ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole1.tex (file contents):
Revision 4114 by mlamichh, Tue May 13 16:14:48 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4163 by mlamichh, Thu May 29 19:08:06 2014 UTC

# Line 23 | Line 23 | preprint,%
23   aip,jcp,
24   amsmath,amssymb,
25   preprint,%
26 < % reprint,%
26 > %reprint,%
27   %author-year,%
28   %author-numerical,%
29   jcp]{revtex4-1}
# Line 1410 | Line 1410 | $10^9$) are given in the supplemental information.
1410   constant), $N$ is the number of dipoles per unit volume, and $\mu$ is
1411   the strength of the dipole. Energy constants (converged to 1 part in
1412   $10^9$) are given in the supplemental information.
1413 + \begin{figure}[!htbp]
1414  
1415 + \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Dipoles_rcutConvergence-crop.pdf}
1416 +
1417 + \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Quadrupoles_rcutConvergence-crop.pdf}
1418 + \caption{Convergence to the analytic energy constants as a function of
1419 +  cutoff radius (normalized by the lattice constant) for the different
1420 +  real-space methods for (a) dipolar and (b) quadrupolar crystals.The energy constants for hard, SP, GSF, TSF and analytic methods are represented by black sold-circle, red solid-square,green solid-diamond and grey dashed line respectively.
1421 + The left panel shows results for the undamped kernel ($1/r$), while the damped
1422 +  error function kernel, $B_0(r)$ was used in the right panel. }
1423 + \label{fig:Dipoles_rcutCovergence-crop.pdf}
1424 + \label{fig:QuadrupolesrcutCovergence-crop.pdf}
1425 + \end{figure}
1426   For the purposes of testing the energy expressions and the
1427   self-neutralization schemes, the primary quantity of interest is the
1428   analytic energy constant for the perfect arrays.  Convergence to these
# Line 1422 | Line 1434 | essentially an extension of the original Wolf method f
1434   potential-shifting and self-interaction term, but does not shift the
1435   forces and torques smoothly at the cutoff radius.  The SP method is
1436   essentially an extension of the original Wolf method for multipoles.
1425
1437   \begin{figure}[!htbp]
1438 < \includegraphics[width=4.5in]{energyConstVsCutoff}
1438 >
1439 > \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Dipoles_alphaConvergence-crop.pdf}
1440 >
1441 > \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Quadrupoles_alphaConvergence-crop.pdf}
1442   \caption{Convergence to the analytic energy constants as a function of
1443 <  cutoff radius (normalized by the lattice constant) for the different
1444 <  real-space methods. The two crystals shown here are the ``B'' array
1445 <  for bcc crystals with the dipoles along the 001 direction (upper),
1432 <  as well as the minimum energy bcc lattice (lower).  The analytic
1433 <  energy constants are shown as a grey dashed line.  The left panel
1434 <  shows results for the undamped kernel ($1/r$), while the damped
1443 >  cutoff damping alpha for the different
1444 >  real-space methods for (a) dipolar and (b) quadrupolar crystals.The energy constants for hard, SP, GSF, TSF, and analytic methods are represented by the black sold-circle, red solid-square, green solid-diamond, and grey dashed line respectively.
1445 > The left panel shows results for the undamped kernel ($1/r$), while the damped
1446    error function kernel, $B_0(r)$ was used in the right panel. }
1447 < \label{fig:energyConstVsCutoff}
1447 > \label{fig:Dipoles_alphaCovergence-crop.pdf}
1448 > \label{fig:Quadrupoles_alphaCovergence-crop.pdf}
1449   \end{figure}
1438
1450   The Hard cutoff exhibits oscillations around the analytic energy
1451   constants, and converges to incorrect energies when the complementary
1452   error function damping kernel is used.  The shifted potential (SP) and
# Line 1445 | Line 1456 | cutoff region to provide accurate measures of the ener
1456   for obtaining accurate energies.  The Taylor-shifted force (TSF)
1457   approximation appears to perturb the potential too much inside the
1458   cutoff region to provide accurate measures of the energy constants.
1448
1459   {\it Quadrupolar} analogues to the Madelung constants were first
1460   worked out by Nagai and Nakamura who computed the energies of selected
1461   quadrupole arrays based on extensions to the Luttinger and Tisza
# Line 1668 | Line 1678 | correct for GSF electrostatics if the subscript $n$ is
1678   ``Bare Coulomb.''  Equations \ref{eq:b9} to \ref{eq:b13} are still
1679   correct for GSF electrostatics if the subscript $n$ is eliminated.
1680  
1671 \newpage
1672 \bibliographystyle{aiprev}
1681   \bibliography{multipole}
1682  
1683   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines