ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4191 by gezelter, Tue Jun 17 16:08:03 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4203 by gezelter, Wed Aug 6 19:10:04 2014 UTC

# Line 47 | Line 47 | preprint,
47  
48   %\preprint{AIP/123-QED}
49  
50 < \title{Real space alternatives to the Ewald Sum. II. Comparison of Methods}
50 > \title{Real space electrostatics for multipoles. II. Comparisons with
51 >  the Ewald Sum}
52  
53   \author{Madan Lamichhane}
54   \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
# Line 994 | Line 995 | $k$-space cutoff values.
995    of a 2000-molecule simulation of SSDQ water with 48 ionic charges at
996    300 K starting from the same initial configuration. All runs
997    utilized the same real-space cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
998 + \end{figure}
999 +
1000 + \subsection{Reproduction of Structural Features\label{sec:structure}}
1001 + One of the best tests of modified interaction potentials is the
1002 + fidelity with which they can reproduce structural features in a
1003 + liquid.  One commonly-utilized measure of structural ordering is the
1004 + pair distribution function, $g(r)$, which measures local density
1005 + deviations in relation to the bulk density.  In the electrostatic
1006 + approaches studied here, the short-range repulsion from the
1007 + Lennard-Jones potential is identical for the various electrostatic
1008 + methods, and since short range repulsion determines much of the local
1009 + liquid ordering, one would not expect to see any differences in
1010 + $g(r)$.  Indeed, the pair distributions are essentially identical for
1011 + all of the electrostatic methods studied (for each of the different
1012 + systems under investigation).  Interested readers may consult the
1013 + supplementary information for plots of these pair distribution
1014 + functions.
1015 +
1016 + A direct measure of the structural features that is a more
1017 + enlightening test of the modified electrostatic methods is the average
1018 + value of the electrostatic energy $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$
1019 + which is obtained by sampling the liquid-state configurations
1020 + experienced by a liquid evolving entirely under the influence of the
1021 + methods being investigated.  In figure \ref{fig:Uelect} we show how
1022 + $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for varies with the damping parameter,
1023 + $\alpha$, for each of the methods.
1024 +
1025 + \begin{figure}
1026 +  \centering
1027 +  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{averagePotentialEnergy_r9_12.eps}
1028 + \label{fig:Uelect}        
1029 + \caption{The average electrostatic potential energy,
1030 +  $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle$ for the SSDQ water with ions as a function
1031 +  of the damping parameter, $\alpha$, for each of the real-space
1032 +  electrostatic methods. Top panel: simulations run with a real-space
1033 +  cutoff, $r_c = 9$\AA.  Bottom panel: the same quantity, but with a
1034 +  larger cutoff, $r_c = 12$\AA.}
1035   \end{figure}
1036 +
1037 + It is clear that moderate damping is important for converging the mean
1038 + potential energy values, particularly for the two shifted force
1039 + methods (GSF and TSF).  A value of $\alpha \approx 0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ is
1040 + sufficient to converge the SP and GSF energies with a cutoff of 12
1041 + \AA, while shorter cutoffs require more dramatic damping ($\alpha
1042 + \approx 0.36$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 9$ \AA).  It is also clear from
1043 + fig. \ref{fig:Uelect} that it is possible to overdamp the real-space
1044 + electrostatic methods, causing the estimate of the energy to drop
1045 + below the Ewald results.
1046 +
1047 + These ``optimal'' values of the damping coefficient are slightly
1048 + larger than what were observed for DSF electrostatics for purely
1049 + point-charge systems, although a value of $\alpha=0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ for
1050 + $r_c = 12$\AA appears to be an excellent compromise for mixed charge
1051 + multipole systems.
1052  
1053 + \subsection{Reproduction of Dynamic Properties\label{sec:structure}}
1054 + To test the fidelity of the electrostatic methods at reproducing
1055 + dynamics in a multipolar liquid, it is also useful to look at
1056 + transport properties, particularly the diffusion constant,
1057 + \begin{equation}
1058 + D = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle \left|
1059 +  \mathbf{r}(t) -\mathbf{r}(0) \right|^2 \rangle
1060 + \label{eq:diff}
1061 + \end{equation}
1062 + which measures long-time behavior and is sensitive to the forces on
1063 + the multipoles.  For the soft dipolar fluid, and the SSDQ liquid
1064 + systems, the self-diffusion constants (D) were calculated from linear
1065 + fits to the long-time portion of the mean square displacement
1066 + ($\langle r^{2}(t) \rangle$).\cite{Allen87}
1067  
1068 + In addition to translational diffusion, orientational relaxation times
1069 + were calculated for comparisons with the Ewald simulations and with
1070 + experiments. These values were determined from the same 1~ns $NVE$
1071 + trajectories used for translational diffusion by calculating the
1072 + orientational time correlation function,
1073 + \begin{equation}
1074 + C_l^\alpha(t) = \left\langle P_l\left[\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(t)
1075 +                \cdot\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\gamma(0)\right]\right\rangle,
1076 + \label{eq:OrientCorr}
1077 + \end{equation}
1078 + where $P_l$ is the Legendre polynomial of order $l$ and
1079 + $\hat{\mathbf{u}}_i^\alpha$ is the unit vector of molecule $i$ along
1080 + axis $\gamma$.  The body-fixed reference frame used for our
1081 + orientational correlation functions has the $z$-axis running along the
1082 + dipoles, and for the SSDQ water model, the $y$-axis connects the two
1083 + implied hydrogen atoms.
1084 +
1085 + From the orientation autocorrelation functions, we can obtain time
1086 + constants for rotational relaxation either by fitting an exponential
1087 + function or by integrating the entire correlation function.  These
1088 + decay times are directly comparable to water orientational relaxation
1089 + times from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The relaxation constant
1090 + obtained from $C_2^y(t)$ is normally of experimental interest because
1091 + it describes the relaxation of the principle axis connecting the
1092 + hydrogen atoms. Thus, $C_2^y(t)$ can be compared to the intermolecular
1093 + portion of the dipole-dipole relaxation from a proton NMR signal and
1094 + should provide an estimate of the NMR relaxation time
1095 + constant.\cite{Impey82}
1096 +
1097 + Results for the diffusion constants and orientational relaxation times
1098 + are shown in figure \ref{fig:dynamics}. From this data, it is apparent
1099 + that the values for both $D$ and $\tau_2$ using the Ewald sum are
1100 + reproduced with high fidelity by the GSF method.
1101 +
1102 + The $\tau_2$ results in \ref{fig:dynamics} show a much greater
1103 + difference between the real-space and the Ewald results.
1104 +
1105 +
1106   \section{CONCLUSION}
1107   In the first paper in this series, we generalized the
1108   charge-neutralized electrostatic energy originally developed by Wolf

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines