ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4186 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 02:31:11 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4187 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 16:25:42 2014 UTC

# Line 63 | Line 63 | preprint,
63   \date{\today}
64  
65   \begin{abstract}
66 <  We report on tests of the real-space shifted potential (SP),
67 <  gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
68 <  for multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this
69 <  series, using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The
70 <  tests were carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments
71 <  designed to test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.
72 <  Comparisons of the energy differences between configurations,
73 <  molecular forces, and torques were used to analyze how well the
74 <  real-space models perform relative to the more computationally
75 <  expensive Ewald treatment.  We have also investigated the energy
76 <  conservation properties of the new methods in molecular dynamics
77 <  simulations. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
78 <  configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
79 <  be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
80 <  shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
81 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and also exhibits
82 <  energy conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
83 <  efficient computation of electrostatic interactions in molecular
84 <  dynamics simulations.
66 >  We report on tests of the shifted potential (SP), gradient shifted
67 >  force (GSF), and Taylor shifted force (TSF) real-space methods for
68 >  multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this series,
69 >  using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The tests were
70 >  carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments designed to
71 >  test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.  Comparisons of the
72 >  energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
73 >  torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
74 >  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald treatment.  We
75 >  have also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
76 >  methods in molecular dynamics simulations. The SP method shows
77 >  excellent agreement with configurational energy differences, forces,
78 >  and torques, and would be suitable for use in Monte Carlo
79 >  calculations.  Of the two new shifted-force methods, the GSF
80 >  approach shows the best agreement with Ewald-derived energies,
81 >  forces, and torques and also exhibits energy conservation properties
82 >  that make it an excellent choice for efficient computation of
83 >  electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations.
84   \end{abstract}
85  
86   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
# Line 100 | Line 99 | space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
99   the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
100   two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
101   real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
102 < space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
102 > space.\cite{Ewald21,deLeeuw80,Smith81,Allen87}
103  
104   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
105   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
106 < scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing
107 < particle meshes and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT),
108 < the particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
106 > scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing a
107 > particle mesh and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT), the
108 > particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
109   (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME)
110   methods can decrease the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N
111   \log
112 < N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
112 > N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}
113  
114   Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
115   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
116 < interfaces require modifications to the
117 < method.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
118 < Parry's extension of the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate
119 < for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that
120 < were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D) electrostatic
121 < interactions in interfacial systems have not seen similar
122 < particle-mesh treatments,\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
123 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq} and still scale poorly
124 < with system size. The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can
125 < also be problematic for interfacial molecular
126 < systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
116 > interfaces require modifications to the method.  Parry's extension of
117 > the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate for slab
118 > geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that were
119 > developed to handle two-dimensional (2-D) electrostatic
120 > interactions,\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
121 > but these methods were originally quite computationally
122 > expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} There have been several successful
123 > efforts that reduced the computational cost of 2-D lattice
124 > summations,\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04}
125 > bringing them more in line with the scaling for the full 3-D
126 > treatments.  The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also
127 > be problematic for interfacial molecular
128 > systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00,Fennell:2006lq}
129  
130   \subsection{Real-space methods}
131   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
# Line 584 | Line 585 | program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all c
585   \subsection{Implementation}
586   The real-space methods developed in the first paper in this series
587   have been implemented in our group's open source molecular simulation
588 < program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all calculations in
588 > program, OpenMD,\cite{Meineke05,openmd} which was used for all calculations in
589   this work.  The complementary error function can be a relatively slow
590   function on some processors, so all of the radial functions are
591   precomputed on a fine grid and are spline-interpolated to provide

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines