ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3200 by gezelter, Fri Jul 27 21:59:45 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3202 by gezelter, Wed Aug 1 16:07:12 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[aps,pre,twocolumn,amssymb,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
2 > %\documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb]{revtex4}
3 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
4 > \usepackage{times}
5 > \usepackage{mathptm}
6 > \usepackage{tabularx}
7 > \usepackage{setspace}
8   \usepackage{amsmath}
9   \usepackage{amssymb}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11 + \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 + \pagestyle{plain}
13 + \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 + \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 + \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 + \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 + \brokenpenalty=10000
18 + \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 + \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20  
21   \begin{document}
22 < \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
23 < \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
22 > %\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
23 > %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
24  
25 < %\bibliographystyle{aps}
25 > \bibliographystyle{achemso}
26  
27   \title{Dipolar Ordering in Molecular-scale Models of the Ripple Phase
28   in Lipid Membranes}
29 < \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter}
30 < \email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
17 < \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
29 > \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
30 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
31   University of Notre Dame, \\
32   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
33  
34 + %\email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
35 +
36   \date{\today}
37  
38 + \maketitle
39 +
40   \begin{abstract}
41   The ripple phase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers has never been
42   completely explained.
43   \end{abstract}
44  
45 < \pacs{}
29 < \maketitle
45 > %\maketitle
46  
47   \section{Introduction}
48   \label{sec:Int}
# Line 178 | Line 194 | $\sigma$ and $\epsilon$ parameters,
194   Pechukas.\cite{Berne72} The potential is constructed in the familiar
195   form of the Lennard-Jones function using orientation-dependent
196   $\sigma$ and $\epsilon$ parameters,
197 < \begin{eqnarray*}
197 > \begin{equation*}
198   V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat
199   r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
200   {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i},
# Line 186 | Line 202 | -\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_
202   -\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
203   {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right]
204   \label{eq:gb}
205 < \end{eqnarray*}
205 > \end{equation*}
206  
207   The range $(\sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
208   \hat{r}}_{ij}))$, and strength $(\epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf
# Line 195 | Line 211 | $\sigma_0$ are also governed by shape mixing and aniso
211   \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}$) as well as the direction of the
212   intermolecular separation (${\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}$).  $\sigma$ and
213   $\sigma_0$ are also governed by shape mixing and anisotropy variables,
214 < \begin {equation}
199 < \begin{array}{rcl}
214 > \begin {eqnarray*}
215   \sigma_0 & = & \sqrt{d_i^2 + d_j^2} \\ \\
216   \chi & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 -
217   d_j^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 + d_i^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
# Line 204 | Line 219 | d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2},
219   \alpha^2 & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 +
220   d_i^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 - d_j^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
221   d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2},
222 < \end{array}
208 < \end{equation}
222 > \end{eqnarray*}
223   where $l$ and $d$ describe the length and width of each uniaxial
224   ellipsoid.  These shape anisotropy parameters can then be used to
225   calculate the range function,
226 < \begin {equation}
226 > \begin{equation*}
227   \sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) = \sigma_{0}
228   \left[ 1- \left\{ \frac{ \chi \alpha^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
229   \hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi \alpha^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
# Line 218 | Line 232 | calculate the range function,
232   \hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi^2
233   \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\}
234   \right]^{-1/2}
235 < \end{equation}
235 > \end{equation*}
236  
237   Gay-Berne ellipsoids also have an energy scaling parameter,
238   $\epsilon^s$, which describes the well depth for two identical
# Line 254 | Line 268 | those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \onlineci
268   \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\},
269   \end {eqnarray*}
270   although many of the quantities and derivatives are identical with
271 < those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \onlinecite{Luckhurst90}
271 > those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \citen{Luckhurst90}
272   has a particularly good explanation of the choice of the Gay-Berne
273   parameters $\mu$ and $\nu$ for modeling liquid crystal molecules. An
274   excellent overview of the computational methods that can be used to
275   efficiently compute forces and torques for this potential can be found
276 < in Ref. \onlinecite{Golubkov06}
276 > in Ref. \citen{Golubkov06}
277  
278   The choices of parameters we have used in this study correspond to a
279   shape anisotropy of 3 for the chain portion of the molecule.  In
# Line 295 | Line 309 | each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
309   are protected by a head ``bead'' with a range parameter which we have
310   varied between $1.20 d$ and $1.41 d$.  The head groups interact with
311   each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
312 < \begin{eqnarray*}
312 > \begin{equation}
313   V_{ij}(r_{ij}) = 4\epsilon_h \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
314   \left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right],
315 < \end{eqnarray*}
315 > \end{equation}
316   and dipole-dipole,
317 < \begin{eqnarray*}
317 > \begin{equation}
318   V_{ij}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
319   \hat{r}}_{ij})) = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
320   \left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot
321   \hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right]
322 < \end{eqnarray*}
322 > \end{equation}
323   potentials.  
324   In these potentials, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
325   along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
# Line 473 | Line 487 | Figure \ref{fig:topView} shows snapshots of bird's-eye
487   different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:topView}}
488   \end{figure}
489  
490 + The principal method for observing orientational ordering in dipolar
491 + or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order parameter (defined
492 + as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest
493 + eigenvalue of the matrix,
494 + \begin{equation}
495 + {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
496 + \begin{array}{ccc}
497 +        u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
498 +        u^{y}_i u^{x}_i  & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
499 +        u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i  & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
500 + \end{array} \right).
501 + \label{eq:opmatrix}
502 + \end{equation}
503 + Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
504 + for molecule $i$.  (Here, $\hat{\bf u}_i$ can refer either to the
505 + principal axis of the molecular body or to the dipole on the head
506 + group of the molecule.)  $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered
507 + system and near $0$ for a randomized system.  Note that this order
508 + parameter is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system.  For
509 + example, the polarization of a perfect anti-ferroelectric arrangement
510 + of point dipoles is $0$, but $P_2$ for the same system is $1$.  The
511 + eigenvector of $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is
512 + familiar as the director axis, which can be used to determine a
513 + privileged axis for an orientationally-ordered system.  Since the
514 + molecular bodies are perpendicular to the head group dipoles, it is
515 + possible for the director axes for the molecular bodies and the head
516 + groups to be completely decoupled from each other.
517 +
518   Figure \ref{fig:topView} shows snapshots of bird's-eye views of the
519   flat ($\sigma_h = 1.20 d$) and rippled ($\sigma_h = 1.41, 1.35 d$)
520   bilayers.  The directions of the dipoles on the head groups are
521   represented with two colored half spheres: blue (phosphate) and yellow
522   (amino).  For flat bilayers, the system exhibits signs of
523 < orientational frustration; some disorder in the dipolar chains is
524 < evident with kinks visible at the edges between different ordered
525 < domains.  The lipids can also move independently of lipids in the
526 < opposing leaf, so the ordering of the dipoles on one leaf is not
527 < necessarily consistant with the ordering on the other.  These two
523 > orientational frustration; some disorder in the dipolar head-to-tail
524 > chains is evident with kinks visible at the edges between differently
525 > ordered domains.  The lipids can also move independently of lipids in
526 > the opposing leaf, so the ordering of the dipoles on one leaf is not
527 > necessarily consistent with the ordering on the other.  These two
528   factors keep the total dipolar order parameter relatively low for the
529   flat phases.
530  
531   With increasing head group size, the surface becomes corrugated, and
532   the dipoles cannot move as freely on the surface. Therefore, the
533   translational freedom of lipids in one layer is dependent upon the
534 < position of lipids in the other layer.  As a result, the ordering of
534 > position of the lipids in the other layer.  As a result, the ordering of
535   the dipoles on head groups in one leaf is correlated with the ordering
536   in the other leaf.  Furthermore, as the membrane deforms due to the
537   corrugation, the symmetry of the allowed dipolar ordering on each leaf
# Line 497 | Line 539 | antiferroelectric state.   It is also notable that the
539   configuration, and the dipolar order parameter increases dramatically.
540   However, the total polarization of the system is still close to zero.
541   This is strong evidence that the corrugated structure is an
542 < antiferroelectric state.   It is also notable that the head-to-tail
543 < arrangement of the dipoles is in a direction perpendicular to the wave
544 < vector for the surface corrugation.  This is a similar finding to what
545 < we observed in our earlier work on the elastic dipolar
546 < membranes.\cite{Sun07}
542 > antiferroelectric state.  It is also notable that the head-to-tail
543 > arrangement of the dipoles is always observed in a direction
544 > perpendicular to the wave vector for the surface corrugation.  This is
545 > a similar finding to what we observed in our earlier work on the
546 > elastic dipolar membranes.\cite{Sun2007}
547  
548   The $P_2$ order parameters (for both the molecular bodies and the head
549   group dipoles) have been calculated to quantify the ordering in these
550 < phases.  $P_2 = 1$ implies a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2 = 0$
551 < implies complete orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2}
552 < shows the $P_2$ order parameter for the head-group dipoles increasing
553 < with increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules
554 < are small, the membrane is nearly flat. The dipolar ordering exhibits
555 < frustrated orientational ordering in this circumstance.
550 > phases.  Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows that the $P_2$ order parameter for
551 > the head-group dipoles increases with increasing head group size. When
552 > the heads of the lipid molecules are small, the membrane is nearly
553 > flat. Since the in-plane packing is essentially a close packing of the
554 > head groups, the head dipoles exhibit frustration in their
555 > orientational ordering.
556  
557 < The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of
558 < the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter {\it decreases}
559 < with increasing head size. This indicates that the surface is more
560 < curved with larger head / tail size ratios. When the surface is flat,
561 < all tails are pointing in the same direction (parallel to the normal
562 < of the surface).  This simplified model appears to be exhibiting a
563 < smectic A fluid phase, similar to the real $L_{\beta}$ phase.  We have
564 < not observed a smectic C gel phase ($L_{\beta'}$) for this model
565 < system.  Increasing the size of the heads, results in rapidly
566 < decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
557 > The ordering trends for the tails are essentially opposite to the
558 > ordering of the head group dipoles. The tail $P_2$ order parameter
559 > {\it decreases} with increasing head size. This indicates that the
560 > surface is more curved with larger head / tail size ratios. When the
561 > surface is flat, all tails are pointing in the same direction (normal
562 > to the bilayer surface).  This simplified model appears to be
563 > exhibiting a smectic A fluid phase, similar to the real $L_{\beta}$
564 > phase.  We have not observed a smectic C gel phase ($L_{\beta'}$) for
565 > this model system.  Increasing the size of the heads results in
566 > rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
567  
568   \begin{figure}[htb]
569   \centering
570   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2}
571 < \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a function of the ratio of
572 < $\sigma_h$ to $d$. \label{fig:rP2}}
571 > \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head groups (circles) and
572 > molecular bodies (squares) as a function of the ratio of head group
573 > size ($\sigma_h$) to the width of the molecular bodies ($d$). \label{fig:rP2}}
574   \end{figure}
575  
576 < We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the
577 < structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole.
578 < Figure \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with
579 < increasing strength of the dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head
580 < group are more ordered by increase in the strength of the interaction
581 < between heads and are more disordered by decreasing the interaction
582 < stength. When the interaction between the heads is weak enough, the
583 < bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules are solvated
584 < directly in the water. The critial value of the strength of the dipole
585 < depends on the head size. The perfectly flat surface melts at $5$
586 < $0.03$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt at $8$ $0.04$
587 < $0.03$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ $0.04$
588 < debye. The ordering of the tails is the same as the ordering of the
589 < dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface is already
590 < perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much until the
591 < strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order parameter
592 < decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further
593 < increased. The head groups of the lipid molecules are brought closer
594 < by stronger interactions between them. For a flat surface, a large
595 < amount of free volume between the head groups is available, but when
596 < the head groups are brought closer, the tails will splay outward,
597 < forming an inverse micelle. When $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, the $P_2$
598 < order parameter decreases slightly after the strength of the dipole is
599 < increased to $16$ debye. For rippled surfaces, there is less free
600 < volume available between the head groups. Therefore there is little
601 < effect on the structure of the membrane due to increasing dipolar
602 < strength. However, the increase of the $P_2$ order parameter implies
603 < the membranes are flatten by the increase of the strength of the
604 < dipole. Unlike other systems that melt directly when the interaction
605 < is weak enough, for $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane
606 < melts into itself first. The upper leaf of the bilayer becomes totally
607 < interdigitated with the lower leaf. This is different behavior than
608 < what is exhibited with the interdigitated lines in the rippled phase
609 < where only one interdigitated line connects the two leaves of bilayer.
576 > In addition to varying the size of the head groups, we studied the
577 > effects of the interactions between head groups on the structure of
578 > lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipoles.  Figure
579 > \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with
580 > increasing strength of the dipole.  Generally, the dipoles on the head
581 > groups become more ordered as the strength of the interaction between
582 > heads is increased and become more disordered by decreasing the
583 > interaction stength.  When the interaction between the heads becomes
584 > too weak, the bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules
585 > become dispersed in the solvent (which is non-polar in this
586 > molecular-scale model).  The critial value of the strength of the
587 > dipole depends on the size of the head groups.  The perfectly flat
588 > surface becomes unstable below $5$ Debye, while the  rippled
589 > surfaces melt at $8$ Debye (asymmetric) or $10$ Debye (symmetric).
590 >
591 > The ordering of the tails mirrors the ordering of the dipoles {\it
592 > except for the flat phase}. Since the surface is nearly flat in this
593 > phase, the order parameters are only weakly dependent on dipolar
594 > strength until it reaches $15$ Debye.  Once it reaches this value, the
595 > head group interactions are strong enough to pull the head groups
596 > close to each other and distort the bilayer structure. For a flat
597 > surface, a substantial amount of free volume between the head groups
598 > is normally available.  When the head groups are brought closer by
599 > dipolar interactions, the tails are forced to splay outward, forming
600 > first curved bilayers, and then inverted micelles.
601 >
602 > When $\sigma_h=1.28 d$, the $P_2$ order parameter decreases slightly
603 > when the strength of the dipole is increased above $16$ debye. For
604 > rippled bilayers, there is less free volume available between the head
605 > groups. Therefore increasing dipolar strength weakly influences the
606 > structure of the membrane.  However, the increase in the body $P_2$
607 > order parameters implies that the membranes are being slightly
608 > flattened due to the effects of increasing head-group attraction.
609 >
610 > A very interesting behavior takes place when the head groups are very
611 > large relative to the molecular bodies ($\sigma_h = 1.41 d$) and the
612 > dipolar strength is relatively weak ($\mu < 9$ Debye). In this case,
613 > the two leaves of the bilayer become totally interdigitated with each
614 > other in large patches of the membrane.   With higher dipolar
615 > strength, the interdigitation is limited to single lines that run
616 > through the bilayer in a direction perpendicular to the ripple wave
617 > vector.
618 >
619   \begin{figure}[htb]
620   \centering
621   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2}
622 < \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the strength of the
623 < dipole.\label{fig:sP2}}
622 > \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head group dipoles (a) and
623 > molecular bodies (b) as a function of the strength of the dipoles.
624 > These order parameters are shown for four values of the head group /
625 > molecular width ratio ($\sigma_h / d$). \label{fig:sP2}}
626   \end{figure}
627  
628 < Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameter on
629 < temperature. The behavior of the $P_2$ order paramter is
630 < straightforward. Systems are more ordered at low temperature, and more
631 < disordered at high temperatures. When the temperature is high enough,
632 < the membranes are instable. For flat surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$
633 < and $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$), when the temperature is increased to
634 < $310$, the $P_2$ order parameter increases slightly instead of
635 < decreases like ripple surface. This is an evidence of the frustration
636 < of the dipolar ordering in each leaf of the lipid bilayer, at low
637 < temperature, the systems are locked in a local minimum energy state,
638 < with increase of the temperature, the system can jump out the local
639 < energy well to find the lower energy state which is the longer range
640 < orientational ordering. Like the dipolar ordering of the flat
641 < surfaces, the ordering of the tails of the lipid molecules for ripple
642 < membranes ($\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$) also
643 < show some nonthermal characteristic. With increase of the temperature,
644 < the $P_2$ order parameter decreases firstly, and increases afterward
645 < when the temperature is greater than $290 K$. The increase of the
646 < $P_2$ order parameter indicates a more ordered structure for the tails
647 < of the lipid molecules which corresponds to a more flat surface. Since
648 < our model lacks the detailed information on lipid tails, we can not
649 < simulate the fluid phase with melted fatty acid chains. Moreover, the
650 < formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase also depends on the
597 < organization of fatty groups on tails.
628 > Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameters on
629 > temperature.  As expected, systems are more ordered at low
630 > temperatures, and more disordered at high temperatures.  All of the
631 > bilayers we studied can become unstable if the temperature becomes
632 > high enough.  The only interesting feature of the temperature
633 > dependence is in the flat surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.20 d$ and
634 > $\sigma_h=1.28 d$).  Here, when the temperature is increased above
635 > $310$K, there is enough jostling of the head groups to allow the
636 > dipolar frustration to resolve into more ordered states.  This results
637 > in a slight increase in the $P_2$ order parameter above this
638 > temperature.
639 >
640 > For the rippled surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.35 d$ and $\sigma_h=1.41 d$),
641 > there is a slightly increased orientational ordering in the molecular
642 > bodies above $290$K.  Since our model lacks the detailed information
643 > about the behavior of the lipid tails, this is the closest the model
644 > can come to depicting the ripple ($P_{\beta'}$) to fluid
645 > ($L_{\alpha}$) phase transition.  What we are observing is a
646 > flattening of the rippled structures made possible by thermal
647 > expansion of the tightly-packed head groups.  The lack of detailed
648 > chain configurations also makes it impossible for this model to depict
649 > the ripple to gel ($L_{\beta'}$) phase transition.
650 >
651   \begin{figure}[htb]
652   \centering
653   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2}
654 < \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of
655 < temperature.\label{fig:tP2}}
654 > \caption{The $P_2$ order parameters for head group dipoles (a) and
655 > molecular bodies (b) as a function of temperature.
656 > These order parameters are shown for four values of the head group /
657 > molecular width ratio ($\sigma_h / d$).\label{fig:tP2}}
658   \end{figure}
659  
660   \section{Discussion}
661   \label{sec:discussion}
662  
663 + The ripple phases have been observed in our molecular dynamic
664 + simulations using a simple molecular lipid model. The lipid model
665 + consists of an anisotropic interacting dipolar head group and an
666 + ellipsoid shape tail. According to our simulations, the explanation of
667 + the formation for the ripples are originated in the size mismatch
668 + between the head groups and the tails. The ripple phases are only
669 + observed in the studies using larger head group lipid models. However,
670 + there is a mismatch betweent the size of the head groups and the size
671 + of the tails in the simulations of the flat surface. This indicates
672 + the competition between the anisotropic dipolar interaction and the
673 + packing of the tails also plays a major role for formation of the
674 + ripple phase. The larger head groups provide more free volume for the
675 + tails, while these hydrophobic ellipsoids trying to be close to each
676 + other, this gives the origin of the spontanous curvature of the
677 + surface, which is believed as the beginning of the ripple phases. The
678 + lager head groups cause the spontanous curvature inward for both of
679 + leaves of the bilayer. This results in a steric strain when the tails
680 + of two leaves too close to each other. The membrane has to be broken
681 + to release this strain. There are two ways to arrange these broken
682 + curvatures: symmetric and asymmetric ripples. Both of the ripple
683 + phases have been observed in our studies. The difference between these
684 + two ripples is that the bilayer is continuum in the symmetric ripple
685 + phase and is disrupt in the asymmetric ripple phase.
686 +
687 + Dipolar head groups are the key elements for the maintaining of the
688 + bilayer structure. The lipids are solvated in water when lowering the
689 + the strength of the dipole on the head groups. The long range
690 + orientational ordering of the dipoles can be achieved by forming the
691 + ripples, although the dipoles are likely to form head-to-tail
692 + configurations even in flat surface, the frustration prevents the
693 + formation of the long range orientational ordering for dipoles. The
694 + corrugation of the surface breaks the frustration and stablizes the
695 + long range oreintational ordering for the dipoles in the head groups
696 + of the lipid molecules. Many rows of the head-to-tail dipoles are
697 + parallel to each other and adopt the antiferroelectric state as a
698 + whole. This is the first time the organization of the head groups in
699 + ripple phases of the lipid bilayer has been addressed.
700 +
701 + The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
702 + simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
703 + corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
704 + be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis.  This prediction
705 + should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
706 + true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases.  The dipole
707 + director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
708 + coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
709 +
710 + Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
711 + behaviors.  It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
712 + if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
713 + replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
714 + elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
715 + What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
716 + non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
717 + phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
718 + corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
719 + dipole-driven or not.
720 +
721   \newpage
722   \bibliography{mdripple}
723   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines