ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4180 by gezelter, Wed Jun 11 21:03:11 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4186 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 02:31:11 2014 UTC

# Line 35 | Line 35 | preprint,
35   %\linenumbers\relax % Commence numbering lines
36   \usepackage{amsmath}
37   \usepackage{times}
38 < \usepackage{mathptm}
38 > \usepackage{mathptmx}
39   \usepackage{tabularx}
40   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
41   \usepackage{url}
# Line 47 | Line 47 | preprint,
47  
48   %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
49  
50 < \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald
51 < Sum. II. Comparison of Methods} % Force line breaks with \\
50 > \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald Sum. II. Comparison of Methods}
51  
52   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
53 < \affiliation{Department of Physics, University
55 < of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}%Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
53 > \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
54  
55   \author{Kathie E. Newman}
56 < \affiliation{Department of Physics, University
59 < of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
56 > \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
57  
58   \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}%
59   \email{gezelter@nd.edu.}
60 < \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556%\\This line break forced with \textbackslash\textbackslash
61 < }%
60 > \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
61 > }
62  
63 < \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
67 <             %  but any date may be explicitly specified
63 > \date{\today}
64  
65   \begin{abstract}
66 <  We have tested the real-space shifted potential (SP),
66 >  We report on tests of the real-space shifted potential (SP),
67    gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
68 <  for multipoles that were developed in the first paper in this series
69 <  against a reference method. The tests were carried out in a variety
70 <  of condensed-phase environments which were designed to test all
71 <  levels of the multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the
72 <  energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
73 <  torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
74 <  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald sum.  We have
75 <  also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
76 <  methods in molecular dynamics simulations using all of these
77 <  methods. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
68 >  for multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this
69 >  series, using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The
70 >  tests were carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments
71 >  designed to test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.
72 >  Comparisons of the energy differences between configurations,
73 >  molecular forces, and torques were used to analyze how well the
74 >  real-space models perform relative to the more computationally
75 >  expensive Ewald treatment.  We have also investigated the energy
76 >  conservation properties of the new methods in molecular dynamics
77 >  simulations. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
78    configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
79    be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
80    shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
81 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and exhibits energy
82 <  conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
83 <  efficiently computing electrostatic interactions in molecular
81 >  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and also exhibits
82 >  energy conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
83 >  efficient computation of electrostatic interactions in molecular
84    dynamics simulations.
85   \end{abstract}
86  
87   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
88                               % Classification Scheme.
89 < \keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
89 > %\keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
90  
91   \maketitle
92  
97
93   \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
94   Computing the interactions between electrostatic sites is one of the
95 < most expensive aspects of molecular simulations, which is why there
96 < have been significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and
97 < convergent methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is
98 < perhaps the best known and most accurate method for evaluating
99 < energies, forces, and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation
100 < cells. In this approach, the conditionally convergent electrostatic
101 < energy is converted into two absolutely convergent contributions, one
102 < which is carried out in real space with a cutoff radius, and one in
103 < reciprocal space.\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
95 > most expensive aspects of molecular simulations. There have been
96 > significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and convergent
97 > methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is perhaps the
98 > best known and most accurate method for evaluating energies, forces,
99 > and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation cells. In this approach,
100 > the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
101 > two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
102 > real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
103 > space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
104  
105   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
106   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
107   scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing
108   particle meshes and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT),
109   the particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
110 < (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME) methods can decrease
111 < the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N \log
110 > (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME)
111 > methods can decrease the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N
112 > \log
113   N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
114  
115 < Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum, the
120 < method may require modification to compute interactions for
115 > Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
116   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
117 < interfaces.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
118 < To simulate interfacial systems, Parry's extension of the 3D Ewald sum
119 < is appropriate for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} The inherent
120 < periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also be problematic for
121 < interfacial molecular systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Modified Ewald
122 < methods that were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D)
123 < electrostatic interactions in interfacial systems have not had similar
124 < particle-mesh treatments.\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
125 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq}
117 > interfaces require modifications to the
118 > method.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
119 > Parry's extension of the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate
120 > for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that
121 > were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D) electrostatic
122 > interactions in interfacial systems have not seen similar
123 > particle-mesh treatments,\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
124 >  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq} and still scale poorly
125 > with system size. The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can
126 > also be problematic for interfacial molecular
127 > systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
128  
129   \subsection{Real-space methods}
130   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
131   method for calculating electrostatic interactions between point
132 < charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in
133 < condensed systems is actually short ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95}.  For
134 < an ordered lattice (e.g., when computing the Madelung constant of an
135 < ionic solid), the material can be considered as a set of ions
136 < interacting with neutral dipolar or quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving
137 < an effective distance dependence for the electrostatic interactions of
138 < $r^{-5}$ (see figure \ref{fig:NaCl}).  For this reason, careful
139 < applications of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
140 < Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.  Recently,
141 < Fukuda used neutralization of the higher order moments for the
142 < calculation of the electrostatic interaction of the point charges
143 < system.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
132 > charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in most
133 > condensed phase systems is effectively short
134 > ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95} For an ordered lattice (e.g., when
135 > computing the Madelung constant of an ionic solid), the material can
136 > be considered as a set of ions interacting with neutral dipolar or
137 > quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving an effective distance dependence for
138 > the electrostatic interactions of $r^{-5}$ (see figure
139 > \ref{fig:schematic}). If one views the \ce{NaCl} crystal as a simple
140 > cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the
141 > electrostatic energy per ion converges more rapidly to the Madelung
142 > energy than the dipolar approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the
143 > correct Madelung constant, Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure
144 > could be constructed in a way that the finite crystal terminates with
145 > complete \ce{(NaCl)4} molecules.\cite{Lacman65} The central ion sees
146 > what is effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts
147 > suggest that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for
148 > perfect ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} For this reason, careful
149 > application of Wolf's method can provide accurate estimates of
150 > Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.
151  
152 < \begin{figure}[h!]
153 <  \centering
154 <  \includegraphics[width=0.50 \textwidth]{chargesystem.pdf}
155 <  \caption{Top: NaCl crystal showing how spherical truncation can
156 <    breaking effective charge ordering, and how complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
157 <    molecules interact with the central ion.  Bottom: A dipolar
158 <    crystal exhibiting similar behavior and illustrating how the
159 <    effective dipole-octupole interactions can be disrupted by
160 <    spherical truncation.}
161 <  \label{fig:NaCl}
162 < \end{figure}
163 <
164 < The direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates
165 < truncation defects. Wolf \textit{et al.} further argued that
166 < truncation errors are due to net charge remaining inside the cutoff
167 < sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To neutralize this charge they proposed
164 < placing an image charge on the surface of the cutoff sphere for every
165 < real charge inside the cutoff.  These charges are present for the
166 < evaluation of both the pair interaction energy and the force, although
167 < the force expression maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.
168 < In the original Wolf formulation, the total energy for the charge and
169 < image were not equal to the integral of their force expression, and as
170 < a result, the total energy would not be conserved in molecular
171 < dynamics (MD) simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.} and
172 < Fennel and Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf
173 < method with commensurate force and energy expressions that do not
174 < exhibit this problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}   Related real-space
175 < methods were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
152 > Direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates numerical
153 > errors.  Wolf \textit{et al.} suggest that truncation errors are due
154 > to net charge remaining inside the cutoff sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To
155 > neutralize this charge they proposed placing an image charge on the
156 > surface of the cutoff sphere for every real charge inside the cutoff.
157 > These charges are present for the evaluation of both the pair
158 > interaction energy and the force, although the force expression
159 > maintains a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.  In the original Wolf
160 > formulation, the total energy for the charge and image were not equal
161 > to the integral of the force expression, and as a result, the total
162 > energy would not be conserved in molecular dynamics (MD)
163 > simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.}, and Fennel and
164 > Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf method with
165 > commensurate force and energy expressions that do not exhibit this
166 > problem.\cite{Zahn:2002hc,Fennell:2006lq} Related real-space methods
167 > were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
168    al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
169 < and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107}
169 > and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107} Recently, Fukuda has successfuly
170 > used additional neutralization of higher order moments for systems of
171 > point charges.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
172  
173 < Considering the interaction of one central ion in an ionic crystal
174 < with a portion of the crystal at some distance, the effective Columbic
175 < potential is found to be decreasing as $r^{-5}$. If one views the
176 < \ce{NaCl} crystal as simple cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar
177 < \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the electrostatic energy per ion converges more
178 < rapidly to the Madelung energy than the dipolar
179 < approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the correct Madelung constant,
180 < Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure could be constructed in a way
181 < that the finite crystal terminates with complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
182 < molecules.\cite{Lacman65} Any charge in a NaCl crystal is surrounded
183 < by opposite charges. Similarly for each pair of charges, there is an
184 < opposite pair of charge adjacent to it.  The central ion sees what is
185 < effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts suggest
186 < that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for perfect
187 < ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn}
173 > \begin{figure}
174 >  \centering
175 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.pdf}
176 >  \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
177 >    charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
178 >    effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
179 >    cutoffs, motion of individual charges in and out of the cutoff
180 >    sphere can break the effective multipolar ordering.  Bottom:
181 >    dipolar crystals and fluids have a similar effective
182 >    \textit{quadrupolar} ordering (in the smaller grey circles), and
183 >    orientational averaging helps to reduce the effective range of the
184 >    interactions in the fluid.  Placement of reversed image multipoles
185 >    on the surface of the cutoff sphere recovers the effective
186 >    higher-order multipole behavior.}
187 >  \label{fig:schematic}
188 > \end{figure}
189  
190 < One can make a similar argument for crystals of point multipoles. The
191 < Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy constants for dipolar lattices
192 < utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain dipoles at the eight corners of
193 < a unit cube.  Only three of these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1,
194 < \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole moments, while the rest have
195 < zero net dipole and retain contributions only from higher order
196 < multipoles.  The effective interaction between a dipole at the center
190 > One can make a similar effective range argument for crystals of point
191 > \textit{multipoles}. The Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy
192 > constants for dipolar lattices utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain
193 > dipoles at the eight corners of a unit cube.\cite{LT} Only three of
194 > these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1, \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole
195 > moments, while the rest have zero net dipole and retain contributions
196 > only from higher order multipoles.  The lowest-energy crystalline
197 > structures are built out of basis vectors that have only residual
198 > quadrupolar moments (e.g. the $Z_5$ array). In these low energy
199 > structures, the effective interaction between a dipole at the center
200   of a crystal and a group of eight dipoles farther away is
201   significantly shorter ranged than the $r^{-3}$ that one would expect
202   for raw dipole-dipole interactions.  Only in crystals which retain a
# Line 208 | Line 206 | multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), cau
206   unstable.
207  
208   In ionic crystals, real-space truncation can break the effective
209 < multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), causing significant
210 < swings in the electrostatic energy as individual ions move back and
211 < forth across the boundary.  This is why the image charges are
209 > multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}), causing
210 > significant swings in the electrostatic energy as individual ions move
211 > back and forth across the boundary.  This is why the image charges are
212   necessary for the Wolf sum to exhibit rapid convergence.  Similarly,
213   the real-space truncation of point multipole interactions breaks
214   higher order multipole arrangements, and image multipoles are required
215   for real-space treatments of electrostatic energies.
216  
217 + The shorter effective range of electrostatic interactions is not
218 + limited to perfect crystals, but can also apply in disordered fluids.
219 + Even at elevated temperatures, there is local charge balance in an
220 + ionic liquid, where each positive ion has surroundings dominated by
221 + negaitve ions and vice versa.  The reversed-charge images on the
222 + cutoff sphere that are integral to the Wolf and DSF approaches retain
223 + the effective multipolar interactions as the charges traverse the
224 + cutoff boundary.
225 +
226 + In multipolar fluids (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}) there is
227 + significant orientational averaging that additionally reduces the
228 + effect of long-range multipolar interactions.  The image multipoles
229 + that are introduced in the TSF, GSF, and SP methods mimic this effect
230 + and reduce the effective range of the multipolar interactions as
231 + interacting molecules traverse each other's cutoff boundaries.
232 +
233   % Because of this reason, although the nature of electrostatic
234   % interaction short ranged, the hard cutoff sphere creates very large
235   % fluctuation in the electrostatic energy for the perfect crystal. In
# Line 226 | Line 240 | The forces and torques acting on atomic sites are the
240   % to the non-neutralized value of the higher order moments within the
241   % cutoff sphere.
242  
243 < The forces and torques acting on atomic sites are the fundamental
244 < factors driving dynamics in molecular simulations. Fennell and
245 < Gezelter proposed the damped shifted force (DSF) energy kernel to
246 < obtain consistent energies and forces on the atoms within the cutoff
247 < sphere. Both the energy and the force go smoothly to zero as an atom
248 < aproaches the cutoff radius. The comparisons of the accuracy these
249 < quantities between the DSF kernel and SPME was surprisingly
250 < good.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} The DSF method has seen increasing use for
251 < calculating electrostatic interactions in molecular systems with
252 < relatively uniform charge
239 < densities.\cite{Shi:2013ij,Kannam:2012rr,Acevedo13,Space12,English08,Lawrence13,Vergne13}
243 > Forces and torques acting on atomic sites are fundamental in driving
244 > dynamics in molecular simulations, and the damped shifted force (DSF)
245 > energy kernel provides consistent energies and forces on charged atoms
246 > within the cutoff sphere. Both the energy and the force go smoothly to
247 > zero as an atom aproaches the cutoff radius. The comparisons of the
248 > accuracy these quantities between the DSF kernel and SPME was
249 > surprisingly good.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} As a result, the DSF method
250 > has seen increasing use in molecular systems with relatively uniform
251 > charge
252 > densities.\cite{English08,Kannam:2012rr,Space12,Lawrence13,Acevedo13,Shi:2013ij,Vergne13}
253  
254   \subsection{The damping function}
255 < The damping function used in our research has been discussed in detail
256 < in the first paper of this series.\cite{PaperI} The radial kernel
257 < $1/r$ for the interactions between point charges can be replaced by
258 < the complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to
259 < accelerate the rate of convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping
260 < parameter with units of inverse distance.  Altering the value of
261 < $\alpha$ is equivalent to changing the width of Gaussian charge
262 < distributions that replace each point charge -- Gaussian overlap
263 < integrals yield complementary error functions when truncated at a
264 < finite distance.
255 > The damping function has been discussed in detail in the first paper
256 > of this series.\cite{PaperI} The $1/r$ Coulombic kernel for the
257 > interactions between point charges can be replaced by the
258 > complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to accelerate
259 > convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter with units of
260 > inverse distance.  Altering the value of $\alpha$ is equivalent to
261 > changing the width of Gaussian charge distributions that replace each
262 > point charge, as Coulomb integrals with Gaussian charge distributions
263 > produce complementary error functions when truncated at a finite
264 > distance.
265  
266 < By using suitable value of damping alpha ($\alpha \sim 0.2$) for a
267 < cutoff radius ($r_{­c}=9 A$), Fennel and Gezelter produced very good
268 < agreement with SPME for the interaction energies, forces and torques
269 < for charge-charge interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
266 > With moderate damping coefficients, $\alpha \sim 0.2$, the DSF method
267 > produced very good agreement with SPME for interaction energies,
268 > forces and torques for charge-charge
269 > interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
270  
271   \subsection{Point multipoles in molecular modeling}
272   Coarse-graining approaches which treat entire molecular subsystems as
273   a single rigid body are now widely used. A common feature of many
274   coarse-graining approaches is simplification of the electrostatic
275   interactions between bodies so that fewer site-site interactions are
276 < required to compute configurational energies.  Many coarse-grained
277 < molecular structures would normally consist of equal positive and
265 < negative charges, and rather than use multiple site-site interactions,
266 < the interaction between higher order multipoles can also be used to
267 < evaluate a single molecule-molecule
268 < interaction.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
276 > required to compute configurational
277 > energies.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
278  
279 < Because electrons in a molecule are not localized at specific points,
280 < the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is a relatively
281 < rough approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point
282 < multipoles and polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the
283 < molecular model.  Recently, water has been modeled with point
284 < multipoles up to octupolar order using the soft sticky
276 < dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
279 > Additionally, because electrons in a molecule are not localized at
280 > specific points, the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers
281 > is always an approximation.  For increased accuracy, atomic sites can
282 > also be assigned point multipoles and polarizabilities.  Recently,
283 > water has been modeled with point multipoles up to octupolar order
284 > using the soft sticky dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
285   model.\cite{Ichiye10_1,Ichiye10_2,Ichiye10_3} Atom-centered point
286   multipoles up to quadrupolar order have also been coupled with point
287   polarizabilities in the high-quality AMOEBA and iAMOEBA water
288 < models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} But
289 < using point multipole with the real space truncation without
290 < accounting for multipolar neutrality will create energy conservation
291 < issues in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
288 > models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} However,
289 > truncating point multipoles without smoothing the forces and torques
290 > can create energy conservation issues in molecular dynamics
291 > simulations.
292  
293   In this paper we test a set of real-space methods that were developed
294   for point multipolar interactions.  These methods extend the damped
295   shifted force (DSF) and Wolf methods originally developed for
296   charge-charge interactions and generalize them for higher order
297 < multipoles. The detailed mathematical development of these methods has
298 < been presented in the first paper in this series, while this work
299 < covers the testing the energies, forces, torques, and energy
297 > multipoles.  The detailed mathematical development of these methods
298 > has been presented in the first paper in this series, while this work
299 > covers the testing of energies, forces, torques, and energy
300   conservation properties of the methods in realistic simulation
301   environments.  In all cases, the methods are compared with the
302 < reference method, a full multipolar Ewald treatment.
302 > reference method, a full multipolar Ewald treatment.\cite{Smith82,Smith98}
303  
304  
305   %\subsection{Conservation of total energy }
# Line 320 | Line 328 | $\bf a$.
328   where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$, $\hat{M}_{\bf a}$, is
329   expressed in terms of the point charge, $C_{\bf a}$, dipole, ${\bf D}_{\bf
330      a}$, and quadrupole, $\mathbf{Q}_{\bf a}$, for object
331 < $\bf a$.
331 > $\bf a$, etc.
332  
333   % Interactions between multipoles can be expressed as higher derivatives
334   % of the bare Coulomb potential, so one way of ensuring that the forces
# Line 348 | Line 356 | of the interaction, with $n=0$ for charge-charge, $n=1
356   \label{generic}
357   \end{equation}
358   where $f_n(r)$ is a shifted kernel that is appropriate for the order
359 < of the interaction, with $n=0$ for charge-charge, $n=1$ for
360 < charge-dipole, $n=2$ for charge-quadrupole and dipole-dipole, $n=3$
361 < for dipole-quadrupole, and $n=4$ for quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure
362 < smooth convergence of the energy, force, and torques, a Taylor
363 < expansion with $n$ terms must be performed at cutoff radius ($r_c$) to
364 < obtain $f_n(r)$.
359 > of the interaction (see Ref. \onlinecite{PaperI}), with $n=0$ for
360 > charge-charge, $n=1$ for charge-dipole, $n=2$ for charge-quadrupole
361 > and dipole-dipole, $n=3$ for dipole-quadrupole, and $n=4$ for
362 > quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure smooth convergence of the energy,
363 > force, and torques, a Taylor expansion with $n$ terms must be
364 > performed at cutoff radius ($r_c$) to obtain $f_n(r)$.
365  
366   % To carry out the same procedure for a damped electrostatic kernel, we
367   % replace $1/r$ in the Coulomb potential with $\text{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$.
# Line 393 | Line 401 | to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
401   connection to unmodified electrostatics as well as the smooth
402   transition to zero in both these functions as $r\rightarrow r_c$.  The
403   electrostatic forces and torques acting on the central multipole due
404 < to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
404 > to another site within the cutoff sphere are derived from
405   Eq.~\ref{generic}, accounting for the appropriate number of
406   derivatives. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions are
407   presented in the first paper in this series (Reference
# Line 407 | Line 415 | without changing their relative orientation,
415   shifted smoothly by finding the gradient for two interacting dipoles
416   which have been projected onto the surface of the cutoff sphere
417   without changing their relative orientation,
418 < \begin{displaymath}
418 > \begin{equation}
419   U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r)  = U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) -
420   U_{D_{\bf a} D_{\bf b}}(r_c)
421     - (r_{ab}-r_c) ~~~\hat{r}_{ab} \cdot
422 <  \vec{\nabla} U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) \Big \lvert _{r_c}
423 < \end{displaymath}
422 >  \nabla U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r_c).
423 > \end{equation}
424   Here the lab-frame orientations of the two dipoles, $\mathbf{D}_{\bf
425    a}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\bf b}$, are retained at the cutoff distance
426   (although the signs are reversed for the dipole that has been
# Line 435 | Line 443 | U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathb
443   In general, the gradient shifted potential between a central multipole
444   and any multipolar site inside the cutoff radius is given by,
445   \begin{equation}
446 < U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
447 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{r}
448 < \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} \right]
446 >  U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
447 >    U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{\mathbf{r}}
448 >    \cdot \nabla U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
449   \label{generic2}
450   \end{equation}
451   where the sum describes a separate force-shifting that is applied to
452 < each orientational contribution to the energy.
452 > each orientational contribution to the energy.  In this expression,
453 > $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ is the unit vector connecting the two multipoles
454 > ($a$ and $b$) in space, and $\hat{\mathbf{a}}$ and $\hat{\mathbf{b}}$
455 > represent the orientations the multipoles.
456  
457   The third term converges more rapidly than the first two terms as a
458   function of radius, hence the contribution of the third term is very
459   small for large cutoff radii.  The force and torque derived from
460 < equation \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
460 > Eq. \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
461   approach zero as $r \rightarrow r_c$.  Both the GSF and TSF methods
462   can be considered generalizations of the original DSF method for
463   higher order multipole interactions. GSF and TSF are also identical up
# Line 454 | Line 465 | GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this
465   the energy, force and torque for higher order multipole-multipole
466   interactions. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions for the
467   GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this series
468 < (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI})
468 > (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI}).
469  
470  
471   \subsection{Shifted potential (SP) }
# Line 468 | Line 479 | U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \ri
479   effectively shifts the total potential to zero at the cutoff radius,
480   \begin{equation}
481   U^{\text{SP}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
482 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
482 > U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
483   \label{eq:SP}
484   \end{equation}          
485   where the sum describes separate potential shifting that is done for
# Line 957 | Line 968 | conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / n
968   energy over time, $\delta E_1$, and the standard deviation of energy
969   fluctuations around this drift $\delta E_0$.  Both of the
970   shifted-force methods (GSF and TSF) provide excellent energy
971 < conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
971 > conservation (drift less than $10^{-5}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
972   while the hard cutoff is essentially unusable for molecular dynamics.
973   SP provides some benefit over the hard cutoff because the energetic
974   jumps that happen as particles leave and enter the cutoff sphere are

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines