1 |
\section{Computational Methodology} |
2 |
\label{sec:details} |
3 |
|
4 |
\subsection{Initial Geometries and Heating} |
5 |
|
6 |
Cu-core / Ag-shell and random alloy structures were constructed on an |
7 |
underlying FCC lattice (4.09 {\AA}) at the bulk eutectic composition |
8 |
$\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$. Three different sizes of nanoparticles |
9 |
corresponding to a 20 \AA radius (1961 atoms), 30 {\AA} radius (6603 |
10 |
atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were constructed. These |
11 |
initial structures were relaxed to their equilibrium structures at 20 |
12 |
K for 20 ps and again at 300 K for 100 ps sampling from a |
13 |
Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at each temperature. |
14 |
|
15 |
To mimic the effects of the heating due to laser irradiation, the |
16 |
particles were allowed to melt by sampling velocities from the Maxwell |
17 |
Boltzmann distribution at a temperature of 900 K. The particles were |
18 |
run under microcanonical simulation conditions for 1 ns of simualtion |
19 |
time prior to studying the effects of heat transfer to the solvent. |
20 |
In all cases, center of mass translational and rotational motion of |
21 |
the particles were set to zero before any data collection was |
22 |
undertaken. Structural features (pair distribution functions) were |
23 |
used to verify that the particles were indeed liquid droplets before |
24 |
cooling simulations took place. |
25 |
|
26 |
\subsection{Modeling random alloy and core shell particles in solution |
27 |
phase environments} |
28 |
|
29 |
To approximate the effects of rapid heat transfer to the solvent |
30 |
following a heating at the plasmon resonance, we utilized a |
31 |
methodology in which atoms contained in the outer $4$ {\AA} radius of |
32 |
the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics with a solvent |
33 |
friction approximating the contribution from the solvent and capping |
34 |
agent. Atoms located in the interior of the nanoparticle evolved |
35 |
under Newtonian dynamics. The set-up of our simulations is nearly |
36 |
identical with the ``stochastic boundary molecular dynamics'' ({\sc |
37 |
sbmd}) method that has seen wide use in the protein simulation |
38 |
community.\cite{BROOKS:1985kx,BROOKS:1983uq,BRUNGER:1984fj} A sketch |
39 |
of this setup can be found in Fig. \ref{fig:langevinSketch}. For a |
40 |
spherical atom of radius $a$, the Langevin frictional forces can be |
41 |
determined by Stokes' law |
42 |
\begin{equation} |
43 |
\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{frictional}}=6\pi a \eta \mathbf{v} |
44 |
\end{equation} |
45 |
where $\eta$ is the effective viscosity of the solvent in which the |
46 |
particle is embedded. Due to the presence of the capping agent and |
47 |
the lack of details about the atomic-scale interactions between the |
48 |
metallic atoms and the solvent, the effective viscosity is a |
49 |
essentially a free parameter that must be tuned to give experimentally |
50 |
relevant simulations. |
51 |
\begin{figure}[htbp] |
52 |
\centering |
53 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/stochbound.pdf} |
54 |
\caption{Methodology for nanoparticle cooling. Equations of motion for metal atoms contained in the outer 4 {\AA} were determined by Langevins' Equations of motion. Metal atoms outside this region were allowed to evolve under Newtonian dynamics.} |
55 |
\label{fig:langevinSketch} |
56 |
\end{figure} |
57 |
The viscosity ($\eta$) can be tuned by comparing the cooling rate that |
58 |
a set of nanoparticles experience with the known cooling rates for |
59 |
those particles obtained via the laser heating experiments. |
60 |
Essentially, we tune the solvent viscosity until the thermal decay |
61 |
profile matches a heat-transfer model using reasonable values for the |
62 |
interfacial conductance and the thermal conductivity of the solvent. |
63 |
|
64 |
Cooling rates for the experimentally-observed nanoparticles were |
65 |
calculated from the heat transfer equations for a spherical particle |
66 |
embedded in a ambient medium that allows for diffusive heat |
67 |
transport. The heat transfer model is a set of two coupled |
68 |
differential equations in the Laplace domain, |
69 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
70 |
Mc_{P}\cdot(s\cdot T_{p}(s)-T_{0})+4\pi R^{2} G\cdot(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r=R,s)=0\\ |
71 |
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r} T_{f}(r,s)\right)_{r=R} + |
72 |
\frac{G}{K}(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r,s) = 0 |
73 |
\label{eq:heateqn} |
74 |
\end{eqnarray} |
75 |
where $s$ is the time-conjugate variable in Laplace space. The |
76 |
variables in these equations describe a nanoparticle of radius $R$, |
77 |
mass $M$, and specific heat $c_{p}$ at an initial temperature |
78 |
$T_0$. The surrounding solvent has a thermal profile $T_f(r,t)$, |
79 |
thermal conductivity $K$, density $\rho$, and specific heat $c$. $G$ |
80 |
is the interfacial conductance between the nanoparticle and the |
81 |
surrounding solvent, and contains information about heat transfer to |
82 |
the capping agent as well as the direct metal-to-solvent heat loss. |
83 |
The temperature of the nanoparticle as a function of time can then |
84 |
obtained by the inverse Laplace transform, |
85 |
\begin{equation} |
86 |
T_{p}(t)=\frac{2 k R^2 g^2 |
87 |
T_0}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-\kappa u^2 |
88 |
t/R^2)u^2}{(u^2(1 + R g) - k R g)^2+(u^3 - k R g u)^2}\mathrm{d}u. |
89 |
\label{eq:laplacetransform} |
90 |
\end{equation} |
91 |
For simplicity, we have introduced the thermal diffusivity $\kappa = |
92 |
K/(\rho c)$, and defined $k=4\pi R^3 \rho c /(M c_p)$ and $g = G/K$ in |
93 |
Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform}. |
94 |
|
95 |
Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} was solved numerically for the Ag-Cu |
96 |
system using mole-fraction weighted values for $c_p$ and $\rho_p$ of |
97 |
0.295 $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$ and $9.826\times 10^6$ $(\mathrm{g |
98 |
m^{-3}})$ respectively. Since most of the laser excitation experiments |
99 |
have been done in aqueous solutions, parameters used for the fluid are |
100 |
$K$ of $0.6$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1.0\times10^6$ $(\mathrm{g |
101 |
m^{-3}})$ and $c$ of $4.184$ $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$. |
102 |
|
103 |
Values for the interfacial conductance have been determined by a |
104 |
number of groups for similar nanoparticles and range from a low |
105 |
$87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ to $120\times 10^{6}$ |
106 |
$(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{hartlandPrv2007} Plech {\it et al.} reported a value for the interfacial conductance of $G=105\pm 15$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ and |
107 |
$G=130\pm 15$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ for Pt nanoparticles.\cite{plech:195423,PhysRevB.66.224301} |
108 |
|
109 |
We conducted our simulations at both ends of the range of |
110 |
experimentally-determined values for the interfacial conductance. |
111 |
This allows us to observe both the slowest and fastest heat transfers |
112 |
from the nanoparticle to the solvent that are consistent with |
113 |
experimental observations. For the slowest heat transfer, a value for |
114 |
G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used and for |
115 |
the fastest heat transfer, a value of $117\times 10^{6}$ |
116 |
$(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used. Based on calculations we have |
117 |
done using raw data from the Hartland group's thermal half-time |
118 |
experiments on Au nanospheres, we believe that the true G values are |
119 |
closer to the faster regime: $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. |
120 |
|
121 |
|
122 |
The rate of cooling for the nanoparticles in a molecular dynamics |
123 |
simulation can then be tuned by changing the effective solvent |
124 |
viscosity ($\eta$) until the nanoparticle cooling rate matches the |
125 |
cooling rate described by the heat-transfer equations |
126 |
(\ref{eq:heateqn}). The effective solvent viscosity (in poise) for a G |
127 |
of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is 0.17, 0.20, and |
128 |
0.22 for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA}, and 40 {\AA} particles, respectively. The |
129 |
effective solvent viscosity (again in poise) for an interfacial |
130 |
conductance of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is 0.23, |
131 |
0.29, and 0.30 for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA} and 40 {\AA} particles. Cooling |
132 |
traces for each particle size are presented in |
133 |
Fig. \ref{fig:images_cooling_plot}. It should be noted that the |
134 |
Langevin thermostat produces cooling curves that are consistent with |
135 |
Newtonian (single-exponential) cooling, which cannot match the cooling |
136 |
profiles from Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} exactly. |
137 |
|
138 |
\begin{figure}[htbp] |
139 |
\centering |
140 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/cooling_plot.pdf} |
141 |
\caption{Thermal cooling curves obtained from the inverse Laplace |
142 |
transform heat model in Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} (solid line) as |
143 |
well as from molecular dynamics simulations (circles). Effective |
144 |
solvent viscosities of 0.23-0.30 poise (depending on the radius of the |
145 |
particle) give the best fit to the experimental cooling curves. Since |
146 |
this viscosity is substantially in excess of the viscosity of liquid |
147 |
water, much of the thermal transfer to the surroundings is probably |
148 |
due to the capping agent.} |
149 |
\label{fig:images_cooling_plot} |
150 |
\end{figure} |
151 |
|
152 |
\subsection{Potentials for classical simulations of bimetallic |
153 |
nanoparticles} |
154 |
|
155 |
Several different potential models have been developed that reasonably |
156 |
describe interactions in transition metals. In particular, the |
157 |
Embedded Atom Model ({\sc eam})~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and |
158 |
Sutton-Chen ({\sc sc})~\cite{Chen90} potential have been used to study |
159 |
a wide range of phenomena in both bulk materials and |
160 |
nanoparticles.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn,ShibataT._ja026764r} Both |
161 |
potentials are based on a model of a metal which treats the nuclei and |
162 |
core electrons as pseudo-atoms embedded in the electron density due to |
163 |
the valence electrons on all of the other atoms in the system. The |
164 |
{\sc sc} potential has a simple form that closely resembles that of |
165 |
the ubiquitous Lennard Jones potential, |
166 |
\begin{equation} |
167 |
\label{eq:SCP1} |
168 |
U_{tot}=\sum _{i}\left[ \frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\neq i}D_{ij}V^{pair}_{ij}(r_{ij})-c_{i}D_{ii}\sqrt{\rho_{i}}\right] , |
169 |
\end{equation} |
170 |
where $V^{pair}_{ij}$ and $\rho_{i}$ are given by |
171 |
\begin{equation} |
172 |
\label{eq:SCP2} |
173 |
V^{pair}_{ij}(r)=\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{n_{ij}}, \rho_{i}=\sum_{j\neq i}\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right) ^{m_{ij}}. |
174 |
\end{equation} |
175 |
$V^{pair}_{ij}$ is a repulsive pairwise potential that accounts for |
176 |
interactions between the pseudoatom cores. The $\sqrt{\rho_i}$ term in |
177 |
Eq. (\ref{eq:SCP1}) is an attractive many-body potential that models |
178 |
the interactions between the valence electrons and the cores of the |
179 |
pseudo-atoms. $D_{ij}$, $D_{ii}$ set the appropriate overall energy |
180 |
scale, $c_i$ scales the attractive portion of the potential relative |
181 |
to the repulsive interaction and $\alpha_{ij}$ is a length parameter |
182 |
that assures a dimensionless form for $\rho$. These parameters are |
183 |
tuned to various experimental properties such as the density, cohesive |
184 |
energy, and elastic moduli for FCC transition metals. The quantum |
185 |
Sutton-Chen ({\sc q-sc}) formulation matches these properties while |
186 |
including zero-point quantum corrections for different transition |
187 |
metals.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} This particular parametarization has |
188 |
been shown to reproduce the experimentally available heat of mixing |
189 |
data for both FCC solid solutions of Ag-Cu and the high-temperature |
190 |
liquid.\cite{sheng:184203} In contrast, the {\sc eam} potential does |
191 |
not reproduce the experimentally observed heat of mixing for the |
192 |
liquid alloy.\cite{MURRAY:1984lr} Combination rules for the alloy were |
193 |
taken to be the arithmatic average of the atomic parameters with the |
194 |
exception of $c_i$ since its values is only dependent on the identity |
195 |
of the atom where the density is evaluated. For the {\sc q-sc} |
196 |
potential, cutoff distances are traditionally taken to be |
197 |
$2\alpha_{ij}$ and include up to the sixth coordination shell in FCC |
198 |
metals. |
199 |
|
200 |
\subsection{Sampling single-temperature configurations from a cooling |
201 |
trajectory} |
202 |
|
203 |
ffdsafjdksalfdsa |