ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/multipole/multipole_2/multipole2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4209 by gezelter, Fri Aug 8 15:11:49 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4210 by gezelter, Fri Aug 15 18:21:49 2014 UTC

# Line 389 | Line 389 | $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} + \frac{3 r}{r_c^4} + \fra
389   approach than they are in the Taylor-shifted method.
390  
391   For the gradient shifted (GSF) method with the undamped kernel,
392 < $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} + \frac{3 r}{r_c^4} + \frac{4}{r_c^3}$ and
392 > $v_{21}(r) = -\frac{1}{r^3} - \frac{3 r}{r_c^4} + \frac{4}{r_c^3}$ and
393   $v_{22}(r) = \frac{3}{r^3} + \frac{9 r}{r_c^4} - \frac{12}{r_c^3}$.
394   Again, these functions go smoothly to zero as $r\rightarrow r_c$, and
395   because the Taylor expansion retains only one term, they are
# Line 896 | Line 896 | cutoff values are utilized.
896   \begin{figure}
897    \centering
898    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{newDrift_12.eps}
899 < \caption{Analysis of the energy conservation of the real-space methods
900 <  for the SSDQ water/ion system. $\delta \mathrm{E}_1$ is the linear
901 <  drift in energy over time (in kcal/mol/particle/ns) and $\delta
902 <  \mathrm{E}_0$ is the standard deviation of energy fluctuations
903 <  around this drift (in kcal/mol/particle).  Points that appear in the
904 <  green region at the bottom exhibit better energy conservation than
905 <  would be obtained using common parameters for Ewald-based
906 <  electrostatics.\label{fig:energyDrift}}
899 >  \caption{Energy conservation of the real-space methods for the SSDQ
900 >    water/ion system. $\delta \mathrm{E}_1$ is the linear drift in
901 >    energy over time (in kcal/mol/particle/ns) and $\delta
902 >    \mathrm{E}_0$ is the standard deviation of energy fluctuations
903 >    around this drift (in kcal/mol/particle).  Points that appear in
904 >    the green region at the bottom exhibit better energy conservation
905 >    than would be obtained using common parameters for Ewald-based
906 >    electrostatics.\label{fig:energyDrift}}
907   \end{figure}
908  
909   \subsection{Reproduction of Structural \& Dynamical Features\label{sec:structure}}
# Line 931 | Line 931 | There is a very slight overstructuring of the first so
931    treatment.\label{fig:gofr}}
932   \end{figure}
933  
934 < There is a very slight overstructuring of the first solvation shell
935 < when using when using TSF at lower values of the damping coefficient
936 < ($\alpha \le 0.1$) or when using undamped GSF.  With moderate damping,
937 < GSF and SP produce pair distributions that are identical (within
938 < numerical noise) to their Ewald counterparts.
934 > There is a minor overstructuring of the first solvation shell when
935 > using TSF or when overdamping with any of the real-space methods.
936 > With moderate damping, GSF and SP produce pair distributions that are
937 > identical (within numerical noise) to their Ewald counterparts.  The
938 > degree of overstructuring can be measured most easily using the
939 > coordination number,
940 > \begin{equation}
941 > n_C = 4\pi\rho \int_{0}^{a}r^2\text{g}(r)dr,
942 > \end{equation}
943 > where $\rho$ is the number density of the site-site pair interactions,
944 > $a$ and is the radial location of the minima following the first peak
945 > in $g(r)$ ($a = 4.2$ \AA for the SSDQ water/ion system).  The
946 > coordination number is shown as a function of the damping coefficient
947 > for all of the real space methods in Fig.  \ref{fig:Props}.
948  
949 < A structural property that is a more demanding test of modified
950 < electrostatics is the mean value of the electrostatic energy $\langle
951 < U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle / N$ which is obtained by sampling the
952 < liquid-state configurations experienced by a liquid evolving entirely
953 < under the influence of each of the methods.  In table \ref{tab:Props}
954 < we demonstrate how $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle / N$ varies with
955 < the damping parameter, $\alpha$, for each of the methods.
949 > A more demanding test of modified electrostatics is the average value
950 > of the electrostatic energy $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle / N$
951 > which is obtained by sampling the liquid-state configurations
952 > experienced by a liquid evolving entirely under the influence of each
953 > of the methods.  In fig \ref{fig:Props} we demonstrate how $\langle
954 > U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle / N$ varies with the damping parameter,
955 > $\alpha$, for each of the methods.
956  
957   As in the crystals studied in the first paper, damping is important
958   for converging the mean electrostatic energy values, particularly for
959   the two shifted force methods (GSF and TSF).  A value of $\alpha
960   \approx 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$ is sufficient to converge the SP and GSF
961   energies with a cutoff of 12 \AA, while shorter cutoffs require more
962 < dramatic damping ($\alpha \approx 0.3$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 9$ \AA).
962 > dramatic damping ($\alpha \approx 0.28$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 9$ \AA).
963   Overdamping the real-space electrostatic methods occurs with $\alpha >
964 < 0.4$, causing the estimate of the energy to drop below the Ewald
965 < results.
964 > 0.3$, causing the estimate of the electrostatic energy to drop below
965 > the Ewald results.
966  
967   These ``optimal'' values of the damping coefficient are slightly
968   larger than what were observed for DSF electrostatics for purely
969 < point-charge systems, although a value of $\alpha=0.18$ \AA$^{-1}$ for
970 < $r_c = 12$\AA\ appears to be an excellent compromise for mixed
971 < charge/multipolar systems.
969 > point-charge systems, although the range $\alpha= 0.175 \rightarrow
970 > 0.225$ \AA$^{-1}$ for $r_c = 12$\AA\ appears to be an excellent
971 > compromise for mixed charge/multipolar systems.
972  
973   To test the fidelity of the electrostatic methods at reproducing
974 < dynamics in a multipolar liquid, it is also useful to look at
974 > \textit{dynamics} in a multipolar liquid, it is also useful to look at
975   transport properties, particularly the diffusion constant,
976   \begin{equation}
977   D = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{6 t} \langle \left|
# Line 970 | Line 979 | the multipoles.  For the soft dipolar fluid and the SS
979   \label{eq:diff}
980   \end{equation}
981   which measures long-time behavior and is sensitive to the forces on
982 < the multipoles.  For the soft dipolar fluid and the SSDQ liquid
983 < systems, the self-diffusion constants (D) were calculated from linear
984 < fits to the long-time portion of the mean square displacement,
985 < $\langle r^{2}(t) \rangle$.\cite{Allen87}
982 > the multipoles.  The self-diffusion constants (D) were calculated from
983 > linear fits to the long-time portion of the mean square displacement,
984 > $\langle r^{2}(t) \rangle$.\cite{Allen87} In fig. \ref{fig:Props} we
985 > demonstrate how the diffusion constant depends on the choice of
986 > real-space methods and the damping coefficient.  Both the SP and GSF
987 > methods can obtain excellent agreement with Ewald again using moderate
988 > damping.
989  
990   In addition to translational diffusion, orientational relaxation times
991   were calculated for comparisons with the Ewald simulations and with
# Line 1003 | Line 1015 | are shown in figure \ref{tab:Props}. From this data, i
1015   constant.\cite{Impey82}
1016  
1017   Results for the diffusion constants and orientational relaxation times
1018 < are shown in figure \ref{tab:Props}. From this data, it is apparent
1018 > are shown in figure \ref{fig:Props}. From this data, it is apparent
1019   that the values for both $D$ and $\tau_2$ using the Ewald sum are
1020   reproduced with reasonable fidelity by the GSF method.
1021  
1022 < The $\tau_2$ results in \ref{tab:Props} show a much greater difference
1023 < between the real-space and the Ewald results.
1022 > \begin{figure}
1023 >  \caption{Comparison of the structural and dynamic properties for the
1024 >    combined multipolar liquid (SSDQ water + ions) for all of the
1025 >    real-space methods with $r_c = 12$\AA. Electrostatic energies,
1026 >    $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle / N$ (in kcal / mol),
1027 >    coordination numbers, $n_C$, diffusion constants (in cm$^2$
1028 >    s$^{-1}$), and rotational correlation times (in fs) all show
1029 >    excellent agreement with Ewald results for damping coefficients in
1030 >    the range $\alpha= 0.175 \rightarrow 0.225$
1031 >    \AA$^{-1}$. \label{fig:Props}}
1032 >  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{properties.eps}
1033 > \end{figure}
1034  
1013 \begin{table}
1014 \caption{Comparison of the structural and dynamic properties for the
1015  soft dipolar liquid test for all of the real-space methods.\label{tab:Props}}
1016 \begin{tabular}{l|c|cccc|cccc|cccc}
1017         & Ewald & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{SP} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{GSF} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{TSF} \\
1018 $\alpha$ (\AA$^{-1}$) & &      
1019 0.0 & 0.1 & 0.2 & 0.3 &
1020 0.0 & 0.1 & 0.2 & 0.3 &
1021 0.0 & 0.1 & 0.2 & 0.3 \\ \cline{2-6}\cline{6-10}\cline{10-14}
1035  
1023 $\langle U_\mathrm{elect} \rangle /N$ &&&&&&&&&&&&&\\
1024 D ($10^{-4}~\mathrm{cm}^2/\mathrm{s}$)&
1025 470.2(6) &
1026 416.6(5) &
1027 379.6(5) &
1028 438.6(5) &
1029 476.0(6) &
1030 412.8(5) &
1031 421.1(5) &
1032 400.5(5) &
1033 437.5(6) &
1034 434.6(5) &
1035 411.4(5) &
1036 545.3(7) &
1037 459.6(6) \\
1038 $\tau_2$ (fs) &
1039 1.136 &
1040 1.041 &
1041 1.064 &
1042 1.109 &
1043 1.211 &
1044 1.119 &
1045 1.039 &
1046 1.058 &
1047 1.21  &
1048 1.15  &
1049 1.172 &
1050 1.153 &
1051 1.125 \\
1052 \end{tabular}
1053 \end{table}
1054
1055
1036   \section{CONCLUSION}
1037   In the first paper in this series, we generalized the
1038   charge-neutralized electrostatic energy originally developed by Wolf

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines