ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4181 by gezelter, Thu Jun 12 14:58:06 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4185 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 00:18:18 2014 UTC

# Line 69 | Line 69 | of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
69   \begin{abstract}
70    We have tested the real-space shifted potential (SP),
71    gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
72 <  for multipoles that were developed in the first paper in this series
73 <  against a reference method. The tests were carried out in a variety
74 <  of condensed-phase environments which were designed to test all
75 <  levels of the multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the
76 <  energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
77 <  torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
78 <  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald sum.  We have
79 <  also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
80 <  methods in molecular dynamics simulations using all of these
81 <  methods. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
82 <  configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
83 <  be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
84 <  shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
85 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and exhibits energy
86 <  conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
87 <  efficiently computing electrostatic interactions in molecular
88 <  dynamics simulations.
72 >  for multipole interactions that were developed in the first paper in
73 >  this series, using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference
74 >  method. The tests were carried out in a variety of condensed-phase
75 >  environments which were designed to test all levels of the
76 >  multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the energy
77 >  differences between configurations, molecular forces, and torques
78 >  were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform relative
79 >  to the more computationally expensive Ewald treatment.  We have also
80 >  investigated the energy conservation properties of the new methods
81 >  in molecular dynamics simulations. The SP method shows excellent
82 >  agreement with configurational energy differences, forces, and
83 >  torques, and would be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.
84 >  Of the two new shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the
85 >  best agreement with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and
86 >  exhibits energy conservation properties that make it an excellent
87 >  choice for efficient computation of electrostatic interactions in
88 >  molecular dynamics simulations.
89   \end{abstract}
90  
91   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
92                               % Classification Scheme.
93 < \keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
93 > %\keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
94  
95   \maketitle
96  
97  
98   \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
99   Computing the interactions between electrostatic sites is one of the
100 < most expensive aspects of molecular simulations, which is why there
101 < have been significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and
102 < convergent methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is
103 < perhaps the best known and most accurate method for evaluating
104 < energies, forces, and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation
105 < cells. In this approach, the conditionally convergent electrostatic
106 < energy is converted into two absolutely convergent contributions, one
107 < which is carried out in real space with a cutoff radius, and one in
108 < reciprocal space.\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
100 > most expensive aspects of molecular simulations. There have been
101 > significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and convergent
102 > methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is perhaps the
103 > best known and most accurate method for evaluating energies, forces,
104 > and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation cells. In this approach,
105 > the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
106 > two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
107 > real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
108 > space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
109  
110   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
111   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
# Line 116 | Line 116 | Because of the artificial periodicity required for the
116   the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N \log
117   N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
118  
119 < Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum, the
120 < method may require modification to compute interactions for
119 > Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
120   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
121 < interfaces.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
122 < To simulate interfacial systems, Parry's extension of the 3D Ewald sum
123 < is appropriate for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} The inherent
124 < periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also be problematic for
125 < interfacial molecular systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Modified Ewald
126 < methods that were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D)
127 < electrostatic interactions in interfacial systems have not had similar
128 < particle-mesh treatments.\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
129 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq}
121 > interfaces require modifications to the
122 > method.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
123 > Parry's extension of the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate
124 > for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that
125 > were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D) electrostatic
126 > interactions in interfacial systems have not seen similar
127 > particle-mesh treatments,\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
128 >  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq} and still scale poorly
129 > with system size. The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can
130 > also be problematic for interfacial molecular
131 > systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
132  
133   \subsection{Real-space methods}
134   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
135   method for calculating electrostatic interactions between point
136 < charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in
137 < condensed systems is actually short ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95} For an
138 < ordered lattice (e.g., when computing the Madelung constant of an
139 < ionic solid), the material can be considered as a set of ions
140 < interacting with neutral dipolar or quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving
141 < an effective distance dependence for the electrostatic interactions of
142 < $r^{-5}$ (see figure \ref{fig:schematic}).  For this reason, careful
143 < applications of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
144 < Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.  Recently,
145 < Fukuda used neutralization of the higher order moments for the
146 < calculation of the electrostatic interaction of the point charges
147 < system.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
136 > charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in most
137 > condensed phase systems is effectively short
138 > ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95} For an ordered lattice (e.g., when
139 > computing the Madelung constant of an ionic solid), the material can
140 > be considered as a set of ions interacting with neutral dipolar or
141 > quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving an effective distance dependence for
142 > the electrostatic interactions of $r^{-5}$ (see figure
143 > \ref{fig:schematic}). If one views the \ce{NaCl} crystal as a simple
144 > cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the
145 > electrostatic energy per ion converges more rapidly to the Madelung
146 > energy than the dipolar approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the
147 > correct Madelung constant, Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure
148 > could be constructed in a way that the finite crystal terminates with
149 > complete \ce{(NaCl)4} molecules.\cite{Lacman65} The central ion sees
150 > what is effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts
151 > suggest that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for
152 > perfect ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} For this reason, careful
153 > application of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
154 > Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.
155  
156 + Direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates numerical
157 + errors.  Wolf \textit{et al.}  argued that truncation errors are due
158 + to net charge remaining inside the cutoff sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To
159 + neutralize this charge they proposed placing an image charge on the
160 + surface of the cutoff sphere for every real charge inside the cutoff.
161 + These charges are present for the evaluation of both the pair
162 + interaction energy and the force, although the force expression
163 + maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.  In the original Wolf
164 + formulation, the total energy for the charge and image were not equal
165 + to the integral of their force expression, and as a result, the total
166 + energy would not be conserved in molecular dynamics (MD)
167 + simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.}, and Fennel and
168 + Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf method with
169 + commensurate force and energy expressions that do not exhibit this
170 + problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Related real-space methods were also
171 + proposed by Chen \textit{et
172 +  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
173 + and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107} Recently, Fukuda has used
174 + neutralization of the higher order moments for the calculation of the
175 + electrostatic interaction of the point charge
176 + systems.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
177 +
178   \begin{figure}
179    \centering
180    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.pdf}
181    \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
182      charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
183 <    effectively charge-multipole in order at longer distances.  With
184 <    hard cutoffs, motion of individual charges in and out of the
185 <    cutoff sphere can break the effective multipolar ordering.
186 <    Bottom: dipolar crystals and fluids have a similar effective
183 >    effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
184 >    cutoffs, motion of individual charges in and out of the cutoff
185 >    sphere can break the effective multipolar ordering.  Bottom:
186 >    dipolar crystals and fluids have a similar effective
187      \textit{quadrupolar} ordering (in the smaller grey circles), and
188      orientational averaging helps to reduce the effective range of the
189      interactions in the fluid.  Placement of reversed image multipoles
# Line 162 | Line 192 | The direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radi
192    \label{fig:schematic}
193   \end{figure}
194  
195 < The direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates
196 < truncation defects. Wolf \textit{et al.} further argued that
197 < truncation errors are due to net charge remaining inside the cutoff
198 < sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To neutralize this charge they proposed
199 < placing an image charge on the surface of the cutoff sphere for every
200 < real charge inside the cutoff.  These charges are present for the
201 < evaluation of both the pair interaction energy and the force, although
202 < the force expression maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.
203 < In the original Wolf formulation, the total energy for the charge and
204 < image were not equal to the integral of their force expression, and as
175 < a result, the total energy would not be conserved in molecular
176 < dynamics (MD) simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.} and
177 < Fennel and Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf
178 < method with commensurate force and energy expressions that do not
179 < exhibit this problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}   Related real-space
180 < methods were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
181 <  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
182 < and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107}
183 <
184 < Considering the interaction of one central ion in an ionic crystal
185 < with a portion of the crystal at some distance, the effective Columbic
186 < potential is found to decrease as $r^{-5}$. If one views the \ce{NaCl}
187 < crystal as a simple cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar
188 < \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the electrostatic energy per ion converges more
189 < rapidly to the Madelung energy than the dipolar
190 < approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the correct Madelung constant,
191 < Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure could be constructed in a way
192 < that the finite crystal terminates with complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
193 < molecules.\cite{Lacman65} The central ion sees what is effectively a
194 < set of octupoles at large distances. These facts suggest that the
195 < Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for perfect ionic
196 < crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn}
197 <
198 < One can make a similar argument for crystals of point multipoles. The
199 < Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy constants for dipolar lattices
200 < utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain dipoles at the eight corners of
201 < a unit cube.  Only three of these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1,
202 < \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole moments, while the rest have
203 < zero net dipole and retain contributions only from higher order
204 < multipoles.  The effective interaction between a dipole at the center
195 > One can make a similar effective range argument for crystals of point
196 > \textit{multipoles}. The Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy
197 > constants for dipolar lattices utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain
198 > dipoles at the eight corners of a unit cube.  Only three of these
199 > basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1, \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole
200 > moments, while the rest have zero net dipole and retain contributions
201 > only from higher order multipoles.  The lowest energy crystalline
202 > structures are built out of basis vectors that have only residual
203 > quadrupolar moments (e.g. the $Z_5$ array). In these low energy
204 > structures, the effective interaction between a dipole at the center
205   of a crystal and a group of eight dipoles farther away is
206   significantly shorter ranged than the $r^{-3}$ that one would expect
207   for raw dipole-dipole interactions.  Only in crystals which retain a
# Line 258 | Line 258 | The damping function used in our research has been dis
258   densities.\cite{Shi:2013ij,Kannam:2012rr,Acevedo13,Space12,English08,Lawrence13,Vergne13}
259  
260   \subsection{The damping function}
261 < The damping function used in our research has been discussed in detail
262 < in the first paper of this series.\cite{PaperI} The radial kernel
263 < $1/r$ for the interactions between point charges can be replaced by
264 < the complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to
265 < accelerate the rate of convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping
266 < parameter with units of inverse distance.  Altering the value of
267 < $\alpha$ is equivalent to changing the width of Gaussian charge
268 < distributions that replace each point charge -- Gaussian overlap
269 < integrals yield complementary error functions when truncated at a
270 < finite distance.
261 > The damping function has been discussed in detail in the first paper
262 > of this series.\cite{PaperI} The $1/r$ Coulombic kernel for the
263 > interactions between point charges can be replaced by the
264 > complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to accelerate
265 > convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter with units of
266 > inverse distance.  Altering the value of $\alpha$ is equivalent to
267 > changing the width of Gaussian charge distributions that replace each
268 > point charge, as Coulomb integrals with Gaussian charge distributions
269 > produce complementary error functions when truncated at a finite
270 > distance.
271  
272 < By using suitable value of damping alpha ($\alpha \sim 0.2$) for a
273 < cutoff radius ($r_{­c}=9 A$), Fennel and Gezelter produced very good
274 < agreement with SPME for the interaction energies, forces and torques
275 < for charge-charge interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
272 > With moderate damping coefficients, $\alpha \sim 0.2$, the DSF method
273 > produced very good agreement with SPME for interaction energies,
274 > forces and torques for charge-charge
275 > interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
276  
277   \subsection{Point multipoles in molecular modeling}
278   Coarse-graining approaches which treat entire molecular subsystems as
279   a single rigid body are now widely used. A common feature of many
280   coarse-graining approaches is simplification of the electrostatic
281   interactions between bodies so that fewer site-site interactions are
282 < required to compute configurational energies.  Many coarse-grained
283 < molecular structures would normally consist of equal positive and
284 < negative charges, and rather than use multiple site-site interactions,
285 < the interaction between higher order multipoles can also be used to
286 < evaluate a single molecule-molecule
287 < interaction.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
282 > required to compute configurational
283 > energies.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
284  
285   Because electrons in a molecule are not localized at specific points,
286 < the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is a relatively
287 < rough approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point
288 < multipoles and polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the
289 < molecular model.  Recently, water has been modeled with point
290 < multipoles up to octupolar order using the soft sticky
295 < dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
286 > the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is always an
287 > approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point multipoles and
288 > polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the molecular model.
289 > Recently, water has been modeled with point multipoles up to octupolar
290 > order using the soft sticky dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
291   model.\cite{Ichiye10_1,Ichiye10_2,Ichiye10_3} Atom-centered point
292   multipoles up to quadrupolar order have also been coupled with point
293   polarizabilities in the high-quality AMOEBA and iAMOEBA water
294 < models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} But
295 < using point multipole with the real space truncation without
296 < accounting for multipolar neutrality will create energy conservation
302 < issues in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
294 > models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} However,
295 > truncating point multipoles without smoothing the forces and torques
296 > will create energy conservation issues in molecular dynamics simulations.
297  
298   In this paper we test a set of real-space methods that were developed
299   for point multipolar interactions.  These methods extend the damped
# Line 339 | Line 333 | $\bf a$.
333   where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$, $\hat{M}_{\bf a}$, is
334   expressed in terms of the point charge, $C_{\bf a}$, dipole, ${\bf D}_{\bf
335      a}$, and quadrupole, $\mathbf{Q}_{\bf a}$, for object
336 < $\bf a$.
336 > $\bf a$, etc.
337  
338   % Interactions between multipoles can be expressed as higher derivatives
339   % of the bare Coulomb potential, so one way of ensuring that the forces
# Line 412 | Line 406 | to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
406   connection to unmodified electrostatics as well as the smooth
407   transition to zero in both these functions as $r\rightarrow r_c$.  The
408   electrostatic forces and torques acting on the central multipole due
409 < to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
409 > to another site within the cutoff sphere are derived from
410   Eq.~\ref{generic}, accounting for the appropriate number of
411   derivatives. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions are
412   presented in the first paper in this series (Reference
# Line 430 | Line 424 | U_{D_{\bf a} D_{\bf b}}(r_c)
424   U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r)  = U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) -
425   U_{D_{\bf a} D_{\bf b}}(r_c)
426     - (r_{ab}-r_c) ~~~\hat{r}_{ab} \cdot
427 <  \vec{\nabla} U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) \Big \lvert _{r_c}
427 >  \nabla U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r_c).
428   \end{equation}
429   Here the lab-frame orientations of the two dipoles, $\mathbf{D}_{\bf
430    a}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\bf b}$, are retained at the cutoff distance
# Line 454 | Line 448 | U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathb
448   In general, the gradient shifted potential between a central multipole
449   and any multipolar site inside the cutoff radius is given by,
450   \begin{equation}
451 < U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
452 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{r}
453 < \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} \right]
451 >  U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
452 >    U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{\mathbf{r}}
453 >    \cdot \nabla U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
454   \label{generic2}
455   \end{equation}
456   where the sum describes a separate force-shifting that is applied to
457 < each orientational contribution to the energy.
457 > each orientational contribution to the energy.  In this expression,
458 > $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ is the unit vector connecting the two multipoles
459 > ($a$ and $b$) in space, and $\hat{\mathbf{a}}$ and $\hat{\mathbf{b}}$
460 > represent the orientations the multipoles.
461  
462   The third term converges more rapidly than the first two terms as a
463   function of radius, hence the contribution of the third term is very
464   small for large cutoff radii.  The force and torque derived from
465 < equation \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
465 > Eq. \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
466   approach zero as $r \rightarrow r_c$.  Both the GSF and TSF methods
467   can be considered generalizations of the original DSF method for
468   higher order multipole interactions. GSF and TSF are also identical up
# Line 473 | Line 470 | GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this
470   the energy, force and torque for higher order multipole-multipole
471   interactions. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions for the
472   GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this series
473 < (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI})
473 > (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI}).
474  
475  
476   \subsection{Shifted potential (SP) }
# Line 487 | Line 484 | U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \ri
484   effectively shifts the total potential to zero at the cutoff radius,
485   \begin{equation}
486   U^{\text{SP}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
487 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
487 > U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
488   \label{eq:SP}
489   \end{equation}          
490   where the sum describes separate potential shifting that is done for

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines