ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/experimental.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/experimental.tex (file contents):
Revision 3230 by gezelter, Tue Sep 25 19:23:21 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3233 by gezelter, Thu Sep 27 18:45:55 2007 UTC

# Line 7 | Line 7 | $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  All three compositions
7  
8   Cu-core / Ag-shell and random alloy structures were constructed on an
9   underlying FCC lattice (4.09 {\AA}) at the bulk eutectic composition
10 < $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  All three compositions were considered
10 > $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  Both initial geometries were considered
11   although experimental results suggest that the random structure is the
12 < most likely composition after
13 < synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163}  Three different sizes of
12 > most likely structure to be found following
13 > synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163} Three different sizes of
14   nanoparticles corresponding to a 20 \AA radius (1961 atoms), 30 {\AA}
15   radius (6603 atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were
16   constructed.  These initial structures were relaxed to their
# Line 34 | Line 34 | the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics with
34   To approximate the effects of rapid heat transfer to the solvent
35   following a heating at the plasmon resonance, we utilized a
36   methodology in which atoms contained in the outer $4$ {\AA} radius of
37 < the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics with a solvent
38 < friction approximating the contribution from the solvent and capping
39 < agent.  Atoms located in the interior of the nanoparticle evolved
40 < under Newtonian dynamics.  The set-up of our simulations is nearly
41 < identical with the ``stochastic boundary molecular dynamics'' ({\sc
42 < sbmd}) method that has seen wide use in the protein simulation
37 > the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics,
38 > \begin{equation}
39 > m \frac{\partial^2 \vec{x}}{\partial t^2} = F_\textrm{sys}(\vec{x}(t))
40 > - 6 \pi a \eta \vec{v}(t)  + F_\textrm{ran}
41 > \label{eq:langevin}
42 > \end{equation}
43 > with a solvent friction ($\eta$) approximating the contribution from
44 > the solvent and capping agent.  Atoms located in the interior of the
45 > nanoparticle evolved under Newtonian dynamics.  The set-up of our
46 > simulations is nearly identical with the ``stochastic boundary
47 > molecular dynamics'' ({\sc sbmd}) method that has seen wide use in the
48 > protein simulation
49   community.\cite{BROOKS:1985kx,BROOKS:1983uq,BRUNGER:1984fj} A sketch
50 < of this setup can be found in Fig. \ref{fig:langevinSketch}.  For a
51 < spherical atom of radius $a$, the Langevin frictional forces can be
52 < determined by Stokes' law
53 < \begin{equation}
54 < \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{frictional}}=6\pi a \eta \mathbf{v}
50 > of this setup can be found in Fig. \ref{fig:langevinSketch}.  In
51 > equation \ref{eq:langevin} the frictional forces of a spherical atom
52 > of radius $a$ depend on the solvent viscosity.  The random forces are
53 > usually taken as gaussian random variables with zero mean and a
54 > variance tied to the solvent viscosity and temperature,
55 > \begin{equation}
56 > \langle F_\textrm{ran}(t) \cdot F_\textrm{ran} (t')
57 > \rangle = 2 k_B T (6 \pi \eta a) \delta(t - t')
58 > \label{eq:stochastic}
59   \end{equation}
60 < where $\eta$ is the effective viscosity of the solvent in which the
61 < particle is embedded.  Due to the presence of the capping agent and
62 < the lack of details about the atomic-scale interactions between the
63 < metallic atoms and the solvent, the effective viscosity is a
54 < essentially a free parameter that must be tuned to give experimentally
55 < relevant simulations.
60 > Due to the presence of the capping agent and the lack of details about
61 > the atomic-scale interactions between the metallic atoms and the
62 > solvent, the effective viscosity is a essentially a free parameter
63 > that must be tuned to give experimentally relevant simulations.
64   \begin{figure}[htbp]
65   \centering
66   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/stochbound.pdf}
# Line 246 | Line 254 | structural features associated with bulk glass formati
254   \end{figure}
255  
256  
257 + \begin{figure}[htbp]
258 + \centering
259 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/cross_section_array.jpg}
260 + \caption{Cutaway views of 30 \AA\ Ag-Cu nanoparticle structures for
261 + random alloy (top) and Cu (core) / Ag (shell) initial conditions
262 + (bottom).  Shown from left to right are the crystalline, liquid
263 + droplet, and final glassy bead configurations.}
264 + \label{fig:q6}
265 + \end{figure}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines