ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex (file contents):
Revision 4180 by gezelter, Wed Jun 11 19:46:13 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4181 by gezelter, Thu Jun 12 14:58:06 2014 UTC

# Line 499 | Line 499 | using the form of Eq.~(\ref{generic3}).  The basic for
499   \end{equation}
500  
501   Functional forms for both methods (TSF and GSF) can both be summarized
502 < using the form of Eq.~(\ref{generic3}).  The basic forms for the
502 > using the form of Eq.~\ref{generic3}).  The basic forms for the
503   energy, force, and torque expressions are tabulated for both shifting
504   approaches below -- for each separate orientational contribution, only
505   the radial factors differ between the two methods.
# Line 523 | Line 523 | Eq.~(\ref{eq:generic}).  The energy, force, and torque
523   method for each orientational contribution, leaving out the $(r-r_c)$
524   terms that multiply the gradient. Functional forms for the
525   shifted-potential (SP) method can also be summarized using the form of
526 < Eq.~(\ref{eq:generic}).  The energy, force, and torque expressions are
526 > Eq.~\ref{generic3}.  The energy, force, and torque expressions are
527   tabulated below for all three methods. As in the GSF and TSF methods,
528   for each separate orientational contribution, only the radial factors
529   differ between the SP, GSF, and TSF methods.
# Line 1579 | Line 1579 | interactions between point multipoles.  These methods
1579  
1580   \section{Conclusion}
1581   We have presented three efficient real-space methods for computing the
1582 < interactions between point multipoles.  These methods have the benefit
1583 < of smoothly truncating the energies, forces, and torques at the cutoff
1584 < radius, making them attractive for both molecular dynamics (MD) and
1585 < Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.  We find that the Gradient-Shifted Force
1586 < (GSF) and the Shifted-Potential (SP) methods converge rapidly to the
1587 < correct lattice energies for ordered dipolar and quadrupolar arrays,
1588 < while the Taylor-Shifted Force (TSF) is too severe an approximation to
1589 < provide accurate convergence to lattice energies.
1582 > interactions between point multipoles.  One of these (SP) is a
1583 > multipolar generalization of Wolf's method that smoothly shifts
1584 > electrostatic energies to zero at the cutoff radius.  Two of these
1585 > methods (GSF and TSF) also smoothly truncate the forces and torques
1586 > (in addition to the energies) at the cutoff radius, making them
1587 > attractive for both molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. We
1588 > find that the Gradient-Shifted Force (GSF) and the Shifted-Potential
1589 > (SP) methods converge rapidly to the correct lattice energies for
1590 > ordered dipolar and quadrupolar arrays, while the Taylor-Shifted Force
1591 > (TSF) is too severe an approximation to provide accurate convergence
1592 > to lattice energies.
1593  
1594   In most cases, GSF can obtain nearly quantitative agreement with the
1595   lattice energy constants with reasonably small cutoff radii.  The only

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines