ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4186 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 02:31:11 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4203 by gezelter, Wed Aug 6 19:10:04 2014 UTC

# Line 47 | Line 47 | preprint,
47  
48   %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
49  
50 < \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald Sum. II. Comparison of Methods}
50 > \title{Real space electrostatics for multipoles. II. Comparisons with
51 >  the Ewald Sum}
52  
53   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
54   \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
# Line 63 | Line 64 | preprint,
64   \date{\today}
65  
66   \begin{abstract}
67 <  We report on tests of the real-space shifted potential (SP),
68 <  gradient-shifted force (GSF), and Taylor-shifted force (TSF) methods
69 <  for multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this
70 <  series, using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The
71 <  tests were carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments
72 <  designed to test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.
73 <  Comparisons of the energy differences between configurations,
74 <  molecular forces, and torques were used to analyze how well the
75 <  real-space models perform relative to the more computationally
76 <  expensive Ewald treatment.  We have also investigated the energy
77 <  conservation properties of the new methods in molecular dynamics
78 <  simulations. The SP method shows excellent agreement with
79 <  configurational energy differences, forces, and torques, and would
80 <  be suitable for use in Monte Carlo calculations.  Of the two new
81 <  shifted-force methods, the GSF approach shows the best agreement
82 <  with Ewald-derived energies, forces, and torques and also exhibits
83 <  energy conservation properties that make it an excellent choice for
84 <  efficient computation of electrostatic interactions in molecular
84 <  dynamics simulations.
67 >  We report on tests of the shifted potential (SP), gradient shifted
68 >  force (GSF), and Taylor shifted force (TSF) real-space methods for
69 >  multipole interactions developed in the first paper in this series,
70 >  using the multipolar Ewald sum as a reference method. The tests were
71 >  carried out in a variety of condensed-phase environments designed to
72 >  test up to quadrupole-quadrupole interactions.  Comparisons of the
73 >  energy differences between configurations, molecular forces, and
74 >  torques were used to analyze how well the real-space models perform
75 >  relative to the more computationally expensive Ewald treatment.  We
76 >  have also investigated the energy conservation properties of the new
77 >  methods in molecular dynamics simulations. The SP method shows
78 >  excellent agreement with configurational energy differences, forces,
79 >  and torques, and would be suitable for use in Monte Carlo
80 >  calculations.  Of the two new shifted-force methods, the GSF
81 >  approach shows the best agreement with Ewald-derived energies,
82 >  forces, and torques and also exhibits energy conservation properties
83 >  that make it an excellent choice for efficient computation of
84 >  electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations.
85   \end{abstract}
86  
87   %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
# Line 100 | Line 100 | space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
100   the conditionally convergent electrostatic energy is converted into
101   two absolutely convergent contributions, one which is carried out in
102   real space with a cutoff radius, and one in reciprocal
103 < space. BETTER CITATIONS\cite{Clarke:1986eu,Woodcock75}
103 > space.\cite{Ewald21,deLeeuw80,Smith81,Allen87}
104  
105   When carried out as originally formulated, the reciprocal-space
106   portion of the Ewald sum exhibits relatively poor computational
107 < scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing
108 < particle meshes and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT),
109 < the particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
107 > scaling, making it prohibitive for large systems. By utilizing a
108 > particle mesh and three dimensional fast Fourier transforms (FFT), the
109 > particle-mesh Ewald (PME), particle-particle particle-mesh Ewald
110   (P\textsuperscript{3}ME), and smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME)
111   methods can decrease the computational cost from $O(N^2)$ down to $O(N
112   \log
113 < N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}.
113 > N)$.\cite{Takada93,Gunsteren94,Gunsteren95,Darden:1993pd,Essmann:1995pb}
114  
115   Because of the artificial periodicity required for the Ewald sum,
116   interfacial molecular systems such as membranes and liquid-vapor
117 < interfaces require modifications to the
118 < method.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
119 < Parry's extension of the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate
120 < for slab geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that
121 < were developed to handle two-dimensional (2D) electrostatic
122 < interactions in interfacial systems have not seen similar
123 < particle-mesh treatments,\cite{Parry:1975if, Parry:1976fq, Clarke77,
124 <  Perram79,Rhee:1989kl,Spohr:1997sf,Yeh:1999oq} and still scale poorly
125 < with system size. The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can
126 < also be problematic for interfacial molecular
127 < systems.\cite{Fennell:2006lq}
117 > interfaces require modifications to the method.  Parry's extension of
118 > the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate for slab
119 > geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that were
120 > developed to handle two-dimensional (2-D) electrostatic
121 > interactions.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
122 > These methods were originally quite computationally
123 > expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} There have been several successful
124 > efforts that reduced the computational cost of 2-D lattice summations,
125 > bringing them more in line with the scaling for the full 3-D
126 > treatments.\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04} The
127 > inherent periodicity required by the Ewald method can also be
128 > problematic in a number of protein/solvent and ionic solution
129 > environments.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00,Fennell:2006lq}
130  
131   \subsection{Real-space methods}
132   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
# Line 172 | Line 174 | point charges.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
174  
175   \begin{figure}
176    \centering
177 <  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.pdf}
177 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.eps}
178    \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
179      charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
180      effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
# Line 572 | Line 574 | the simulation proceeds. These differences are the mos
574   and have been compared with the values obtained from the multipolar
575   Ewald sum.  In Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the energy differences
576   between two configurations is the primary quantity that governs how
577 < the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most imporant
577 > the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most important
578   indicators of the reliability of a method even if the absolute
579   energies are not exact.  For each of the multipolar systems listed
580   above, we have compared the change in electrostatic potential energy
# Line 584 | Line 586 | program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all c
586   \subsection{Implementation}
587   The real-space methods developed in the first paper in this series
588   have been implemented in our group's open source molecular simulation
589 < program, OpenMD,\cite{openmd} which was used for all calculations in
589 > program, OpenMD,\cite{Meineke05,openmd} which was used for all calculations in
590   this work.  The complementary error function can be a relatively slow
591   function on some processors, so all of the radial functions are
592   precomputed on a fine grid and are spline-interpolated to provide
# Line 791 | Line 793 | model must allow for long simulation times with minima
793  
794   \begin{figure}
795    \centering
796 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
796 >  \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
797    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational
798      energy differences for the real-space electrostatic methods
799      compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal
# Line 864 | Line 866 | forces is desired.
866  
867   \begin{figure}
868    \centering
869 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
869 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
870    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector
871      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
872      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 878 | Line 880 | forces is desired.
880  
881   \begin{figure}
882    \centering
883 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
883 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
884    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector
885      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
886      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 936 | Line 938 | systematically improved by varying $\alpha$ and $r_c$.
938  
939   \begin{figure}
940    \centering
941 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6 \linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified-crop.pdf}
941 >  \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified.eps}
942    \caption{The circular variance of the direction of the force and
943      torque vectors obtained from the real-space methods around the
944      reference Ewald vectors. A variance equal to 0 (dashed line)
# Line 983 | Line 985 | $k$-space cutoff values.
985  
986   \begin{figure}
987    \centering
988 <  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.pdf}
988 >  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.eps}
989   \label{fig:energyDrift}        
990   \caption{Analysis of the energy conservation of the real-space
991    electrostatic methods. $\delta \mathrm{E}_1$ is the linear drift in
# Line 995 | Line 997 | $k$-space cutoff values.
997    utilized the same real-space cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
998   \end{figure}
999  
1000 + \subsection{Reproduction of Structural Features\label{sec:structure}}
1001 + One of the best tests of modified interaction potentials is the
1002 + fidelity with which they can reproduce structural features in a
1003 + liquid.  One commonly-utilized measure of structural ordering is the
1004 + pair distribution function, $g(r)$, which measures local density
1005 + deviations in relation to the bulk density.  In the electrostatic
1006 + approaches studied here, the short-range repulsion from the
1007 + Lennard-Jones potential is identical for the various electrostatic
1008 + methods, and since short range repulsion determines much of the local
1009 + liquid ordering, one would not expect to see any differences in
1010 + $g(r)$.  Indeed, the pair distributions are essentially identical for
1011 + all of the electrostatic methods studied (for each of the different
1012 + systems under investigation).  Interested readers may consult the
1013 + supplementary information for plots of these pair distribution
1014 + functions.
1015  
1016 + A direct measure of the structural features that is a more
1017 + enlightening test of the modified electrostatic methods is the average
1018 + value of the electrostatic energy $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$
1019 + which is obtained by sampling the liquid-state configurations
1020 + experienced by a liquid evolving entirely under the influence of the
1021 + methods being investigated.  In figure \ref{fig:Uelect} we show how
1022 + $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for varies with the damping parameter,
1023 + $\alpha$, for each of the methods.
1024 +
1025 + \begin{figure}
1026 +  \centering
1027 +  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{averagePotentialEnergy_r9_12.eps}
1028 + \label{fig:Uelect}        
1029 + \caption{The average electrostatic potential energy,
1030 +  $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for the SSDQ water with ions as a function
1031 +  of the damping parameter, $\alpha$, for each of the real-space
1032 +  electrostatic methods. Top panel: simulations run with a real-space
1033 +  cutoff, $r_c = 9$\AA.  Bottom panel: the same quantity, but with a
1034 +  larger cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
1035 + \end{figure}
1036 +
1037 + It is clear that moderate damping is important for converging the mean
1038 + potential energy values, particularly for the two shifted force
1039 + methods (GSF and TSF).  A value of $\alpha \approx 0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ is
1040 + sufficient to converge the SP and GSF energies with a cutoff of 12
1041 + \AA, while shorter cutoffs require more dramatic damping ($\alpha
1042 + \approx 0.36$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 9$ \AA).  It is also clear from
1043 + fig. \ref{fig:Uelect} that it is possible to overdamp the real-space
1044 + electrostatic methods, causing the estimate of the energy to drop
1045 + below the Ewald results.
1046 +
1047 + These ``optimal'' values of the damping coefficient are slightly
1048 + larger than what were observed for DSF electrostatics for purely
1049 + point-charge systems, although a value of $\alpha=0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ for
1050 + $r_c = 12$\AA appears to be an excellent compromise for mixed charge
1051 + multipole systems.
1052 +
1053 + \subsection{Reproduction of Dynamic Properties\label{sec:structure}}
1054 + To test the fidelity of the electrostatic methods at reproducing
1055 + dynamics in a multipolar liquid, it is also useful to look at
1056 + transport properties, particularly the diffusion constant,
1057 + \begin{equation}
1058 + D = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle \left|
1059 +  \mathbf{r}(t) -\mathbf{r}(0) \right|^2 \rangle
1060 + \label{eq:diff}
1061 + \end{equation}
1062 + which measures long-time behavior and is sensitive to the forces on
1063 + the multipoles.  For the soft dipolar fluid, and the SSDQ liquid
1064 + systems, the self-diffusion constants (D) were calculated from linear
1065 + fits to the long-time portion of the mean square displacement
1066 + ($\langle r^{2}(t) \rangle$).\cite{Allen87}
1067 +
1068 + In addition to translational diffusion, orientational relaxation times
1069 + were calculated for comparisons with the Ewald simulations and with
1070 + experiments. These values were determined from the same 1~ns $NVE$
1071 + trajectories used for translational diffusion by calculating the
1072 + orientational time correlation function,
1073 + \begin{equation}
1074 + C_l^\alpha(t) = \left\langle P_l\left[\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(t)
1075 +                \cdot\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(0)\right]\right\rangle,
1076 + \label{eq:OrientCorr}
1077 + \end{equation}
1078 + where $P_l$ is the Legendre polynomial of order $l$ and
1079 + $\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\alpha$ is the unit vector of molecule $i$ along
1080 + axis $\gamma$.  The body-fixed reference frame used for our
1081 + orientational correlation functions has the $z$-axis running along the
1082 + dipoles, and for the SSDQ water model, the $y$-axis connects the two
1083 + implied hydrogen atoms.
1084 +
1085 + From the orientation autocorrelation functions, we can obtain time
1086 + constants for rotational relaxation either by fitting an exponential
1087 + function or by integrating the entire correlation function.  These
1088 + decay times are directly comparable to water orientational relaxation
1089 + times from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The relaxation constant
1090 + obtained from $C_2^y(t)$ is normally of experimental interest because
1091 + it describes the relaxation of the principle axis connecting the
1092 + hydrogen atoms. Thus, $C_2^y(t)$ can be compared to the intermolecular
1093 + portion of the dipole-dipole relaxation from a proton NMR signal and
1094 + should provide an estimate of the NMR relaxation time
1095 + constant.\cite{Impey82}
1096 +
1097 + Results for the diffusion constants and orientational relaxation times
1098 + are shown in figure \ref{fig:dynamics}. From this data, it is apparent
1099 + that the values for both $D$ and $\tau_2$ using the Ewald sum are
1100 + reproduced with high fidelity by the GSF method.
1101 +
1102 + The $\tau_2$ results in \ref{fig:dynamics} show a much greater
1103 + difference between the real-space and the Ewald results.
1104 +
1105 +
1106   \section{CONCLUSION}
1107   In the first paper in this series, we generalized the
1108   charge-neutralized electrostatic energy originally developed by Wolf

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines