ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4180 by gezelter, Wed Jun 11 21:03:11 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4185 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 00:18:18 2014 UTC

# Line 35 | Line 35 | preprint,
35   %\linenumbers\relax % Commence numbering lines
36   \usepackage{amsmath}
37   \usepackage{times}
38 < \usepackage{mathptm}
38 > \usepackage{mathptmx}
39   \usepackage{tabularx}
40   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
41   \usepackage{url}
# Line 69 | Line 69 | of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
69   \begin{abstract}
70    We have tested the real-space shifted potential (SP),
71    gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
72 <  for multipoles that were developed in the first paper in this series
73 <  against a reference method. The tests were carried out in a variety
74 <  of condensed-phase environments which were designed to test all
75 <  levels of the multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the
76 <  energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
77 <  torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
78 <  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald sum.  We have
79 <  also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
80 <  methods in molecular dynamics simulations using all of these
81 <  methods. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
82 <  configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
83 <  be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
84 <  shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
85 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and exhibits energy
86 <  conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
87 <  efficiently computing electrostatic interactions in molecular
88 <  dynamics simulations.
72 >  for multipole interactions that were developed in the first paper in
73 >  this series, using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference
74 >  method. The tests were carried out in a variety of condensed-phase
75 >  environments which were designed to test all levels of the
76 >  multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the energy
77 >  differences between configurations, molecular forces, and torques
78 >  were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform relative
79 >  to the more computationally expensive Ewald treatment.  We have also
80 >  investigated the energy conservation properties of the new methods
81 >  in molecular dynamics simulations. The SP method shows excellent
82 >  agreement with configurational energy differences, forces, and
83 >  torques, and would be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.
84 >  Of the two new shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the
85 >  best agreement with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and
86 >  exhibits energy conservation properties that make it an excellent
87 >  choice for efficient computation of electrostatic interactions in
88 >  molecular dynamics simulations.
89   \end{abstract}
90  
91   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
92                               % Classification Scheme.
93 < \keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
93 > %\keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
94  
95   \maketitle
96  
97  
98   \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
99   Computing the interactions between electrostatic sites is one of the
100 < most expensive aspects of molecular simulations, which is why there
101 < have been significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and
102 < convergent methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is
103 < perhaps the best known and most accurate method for evaluating
104 < energies, forces, and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation
105 < cells. In this approach, the conditionally convergent electrostatic
106 < energy is converted into two absolutely convergent contributions, one
107 < which is carried out in real space with a cutoff radius, and one in
108 < reciprocal space.\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
100 > most expensive aspects of molecular simulations. There have been
101 > significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and convergent
102 > methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is perhaps the
103 > best known and most accurate method for evaluating energies, forces,
104 > and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation cells. In this approach,
105 > the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
106 > two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
107 > real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
108 > space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
109  
110   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
111   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
# Line 116 | Line 116 | Because of the artificial periodicity required for the
116   the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N \log
117   N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
118  
119 < Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum, the
120 < method may require modification to compute interactions for
119 > Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
120   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
121 < interfaces.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
122 < To simulate interfacial systems, Parry's extension of the 3D Ewald sum
123 < is appropriate for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} The inherent
124 < periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also be problematic for
125 < interfacial molecular systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Modified Ewald
126 < methods that were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D)
127 < electrostatic interactions in interfacial systems have not had similar
128 < particle-mesh treatments.\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
129 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq}
121 > interfaces require modifications to the
122 > method.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
123 > Parry's extension of the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate
124 > for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that
125 > were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D) electrostatic
126 > interactions in interfacial systems have not seen similar
127 > particle-mesh treatments,\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
128 >  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq} and still scale poorly
129 > with system size. The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can
130 > also be problematic for interfacial molecular
131 > systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
132  
133   \subsection{Real-space methods}
134   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
135   method for calculating electrostatic interactions between point
136 < charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in
137 < condensed systems is actually short ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95}.  For
138 < an ordered lattice (e.g., when computing the Madelung constant of an
139 < ionic solid), the material can be considered as a set of ions
140 < interacting with neutral dipolar or quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving
141 < an effective distance dependence for the electrostatic interactions of
142 < $r^{-5}$ (see figure \ref{fig:NaCl}).  For this reason, careful
143 < applications of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
144 < Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.  Recently,
145 < Fukuda used neutralization of the higher order moments for the
146 < calculation of the electrostatic interaction of the point charges
147 < system.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
136 > charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in most
137 > condensed phase systems is effectively short
138 > ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95} For an ordered lattice (e.g., when
139 > computing the Madelung constant of an ionic solid), the material can
140 > be considered as a set of ions interacting with neutral dipolar or
141 > quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving an effective distance dependence for
142 > the electrostatic interactions of $r^{-5}$ (see figure
143 > \ref{fig:schematic}). If one views the \ce{NaCl} crystal as a simple
144 > cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the
145 > electrostatic energy per ion converges more rapidly to the Madelung
146 > energy than the dipolar approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the
147 > correct Madelung constant, Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure
148 > could be constructed in a way that the finite crystal terminates with
149 > complete \ce{(NaCl)4} molecules.\cite{Lacman65} The central ion sees
150 > what is effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts
151 > suggest that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for
152 > perfect ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} For this reason, careful
153 > application of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
154 > Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.
155  
156 < \begin{figure}[h!]
156 > Direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates numerical
157 > errors.  Wolf \textit{et al.}  argued that truncation errors are due
158 > to net charge remaining inside the cutoff sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To
159 > neutralize this charge they proposed placing an image charge on the
160 > surface of the cutoff sphere for every real charge inside the cutoff.
161 > These charges are present for the evaluation of both the pair
162 > interaction energy and the force, although the force expression
163 > maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.  In the original Wolf
164 > formulation, the total energy for the charge and image were not equal
165 > to the integral of their force expression, and as a result, the total
166 > energy would not be conserved in molecular dynamics (MD)
167 > simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.}, and Fennel and
168 > Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf method with
169 > commensurate force and energy expressions that do not exhibit this
170 > problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Related real-space methods were also
171 > proposed by Chen \textit{et
172 >  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
173 > and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107} Recently, Fukuda has used
174 > neutralization of the higher order moments for the calculation of the
175 > electrostatic interaction of the point charge
176 > systems.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
177 >
178 > \begin{figure}
179    \centering
180 <  \includegraphics[width=0.50 \textwidth]{chargesystem.pdf}
181 <  \caption{Top: NaCl crystal showing how spherical truncation can
182 <    breaking effective charge ordering, and how complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
183 <    molecules interact with the central ion.  Bottom: A dipolar
184 <    crystal exhibiting similar behavior and illustrating how the
185 <    effective dipole-octupole interactions can be disrupted by
186 <    spherical truncation.}
187 <  \label{fig:NaCl}
180 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.pdf}
181 >  \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
182 >    charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
183 >    effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
184 >    cutoffs, motion of individual charges in and out of the cutoff
185 >    sphere can break the effective multipolar ordering.  Bottom:
186 >    dipolar crystals and fluids have a similar effective
187 >    \textit{quadrupolar} ordering (in the smaller grey circles), and
188 >    orientational averaging helps to reduce the effective range of the
189 >    interactions in the fluid.  Placement of reversed image multipoles
190 >    on the surface of the cutoff sphere recovers the effective
191 >    higher-order multipole behavior.}
192 >  \label{fig:schematic}
193   \end{figure}
194  
195 < The direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates
196 < truncation defects. Wolf \textit{et al.} further argued that
197 < truncation errors are due to net charge remaining inside the cutoff
198 < sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To neutralize this charge they proposed
199 < placing an image charge on the surface of the cutoff sphere for every
200 < real charge inside the cutoff.  These charges are present for the
201 < evaluation of both the pair interaction energy and the force, although
202 < the force expression maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.
203 < In the original Wolf formulation, the total energy for the charge and
204 < image were not equal to the integral of their force expression, and as
170 < a result, the total energy would not be conserved in molecular
171 < dynamics (MD) simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.} and
172 < Fennel and Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf
173 < method with commensurate force and energy expressions that do not
174 < exhibit this problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}   Related real-space
175 < methods were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
176 <  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
177 < and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107}
178 <
179 < Considering the interaction of one central ion in an ionic crystal
180 < with a portion of the crystal at some distance, the effective Columbic
181 < potential is found to be decreasing as $r^{-5}$. If one views the
182 < \ce{NaCl} crystal as simple cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar
183 < \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the electrostatic energy per ion converges more
184 < rapidly to the Madelung energy than the dipolar
185 < approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the correct Madelung constant,
186 < Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure could be constructed in a way
187 < that the finite crystal terminates with complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
188 < molecules.\cite{Lacman65} Any charge in a NaCl crystal is surrounded
189 < by opposite charges. Similarly for each pair of charges, there is an
190 < opposite pair of charge adjacent to it.  The central ion sees what is
191 < effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts suggest
192 < that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for perfect
193 < ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn}
194 <
195 < One can make a similar argument for crystals of point multipoles. The
196 < Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy constants for dipolar lattices
197 < utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain dipoles at the eight corners of
198 < a unit cube.  Only three of these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1,
199 < \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole moments, while the rest have
200 < zero net dipole and retain contributions only from higher order
201 < multipoles.  The effective interaction between a dipole at the center
195 > One can make a similar effective range argument for crystals of point
196 > \textit{multipoles}. The Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy
197 > constants for dipolar lattices utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain
198 > dipoles at the eight corners of a unit cube.  Only three of these
199 > basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1, \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole
200 > moments, while the rest have zero net dipole and retain contributions
201 > only from higher order multipoles.  The lowest energy crystalline
202 > structures are built out of basis vectors that have only residual
203 > quadrupolar moments (e.g. the $Z_5$ array). In these low energy
204 > structures, the effective interaction between a dipole at the center
205   of a crystal and a group of eight dipoles farther away is
206   significantly shorter ranged than the $r^{-3}$ that one would expect
207   for raw dipole-dipole interactions.  Only in crystals which retain a
# Line 208 | Line 211 | multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), cau
211   unstable.
212  
213   In ionic crystals, real-space truncation can break the effective
214 < multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), causing significant
215 < swings in the electrostatic energy as individual ions move back and
216 < forth across the boundary.  This is why the image charges are
214 > multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}), causing
215 > significant swings in the electrostatic energy as individual ions move
216 > back and forth across the boundary.  This is why the image charges are
217   necessary for the Wolf sum to exhibit rapid convergence.  Similarly,
218   the real-space truncation of point multipole interactions breaks
219   higher order multipole arrangements, and image multipoles are required
220   for real-space treatments of electrostatic energies.
221  
222 + The shorter effective range of electrostatic interactions is not
223 + limited to perfect crystals, but can also apply in disordered fluids.
224 + Even at elevated temperatures, there is, on average, local charge
225 + balance in an ionic liquid, where each positive ion has surroundings
226 + dominated by negaitve ions and vice versa.  The reversed-charge images
227 + on the cutoff sphere that are integral to the Wolf and DSF approaches
228 + retain the effective multipolar interactions as the charges traverse
229 + the cutoff boundary.
230 +
231 + In multipolar fluids (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}) there is
232 + significant orientational averaging that additionally reduces the
233 + effect of long-range multipolar interactions.  The image multipoles
234 + that are introduced in the TSF, GSF, and SP methods mimic this effect
235 + and reduce the effective range of the multipolar interactions as
236 + interacting molecules traverse each other's cutoff boundaries.
237 +
238   % Because of this reason, although the nature of electrostatic
239   % interaction short ranged, the hard cutoff sphere creates very large
240   % fluctuation in the electrostatic energy for the perfect crystal. In
# Line 239 | Line 258 | The damping function used in our research has been dis
258   densities.\cite{Shi:2013ij,Kannam:2012rr,Acevedo13,Space12,English08,Lawrence13,Vergne13}
259  
260   \subsection{The damping function}
261 < The damping function used in our research has been discussed in detail
262 < in the first paper of this series.\cite{PaperI} The radial kernel
263 < $1/r$ for the interactions between point charges can be replaced by
264 < the complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to
265 < accelerate the rate of convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping
266 < parameter with units of inverse distance.  Altering the value of
267 < $\alpha$ is equivalent to changing the width of Gaussian charge
268 < distributions that replace each point charge -- Gaussian overlap
269 < integrals yield complementary error functions when truncated at a
270 < finite distance.
261 > The damping function has been discussed in detail in the first paper
262 > of this series.\cite{PaperI} The $1/r$ Coulombic kernel for the
263 > interactions between point charges can be replaced by the
264 > complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to accelerate
265 > convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter with units of
266 > inverse distance.  Altering the value of $\alpha$ is equivalent to
267 > changing the width of Gaussian charge distributions that replace each
268 > point charge, as Coulomb integrals with Gaussian charge distributions
269 > produce complementary error functions when truncated at a finite
270 > distance.
271  
272 < By using suitable value of damping alpha ($\alpha \sim 0.2$) for a
273 < cutoff radius ($r_{­c}=9 A$), Fennel and Gezelter produced very good
274 < agreement with SPME for the interaction energies, forces and torques
275 < for charge-charge interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
272 > With moderate damping coefficients, $\alpha \sim 0.2$, the DSF method
273 > produced very good agreement with SPME for interaction energies,
274 > forces and torques for charge-charge
275 > interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
276  
277   \subsection{Point multipoles in molecular modeling}
278   Coarse-graining approaches which treat entire molecular subsystems as
279   a single rigid body are now widely used. A common feature of many
280   coarse-graining approaches is simplification of the electrostatic
281   interactions between bodies so that fewer site-site interactions are
282 < required to compute configurational energies.  Many coarse-grained
283 < molecular structures would normally consist of equal positive and
265 < negative charges, and rather than use multiple site-site interactions,
266 < the interaction between higher order multipoles can also be used to
267 < evaluate a single molecule-molecule
268 < interaction.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
282 > required to compute configurational
283 > energies.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
284  
285   Because electrons in a molecule are not localized at specific points,
286 < the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is a relatively
287 < rough approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point
288 < multipoles and polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the
289 < molecular model.  Recently, water has been modeled with point
290 < multipoles up to octupolar order using the soft sticky
276 < dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
286 > the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is always an
287 > approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point multipoles and
288 > polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the molecular model.
289 > Recently, water has been modeled with point multipoles up to octupolar
290 > order using the soft sticky dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
291   model.\cite{Ichiye10_1,Ichiye10_2,Ichiye10_3} Atom-centered point
292   multipoles up to quadrupolar order have also been coupled with point
293   polarizabilities in the high-quality AMOEBA and iAMOEBA water
294 < models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} But
295 < using point multipole with the real space truncation without
296 < accounting for multipolar neutrality will create energy conservation
283 < issues in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
294 > models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} However,
295 > truncating point multipoles without smoothing the forces and torques
296 > will create energy conservation issues in molecular dynamics simulations.
297  
298   In this paper we test a set of real-space methods that were developed
299   for point multipolar interactions.  These methods extend the damped
# Line 320 | Line 333 | $\bf a$.
333   where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$, $\hat{M}_{\bf a}$, is
334   expressed in terms of the point charge, $C_{\bf a}$, dipole, ${\bf D}_{\bf
335      a}$, and quadrupole, $\mathbf{Q}_{\bf a}$, for object
336 < $\bf a$.
336 > $\bf a$, etc.
337  
338   % Interactions between multipoles can be expressed as higher derivatives
339   % of the bare Coulomb potential, so one way of ensuring that the forces
# Line 348 | Line 361 | of the interaction, with $n=0$ for charge-charge, $n=1
361   \label{generic}
362   \end{equation}
363   where $f_n(r)$ is a shifted kernel that is appropriate for the order
364 < of the interaction, with $n=0$ for charge-charge, $n=1$ for
365 < charge-dipole, $n=2$ for charge-quadrupole and dipole-dipole, $n=3$
366 < for dipole-quadrupole, and $n=4$ for quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure
367 < smooth convergence of the energy, force, and torques, a Taylor
368 < expansion with $n$ terms must be performed at cutoff radius ($r_c$) to
369 < obtain $f_n(r)$.
364 > of the interaction (see Ref. \onlinecite{PaperI}), with $n=0$ for
365 > charge-charge, $n=1$ for charge-dipole, $n=2$ for charge-quadrupole
366 > and dipole-dipole, $n=3$ for dipole-quadrupole, and $n=4$ for
367 > quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure smooth convergence of the energy,
368 > force, and torques, a Taylor expansion with $n$ terms must be
369 > performed at cutoff radius ($r_c$) to obtain $f_n(r)$.
370  
371   % To carry out the same procedure for a damped electrostatic kernel, we
372   % replace $1/r$ in the Coulomb potential with $\text{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$.
# Line 393 | Line 406 | to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
406   connection to unmodified electrostatics as well as the smooth
407   transition to zero in both these functions as $r\rightarrow r_c$.  The
408   electrostatic forces and torques acting on the central multipole due
409 < to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
409 > to another site within the cutoff sphere are derived from
410   Eq.~\ref{generic}, accounting for the appropriate number of
411   derivatives. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions are
412   presented in the first paper in this series (Reference
# Line 407 | Line 420 | without changing their relative orientation,
420   shifted smoothly by finding the gradient for two interacting dipoles
421   which have been projected onto the surface of the cutoff sphere
422   without changing their relative orientation,
423 < \begin{displaymath}
423 > \begin{equation}
424   U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r)  = U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) -
425   U_{D_{\bf a} D_{\bf b}}(r_c)
426     - (r_{ab}-r_c) ~~~\hat{r}_{ab} \cdot
427 <  \vec{\nabla} U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) \Big \lvert _{r_c}
428 < \end{displaymath}
427 >  \nabla U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r_c).
428 > \end{equation}
429   Here the lab-frame orientations of the two dipoles, $\mathbf{D}_{\bf
430    a}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\bf b}$, are retained at the cutoff distance
431   (although the signs are reversed for the dipole that has been
# Line 435 | Line 448 | U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathb
448   In general, the gradient shifted potential between a central multipole
449   and any multipolar site inside the cutoff radius is given by,
450   \begin{equation}
451 < U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
452 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{r}
453 < \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} \right]
451 >  U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
452 >    U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{\mathbf{r}}
453 >    \cdot \nabla U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
454   \label{generic2}
455   \end{equation}
456   where the sum describes a separate force-shifting that is applied to
457 < each orientational contribution to the energy.
457 > each orientational contribution to the energy.  In this expression,
458 > $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ is the unit vector connecting the two multipoles
459 > ($a$ and $b$) in space, and $\hat{\mathbf{a}}$ and $\hat{\mathbf{b}}$
460 > represent the orientations the multipoles.
461  
462   The third term converges more rapidly than the first two terms as a
463   function of radius, hence the contribution of the third term is very
464   small for large cutoff radii.  The force and torque derived from
465 < equation \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
465 > Eq. \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
466   approach zero as $r \rightarrow r_c$.  Both the GSF and TSF methods
467   can be considered generalizations of the original DSF method for
468   higher order multipole interactions. GSF and TSF are also identical up
# Line 454 | Line 470 | GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this
470   the energy, force and torque for higher order multipole-multipole
471   interactions. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions for the
472   GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this series
473 < (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI})
473 > (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI}).
474  
475  
476   \subsection{Shifted potential (SP) }
# Line 468 | Line 484 | U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \ri
484   effectively shifts the total potential to zero at the cutoff radius,
485   \begin{equation}
486   U^{\text{SP}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
487 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
487 > U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
488   \label{eq:SP}
489   \end{equation}          
490   where the sum describes separate potential shifting that is done for
# Line 957 | Line 973 | conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / n
973   energy over time, $\delta E_1$, and the standard deviation of energy
974   fluctuations around this drift $\delta E_0$.  Both of the
975   shifted-force methods (GSF and TSF) provide excellent energy
976 < conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
976 > conservation (drift less than $10^{-5}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
977   while the hard cutoff is essentially unusable for molecular dynamics.
978   SP provides some benefit over the hard cutoff because the energetic
979   jumps that happen as particles leave and enter the cutoff sphere are

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines