ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4187 by gezelter, Sun Jun 15 16:25:42 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4203 by gezelter, Wed Aug 6 19:10:04 2014 UTC

# Line 47 | Line 47 | preprint,
47  
48   %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
49  
50 < \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald Sum. II. Comparison of Methods}
50 > \title{Real space electrostatics for multipoles. II. Comparisons with
51 >  the Ewald Sum}
52  
53   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
54   \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
# Line 117 | Line 118 | interactions,\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,
118   the three dimensional Ewald sum is appropriate for slab
119   geometries.\cite{Parry:1975if} Modified Ewald methods that were
120   developed to handle two-dimensional (2-D) electrostatic
121 < interactions,\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
122 < but these methods were originally quite computationally
121 > interactions.\cite{Parry:1975if,Parry:1976fq,Clarke77,Perram79,Rhee:1989kl}
122 > These methods were originally quite computationally
123   expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} There have been several successful
124 < efforts that reduced the computational cost of 2-D lattice
124 < summations,\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04}
124 > efforts that reduced the computational cost of 2-D lattice summations,
125   bringing them more in line with the scaling for the full 3-D
126 < treatments.  The inherent periodicity in the Ewald’s method can also
127 < be problematic for interfacial molecular
128 < systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00,Fennell:2006lq}
126 > treatments.\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04} The
127 > inherent periodicity required by the Ewald method can also be
128 > problematic in a number of protein/solvent and ionic solution
129 > environments.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00,Fennell:2006lq}
130  
131   \subsection{Real-space methods}
132   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf:1999dn} proposed a real space $O(N)$
# Line 173 | Line 174 | point charges.\cite{Fukuda:2013sf}
174  
175   \begin{figure}
176    \centering
177 <  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.pdf}
177 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{schematic.eps}
178    \caption{Top: Ionic systems exhibit local clustering of dissimilar
179      charges (in the smaller grey circle), so interactions are
180      effectively charge-multipole at longer distances.  With hard
# Line 573 | Line 574 | the simulation proceeds. These differences are the mos
574   and have been compared with the values obtained from the multipolar
575   Ewald sum.  In Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the energy differences
576   between two configurations is the primary quantity that governs how
577 < the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most imporant
577 > the simulation proceeds. These differences are the most important
578   indicators of the reliability of a method even if the absolute
579   energies are not exact.  For each of the multipolar systems listed
580   above, we have compared the change in electrostatic potential energy
# Line 792 | Line 793 | model must allow for long simulation times with minima
793  
794   \begin{figure}
795    \centering
796 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
796 >  \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{energyPlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
797    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational
798      energy differences for the real-space electrostatic methods
799      compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal
# Line 865 | Line 866 | forces is desired.
866  
867   \begin{figure}
868    \centering
869 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
869 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{forcePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
870    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector
871      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
872      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 879 | Line 880 | forces is desired.
880  
881   \begin{figure}
882    \centering
883 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined-crop.pdf}
883 >  \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{torquePlot_slopeCorrelation_combined.eps}
884    \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector
885      magnitudes for the real-space electrostatic methods compared with
886      the reference Ewald sum. Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed
# Line 937 | Line 938 | systematically improved by varying $\alpha$ and $r_c$.
938  
939   \begin{figure}
940    \centering
941 <  \includegraphics[width=0.6 \linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified-crop.pdf}
941 >  \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth]{Variance_forceNtorque_modified.eps}
942    \caption{The circular variance of the direction of the force and
943      torque vectors obtained from the real-space methods around the
944      reference Ewald vectors. A variance equal to 0 (dashed line)
# Line 984 | Line 985 | $k$-space cutoff values.
985  
986   \begin{figure}
987    \centering
988 <  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.pdf}
988 >  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.eps}
989   \label{fig:energyDrift}        
990   \caption{Analysis of the energy conservation of the real-space
991    electrostatic methods. $\delta \mathrm{E}_1$ is the linear drift in
# Line 994 | Line 995 | $k$-space cutoff values.
995    of a 2000-molecule simulation of SSDQ water with 48 ionic charges at
996    300 K starting from the same initial configuration. All runs
997    utilized the same real-space cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
998 + \end{figure}
999 +
1000 + \subsection{Reproduction of Structural Features\label{sec:structure}}
1001 + One of the best tests of modified interaction potentials is the
1002 + fidelity with which they can reproduce structural features in a
1003 + liquid.  One commonly-utilized measure of structural ordering is the
1004 + pair distribution function, $g(r)$, which measures local density
1005 + deviations in relation to the bulk density.  In the electrostatic
1006 + approaches studied here, the short-range repulsion from the
1007 + Lennard-Jones potential is identical for the various electrostatic
1008 + methods, and since short range repulsion determines much of the local
1009 + liquid ordering, one would not expect to see any differences in
1010 + $g(r)$.  Indeed, the pair distributions are essentially identical for
1011 + all of the electrostatic methods studied (for each of the different
1012 + systems under investigation).  Interested readers may consult the
1013 + supplementary information for plots of these pair distribution
1014 + functions.
1015 +
1016 + A direct measure of the structural features that is a more
1017 + enlightening test of the modified electrostatic methods is the average
1018 + value of the electrostatic energy $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$
1019 + which is obtained by sampling the liquid-state configurations
1020 + experienced by a liquid evolving entirely under the influence of the
1021 + methods being investigated.  In figure \ref{fig:Uelect} we show how
1022 + $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for varies with the damping parameter,
1023 + $\alpha$, for each of the methods.
1024 +
1025 + \begin{figure}
1026 +  \centering
1027 +  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{averagePotentialEnergy_r9_12.eps}
1028 + \label{fig:Uelect}        
1029 + \caption{The average electrostatic potential energy,
1030 +  $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for the SSDQ water with ions as a function
1031 +  of the damping parameter, $\alpha$, for each of the real-space
1032 +  electrostatic methods. Top panel: simulations run with a real-space
1033 +  cutoff, $r_c = 9$\AA.  Bottom panel: the same quantity, but with a
1034 +  larger cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
1035   \end{figure}
1036  
1037 + It is clear that moderate damping is important for converging the mean
1038 + potential energy values, particularly for the two shifted force
1039 + methods (GSF and TSF).  A value of $\alpha \approx 0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ is
1040 + sufficient to converge the SP and GSF energies with a cutoff of 12
1041 + \AA, while shorter cutoffs require more dramatic damping ($\alpha
1042 + \approx 0.36$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 9$ \AA).  It is also clear from
1043 + fig. \ref{fig:Uelect} that it is possible to overdamp the real-space
1044 + electrostatic methods, causing the estimate of the energy to drop
1045 + below the Ewald results.
1046  
1047 + These ``optimal'' values of the damping coefficient are slightly
1048 + larger than what were observed for DSF electrostatics for purely
1049 + point-charge systems, although a value of $\alpha=0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ for
1050 + $r_c = 12$\AA appears to be an excellent compromise for mixed charge
1051 + multipole systems.
1052 +
1053 + \subsection{Reproduction of Dynamic Properties\label{sec:structure}}
1054 + To test the fidelity of the electrostatic methods at reproducing
1055 + dynamics in a multipolar liquid, it is also useful to look at
1056 + transport properties, particularly the diffusion constant,
1057 + \begin{equation}
1058 + D = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle \left|
1059 +  \mathbf{r}(t) -\mathbf{r}(0) \right|^2 \rangle
1060 + \label{eq:diff}
1061 + \end{equation}
1062 + which measures long-time behavior and is sensitive to the forces on
1063 + the multipoles.  For the soft dipolar fluid, and the SSDQ liquid
1064 + systems, the self-diffusion constants (D) were calculated from linear
1065 + fits to the long-time portion of the mean square displacement
1066 + ($\langle r^{2}(t) \rangle$).\cite{Allen87}
1067 +
1068 + In addition to translational diffusion, orientational relaxation times
1069 + were calculated for comparisons with the Ewald simulations and with
1070 + experiments. These values were determined from the same 1~ns $NVE$
1071 + trajectories used for translational diffusion by calculating the
1072 + orientational time correlation function,
1073 + \begin{equation}
1074 + C_l^\alpha(t) = \left\langle P_l\left[\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(t)
1075 +                \cdot\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(0)\right]\right\rangle,
1076 + \label{eq:OrientCorr}
1077 + \end{equation}
1078 + where $P_l$ is the Legendre polynomial of order $l$ and
1079 + $\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\alpha$ is the unit vector of molecule $i$ along
1080 + axis $\gamma$.  The body-fixed reference frame used for our
1081 + orientational correlation functions has the $z$-axis running along the
1082 + dipoles, and for the SSDQ water model, the $y$-axis connects the two
1083 + implied hydrogen atoms.
1084 +
1085 + From the orientation autocorrelation functions, we can obtain time
1086 + constants for rotational relaxation either by fitting an exponential
1087 + function or by integrating the entire correlation function.  These
1088 + decay times are directly comparable to water orientational relaxation
1089 + times from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The relaxation constant
1090 + obtained from $C_2^y(t)$ is normally of experimental interest because
1091 + it describes the relaxation of the principle axis connecting the
1092 + hydrogen atoms. Thus, $C_2^y(t)$ can be compared to the intermolecular
1093 + portion of the dipole-dipole relaxation from a proton NMR signal and
1094 + should provide an estimate of the NMR relaxation time
1095 + constant.\cite{Impey82}
1096 +
1097 + Results for the diffusion constants and orientational relaxation times
1098 + are shown in figure \ref{fig:dynamics}. From this data, it is apparent
1099 + that the values for both $D$ and $\tau_2$ using the Ewald sum are
1100 + reproduced with high fidelity by the GSF method.
1101 +
1102 + The $\tau_2$ results in \ref{fig:dynamics} show a much greater
1103 + difference between the real-space and the Ewald results.
1104 +
1105 +
1106   \section{CONCLUSION}
1107   In the first paper in this series, we generalized the
1108   charge-neutralized electrostatic energy originally developed by Wolf

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines