ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4175 by gezelter, Fri Jun 6 16:01:36 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4191 by gezelter, Tue Jun 17 16:08:03 2014 UTC

# Line 35 | Line 35 | preprint,
35   %\linenumbers\relax % Commence numbering lines
36   \usepackage{amsmath}
37   \usepackage{times}
38 < \usepackage{mathptm}
38 > \usepackage{mathptmx}
39   \usepackage{tabularx}
40   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
41   \usepackage{url}
# Line 47 | Line 47 | preprint,
47  
48   %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
49  
50 < \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald
51 < Sum. II. Comparison of Methods} % Force line breaks with \\
50 > \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald Sum. II. Comparison of Methods}
51  
52   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
53 < \affiliation{Department of Physics, University
55 < of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}%Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
53 > \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
54  
55   \author{Kathie E. Newman}
56 < \affiliation{Department of Physics, University
59 < of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
56 > \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
57  
58   \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}%
59   \email{gezelter@nd.edu.}
60 < \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556%\\This line break forced with \textbackslash\textbackslash
61 < }%
60 > \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
61 > }
62  
63 < \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
67 <             %  but any date may be explicitly specified
63 > \date{\today}
64  
65   \begin{abstract}
66 <  We have tested the real-space shifted potential (SP),
67 <  gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
68 <  for multipoles that were developed in the first paper in this series
69 <  against a reference method. The tests were carried out in a variety
70 <  of condensed-phase environments which were designed to test all
71 <  levels of the multipole-multipole interactions.  Comparisons of the
66 >  We report on tests of the shifted potential (SP), gradient shifted
67 >  force (GSF), and Taylor shifted force (TSF) real-space methods for
68 >  multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this series,
69 >  using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The tests were
70 >  carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments designed to
71 >  test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.  Comparisons of the
72    energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
73    torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
74 <  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald sum.  We have
75 <  also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
76 <  methods in molecular dynamics simulations using all of these
77 <  methods. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
78 <  configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
79 <  be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
80 <  shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
81 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and exhibits energy
82 <  conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
83 <  efficiently computing electrostatic interactions in molecular
88 <  dynamics simulations.
74 >  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald treatment.  We
75 >  have also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
76 >  methods in molecular dynamics simulations. The SP method shows
77 >  excellent agreement with configurational energy differences, forces,
78 >  and torques, and would be suitable for use in Monte Carlo
79 >  calculations.  Of the two new shifted-force methods, the GSF
80 >  approach shows the best agreement with Ewald-derived energies,
81 >  forces, and torques and also exhibits energy conservation properties
82 >  that make it an excellent choice for efficient computation of
83 >  electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations.
84   \end{abstract}
85  
86   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
87                               % Classification Scheme.
88 < \keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
88 > %\keywords{Electrostatics, Multipoles, Real-space}
89  
90   \maketitle
91  
97
92   \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
93   Computing the interactions between electrostatic sites is one of the
94 < most expensive aspects of molecular simulations, which is why there
95 < have been significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and
96 < convergent methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is
97 < perhaps the best known and most accurate method for evaluating
98 < energies, forces, and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation
99 < cells. In this approach, the conditionally convergent electrostatic
100 < energy is converted into two absolutely convergent contributions, one
101 < which is carried out in real space with a cutoff radius, and one in
102 < reciprocal space.\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
94 > most expensive aspects of molecular simulations. There have been
95 > significant efforts to develop practical, efficient and convergent
96 > methods for handling these interactions. Ewald's method is perhaps the
97 > best known and most accurate method for evaluating energies, forces,
98 > and torques in explicitly-periodic simulation cells. In this approach,
99 > the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
100 > two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
101 > real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
102 > space.\cite{Ewald21,deLeeuw80,Smith81,Allen87}
103  
104   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
105   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
106 < scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing
107 < particle meshes and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT),
108 < the particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
109 < (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME) methods can decrease
110 < the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N \log
111 < N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
106 > scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing a
107 > particle mesh and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT), the
108 > particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
109 > (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME)
110 > methods can decrease the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N
111 > \log
112 > N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}
113  
114 < Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum, the
120 < method may require modification to compute interactions for
114 > Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
115   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
116 < interfaces.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
117 < To simulate interfacial systems, Parry’s extension of the 3D Ewald sum
118 < is appropriate for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} The inherent
119 < periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also be problematic for
120 < interfacial molecular systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} Modified Ewald
121 < methods that were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D)
122 < electrostatic interactions in interfacial systems have not had similar
123 < particle-mesh treatments.\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
124 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq}
116 > interfaces require modifications to the method.  Parry's extension of
117 > the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate for slab
118 > geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that were
119 > developed to handle two-dimensional (2-D) electrostatic
120 > interactions.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
121 > These methods were originally quite computationally
122 > expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} There have been several successful
123 > efforts that reduced the computational cost of 2-D lattice summations,
124 > bringing them more in line with the scaling for the full 3-D
125 > treatments.\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04} The
126 > inherent periodicity required by the Ewald method can also be
127 > problematic in a number of protein/solvent and ionic solution
128 > environments.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00,Fennell:2006lq}
129  
130   \subsection{Real-space methods}
131   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
132   method for calculating electrostatic interactions between point
133 < charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in
134 < condensed systems is actually short ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95}.  For
135 < an ordered lattice (e.g. when computing the Madelung constant of an
136 < ionic solid), the material can be considered as a set of ions
137 < interacting with neutral dipolar or quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving
138 < an effective distance dependence for the electrostatic interactions of
139 < $r^{-5}$ (see figure \ref{fig:NaCl}.  For this reason, careful
140 < applications of Wolf's method are able to obtain accurate estimates of
141 < Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.  Recently,
142 < Fukuda used neutralization of the higher order moments for the
143 < calculation of the electrostatic interaction of the point charges
144 < system.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
133 > charges. They argued that the effective Coulomb interaction in most
134 > condensed phase systems is effectively short
135 > ranged.\cite{Wolf92,Wolf95} For an ordered lattice (e.g., when
136 > computing the Madelung constant of an ionic solid), the material can
137 > be considered as a set of ions interacting with neutral dipolar or
138 > quadrupolar ``molecules'' giving an effective distance dependence for
139 > the electrostatic interactions of $r^{-5}$ (see figure
140 > \ref{fig:schematic}). If one views the \ce{NaCl} crystal as a simple
141 > cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the
142 > electrostatic energy per ion converges more rapidly to the Madelung
143 > energy than the dipolar approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the
144 > correct Madelung constant, Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure
145 > could be constructed in a way that the finite crystal terminates with
146 > complete \ce{(NaCl)4} molecules.\cite{Lacman65} The central ion sees
147 > what is effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts
148 > suggest that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for
149 > perfect ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} For this reason, careful
150 > application of Wolf's method can provide accurate estimates of
151 > Madelung constants using relatively short cutoff radii.
152  
153 < \begin{figure}[h!]
153 > Direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates numerical
154 > errors.  Wolf \textit{et al.} suggest that truncation errors are due
155 > to net charge remaining inside the cutoff sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To
156 > neutralize this charge they proposed placing an image charge on the
157 > surface of the cutoff sphere for every real charge inside the cutoff.
158 > These charges are present for the evaluation of both the pair
159 > interaction energy and the force, although the force expression
160 > maintains a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.  In the original Wolf
161 > formulation, the total energy for the charge and image were not equal
162 > to the integral of the force expression, and as a result, the total
163 > energy would not be conserved in molecular dynamics (MD)
164 > simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.}, and Fennel and
165 > Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf method with
166 > commensurate force and energy expressions that do not exhibit this
167 > problem.\cite{Zahn:2002hc,Fennell:2006lq} Related real-space methods
168 > were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
169 >  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
170 > and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107} Recently, Fukuda has successfuly
171 > used additional neutralization of higher order moments for systems of
172 > point charges.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
173 >
174 > \begin{figure}
175    \centering
176 <  \includegraphics[width=0.50 \textwidth]{chargesystem.pdf}
177 <  \caption{Top: NaCl crystal showing how spherical truncation can
178 <    breaking effective charge ordering, and how complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
179 <    molecules interact with the central ion.  Bottom: A dipolar
180 <    crystal exhibiting similar behavior and illustrating how the
181 <    effective dipole-octupole interactions can be disrupted by
182 <    spherical truncation.}
183 <  \label{fig:NaCl}
176 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.eps}
177 >  \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
178 >    charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
179 >    effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
180 >    cutoffs, motion of individual charges in and out of the cutoff
181 >    sphere can break the effective multipolar ordering.  Bottom:
182 >    dipolar crystals and fluids have a similar effective
183 >    \textit{quadrupolar} ordering (in the smaller grey circles), and
184 >    orientational averaging helps to reduce the effective range of the
185 >    interactions in the fluid.  Placement of reversed image multipoles
186 >    on the surface of the cutoff sphere recovers the effective
187 >    higher-order multipole behavior.}
188 >  \label{fig:schematic}
189   \end{figure}
190  
191 < The direct truncation of interactions at a cutoff radius creates
192 < truncation defects. Wolf \textit{et al.} further argued that
193 < truncation errors are due to net charge remaining inside the cutoff
194 < sphere.\cite{Wolf:1999dn} To neutralize this charge they proposed
195 < placing an image charge on the surface of the cutoff sphere for every
196 < real charge inside the cutoff.  These charges are present for the
197 < evaluation of both the pair interaction energy and the force, although
198 < the force expression maintained a discontinuity at the cutoff sphere.
199 < In the original Wolf formulation, the total energy for the charge and
200 < image were not equal to the integral of their force expression, and as
170 < a result, the total energy would not be conserved in molecular
171 < dynamics (MD) simulations.\cite{Zahn:2002hc} Zahn \textit{et al.} and
172 < Fennel and Gezelter later proposed shifted force variants of the Wolf
173 < method with commensurate force and energy expressions that do not
174 < exhibit this problem.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}   Related real-space
175 < methods were also proposed by Chen \textit{et
176 <  al.}\cite{Chen:2004du,Chen:2006ii,Denesyuk:2008ez,Rodgers:2006nw}
177 < and by Wu and Brooks.\cite{Wu:044107}
178 <
179 < Considering the interaction of one central ion in an ionic crystal
180 < with a portion of the crystal at some distance, the effective Columbic
181 < potential is found to be decreasing as $r^{-5}$. If one views the
182 < \ce{NaCl} crystal as simple cubic (SC) structure with an octupolar
183 < \ce{(NaCl)4} basis, the electrostatic energy per ion converges more
184 < rapidly to the Madelung energy than the dipolar
185 < approximation.\cite{Wolf92} To find the correct Madelung constant,
186 < Lacman suggested that the NaCl structure could be constructed in a way
187 < that the finite crystal terminates with complete \ce{(NaCl)4}
188 < molecules.\cite{Lacman65} Any charge in a NaCl crystal is surrounded
189 < by opposite charges. Similarly for each pair of charges, there is an
190 < opposite pair of charge adjacent to it.  The central ion sees what is
191 < effectively a set of octupoles at large distances. These facts suggest
192 < that the Madelung constants are relatively short ranged for perfect
193 < ionic crystals.\cite{Wolf:1999dn}
194 <
195 < One can make a similar argument for crystals of point multipoles. The
196 < Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy constants for dipolar lattices
197 < utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain dipoles at the eight corners of
198 < a unit cube.  Only three of these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1,
199 < \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole moments, while the rest have
200 < zero net dipole and retain contributions only from higher order
201 < multipoles.  The effective interaction between a dipole at the center
191 > One can make a similar effective range argument for crystals of point
192 > \textit{multipoles}. The Luttinger and Tisza treatment of energy
193 > constants for dipolar lattices utilizes 24 basis vectors that contain
194 > dipoles at the eight corners of a unit cube.\cite{LT} Only three of
195 > these basis vectors, $X_1, Y_1, \mathrm{~and~} Z_1,$ retain net dipole
196 > moments, while the rest have zero net dipole and retain contributions
197 > only from higher order multipoles.  The lowest-energy crystalline
198 > structures are built out of basis vectors that have only residual
199 > quadrupolar moments (e.g. the $Z_5$ array). In these low energy
200 > structures, the effective interaction between a dipole at the center
201   of a crystal and a group of eight dipoles farther away is
202   significantly shorter ranged than the $r^{-3}$ that one would expect
203   for raw dipole-dipole interactions.  Only in crystals which retain a
# Line 208 | Line 207 | multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), cau
207   unstable.
208  
209   In ionic crystals, real-space truncation can break the effective
210 < multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:NaCl}), causing significant
211 < swings in the electrostatic energy as the cutoff radius is increased
212 < (or as individual ions move back and forth across the boundary).  This
213 < is why the image charges were necessary for the Wolf sum to exhibit
214 < rapid convergence.  Similarly, the real-space truncation of point
215 < multipole interactions breaks higher order multipole arrangements, and
216 < image multipoles are required for real-space treatments of
218 < electrostatic energies.
210 > multipolar arrangements (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}), causing
211 > significant swings in the electrostatic energy as individual ions move
212 > back and forth across the boundary.  This is why the image charges are
213 > necessary for the Wolf sum to exhibit rapid convergence.  Similarly,
214 > the real-space truncation of point multipole interactions breaks
215 > higher order multipole arrangements, and image multipoles are required
216 > for real-space treatments of electrostatic energies.
217  
218 + The shorter effective range of electrostatic interactions is not
219 + limited to perfect crystals, but can also apply in disordered fluids.
220 + Even at elevated temperatures, there is local charge balance in an
221 + ionic liquid, where each positive ion has surroundings dominated by
222 + negaitve ions and vice versa.  The reversed-charge images on the
223 + cutoff sphere that are integral to the Wolf and DSF approaches retain
224 + the effective multipolar interactions as the charges traverse the
225 + cutoff boundary.
226 +
227 + In multipolar fluids (see Fig. \ref{fig:schematic}) there is
228 + significant orientational averaging that additionally reduces the
229 + effect of long-range multipolar interactions.  The image multipoles
230 + that are introduced in the TSF, GSF, and SP methods mimic this effect
231 + and reduce the effective range of the multipolar interactions as
232 + interacting molecules traverse each other's cutoff boundaries.
233 +
234   % Because of this reason, although the nature of electrostatic
235   % interaction short ranged, the hard cutoff sphere creates very large
236   % fluctuation in the electrostatic energy for the perfect crystal. In
# Line 227 | Line 241 | The forces and torques acting on atomic sites are the
241   % to the non-neutralized value of the higher order moments within the
242   % cutoff sphere.
243  
244 < The forces and torques acting on atomic sites are the fundamental
245 < factors driving dynamics in molecular simulations. Fennell and
246 < Gezelter proposed the damped shifted force (DSF) energy kernel to
247 < obtain consistent energies and forces on the atoms within the cutoff
248 < sphere. Both the energy and the force go smoothly to zero as an atom
249 < aproaches the cutoff radius. The comparisons of the accuracy these
250 < quantities between the DSF kernel and SPME was surprisingly
251 < good.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} The DSF method has seen increasing use for
252 < calculating electrostatic interactions in molecular systems with
253 < relatively uniform charge
240 < densities.\cite{Shi:2013ij,Kannam:2012rr,Acevedo13,Space12,English08,Lawrence13,Vergne13}
244 > Forces and torques acting on atomic sites are fundamental in driving
245 > dynamics in molecular simulations, and the damped shifted force (DSF)
246 > energy kernel provides consistent energies and forces on charged atoms
247 > within the cutoff sphere. Both the energy and the force go smoothly to
248 > zero as an atom aproaches the cutoff radius. The comparisons of the
249 > accuracy these quantities between the DSF kernel and SPME was
250 > surprisingly good.\cite{Fennell:2006lq} As a result, the DSF method
251 > has seen increasing use in molecular systems with relatively uniform
252 > charge
253 > densities.\cite{English08,Kannam:2012rr,Space12,Lawrence13,Acevedo13,Shi:2013ij,Vergne13}
254  
255   \subsection{The damping function}
256 < The damping function used in our research has been discussed in detail
257 < in the first paper of this series.\cite{PaperI} The radial kernel
258 < $1/r$ for the interactions between point charges can be replaced by
259 < the complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to
260 < accelerate the rate of convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping
261 < parameter with units of inverse distance.  Altering the value of
262 < $\alpha$ is equivalent to changing the width of Gaussian charge
263 < distributions that replace each point charge -- Gaussian overlap
264 < integrals yield complementary error functions when truncated at a
265 < finite distance.
256 > The damping function has been discussed in detail in the first paper
257 > of this series.\cite{PaperI} The $1/r$ Coulombic kernel for the
258 > interactions between point charges can be replaced by the
259 > complementary error function $\mathrm{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$ to accelerate
260 > convergence, where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter with units of
261 > inverse distance.  Altering the value of $\alpha$ is equivalent to
262 > changing the width of Gaussian charge distributions that replace each
263 > point charge, as Coulomb integrals with Gaussian charge distributions
264 > produce complementary error functions when truncated at a finite
265 > distance.
266  
267 < By using suitable value of damping alpha ($\alpha \sim 0.2$) for a
268 < cutoff radius ($r_{­c}=9 A$), Fennel and Gezelter produced very good
269 < agreement with SPME for the interaction energies, forces and torques
270 < for charge-charge interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
267 > With moderate damping coefficients, $\alpha \sim 0.2$, the DSF method
268 > produced very good agreement with SPME for interaction energies,
269 > forces and torques for charge-charge
270 > interactions.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
271  
272   \subsection{Point multipoles in molecular modeling}
273   Coarse-graining approaches which treat entire molecular subsystems as
274   a single rigid body are now widely used. A common feature of many
275   coarse-graining approaches is simplification of the electrostatic
276   interactions between bodies so that fewer site-site interactions are
277 < required to compute configurational energies.  Many coarse-grained
278 < molecular structures would normally consist of equal positive and
266 < negative charges, and rather than use multiple site-site interactions,
267 < the interaction between higher order multipoles can also be used to
268 < evaluate a single molecule-molecule
269 < interaction.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
277 > required to compute configurational
278 > energies.\cite{Ren06,Essex10,Essex11}
279  
280 < Because electrons in a molecule are not localized at specific points,
281 < the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers is a relatively
282 < rough approximation.  Atomic sites can also be assigned point
283 < multipoles and polarizabilities to increase the accuracy of the
284 < molecular model.  Recently, water has been modeled with point
285 < multipoles up to octupolar
286 < order.\cite{Ichiye10_1,Ichiye10_2,Ichiye10_3} Atom-centered point
280 > Additionally, because electrons in a molecule are not localized at
281 > specific points, the assignment of partial charges to atomic centers
282 > is always an approximation.  For increased accuracy, atomic sites can
283 > also be assigned point multipoles and polarizabilities.  Recently,
284 > water has been modeled with point multipoles up to octupolar order
285 > using the soft sticky dipole-quadrupole-octupole (SSDQO)
286 > model.\cite{Ichiye10_1,Ichiye10_2,Ichiye10_3} Atom-centered point
287   multipoles up to quadrupolar order have also been coupled with point
288   polarizabilities in the high-quality AMOEBA and iAMOEBA water
289 < models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk}.  But
290 < using point multipole with the real space truncation without
291 < accounting for multipolar neutrality will create energy conservation
292 < issues in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
289 > models.\cite{Ren:2003uq,Ren:2004kx,Ponder:2010vl,Wang:2013fk} However,
290 > truncating point multipoles without smoothing the forces and torques
291 > can create energy conservation issues in molecular dynamics
292 > simulations.
293  
294   In this paper we test a set of real-space methods that were developed
295   for point multipolar interactions.  These methods extend the damped
296   shifted force (DSF) and Wolf methods originally developed for
297   charge-charge interactions and generalize them for higher order
298 < multipoles. The detailed mathematical development of these methods has
299 < been presented in the first paper in this series, while this work
300 < covers the testing the energies, forces, torques, and energy
298 > multipoles.  The detailed mathematical development of these methods
299 > has been presented in the first paper in this series, while this work
300 > covers the testing of energies, forces, torques, and energy
301   conservation properties of the methods in realistic simulation
302   environments.  In all cases, the methods are compared with the
303 < reference method, a full multipolar Ewald treatment.
303 > reference method, a full multipolar Ewald treatment.\cite{Smith82,Smith98}
304  
305  
306   %\subsection{Conservation of total energy }
# Line 317 | Line 326 | where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$,
326   \begin{equation}
327   U_{\bf{ab}}(r)=\hat{M}_{\bf a} \hat{M}_{\bf b} \frac{1}{r}  \label{kernel}.
328   \end{equation}
329 < where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$,
330 < \begin{equation}
331 < \hat{M}_{\bf a} = C_{\bf a} - D_{{\bf a}\alpha} \frac{\partial}{\partial r_{\alpha}}
332 < +  Q_{{\bf a}\alpha\beta}
324 < \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r_{\alpha} \partial r_{\beta}} + \dots
325 < \end{equation}
326 < is expressed in terms of the point charge, $C_{\bf a}$, dipole,
327 < $D_{{\bf a}\alpha}$, and quadrupole, $Q_{{\bf a}\alpha\beta}$, for
328 < object $\bf a$.  Note that in this work, we use the primitive
329 < quadrupole tensor, $Q_{a\alpha,\beta}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k\;in\;a}q_k
330 < r_{k\alpha}r_{k\beta}$ to represent point quadrupoles on a site.
329 > where the multipole operator for site $\bf a$, $\hat{M}_{\bf a}$, is
330 > expressed in terms of the point charge, $C_{\bf a}$, dipole, ${\bf D}_{\bf
331 >    a}$, and quadrupole, $\mathbf{Q}_{\bf a}$, for object
332 > $\bf a$, etc.
333  
334 < Interactions between multipoles can be expressed as higher derivatives
335 < of the bare Coulomb potential, so one way of ensuring that the forces
336 < and torques vanish at the cutoff distance is to include a larger
337 < number of terms in the truncated Taylor expansion, e.g.,
338 < %
339 < \begin{equation}
340 < f_n^{\text{shift}}(r)=\sum_{m=0}^{n+1} \frac {(r-r_c)^m}{m!} f^{(m)} \Big \lvert  _{r_c}  .
341 < \end{equation}
342 < %
343 < The combination of $f(r)$ with the shifted function is denoted $f_n(r)=f(r)-f_n^{\text{shift}}(r)$.
344 < Thus, for $f(r)=1/r$, we find
345 < %
346 < \begin{equation}
347 < f_1(r)=\frac{1}{r}- \frac{1}{r_c} + (r - r_c) \frac{1}{r_c^2} - \frac{(r-r_c)^2}{r_c^3} .
348 < \end{equation}
349 < This function is an approximate electrostatic potential that has
350 < vanishing second derivatives at the cutoff radius, making it suitable
351 < for shifting the forces and torques of charge-dipole interactions.
334 > % Interactions between multipoles can be expressed as higher derivatives
335 > % of the bare Coulomb potential, so one way of ensuring that the forces
336 > % and torques vanish at the cutoff distance is to include a larger
337 > % number of terms in the truncated Taylor expansion, e.g.,
338 > % %
339 > % \begin{equation}
340 > % f_n^{\text{shift}}(r)=\sum_{m=0}^{n+1} \frac {(r-r_c)^m}{m!} f^{(m)} \Big \lvert  _{r_c}  .
341 > % \end{equation}
342 > % %
343 > % The combination of $f(r)$ with the shifted function is denoted $f_n(r)=f(r)-f_n^{\text{shift}}(r)$.
344 > % Thus, for $f(r)=1/r$, we find
345 > % %
346 > % \begin{equation}
347 > % f_1(r)=\frac{1}{r}- \frac{1}{r_c} + (r - r_c) \frac{1}{r_c^2} - \frac{(r-r_c)^2}{r_c^3} .
348 > % \end{equation}
349 > % This function is an approximate electrostatic potential that has
350 > % vanishing second derivatives at the cutoff radius, making it suitable
351 > % for shifting the forces and torques of charge-dipole interactions.
352  
353 < In general, the TSF potential for any multipole-multipole interaction
354 < can be written
353 > The TSF potential for any multipole-multipole interaction can be
354 > written
355   \begin{equation}
356   U^{\text{TSF}}= (\text{prefactor}) (\text{derivatives}) f_n(r)
357   \label{generic}
358   \end{equation}
359 < with $n=0$ for charge-charge, $n=1$ for charge-dipole, $n=2$ for
360 < charge-quadrupole and dipole-dipole, $n=3$ for dipole-quadrupole, and
361 < $n=4$ for quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure smooth convergence of the
362 < energy, force, and torques, the required number of terms from Taylor
363 < series expansion in $f_n(r)$ must be performed for different
364 < multipole-multipole interactions.
359 > where $f_n(r)$ is a shifted kernel that is appropriate for the order
360 > of the interaction (see Ref. \onlinecite{PaperI}), with $n=0$ for
361 > charge-charge, $n=1$ for charge-dipole, $n=2$ for charge-quadrupole
362 > and dipole-dipole, $n=3$ for dipole-quadrupole, and $n=4$ for
363 > quadrupole-quadrupole.  To ensure smooth convergence of the energy,
364 > force, and torques, a Taylor expansion with $n$ terms must be
365 > performed at cutoff radius ($r_c$) to obtain $f_n(r)$.
366  
367 < To carry out the same procedure for a damped electrostatic kernel, we
368 < replace $1/r$ in the Coulomb potential with $\text{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$.
369 < Many of the derivatives of the damped kernel are well known from
370 < Smith's early work on multipoles for the Ewald
371 < summation.\cite{Smith82,Smith98}
367 > % To carry out the same procedure for a damped electrostatic kernel, we
368 > % replace $1/r$ in the Coulomb potential with $\text{erfc}(\alpha r)/r$.
369 > % Many of the derivatives of the damped kernel are well known from
370 > % Smith's early work on multipoles for the Ewald
371 > % summation.\cite{Smith82,Smith98}
372  
373 < Note that increasing the value of $n$ will add additional terms to the
374 < electrostatic potential, e.g., $f_2(r)$ includes orders up to
375 < $(r-r_c)^3/r_c^4$, and so on.  Successive derivatives of the $f_n(r)$
376 < functions are denoted $g_2(r) = f^\prime_2(r)$, $h_2(r) =
377 < f^{\prime\prime}_2(r)$, etc.  These higher derivatives are required
378 < for computing multipole energies, forces, and torques, and smooth
379 < cutoffs of these quantities can be guaranteed as long as the number of
380 < terms in the Taylor series exceeds the derivative order required.
373 > % Note that increasing the value of $n$ will add additional terms to the
374 > % electrostatic potential, e.g., $f_2(r)$ includes orders up to
375 > % $(r-r_c)^3/r_c^4$, and so on.  Successive derivatives of the $f_n(r)$
376 > % functions are denoted $g_2(r) = f^\prime_2(r)$, $h_2(r) =
377 > % f^{\prime\prime}_2(r)$, etc.  These higher derivatives are required
378 > % for computing multipole energies, forces, and torques, and smooth
379 > % cutoffs of these quantities can be guaranteed as long as the number of
380 > % terms in the Taylor series exceeds the derivative order required.
381  
382   For multipole-multipole interactions, following this procedure results
383 < in separate radial functions for each distinct orientational
384 < contribution to the potential, and ensures that the forces and torques
385 < from {\it each} of these contributions will vanish at the cutoff
386 < radius.  For example, the direct dipole dot product ($\mathbf{D}_{i}
387 < \cdot \mathbf{D}_{j}$) is treated differently than the dipole-distance
383 > in separate radial functions for each of the distinct orientational
384 > contributions to the potential, and ensures that the forces and
385 > torques from each of these contributions will vanish at the cutoff
386 > radius.  For example, the direct dipole dot product
387 > ($\mathbf{D}_{\bf a}
388 > \cdot \mathbf{D}_{\bf b}$) is treated differently than the dipole-distance
389   dot products:
390   \begin{equation}
391 < U_{D_{i}D_{j}}(r)= -\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \left( \mathbf{D}_{i} \cdot
392 < \mathbf{D}_{j} \right) \frac{g_2(r)}{r}
393 < -\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}
394 < \left( \mathbf{D}_{i} \cdot \hat{r} \right)
395 < \left( \mathbf{D}_{j} \cdot \hat{r} \right) \left(h_2(r) -
392 <  \frac{g_2(r)}{r} \right)
391 > U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r)= -\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \left(
392 >  \mathbf{D}_{\bf a} \cdot
393 > \mathbf{D}_{\bf b} \right) v_{21}(r) +
394 > \left( \mathbf{D}_{\bf a} \cdot \hat{r} \right)
395 > \left( \mathbf{D}_{\bf b} \cdot \hat{r} \right) v_{22}(r) \right]
396   \end{equation}
397  
398 < The electrostatic forces and torques acting on the central multipole
399 < site due to another site within cutoff sphere are derived from
398 > For the Taylor shifted (TSF) method with the undamped kernel,
399 > $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} + \frac{3 r}{r_c^4} - \frac{8}{r_c^3} +
400 > \frac{6}{r r_c^2}$ and $v_{22}(r) = \frac{3}{r^3} + \frac{3 r}{r_c^4}
401 > - \frac{6}{r r_c^2}$.  In these functions, one can easily see the
402 > connection to unmodified electrostatics as well as the smooth
403 > transition to zero in both these functions as $r\rightarrow r_c$.  The
404 > electrostatic forces and torques acting on the central multipole due
405 > to another site within the cutoff sphere are derived from
406   Eq.~\ref{generic}, accounting for the appropriate number of
407   derivatives. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions are
408   presented in the first paper in this series (Reference
# Line 401 | Line 410 | A second (and significantly simpler) method involves s
410  
411   \subsection{Gradient-shifted force (GSF)}
412  
413 < A second (and significantly simpler) method involves shifting the
414 < gradient of the raw coulomb potential for each particular multipole
413 > A second (and conceptually simpler) method involves shifting the
414 > gradient of the raw Coulomb potential for each particular multipole
415   order.  For example, the raw dipole-dipole potential energy may be
416   shifted smoothly by finding the gradient for two interacting dipoles
417   which have been projected onto the surface of the cutoff sphere
418   without changing their relative orientation,
419 < \begin{displaymath}
420 < U_{D_{i}D_{j}}(r_{ij})  = U_{D_{i}D_{j}}(r_{ij}) - U_{D_{i}D_{j}}(r_c)
421 <   - (r_{ij}-r_c) \hat{r}_{ij} \cdot
422 <  \vec{\nabla} V_{D_{i}D_{j}}(r) \Big \lvert _{r_c}
423 < \end{displaymath}
424 < Here the lab-frame orientations of the two dipoles, $\mathbf{D}_{i}$
425 < and $\mathbf{D}_{j}$, are retained at the cutoff distance (although
426 < the signs are reversed for the dipole that has been projected onto the
427 < cutoff sphere).  In many ways, this simpler approach is closer in
428 < spirit to the original shifted force method, in that it projects a
429 < neutralizing multipole (and the resulting forces from this multipole)
430 < onto a cutoff sphere. The resulting functional forms for the
431 < potentials, forces, and torques turn out to be quite similar in form
432 < to the Taylor-shifted approach, although the radial contributions are
433 < significantly less perturbed by the Gradient-shifted approach than
434 < they are in the Taylor-shifted method.
419 > \begin{equation}
420 > U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r)  = U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r) -
421 > U_{D_{\bf a} D_{\bf b}}(r_c)
422 >   - (r_{ab}-r_c) ~~~\hat{r}_{ab} \cdot
423 >  \nabla U_{D_{\bf a}D_{\bf b}}(r_c).
424 > \end{equation}
425 > Here the lab-frame orientations of the two dipoles, $\mathbf{D}_{\bf
426 >  a}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\bf b}$, are retained at the cutoff distance
427 > (although the signs are reversed for the dipole that has been
428 > projected onto the cutoff sphere).  In many ways, this simpler
429 > approach is closer in spirit to the original shifted force method, in
430 > that it projects a neutralizing multipole (and the resulting forces
431 > from this multipole) onto a cutoff sphere. The resulting functional
432 > forms for the potentials, forces, and torques turn out to be quite
433 > similar in form to the Taylor-shifted approach, although the radial
434 > contributions are significantly less perturbed by the gradient-shifted
435 > approach than they are in the Taylor-shifted method.
436  
437 + For the gradient shifted (GSF) method with the undamped kernel,
438 + $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} + \frac{3 r}{r_c^4} + \frac{4}{r_c^3}$ and
439 + $v_{22}(r) = \frac{3}{r^3} + \frac{9 r}{r_c^4} - \frac{12}{r_c^3}$.
440 + Again, these functions go smoothly to zero as $r\rightarrow r_c$, and
441 + because the Taylor expansion retains only one term, they are
442 + significantly less perturbed than the TSF functions.
443 +
444   In general, the gradient shifted potential between a central multipole
445   and any multipolar site inside the cutoff radius is given by,
446   \begin{equation}
447 < U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
448 < U(\mathbf{r}_c,\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{r}
449 < \cdot \nabla U(\mathbf{r},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \Big \lvert  _{r_c} \right]
447 >  U^{\text{GSF}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
448 >    U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) - (r-r_c) \hat{\mathbf{r}}
449 >    \cdot \nabla U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
450   \label{generic2}
451   \end{equation}
452   where the sum describes a separate force-shifting that is applied to
453 < each orientational contribution to the energy.
453 > each orientational contribution to the energy.  In this expression,
454 > $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ is the unit vector connecting the two multipoles
455 > ($a$ and $b$) in space, and $\hat{\mathbf{a}}$ and $\hat{\mathbf{b}}$
456 > represent the orientations the multipoles.
457  
458   The third term converges more rapidly than the first two terms as a
459   function of radius, hence the contribution of the third term is very
460   small for large cutoff radii.  The force and torque derived from
461 < equation \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
461 > Eq. \ref{generic2} are consistent with the energy expression and
462   approach zero as $r \rightarrow r_c$.  Both the GSF and TSF methods
463   can be considered generalizations of the original DSF method for
464   higher order multipole interactions. GSF and TSF are also identical up
# Line 446 | Line 466 | GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this
466   the energy, force and torque for higher order multipole-multipole
467   interactions. Complete energy, force, and torque expressions for the
468   GSF potential are presented in the first paper in this series
469 < (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI})
469 > (Reference~\onlinecite{PaperI}).
470  
471  
472   \subsection{Shifted potential (SP) }
# Line 459 | Line 479 | U_{SP}(\vec r)=\sum U(\vec r) - U(\vec r_c)
479   interactions with the central multipole and the image. This
480   effectively shifts the total potential to zero at the cutoff radius,
481   \begin{equation}
482 < U_{SP}(\vec r)=\sum U(\vec r) - U(\vec r_c)
482 > U^{\text{SP}} = \sum \left[ U(\mathbf{r}, \hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) -
483 > U(r_c \hat{\mathbf{r}},\hat{\mathbf{a}}, \hat{\mathbf{b}}) \right]
484   \label{eq:SP}
485   \end{equation}          
486   where the sum describes separate potential shifting that is done for
# Line 471 | Line 492 | The potential energy between a central multipole and o
492   multipoles that reorient after leaving the cutoff sphere can re-enter
493   the cutoff sphere without perturbing the total energy.
494  
495 < The potential energy between a central multipole and other multipolar
496 < sites then goes smoothly to zero as $r \rightarrow r_c$. However, the
497 < force and torque obtained from the shifted potential (SP) are
498 < discontinuous at $r_c$. Therefore, MD simulations will still
499 < experience energy drift while operating under the SP potential, but it
500 < may be suitable for Monte Carlo approaches where the configurational
501 < energy differences are the primary quantity of interest.
495 > For the shifted potential (SP) method with the undamped kernel,
496 > $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} + \frac{1}{r_c^3}$ and $v_{22}(r) =
497 > \frac{3}{r^3} - \frac{3}{r_c^3}$.  The potential energy between a
498 > central multipole and other multipolar sites goes smoothly to zero as
499 > $r \rightarrow r_c$.  However, the force and torque obtained from the
500 > shifted potential (SP) are discontinuous at $r_c$.  MD simulations
501 > will still experience energy drift while operating under the SP
502 > potential, but it may be suitable for Monte Carlo approaches where the
503 > configurational energy differences are the primary quantity of
504 > interest.
505  
506 < \subsection{The Self term}
506 > \subsection{The Self Term}
507   In the TSF, GSF, and SP methods, a self-interaction is retained for
508   the central multipole interacting with its own image on the surface of
509   the cutoff sphere.  This self interaction is nearly identical with the
# Line 501 | Line 525 | in the test-cases are given in table~\ref{tab:pars}.
525   used the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method for comparing
526   energies, forces, and torques for molecular models that mimic
527   disordered and ordered condensed-phase systems.  The parameters used
528 < in the test-cases are given in table~\ref{tab:pars}.
528 > in the test cases are given in table~\ref{tab:pars}.
529  
530   \begin{table}
531   \label{tab:pars}
# Line 519 | Line 543 | in the test-cases are given in table~\ref{tab:pars}.
543   & (\AA) & (kcal/mol) & (e) & (debye) & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(debye \AA)} & (amu) & \multicolumn{3}{c}{(amu
544   \AA\textsuperscript{2})} \\ \hline
545      Soft Dipolar fluid & 3.051 & 0.152 &  & 2.35 & & & & 18.0153 & 1.77&0.6145& 1.155 \\
546 <    Soft Dipolar solid & 2.837 & 1.0   &  & 2.35 & & & & 10,000  & 17.6 &17.6 & 0 \\
546 >    Soft Dipolar solid & 2.837 & 1.0   &  & 2.35 & & & & $10^4$  & 17.6 &17.6 & 0 \\
547   Soft Quadrupolar fluid & 3.051 & 0.152 &  &  & -1&-1&-2.5 & 18.0153 & 1.77&0.6145&1.155  \\
548 < Soft Quadrupolar solid & 2.837 & 1.0   &  &  & -1&-1&-2.5 & 10,000  & 17.6&17.6&0 \\
548 > Soft Quadrupolar solid & 2.837 & 1.0   &  &  & -1&-1&-2.5 & $10^4$  & 17.6&17.6&0 \\
549        SSDQ water  & 3.051 & 0.152 &  & 2.35 & -1.35&0&-0.68 & 18.0153 & 1.77&0.6145&1.155 \\
550                \ce{Na+} & 2.579 & 0.118 & +1& & & & & 22.99 & & &\\
551                \ce{Cl-} & 4.445 & 0.1   & -1& & & & & 35.4527& & & \\ \hline
# Line 546 | Line 570 | and have been compared with the values obtaine from th
570   electrostatic energy, as well as the electrostatic contributions to
571   the force and torque on each molecule.  These quantities have been
572   computed using the SP, TSF, and GSF methods, as well as a hard cutoff,
573 < and have been compared with the values obtaine from the multipolar
574 < Ewald sum.  In Mote Carlo (MC) simulations, the energy differences
573 > and have been compared with the values obtained from the multipolar
574 > Ewald sum.  In Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the energy differences
575   between two configurations is the primary quantity that governs how
576 < the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most imporant
576 > the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most important
577   indicators of the reliability of a method even if the absolute
578   energies are not exact.  For each of the multipolar systems listed
579   above, we have compared the change in electrostatic potential energy
# Line 561 | Line 585 | program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all c
585   \subsection{Implementation}
586   The real-space methods developed in the first paper in this series
587   have been implemented in our group's open source molecular simulation
588 < program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all calculations in
588 > program, OpenMD,\cite{Meineke05,openmd} which was used for all calculations in
589   this work.  The complementary error function can be a relatively slow
590   function on some processors, so all of the radial functions are
591   precomputed on a fine grid and are spline-interpolated to provide
# Line 594 | Line 618 | To sample independent configurations of multipolar cry
618   recomputed at each time step.
619  
620   \subsection{Model systems}
621 < To sample independent configurations of multipolar crystals, a body
622 < centered cubic (bcc) crystal which is a minimum energy structure for
623 < point dipoles was generated using 3,456 molecules.  The multipoles
624 < were translationally locked in their respective crystal sites for
625 < equilibration at a relatively low temperature (50K), so that dipoles
626 < or quadrupoles could freely explore all accessible orientations.  The
627 < translational constraints were removed, and the crystals were
628 < simulated for 10 ps in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble with an
629 < average temperature of 50 K.  Configurations were sampled at equal
630 < time intervals for the comparison of the configurational energy
631 < differences.  The crystals were not simulated close to the melting
632 < points in order to avoid translational deformation away of the ideal
633 < lattice geometry.
621 > To sample independent configurations of the multipolar crystals, body
622 > centered cubic (bcc) crystals, which exhibit the minimum energy
623 > structures for point dipoles, were generated using 3,456 molecules.
624 > The multipoles were translationally locked in their respective crystal
625 > sites for equilibration at a relatively low temperature (50K) so that
626 > dipoles or quadrupoles could freely explore all accessible
627 > orientations.  The translational constraints were then removed, the
628 > systems were re-equilibrated, and the crystals were simulated for an
629 > additional 10 ps in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble with an average
630 > temperature of 50 K.  The balance between moments of inertia and
631 > particle mass were chosen to allow orientational sampling without
632 > significant translational motion.  Configurations were sampled at
633 > equal time intervals in order to compare configurational energy
634 > differences.  The crystals were simulated far from the melting point
635 > in order to avoid translational deformation away of the ideal lattice
636 > geometry.
637  
638 < For dipolar, quadrupolar, and mixed-multipole liquid simulations, each
639 < system was created with 2048 molecules oriented randomly.  These were
640 <
641 < system with 2,048 molecules simulated for 1ns in NVE ensemble at 300 K
642 < temperature after equilibration.  We collected 250 different
643 < configurations in equal interval of time. For the ions mixed liquid
644 < system, we converted 48 different molecules into 24 \ce{Na+} and 24
645 < \ce{Cl-} ions and equilibrated. After equilibration, the system was run
646 < at the same environment for 1ns and 250 configurations were
647 < collected. While comparing energies, forces, and torques with Ewald
648 < method, Lennard-Jones potentials were turned off and purely
649 < electrostatic interaction had been compared.
638 > For dipolar, quadrupolar, and mixed-multipole \textit{liquid}
639 > simulations, each system was created with 2,048 randomly-oriented
640 > molecules.  These were equilibrated at a temperature of 300K for 1 ns.
641 > Each system was then simulated for 1 ns in the microcanonical (NVE)
642 > ensemble.  We collected 250 different configurations at equal time
643 > intervals. For the liquid system that included ionic species, we
644 > converted 48 randomly-distributed molecules into 24 \ce{Na+} and 24
645 > \ce{Cl-} ions and re-equilibrated. After equilibration, the system was
646 > run under the same conditions for 1 ns. A total of 250 configurations
647 > were collected. In the following comparisons of energies, forces, and
648 > torques, the Lennard-Jones potentials were turned off and only the
649 > purely electrostatic quantities were compared with the same values
650 > obtained via the Ewald sum.
651  
652   \subsection{Accuracy of Energy Differences, Forces and Torques}
653   The pairwise summation techniques (outlined above) were evaluated for
# Line 633 | Line 661 | we used least square regressions analysiss for the six
661   should be identical for all methods.
662  
663   Since none of the real-space methods provide exact energy differences,
664 < we used least square regressions analysiss for the six different
664 > we used least square regressions analysis for the six different
665   molecular systems to compare $\Delta E$ from Hard, SP, GSF, and TSF
666   with the multipolar Ewald reference method.  Unitary results for both
667   the correlation (slope) and correlation coefficient for these
# Line 644 | Line 672 | also been compared by using least squares regression a
672   configurations and 250 configurations were recorded for comparison.
673   Each system provided 31,125 energy differences for a total of 186,750
674   data points.  Similarly, the magnitudes of the forces and torques have
675 < also been compared by using least squares regression analyses. In the
675 > also been compared using least squares regression analysis. In the
676   forces and torques comparison, the magnitudes of the forces acting in
677   each molecule for each configuration were evaluated. For example, our
678   dipolar liquid simulation contains 2048 molecules and there are 250
# Line 764 | Line 792 | model must allow for long simulation times with minima
792  
793   \begin{figure}
794    \centering
795 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
795 >  \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
796    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational
797      energy differences for the real-space electrostatic methods
798      compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal
# Line 829 | Line 857 | perturbations are minimal, particularly for moderate d
857   molecules inside each other's cutoff spheres in order to correct the
858   energy conservation issues, and this perturbation is evident in the
859   statistics accumulated for the molecular forces.  The GSF
860 < perturbations are minimal, particularly for moderate damping and and
860 > perturbations are minimal, particularly for moderate damping and
861   commonly-used cutoff values ($r_c = 12$\AA).  The TSF method shows
862   reasonable agreement in the correlation coefficient but again the
863   systematic error in the forces is concerning if replication of Ewald
# Line 837 | Line 865 | forces is desired.
865  
866   \begin{figure}
867    \centering
868 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
868 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
869    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector
870      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
871      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 851 | Line 879 | forces is desired.
879  
880   \begin{figure}
881    \centering
882 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
882 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
883    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector
884      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
885      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 886 | Line 914 | directionality is shown in terms of circular variance
914   these quantities. Force and torque vectors for all six systems were
915   analyzed using Fisher statistics, and the quality of the vector
916   directionality is shown in terms of circular variance
917 < ($\mathrm{Var}(\theta$) in figure
917 > ($\mathrm{Var}(\theta)$) in figure
918   \ref{fig:slopeCorr_circularVariance}. The force and torque vectors
919   from the new real-space methods exhibit nearly-ideal Fisher probability
920   distributions (Eq.~\ref{eq:pdf}). Both the hard and SP cutoff methods
# Line 909 | Line 937 | systematically improved by varying $\alpha$ and $r_c$.
937  
938   \begin{figure}
939    \centering
940 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6 \linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified-crop.pdf}
940 >  \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified.eps}
941    \caption{The circular variance of the direction of the force and
942      torque vectors obtained from the real-space methods around the
943      reference Ewald vectors. A variance equal to 0 (dashed line)
# Line 941 | Line 969 | conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / n
969   energy over time, $\delta E_1$, and the standard deviation of energy
970   fluctuations around this drift $\delta E_0$.  Both of the
971   shifted-force methods (GSF and TSF) provide excellent energy
972 < conservation (drift less than $10^{-6}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
972 > conservation (drift less than $10^{-5}$ kcal / mol / ns / particle),
973   while the hard cutoff is essentially unusable for molecular dynamics.
974   SP provides some benefit over the hard cutoff because the energetic
975   jumps that happen as particles leave and enter the cutoff sphere are
# Line 956 | Line 984 | $k$-space cutoff values.
984  
985   \begin{figure}
986    \centering
987 <  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift.pdf}
987 >  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.eps}
988   \label{fig:energyDrift}        
989   \caption{Analysis of the energy conservation of the real-space
990    electrostatic methods. $\delta \mathrm{E}_1$ is the linear drift in
991 <  energy over time and $\delta \mathrm{E}_0$ is the standard deviation
992 <  of energy fluctuations around this drift.  All simulations were of a
993 <  2000-molecule simulation of SSDQ water with 48 ionic charges at 300
994 <  K starting from the same initial configuration. All runs utilized
995 <  the same real-space cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
991 >  energy over time (in kcal / mol / particle / ns) and $\delta
992 >  \mathrm{E}_0$ is the standard deviation of energy fluctuations
993 >  around this drift (in kcal / mol / particle).  All simulations were
994 >  of a 2000-molecule simulation of SSDQ water with 48 ionic charges at
995 >  300 K starting from the same initial configuration. All runs
996 >  utilized the same real-space cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
997   \end{figure}
998  
999  
# Line 1044 | Line 1073 | real-space cutoff boundary.
1073   handling of energies, forces, and torques as multipoles cross the
1074   real-space cutoff boundary.
1075  
1076 + \begin{acknowledgments}
1077 +  JDG acknowledges helpful discussions with Christopher
1078 +  Fennell. Support for this project was provided by the National
1079 +  Science Foundation under grant CHE-1362211. Computational time was
1080 +  provided by the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the
1081 +  University of Notre Dame.
1082 + \end{acknowledgments}
1083 +
1084   %\bibliographystyle{aip}
1085   \newpage
1086   \bibliography{references}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines