ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex (file contents):
Revision 3990 by gezelter, Fri Jan 3 18:28:01 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 3996 by gezelter, Wed Jan 15 15:26:27 2014 UTC

# Line 276 | Line 276 | C_{\bf a} =&\sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k , \\
276      a}\alpha\beta}$, respectively.  These are the primitive multipoles
277   which can be expressed as a distribution of charges,
278   \begin{align}
279 < C_{\bf a} =&\sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k , \\
280 < D_{{\bf a}\alpha} =&\sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k r_{k\alpha} ,\\
281 < Q_{{\bf a}\alpha\beta} =& \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k r_{k\alpha}  r_{k\beta} .
279 > C_{\bf a} =&\sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k , \label{eq:charge} \\
280 > D_{{\bf a}\alpha} =&\sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k r_{k\alpha}, \label{eq:dipole}\\
281 > Q_{{\bf a}\alpha\beta} =& \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k \, \text{in \bf a}} q_k
282 > r_{k\alpha}  r_{k\beta} . \label{eq:quadrupole}
283   \end{align}
284   Note that the definition of the primitive quadrupole here differs from
285   the standard traceless form, and contains an additional Taylor-series
286 < based factor of $1/2$.
286 > based factor of $1/2$.  We are essentially treating the mass
287 > distribution with higher priority; the moment of inertia tensor,
288 > $\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf I}$, is diagonalized to obtain body-fixed
289 > axes, and the charge distribution may result in a quadrupole tensor
290 > that is not necessarily diagonal in the body frame.  Additional
291 > reasons for utilizing the primitive quadrupole are discussed in
292 > section \ref{sec:damped}.
293  
294   It is convenient to locate charges $q_j$ relative to the center of mass of  $\bf b$.  Then with $\bf{r}$ pointing from
295   $\bf a$ to $\bf b$ ($\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{r}_b - \mathbf{r}_b $), the interaction energy is given by
# Line 306 | Line 313 | In the standard multipole expansion, one typically use
313   of $\bf a$ interacting with the same multipoles on $\bf b$.
314  
315   \subsection{Damped Coulomb interactions}
316 + \label{sec:damped}
317   In the standard multipole expansion, one typically uses the bare
318   Coulomb potential, with radial dependence $1/r$, as shown in
319   Eq.~(\ref{kernel}).  It is also quite common to use a damped Coulomb
# Line 321 | Line 329 | functions $B_l(r)$ are summarized in Appendix A.
329   either $1/r$ or $B_0(r)$, and all of the techniques can be applied to
330   bare or damped Coulomb kernels (or any other function) as long as
331   derivatives of these functions are known.  Smith's convenient
332 < functions $B_l(r)$ are summarized in Appendix A.
332 > functions $B_l(r)$ are summarized in Appendix A.  (N.B. there is one
333 > important distinction between the two kernels, which is the behavior
334 > of $\nabla^2 \frac{1}{r}$ compared with $\nabla^2 B_0(r)$.  The former
335 > is zero everywhere except for a delta function evaluated at the
336 > origin.  The latter also has delta function behavior, but is non-zero
337 > for $r \neq 0$.  Thus the standard justification for using a traceless
338 > quadrupole tensor fails for the damped case.)
339  
340   The main goal of this work is to smoothly cut off the interaction
341   energy as well as forces and torques as $r\rightarrow r_c$.  To
# Line 439 | Line 453 | presented in tables \ref{tab:tableenergy} and \ref{tab
453   of the same index $n$.  The algebra required to evaluate energies,
454   forces and torques is somewhat tedious, so only the final forms are
455   presented in tables \ref{tab:tableenergy} and \ref{tab:tableFORCE}.
456 + One of the principal findings of our work is that the individual
457 + orientational contributions to the various multipole-multipole
458 + interactions must be treated with distinct radial functions, but each
459 + of these contributions is independently force shifted at the cutoff
460 + radius.  
461  
462   \subsection{Gradient-shifted force (GSF) electrostatics}
463   The second, and conceptually simpler approach to force-shifting
# Line 446 | Line 465 | U^{\text{GSF}} =
465   expansion, and has a similar interaction energy for all multipole
466   orders:
467   \begin{equation}
468 < U^{\text{GSF}} =
450 < U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
468 > U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
469   U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{r}
470 < \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} .
470 > \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} \right]
471   \label{generic2}
472   \end{equation}
473 < Both the potential and the gradient for force shifting are evaluated
474 < for an image multipole projected onto the surface of the cutoff sphere
475 < (see fig \ref{fig:shiftedMultipoles}).  The image multipole retains
476 < the orientation ($\hat{\mathbf{b}}$) of the interacting multipole.  No
473 > where the sum describes a separate force-shifting that is applied to
474 > each orientational contribution to the energy.  Both the potential and
475 > the gradient for force shifting are evaluated for an image multipole
476 > projected onto the surface of the cutoff sphere (see fig
477 > \ref{fig:shiftedMultipoles}).  The image multipole retains the
478 > orientation ($\hat{\mathbf{b}}$) of the interacting multipole.  No
479   higher order terms $(r-r_c)^n$ appear.  The primary difference between
480   the TSF and GSF methods is the stage at which the Taylor Series is
481   applied; in the Taylor-shifted approach, it is applied to the kernel
# Line 1439 | Line 1459 | the quadrupolar arrays is:
1459   In analogy to the dipolar arrays, the total electrostatic energy for
1460   the quadrupolar arrays is:
1461   \begin{equation}
1462 < E = C \frac{3}{4} N^2 Q^2
1462 > E = C N \frac{3\bar{Q}^2}{4a^5}
1463   \end{equation}
1464 < where $Q$ is the quadrupole moment.  The lowest energy
1464 > where $a$ is the lattice parameter, and $\bar{Q}$ is the effective
1465 > quadrupole moment,
1466 > \begin{equation}
1467 > \bar{Q}^2 = 4 \left(3 Q : Q - (\text{Tr} Q)^2 \right)
1468 > \end{equation}
1469 > for the primitive quadrupole as defined in Eq. \ref{eq:quadrupole}.
1470 > (For the traceless quadrupole tensor, $\Theta = 3 Q - \text{Tr} Q$,
1471 > the effective moment, $\bar{Q}^2 = \frac{4}{3} \Theta : \Theta$.)
1472  
1473   \section{Conclusion}
1474   We have presented two efficient real-space methods for computing the

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines