ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex (file contents):
Revision 3254 by chuckv, Thu Oct 11 17:16:29 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3259 by gezelter, Fri Oct 12 21:21:04 2007 UTC

# Line 8 | Line 8 | Icosahedra also have six five-fold symmetry axes that
8   higher binding energy the either a face centered cubic ({\sc fcc}) or
9   hexagonal close-packed ({\sc hcp}) crystal structures.\cite{19521106}
10   Icosahedra also have six five-fold symmetry axes that cannot be
11 < extended indefinitely in three dimensions, which makes them long-range
12 < translational order incommensurate with local icosahedral ordering.
11 > extended indefinitely in three dimensions; long-range translational
12 > order is therefore incommensurate with local icosahedral ordering.
13   This does not preclude icosahedral clusters from possessing long-range
14   {\it orientational} order. The ``frustrated'' packing of these
15   icosahedral structures into dense clusters has been proposed as a
# Line 128 | Line 128 | Similar behavior is observed in the bond-orientational
128   values for {\it individual} icosahedral clusters, but these values are
129   not invariant under rotations of the reference coordinate systems.
130   Similar behavior is observed in the bond-orientational order
131 < parameters for individual liquid-like structures.
132 <
133 < Additionally, both $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are thought to have extreme
134 < values for the icosahedral clusters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This
135 < makes the $l=6$ bond-orientational order parameters particularly
136 < useful in identifying the extent of local icosahedral ordering in
137 < condensed phases.  For example, a local structure which exhibits
138 < $\hat{W}_6$ values near -0.17 is easily identified as an icosahedral
139 < cluster and cannot be mistaken for distorted cubic or liquid-like
140 < structures.
131 > parameters for individual liquid-like structures.  Additionally, both
132 > $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are thought to have extreme values for the
133 > icosahedral clusters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This makes the $l=6$
134 > bond-orientational order parameters particularly useful in identifying
135 > the extent of local icosahedral ordering in condensed phases.  For
136 > example, a local structure which exhibits $\hat{W}_6$ values near
137 > -0.17 is easily identified as an icosahedral cluster and cannot be
138 > mistaken for distorted cubic or liquid-like structures.
139  
140   One may use these bond orientational order parameters as an averaged
141   property to obtain the extent of icosahedral ordering in a supercooled
# Line 236 | Line 234 | the fraction of local icosahedral ordering rises smoot
234   plot of $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ as a function of temperature of the
235   particles is given in figure \ref{fig:ficos}.  As the particles cool,
236   the fraction of local icosahedral ordering rises smoothly to a plateau
237 < value.  The larger particles (particularly the ones that were cooled
238 < in a lower viscosity solvent) show a slightly smaller tendency towards
237 > value.  The smaller particles (particularly the ones that were cooled
238 > in a higher viscosity solvent) show a slightly larger tendency towards
239   icosahedral ordering.
240  
241   \begin{figure}[htbp]
# Line 303 | Line 301 | increase in size with decreasing temperature.}
301   \label{fig:icoscluster}
302   \end{figure}
303  
304 < Additionally, we have observed that those silver atoms that {\it do}
305 < form local icosahedral structures are usually on the surface of the
306 < nanoparticle, while the copper atoms which have local icosahedral
307 < ordering are distributed more evenly throughout the nanoparticles.
308 < Figure \ref{fig:Surface} shows this tendency as a function of distance
309 < from the center of the nanoparticle.  Silver, since it has a lower
310 < surface free energy than copper, tends to coat the skins of the mixed
311 < particles.\cite{Zhu:1997lr} This is true even for bimetallic particles
312 < that have been prepared in the Ag (core) / Cu (shell) configuration.
313 < Upon forming a liquid droplet, approximately 1 monolayer of Ag atoms
314 < will rise to the surface of the particles.  This can be seen visually
315 < in figure \ref{fig:cross_sections} as well as in the density plots in
316 < the bottom panel of figure \ref{fig:Surface}.  This observation is
319 < consistent with previous experimental and theoretical studies on
320 < bimetallic alloys composed of noble
304 > In contrast with the silver ordering behavior, the copper atoms which
305 > have local icosahedral ordering are distributed more evenly throughout
306 > the nanoparticles.  Figure \ref{fig:Surface} shows this tendency as a
307 > function of distance from the center of the nanoparticle.  Silver,
308 > since it has a lower surface free energy than copper, tends to coat
309 > the skins of the mixed particles.\cite{Zhu:1997lr} This is true even
310 > for bimetallic particles that have been prepared in the Ag (core) / Cu
311 > (shell) configuration.  Upon forming a liquid droplet, approximately 1
312 > monolayer of Ag atoms will rise to the surface of the particles.  This
313 > can be seen visually in figure \ref{fig:cross_sections} as well as in
314 > the density plots in the bottom panel of figure \ref{fig:Surface}.
315 > This observation is consistent with previous experimental and
316 > theoretical studies on bimetallic alloys composed of noble
317   metals.\cite{MainardiD.S._la0014306,HuangS.-P._jp0204206,Ramirez-Caballero:2006lr}
318   Bond order parameters for surface atoms are averaged only over the
319   neighboring atoms, so packing constraints that may prevent icosahedral

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines