ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/dielectric_new.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/dielectric_new.tex (file contents):
Revision 4390 by gezelter, Thu Nov 19 13:57:07 2015 UTC vs.
Revision 4392 by gezelter, Fri Nov 20 17:36:32 2015 UTC

# Line 60 | Line 60 | pairwise methods for correcting electrostatic interact
60   \section{Introduction}
61  
62   Over the past several years, there has been increasing interest in
63 < pairwise methods for correcting electrostatic interactions in computer
63 > pairwise methods for computing electrostatic interactions in
64   simulations of condensed
65   systems.\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02,Kast03,Beckd.A.C._Bi0486381,Ma05,Fennell06}
66   These techniques were initially developed from the observations and
# Line 73 | Line 73 | three generalized real space methods charges: shifted
73   using shifted force approximations at the cutoff distance in order to
74   conserve total energy in molecular dynamics simulations.\cite{Zahn02,
75    Fennell06} In the previous two papers in this series we developed
76 < three generalized real space methods charges: shifted potential (SP),
77 < gradient shifted force (GSF), and Taylor shifted force
78 < (TSF).\cite{PaperI, PaperII} These methods provide electrostatic
79 < interactions for higher order multipoles (dipoles and quadrupoles)
80 < using finite cutoff sphere with the neutralization of the
81 < electrostatic moments within the cutoff sphere. The multipolar
82 < generalizations of shifted force terms provides additional terms in
83 < the potential energy so that force and torque vanish smoothly at the
84 < cutoff radius. This ensures that the total energy is conserved in
85 < molecular dynamics simulations.
76 > three generalized real space methods: shifted potential (SP), gradient
77 > shifted force (GSF), and Taylor shifted force (TSF).\cite{PaperI,
78 >  PaperII} These methods provide real-space electrostatic interactions
79 > for higher order multipoles (e.g. dipoles and quadrupoles) using a
80 > finite cutoff sphere with neutralization of the electrostatic moments
81 > within the cutoff region. The multipolar generalizations of the
82 > shifted force approach provide additional terms in the potential
83 > energy so that force and torque vanish smoothly at the cutoff
84 > radius. This ensures that the total energy is conserved in molecular
85 > dynamics simulations.
86  
87   One of the most difficult tests of any new electrostatic method is the
88   fidelity with which that method can reproduce the bulk-phase
89   polarizability or equivalently, the dielectric properties of a
90   fluid. Since dielectric properties are macroscopic properties, all
91 < interactions between molecules in the system contribute.  Well before
92 < the advent of computer simulations, Kirkwood and Onsager developed
91 > interactions between molecules in the system contribute.  Before the
92 > advent of computer simulations, Kirkwood and Onsager developed
93   fluctuation formulae for the dielectric properties of dipolar
94   fluids.\cite{Kirkwood39,Onsagar36} Similar developments were made by
95   Logan \textit{et al.} for the bulk polarizability of quadrupolar
# Line 126 | Line 126 | Zahn \textit{et al.}\cite{Zahn02} evaluated the correc
126   % cutoff method (See equation
127   % \ref{dipole-diopleTensor}).\cite{Neumann83}
128  
129 < Zahn \textit{et al.}\cite{Zahn02} evaluated the correction factor for
130 < using damped shifted charge-charge kernel (see equation
131 < \ref{dipole-chargeTensor}). This was later generalized by Izvekove
132 < \textit{et al.},\cite{Izvekov:2008wo} who showed that the expression
133 < for the dielectric constant reduces to widely-used \textit{conducting
129 > Zahn \textit{et al.}\cite{Zahn02} utilized this approach and evaluated
130 > the correction factor for using damped shifted charge-charge
131 > kernel. This was later generalized by Izvekov \textit{et
132 >  al.},\cite{Izvekov:2008wo} who showed that the expression for the
133 > dielectric constant reduces to widely-used \textit{conducting
134    boundary} formula for real-space cutoff methods that have first
135 < derivatives (forces) that vanish at the cutoff sphere.
136 <
137 < The relationship between quadrupolar susceptibility and dielectric
138 < constant is not as straight forward for quadrupolar fluids as in the
139 < dipolar case. The dielectric constant depends on the geometry of the
140 < external field perturbation.\cite{Ernst92} Many studies have also been
141 < conducted to understand solvation theory using dielectric properties
142 < of these fluids,\cite{JeonI03,JeonII03,Chitanvis96} although a
143 < correction formula for different cutoff methods has not yet been
144 < developed.
135 > derivatives that vanish at the cutoff sphere.
136  
137 < In this paper we derive general formulas for calculating the
137 > In quadrupolar fluids, the relationship between quadrupolar
138 > susceptibility and the dielectric constant is not as straightforward
139 > as in the dipolar case. The dielectric constant depends on the
140 > geometry of the external field perturbation.\cite{Ernst92} Many
141 > studies have also been conducted to understand solvation theory using
142 > dielectric properties of these
143 > fluids,\cite{JeonI03,JeonII03,Chitanvis96} although a correction
144 > formula for different cutoff methods has not yet been developed.
145 >
146 > In this paper we derive general formulae for calculating the
147   dielectric properties of quadrupolar fluids. We also evaluate the
148   correction factor for SP, GSF, and TSF methods for both dipolar and
149   quadrupolar fluids interacting via charge-charge, dipole-dipole or
150 < quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.
150 > quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.
151  
152   We have also calculated the geometrical factor for two ions immersed
153   quadrupolar system to evaluate dielectric constant from the

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines