqnarray*}
215 > \sigma_0 & = & \sqrt{d_i^2 + d_j^2} \\ \\
216 > \chi & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 -
217 > d_j^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 + d_i^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
218 > d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2} \\ \\
219 > \alpha^2 & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 +
220 > d_i^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 - d_j^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
221 > d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2},
222 > \end{eqnarray*}
223 > where $l$ and $d$ describe the length and width of each uniaxial
224 > ellipsoid.  These shape anisotropy parameters can then be used to
225 > calculate the range function,
226 > \begin{equation*}
227 > \sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) = \sigma_{0}
228 > \left[ 1- \left\{ \frac{ \chi \alpha^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
229 > \hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi \alpha^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
230 > \hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
231 > \hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
232 > \hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi^2
233 > \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\}
234 > \right]^{-1/2}
235 > \end{equation*}
236  
237 + Gay-Berne ellipsoids also have an energy scaling parameter,
238 + $\epsilon^s$, which describes the well depth for two identical
239 + ellipsoids in a {\it side-by-side} configuration.  Additionaly, a well
240 + depth aspect ratio, $\epsilon^r = \epsilon^e / \epsilon^s$, describes
241 + the ratio between the well depths in the {\it end-to-end} and
242 + side-by-side configurations.  As in the range parameter, a set of
243 + mixing and anisotropy variables can be used to describe the well
244 + depths for dissimilar particles,
245 + \begin {eqnarray*}
246 + \epsilon_0 & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^s_i  * \epsilon^s_j} \\ \\
247 + \epsilon^r & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^r_i  * \epsilon^r_j} \\ \\
248 + \chi' & = & \frac{1 - (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}}{1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}}
249 + \\ \\
250 + \alpha'^2 & = & \left[1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}\right]^{-1}
251 + \end{eqnarray*}
252 + The form of the strength function is somewhat complicated,
253 + \begin {eqnarray*}
254 + \epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}, {\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) & = &
255 + \epsilon_{0}  \epsilon_{1}^{\nu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf \hat{u}}_{j})
256 + \epsilon_{2}^{\mu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
257 + \hat{r}}_{ij}) \\ \\
258 + \epsilon_{1}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}) & = &
259 + \left[1-\chi^{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf
260 + \hat{u}}_{j})^{2}\right]^{-1/2} \\ \\
261 + \epsilon_{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) &
262 + = &
263 + 1 - \left\{ \frac{ \chi' \alpha'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
264 + \hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi' \alpha'^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
265 + \hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
266 + \hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
267 + \hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi'^2
268 + \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\},
269 + \end {eqnarray*}
270 + although many of the quantities and derivatives are identical with
271 + those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \citen{Luckhurst90}
272 + has a particularly good explanation of the choice of the Gay-Berne
273 + parameters $\mu$ and $\nu$ for modeling liquid crystal molecules. An
274 + excellent overview of the computational methods that can be used to
275 + efficiently compute forces and torques for this potential can be found
276 + in Ref. \citen{Golubkov06}
277  
278 < Fig. shows the changing of the order parameter with temperature. The
279 < behavior of the $P_2$ orderparamter is straightforword. Systems are
280 < more ordered at low temperature, and more disordered at high
281 < temperature. When the temperature is high enough, the membranes are
282 < discontinuted. The structures are stable during the changing of the
283 < temperature. Since our model lacks the detail information for tails of
284 < lipid molecules, we did not simulate the fluid phase with a melted
285 < fatty chains. Moreover, the formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase
286 < also depends on the organization of fatty groups on tails, we did not
287 < observe it either.
278 > The choices of parameters we have used in this study correspond to a
279 > shape anisotropy of 3 for the chain portion of the molecule.  In
280 > principle, this could be varied to allow for modeling of longer or
281 > shorter chain lipid molecules. For these prolate ellipsoids, we have:
282 > \begin{equation}
283 > \begin{array}{rcl}
284 > d & < & l \\
285 > \epsilon^{r} & < & 1
286 > \end{array}
287 > \end{equation}
288 > A sketch of the various structural elements of our molecular-scale
289 > lipid / solvent model is shown in figure \ref{fig:lipidModel}.  The
290 > actual parameters used in our simulations are given in table
291 > \ref{tab:parameters}.
292  
293 + \begin{figure}[htb]
294 + \centering
295 + \includegraphics[width=4in]{2lipidModel}
296 + \caption{The parameters defining the behavior of the lipid
297 + models. $l / d$ is the ratio of the head group to body diameter.
298 + Molecular bodies had a fixed aspect ratio of 3.0.  The solvent model
299 + was a simplified 4-water bead ($\sigma_w \approx d$) that has been
300 + used in other coarse-grained (DPD) simulations.  The dipolar strength
301 + (and the temperature and pressure) were the only other parameters that
302 + were varied systematically.\label{fig:lipidModel}}
303 + \end{figure}
304 +
305 + To take into account the permanent dipolar interactions of the
306 + zwitterionic head groups, we place fixed dipole moments $\mu_{i}$ at
307 + one end of the Gay-Berne particles.  The dipoles are oriented at an
308 + angle $\theta = \pi / 2$ relative to the major axis.  These dipoles
309 + are protected by a head ``bead'' with a range parameter which we have
310 + varied between $1.20 d$ and $1.41 d$.  The head groups interact with
311 + each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
312 + \begin{equation}
313 + V_{ij}(r_{ij}) = 4\epsilon_h \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
314 + \left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right],
315 + \end{equation}
316 + and dipole-dipole,
317 + \begin{equation}
318 + V_{ij}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
319 + \hat{r}}_{ij})) = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
320 + \left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot
321 + \hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right]
322 + \end{equation}
323 + potentials.  
324 + In these potentials, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
325 + along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
326 + pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.  
327 +
328 + For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this
329 + case, between spheres and ellipsoids), the spheres are treated as
330 + ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and with an well depth
331 + ratio ($\epsilon^r$) of 1 ($\epsilon^e = \epsilon^s$).  The form of
332 + the Gay-Berne potential we are using was generalized by Cleaver {\it
333 + et al.} and is appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial
334 + ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96}
335 +
336 + The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by
337 + Marrink {\it et al.}  in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD)
338 + simulation of lipid bilayers.\cite{Marrink04} This solvent bead is a single
339 + site that represents four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has
340 + comparable density and diffusive behavior to liquid water.  However,
341 + since there are no electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent
342 + model cannot replicate the dielectric properties of water.
343 + \begin{table*}
344 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
345 + \begin{center}
346 + \caption{Potential parameters used for molecular-scale coarse-grained
347 + lipid simulations}
348 + \begin{tabular}{llccc}
349 + \hline
350 +  & &  Head & Chain & Solvent \\
351 + \hline
352 + $d$ (\AA) & & varied & 4.6  & 4.7 \\
353 + $l$ (\AA) & & $= d$ & 13.8 & 4.7 \\
354 + $\epsilon^s$ (kcal/mol) & & 0.185 & 1.0 & 0.8 \\
355 + $\epsilon_r$ (well-depth aspect ratio)& & 1 & 0.2 &  1 \\
356 + $m$ (amu) & & 196 & 760 & 72.06 \\
357 + $\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf I}$ (amu \AA$^2$) & & & & \\
358 + \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{xx}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
359 + \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{yy}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
360 + \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{zz}$} &  0 &    9000 & N/A \\
361 + $\mu$ (Debye) & & varied & 0 & 0 \\
362 + \end{tabular}
363 + \label{tab:parameters}
364 + \end{center}
365 + \end{minipage}
366 + \end{table*}
367 +
368 + A switching function has been applied to all potentials to smoothly
369 + turn off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA.
370 +
371 + The parameters that were systematically varied in this study were the
372 + size of the head group ($\sigma_h$), the strength of the dipole moment
373 + ($\mu$), and the temperature of the system.  Values for $\sigma_h$
374 + ranged from 5.5 \AA\  to 6.5 \AA\ .  If the width of the tails is
375 + taken to be the unit of length, these head groups correspond to a
376 + range from $1.2 d$ to $1.41 d$.  Since the solvent beads are nearly
377 + identical in diameter to the tail ellipsoids, all distances that
378 + follow will be measured relative to this unit of distance.
379 +
380 + \section{Experimental Methodology}
381 + \label{sec:experiment}
382 +
383 + To create unbiased bilayers, all simulations were started from two
384 + perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 26 \AA\ gap between the
385 + molecular bodies of the upper and lower leaves.  The separated
386 + monolayers were evolved in a vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
387 + coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a
388 + constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of
389 + the bilayer. Periodic boundary conditions were used, and $480-720$
390 + lipid molecules were present in the simulations, depending on the size
391 + of the head beads.  In all cases, the two monolayers spontaneously
392 + collapsed into bilayer structures within 100 ps. Following this
393 + collapse, all systems were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K.
394 +
395 + The resulting bilayer structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$
396 + solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations
397 + were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations utilizing
398 + the solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) with
399 + $3$D anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension
400 + ($\gamma=0.015$ UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in
401 + this model, a timestep of $50$ fs was utilized with excellent energy
402 + conservation.  Data collection for structural properties of the
403 + bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run following the solvent
404 + equilibration.  All simulations were performed using the OOPSE
405 + molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
406 +
407 + \section{Results}
408 + \label{sec:results}
409 +
410 + Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is
411 + more corrugated with increasing size of the head groups. The surface
412 + is nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20 d$. With $\sigma_h=1.28 d$,
413 + although the surface is still flat, the bilayer starts to splay
414 + inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is connected to the lower leaf
415 + with an interdigitated line defect. Two periodicities with $100$ \AA\
416 + wavelengths were observed in the simulation. This structure is very
417 + similiar to the structure observed by de Vries and Lenz {\it et
418 + al.}. The same basic structure is also observed when $\sigma_h=1.41
419 + d$, but the wavelength of the surface corrugations depends sensitively
420 + on the size of the ``head'' beads. From the undulation spectrum, the
421 + corrugation is clearly non-thermal.
422 + \begin{figure}[htb]
423 + \centering
424 + \includegraphics[width=4in]{phaseCartoon}
425 + \caption{A sketch to discribe the structure of the phases observed in
426 + our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}}
427 + \end{figure}
428 +
429 + When $\sigma_h=1.35 d$, we observed another corrugated surface
430 + morphology.  This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled
431 + surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower
432 + leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several
433 + hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together
434 + much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper
435 + hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge
436 + of lower hemicylinder, this ``symmetric'' ripple has no prefered
437 + direction.  The corresponding structures are shown in Figure
438 + \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of
439 + different phases.  The top panel in figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} is
440 + the flat phase, the middle panel shows the asymmetric ripple phase
441 + corresponding to $\sigma_h = 1.41 d$ and the lower panel shows the
442 + symmetric ripple phase observed when $\sigma_h=1.35 d$. In the
443 + symmetric ripple, the bilayer is continuous over the whole membrane,
444 + however, in asymmetric ripple phase, the bilayer domains are connected
445 + by thin interdigitated monolayers that share molecules between the
446 + upper and lower leaves.
447 + \begin{table*}
448 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
449 + \begin{center}
450 + \caption{Phases, ripple wavelengths and amplitudes observed as a
451 + function of the ratio between the head beads and the diameters of the
452 + tails.  All lengths are normalized to the diameter of the tail
453 + ellipsoids.}
454 + \begin{tabular}{lccc}
455 + \hline
456 + $\sigma_h / d$ & type of phase & $\lambda / d$ & $A / d$\\
457 + \hline
458 + 1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\
459 + 1.28 & asymmetric ripple or flat & 21.7 & N/A \\
460 + 1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\
461 + 1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\
462 + \end{tabular}
463 + \label{tab:property}
464 + \end{center}
465 + \end{minipage}
466 + \end{table*}
467 +
468 + The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda / d$,
469 + reduced amplitude $A / d$ of the ripples are summarized in Table
470 + \ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ molecular bodies
471 + and the amplitude is $1.5$ molecular bodies for asymmetric ripple and
472 + $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These values are consistent to the
473 + experimental results.  Note, that given the lack of structural freedom
474 + in the tails of our model lipids, the amplitudes observed from these
475 + simulations are likely to underestimate of the true amplitudes.
476 +
477 + \begin{figure}[htb]
478 + \centering
479 + \includegraphics[width=4in]{topDown}
480 + \caption{Top views of the flat (upper), asymmetric ripple (middle),
481 + and symmetric ripple (lower) phases.  Note that the head-group dipoles
482 + have formed head-to-tail chains in all three of these phases, but in
483 + the two rippled phases, the dipolar chains are all aligned
484 + {\it perpendicular} to the direction of the ripple.  The flat membrane
485 + has multiple point defects in the dipolar orientational ordering, and
486 + the dipolar ordering on the lower leaf of the bilayer can be in a
487 + different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:topView}}
488 + \end{figure}
489 +
490 + The principal method for observing orientational ordering in dipolar
491 + or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order parameter (defined
492 + as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest
493 + eigenvalue of the matrix,
494 + \begin{equation}
495 + {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
496 + \begin{array}{ccc}
497 +        u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
498 +        u^{y}_i u^{x}_i  & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
499 +        u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i  & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
500 + \end{array} \right).
501 + \label{eq:opmatrix}
502 + \end{equation}
503 + Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
504 + for molecule $i$.  (Here, $\hat{\bf u}_i$ can refer either to the
505 + principal axis of the molecular body or to the dipole on the head
506 + group of the molecule.)  $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered
507 + system and near $0$ for a randomized system.  Note that this order
508 + parameter is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system.  For
509 + example, the polarization of a perfect anti-ferroelectric arrangement
510 + of point dipoles is $0$, but $P_2$ for the same system is $1$.  The
511 + eigenvector of $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is
512 + familiar as the director axis, which can be used to determine a
513 + privileged axis for an orientationally-ordered system.  Since the
514 + molecular bodies are perpendicular to the head group dipoles, it is
515 + possible for the director axes for the molecular bodies and the head
516 + groups to be completely decoupled from each other.
517 +
518 + Figure \ref{fig:topView} shows snapshots of bird's-eye views of the
519 + flat ($\sigma_h = 1.20 d$) and rippled ($\sigma_h = 1.41, 1.35 d$)
520 + bilayers.  The directions of the dipoles on the head groups are
521 + represented with two colored half spheres: blue (phosphate) and yellow
522 + (amino).  For flat bilayers, the system exhibits signs of
523 + orientational frustration; some disorder in the dipolar head-to-tail
524 + chains is evident with kinks visible at the edges between differently
525 + ordered domains.  The lipids can also move independently of lipids in
526 + the opposing leaf, so the ordering of the dipoles on one leaf is not
527 + necessarily consistent with the ordering on the other.  These two
528 + factors keep the total dipolar order parameter relatively low for the
529 + flat phases.
530 +
531 + With increasing head group size, the surface becomes corrugated, and
532 + the dipoles cannot move as freely on the surface. Therefore, the
533 + translational freedom of lipids in one layer is dependent upon the
534 + position of the lipids in the other layer.  As a result, the ordering of
535 + the dipoles on head groups in one leaf is correlated with the ordering
536 + in the other leaf.  Furthermore, as the membrane deforms due to the
537 + corrugation, the symmetry of the allowed dipolar ordering on each leaf
538 + is broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-to-tail
539 + configuration, and the dipolar order parameter increases dramatically.
540 + However, the total polarization of the system is still close to zero.
541 + This is strong evidence that the corrugated structure is an
542 + antiferroelectric state.  It is also notable that the head-to-tail
543 + arrangement of the dipoles is always observed in a direction
544 + perpendicular to the wave vector for the surface corrugation.  This is
545 + a similar finding to what we observed in our earlier work on the
546 + elastic dipolar membranes.\cite{Sun2007}
547 +
548 + The $P_2$ order parameters (for both the molecular bodies and the head
549 + group dipoles) have been calculated to quantify the ordering in these
550 + phases.  Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows that the $P_2$ order parameter for
551 + the head-group dipoles increases with increasing head group size. When
552 + the heads of the lipid molecules are small, the membrane is nearly
553 + flat. Since the in-plane packing is essentially a close packing of the
554 + head groups, the head dipoles exhibit frustration in their
555 + orientational ordering.
556 +
557 + The ordering trends for the tails are essentially opposite to the
558 + ordering of the head group dipoles. The tail $P_2$ order parameter
559 + {\it decreases} with increasing head size. This indicates that the
560 + surface is more curved with larger head / tail size ratios. When the
561 + surface is flat, all tails are pointing in the same direction (normal
562 + to the bilayer surface).  This simplified model appears to be
563 + exhibiting a smectic A fluid phase, similar to the real $L_{\beta}$
564 + phase.  We have not observed a smectic C gel phase ($L_{\beta'}$) for
565 + this model system.  Increasing the size of the heads results in
566 + rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
567 +
568 + \begin{figure}[htb]
569 + \centering
570 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2}
571 + \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head groups (circles) and
572 + molecular bodies (squares) as a function of the ratio of head group
573 + size ($\sigma_h$) to the width of the molecular bodies ($d$). \label{fig:rP2}}
574 + \end{figure}
575 +
576 + In addition to varying the size of the head groups, we studied the
577 + effects of the interactions between head groups on the structure of
578 + lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipoles.  Figure
579 + \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with
580 + increasing strength of the dipole.  Generally, the dipoles on the head
581 + groups become more ordered as the strength of the interaction between
582 + heads is increased and become more disordered by decreasing the
583 + interaction stength.  When the interaction between the heads becomes
584 + too weak, the bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules
585 + become dispersed in the solvent (which is non-polar in this
586 + molecular-scale model).  The critial value of the strength of the
587 + dipole depends on the size of the head groups.  The perfectly flat
588 + surface becomes unstable below $5$ Debye, while the  rippled
589 + surfaces melt at $8$ Debye (asymmetric) or $10$ Debye (symmetric).
590 +
591 + The ordering of the tails mirrors the ordering of the dipoles {\it
592 + except for the flat phase}. Since the surface is nearly flat in this
593 + phase, the order parameters are only weakly dependent on dipolar
594 + strength until it reaches $15$ Debye.  Once it reaches this value, the
595 + head group interactions are strong enough to pull the head groups
596 + close to each other and distort the bilayer structure. For a flat
597 + surface, a substantial amount of free volume between the head groups
598 + is normally available.  When the head groups are brought closer by
599 + dipolar interactions, the tails are forced to splay outward, forming
600 + first curved bilayers, and then inverted micelles.
601 +
602 + When $\sigma_h=1.28 d$, the $P_2$ order parameter decreases slightly
603 + when the strength of the dipole is increased above $16$ debye. For
604 + rippled bilayers, there is less free volume available between the head
605 + groups. Therefore increasing dipolar strength weakly influences the
606 + structure of the membrane.  However, the increase in the body $P_2$
607 + order parameters implies that the membranes are being slightly
608 + flattened due to the effects of increasing head-group attraction.
609 +
610 + A very interesting behavior takes place when the head groups are very
611 + large relative to the molecular bodies ($\sigma_h = 1.41 d$) and the
612 + dipolar strength is relatively weak ($\mu < 9$ Debye). In this case,
613 + the two leaves of the bilayer become totally interdigitated with each
614 + other in large patches of the membrane.   With higher dipolar
615 + strength, the interdigitation is limited to single lines that run
616 + through the bilayer in a direction perpendicular to the ripple wave
617 + vector.
618 +
619 + \begin{figure}[htb]
620 + \centering
621 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2}
622 + \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head group dipoles (a) and
623 + molecular bodies (b) as a function of the strength of the dipoles.
624 + These order parameters are shown for four values of the head group /
625 + molecular width ratio ($\sigma_h / d$). \label{fig:sP2}}
626 + \end{figure}
627 +
628 + Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameters on
629 + temperature.  As expected, systems are more ordered at low
630 + temperatures, and more disordered at high temperatures.  All of the
631 + bilayers we studied can become unstable if the temperature becomes
632 + high enough.  The only interesting feature of the temperature
633 + dependence is in the flat surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.20 d$ and
634 + $\sigma_h=1.28 d$).  Here, when the temperature is increased above
635 + $310$K, there is enough jostling of the head groups to allow the
636 + dipolar frustration to resolve into more ordered states.  This results
637 + in a slight increase in the $P_2$ order parameter above this
638 + temperature.
639 +
640 + For the rippled surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.35 d$ and $\sigma_h=1.41 d$),
641 + there is a slightly increased orientational ordering in the molecular
642 + bodies above $290$K.  Since our model lacks the detailed information
643 + about the behavior of the lipid tails, this is the closest the model
644 + can come to depicting the ripple ($P_{\beta'}$) to fluid
645 + ($L_{\alpha}$) phase transition.  What we are observing is a
646 + flattening of the rippled structures made possible by thermal
647 + expansion of the tightly-packed head groups.  The lack of detailed
648 + chain configurations also makes it impossible for this model to depict
649 + the ripple to gel ($L_{\beta'}$) phase transition.
650 +
651 + \begin{figure}[htb]
652 + \centering
653 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2}
654 + \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head group dipoles (a) and
655 + molecular bodies (b) as a function of temperature.
656 + These order parameters are shown for four values of the head group /
657 + molecular width ratio ($\sigma_h / d$).\label{fig:tP2}}
658 + \end{figure}
659 +
660 + \section{Discussion}
661 + \label{sec:discussion}
662 +
663 + The ripple phases have been observed in our molecular dynamic
664 + simulations using a simple molecular lipid model. The lipid model
665 + consists of an anisotropic interacting dipolar head group and an
666 + ellipsoid shape tail. According to our simulations, the explanation of
667 + the formation for the ripples are originated in the size mismatch
668 + between the head groups and the tails. The ripple phases are only
669 + observed in the studies using larger head group lipid models. However,
670 + there is a mismatch betweent the size of the head groups and the size
671 + of the tails in the simulations of the flat surface. This indicates
672 + the competition between the anisotropic dipolar interaction and the
673 + packing of the tails also plays a major role for formation of the
674 + ripple phase. The larger head groups provide more free volume for the
675 + tails, while these hydrophobic ellipsoids trying to be close to each
676 + other, this gives the origin of the spontanous curvature of the
677 + surface, which is believed as the beginning of the ripple phases. The
678 + lager head groups cause the spontanous curvature inward for both of
679 + leaves of the bilayer. This results in a steric strain when the tails
680 + of two leaves too close to each other. The membrane has to be broken
681 + to release this strain. There are two ways to arrange these broken
682 + curvatures: symmetric and asymmetric ripples. Both of the ripple
683 + phases have been observed in our studies. The difference between these
684 + two ripples is that the bilayer is continuum in the symmetric ripple
685 + phase and is disrupt in the asymmetric ripple phase.
686 +
687 + Dipolar head groups are the key elements for the maintaining of the
688 + bilayer structure. The lipids are solvated in water when lowering the
689 + the strength of the dipole on the head groups. The long range
690 + orientational ordering of the dipoles can be achieved by forming the
691 + ripples, although the dipoles are likely to form head-to-tail
692 + configurations even in flat surface, the frustration prevents the
693 + formation of the long range orientational ordering for dipoles. The
694 + corrugation of the surface breaks the frustration and stablizes the
695 + long range oreintational ordering for the dipoles in the head groups
696 + of the lipid molecules. Many rows of the head-to-tail dipoles are
697 + parallel to each other and adopt the antiferroelectric state as a
698 + whole. This is the first time the organization of the head groups in
699 + ripple phases of the lipid bilayer has been addressed.
700 +
701 + The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
702 + simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
703 + corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
704 + be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis.  This prediction
705 + should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
706 + true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases.  The dipole
707 + director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
708 + coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
709 +
710 + Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
711 + behaviors.  It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
712 + if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
713 + replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
714 + elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
715 + What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
716 + non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
717 + phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
718 + corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
719 + dipole-driven or not.
720 +
721 + \newpage
722   \bibliography{mdripple}
723   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines