ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/experimental.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/experimental.tex (file contents):
Revision 3228 by chuckv, Fri Sep 21 21:31:25 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3230 by gezelter, Tue Sep 25 19:23:21 2007 UTC

# Line 7 | Line 7 | $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  All three compositions
7  
8   Cu-core / Ag-shell and random alloy structures were constructed on an
9   underlying FCC lattice (4.09 {\AA}) at the bulk eutectic composition
10 < $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  All three compositions were considered although experimental results suggest that the random structure is the most likely composition after synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163} Three different sizes of nanoparticles
11 < corresponding to a 20 \AA radius (1961 atoms), 30 {\AA} radius (6603
12 < atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were constructed.  These
13 < initial structures were relaxed to their equilibrium structures at 20
14 < K for 20 ps and again at 300 K for 100 ps sampling from a
15 < Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at each temperature.  
10 > $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  All three compositions were considered
11 > although experimental results suggest that the random structure is the
12 > most likely composition after
13 > synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163}  Three different sizes of
14 > nanoparticles corresponding to a 20 \AA radius (1961 atoms), 30 {\AA}
15 > radius (6603 atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were
16 > constructed.  These initial structures were relaxed to their
17 > equilibrium structures at 20 K for 20 ps and again at 300 K for 100 ps
18 > sampling from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at each temperature.
19  
20   To mimic the effects of the heating due to laser irradiation, the
21   particles were allowed to melt by sampling velocities from the Maxwell
# Line 53 | Line 56 | relevant simulations.
56   \begin{figure}[htbp]
57   \centering
58   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/stochbound.pdf}
59 < \caption{Methodology for nanoparticle cooling. Equations of motion for metal atoms contained in the outer 4 {\AA} were determined by Langevins' Equations of motion. Metal atoms outside this region were allowed to evolve under Newtonian dynamics.}
59 > \caption{Methodology used to mimic the experimental cooling conditions
60 > of a hot nanoparticle surrounded by a solvent.  Atoms in the core of
61 > the particle evolved under Newtonian dynamics, while atoms that were
62 > in the outer skin of the particle evolved under Langevin dynamics.
63 > The radial cutoff between the two dynamical regions was set to 4 {\AA}
64 > smaller than the original radius of the liquid droplet.}
65   \label{fig:langevinSketch}
66   \end{figure}
67 +
68   The viscosity ($\eta$) can be tuned by comparing the cooling rate that
69   a set of nanoparticles experience with the known cooling rates for
70 < those particles obtained via the laser heating experiments.
70 > similar particles obtained via the laser heating experiments.
71   Essentially, we tune the solvent viscosity until the thermal decay
72   profile matches a heat-transfer model using reasonable values for the
73   interfacial conductance and the thermal conductivity of the solvent.
74  
75   Cooling rates for the experimentally-observed nanoparticles were
76   calculated from the heat transfer equations for a spherical particle
77 < embedded in a ambient medium that allows for diffusive heat
78 < transport. The heat transfer model is a set of two coupled
79 < differential equations in the Laplace domain,
77 > embedded in a ambient medium that allows for diffusive heat transport.
78 > Following Plech {\it et al.},\cite{plech:195423} we use a heat
79 > transfer model that consists of two coupled differential equations
80 > in the Laplace domain,
81   \begin{eqnarray}
82   Mc_{P}\cdot(s\cdot T_{p}(s)-T_{0})+4\pi R^{2} G\cdot(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r=R,s)=0\\
83   \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r} T_{f}(r,s)\right)_{r=R} +
# Line 99 | Line 109 | $K$ of $0.6$  $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1
109   0.295 $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$ and $9.826\times 10^6$ $(\mathrm{g
110   m^{-3}})$ respectively. Since most of the laser excitation experiments
111   have been done in aqueous solutions, parameters used for the fluid are
112 < $K$ of $0.6$  $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1.0\times10^6$ $(\mathrm{g
113 < m^{-3}})$ and $c$ of $4.184$ $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$.
112 > $K$ of $0.6$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1.0\times10^6$
113 > $(\mathrm{g m^{-3}})$ and $c$ of $4.184$ $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$.
114  
115   Values for the interfacial conductance have been determined by a
116   number of groups for similar nanoparticles and range from a low
117   $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ to $120\times 10^{6}$
118 < $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{hartlandPrv2007} Plech {\it et al.} reported a value for the interfacial conductance of $G=105\pm 15$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ and
119 < $G=130\pm 15$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ for Pt nanoparticles.\cite{plech:195423,PhysRevB.66.224301}
118 > $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{hartlandPrv2007} Similarly, Plech
119 > {\it et al.}  reported a value for the interfacial conductance of
120 > $G=105\pm 15$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ and $G=130\pm 15$
121 > $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ for Pt
122 > nanoparticles.\cite{plech:195423,PhysRevB.66.224301}
123  
124   We conducted our simulations at both ends of the range of
125   experimentally-determined values for the interfacial conductance.
# Line 117 | Line 130 | experiments on Au nanospheres, we believe that the tru
130   the fastest heat transfer, a value of $117\times 10^{6}$
131   $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used.  Based on calculations we have
132   done using raw data from the Hartland group's thermal half-time
133 < experiments on Au nanospheres, we believe that the true G values are
134 < closer to the faster regime: $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.
133 > experiments on Au nanospheres, the true G values are probably in the
134 > faster regime: $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.
135  
123
136   The rate of cooling for the nanoparticles in a molecular dynamics
137   simulation can then be tuned by changing the effective solvent
138   viscosity ($\eta$) until the nanoparticle cooling rate matches the
# Line 135 | Line 147 | profiles from Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} exactly. F
147   Fig. \ref{fig:images_cooling_plot}. It should be noted that the
148   Langevin thermostat produces cooling curves that are consistent with
149   Newtonian (single-exponential) cooling, which cannot match the cooling
150 < profiles from Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} exactly. Fitting the Langevin cooling profiles to a single-exponential produces $\tau=25.576$ ps, $\tau=43.786$ ps, and $\tau=56.621$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles and a G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. The faster cooling G of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ produced a $\tau=13.391$ ps, $\tau=30.426$ ps, $\tau=43.857$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles.
150 > profiles from Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} exactly. Fitting the
151 > Langevin cooling profiles to a single-exponential produces
152 > $\tau=25.576$ ps, $\tau=43.786$ ps, and $\tau=56.621$ ps for the 20,
153 > 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles and a G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$
154 > $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.  For comparison's sake, similar
155 > single-exponential fits with an interfacial conductance of G of
156 > $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ produced a $\tau=13.391$
157 > ps, $\tau=30.426$ ps, $\tau=43.857$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA}
158 > nanoparticles.
159  
160   \begin{figure}[htbp]
161   \centering
# Line 144 | Line 164 | particle) give the best fit to the experimental coolin
164   transform heat model in Eq. \ref{eq:laplacetransform} (solid line) as
165   well as from molecular dynamics simulations (circles).  Effective
166   solvent viscosities of 0.23-0.30 poise (depending on the radius of the
167 < particle) give the best fit to the experimental cooling curves.  Since
168 < this viscosity is substantially in excess of the viscosity of liquid
169 < water, much of the thermal transfer to the surroundings is probably
170 < due to the capping agent.}
167 > particle) give the best fit to the experimental cooling curves.
168 > %Since
169 > %this viscosity is substantially in excess of the viscosity of liquid
170 > %water, much of the thermal transfer to the surroundings is probably
171 > %due to the capping agent.
172 > }
173   \label{fig:images_cooling_plot}
174   \end{figure}
175  
# Line 202 | Line 224 | To better understand the structural changes occurring
224   %\subsection{Sampling single-temperature configurations from a cooling
225   %trajectory}
226  
227 < To better understand the structural changes occurring in the nanoparticles throughout the cooling trajectory, configurations were sampled at temperatures throughout the cooling trajectory. These configurations were then allowed to evolve under NVE dynamics to sample from the proper distribution in phase space. Figure \ref{fig:images_cooling_time_traces} illustrates this sampling.
227 > To better understand the structural changes occurring in the
228 > nanoparticles throughout the cooling trajectory, configurations were
229 > sampled at regular intervals during the cooling trajectory. These
230 > configurations were then allowed to evolve under NVE dynamics to
231 > sample from the proper distribution in phase space. Figure
232 > \ref{fig:images_cooling_time_traces} illustrates this sampling.
233  
234  
235   \begin{figure}[htbp]
236          \centering
237                  \includegraphics[height=3in]{images/cooling_time_traces.pdf}
238 <        \caption{Illustrative cooling profile for the 40 {\AA} nanoparticle evolving under stochastic boundary conditions corresponding to $G=$$87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. At temperatures along the cooling trajectory, configurations were sampled and allowed to evolve in the NVE ensemble. These subsequent trajectories were analyzed for structural features associated with bulk glass formation.}
238 >        \caption{Illustrative cooling profile for the 40 {\AA}
239 > nanoparticle evolving under stochastic boundary conditions
240 > corresponding to $G=$$87.5\times 10^{6}$
241 > $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. At temperatures along the cooling
242 > trajectory, configurations were sampled and allowed to evolve in the
243 > NVE ensemble. These subsequent trajectories were analyzed for
244 > structural features associated with bulk glass formation.}
245          \label{fig:images_cooling_time_traces}
246   \end{figure}
247  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines