ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex (file contents):
Revision 3986 by gezelter, Tue Dec 31 17:28:43 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3988 by gezelter, Thu Jan 2 15:46:58 2014 UTC

# Line 41 | Line 41 | jcp]{revtex4-1}
41  
42   \begin{document}
43  
44 < \preprint{AIP/123-QED}
44 > %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
45  
46 < \title[Taylor-shifted and Gradient-shifted electrostatics for multipoles]
47 < {Real space alternatives to the Ewald
46 > \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald
47   Sum. I. Taylor-shifted and Gradient-shifted electrostatics for multipoles}
48  
49   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
# Line 77 | Line 76 | of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
76    results for ordered arrays of multipoles.
77   \end{abstract}
78  
79 < \pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
79 > %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
80                               % Classification Scheme.
81 < \keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
81 > %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
82                                %display desired
83   \maketitle
84  
# Line 1420 | Line 1419 | To test the new electrostatic methods, we have constru
1419   the number of dipoles per unit volume, and $\mu$ is the strength of
1420   the dipole.
1421  
1422 < To test the new electrostatic methods, we have constructed very large
1423 < ($N = 8,000, 16,000, 32,000$) arrays of dipoles in the orientations
1424 < described in \ref{tab:LT}. For the purposes of this paper, the primary
1425 < quantity of interest is the analytic energy constant for the perfect
1426 < arrays. Convergence to these constants are shown as a function of both
1427 < the cutoff radius, $r_c$, and the damping parameter, $\alpha$ in Fig.
1428 < XXX. We have simultaneously tested a hard cutoff (where the kernel is
1429 < simply truncated at the cutoff radius), as well as a shifted potential
1430 < (SP) form which includes a potential-shifting and self-interaction
1431 < term, but does not shift the forces and torques smoothly at the cutoff
1422 > To test the new electrostatic methods, we have constructed very large,
1423 > $N$ = 8,000~(sc), 16,000~(bcc), or 32,000~(fcc) arrays of dipoles in
1424 > the orientations described in table \ref{tab:LT}.  For the purposes of
1425 > testing the energy expressions and the self-neutralization schemes,
1426 > the primary quantity of interest is the analytic energy constant for
1427 > the perfect arrays.  Convergence to these constants are shown as a
1428 > function of both the cutoff radius, $r_c$, and the damping parameter,
1429 > $\alpha$ in Figs.  \ref{fig:energyConstVsCutoff} and XXX. We have
1430 > simultaneously tested a hard cutoff (where the kernel is simply
1431 > truncated at the cutoff radius), as well as a shifted potential (SP)
1432 > form which includes a potential-shifting and self-interaction term,
1433 > but does not shift the forces and torques smoothly at the cutoff
1434   radius.
1435  
1436 + \begin{figure}
1437 + \includegraphics[width=4.5in]{energyConstVsCutoff}
1438 + \caption{Convergence to the analytic energy constants as a function of
1439 +  cutoff radius (normalized by the lattice constant) for the different
1440 +  real-space methods. The two crystals shown here are the ``B'' array
1441 +  for bcc crystals with the dipoles along the 001 direction (upper),
1442 +  as well as the minimum energy bcc lattice (lower).  The analytic
1443 +  energy constants are shown as a grey dashed line.  The left panel
1444 +  shows results for the undamped kernel ($1/r$), while the damped
1445 +  error function kernel, $B_0(r)$ was used in the right panel. }
1446 + \label{fig:energyConstVsCutoff}
1447 + \end{figure}
1448 +
1449 + The Hard cutoff exhibits oscillations around the analytic energy
1450 + constants, and converges to incorrect energies when the complementary
1451 + error function damping kernel is used.  The shifted potential (SP) and
1452 + gradient-shifted force (GSF) approximations converge to the correct
1453 + energy smoothly by $r_c / 6 a$ even for the undamped case.  This
1454 + indicates that the correction provided by the self term is required
1455 + for obtaining accurate energies.  The Taylor-shifted force (TSF)
1456 + approximation appears to perturb the potential too much inside the
1457 + cutoff region to provide accurate measures of the energy constants.
1458 +
1459 +
1460   {\it Quadrupolar} analogues to the Madelung constants were first
1461   worked out by Nagai and Nakamura who computed the energies of selected
1462   quadrupole arrays based on extensions to the Luttinger and Tisza

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines