ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3218 by chuckv, Thu Sep 6 15:07:28 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3219 by gezelter, Thu Sep 6 15:58:45 2007 UTC

# Line 33 | Line 33 | particles (10$^11$-10$^12$ K/s) is in excess of the co
33   transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process.
34   In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
35   nanoparticles,\cite{} we observed that the cooling rate for these
36 < particles (10$^11$-10$^12$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate
36 > particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate
37   required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys.  Given this
38   fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and
39   quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form metallic glass
# Line 43 | Line 43 | dynamics.\cite{Vardeman2001}
43   chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
44   model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and
45   has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
46 < dynamics.\cite{Vardeman2001}
46 > dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that
47 > alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid
48 > state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each
49 > another.\cite{XXX} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a
50 > well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid
51 > state given equilibrium conditions. Below the eutectic temperature of
52 > 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the
53 > solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich
54 > $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively. This behavior is due to a
55 > positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the
56 > one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H$ is on the order
57 > of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005zt} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be
58 > formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a
59 > compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.
60  
61 < \section{Background}
62 < Hume-Rothery rules suggest that alloys composed of Copper and Silver noble fcc metals should be miscible in the solid state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each another.
63 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
64 < \begin{center}
65 < \includegraphics[]{agcu_phase_diagram.pdf}
66 < \caption{Equilibrium Phase Diagram for Ag-Cu binary system from reference \cite{Banhart:1992sv}. The dashed line indicates the lowest temperature required to obtain the metastable crystalline phase of the same composition.}
67 < \label{fig:phasedia}
68 < \end{center}
69 < \end{figure}
70 < Experimentally, Ag-Cu alloys are an exception to this well-known rule and are only miscible in the liquid state given equilibrium conditions. Below the eutectic temperature of \unit{779}{\celsius} and composition (60.1 wt. \% Ag,39.9 wt .\% Cu), the solid alloy Ag and Cu phase separate into a Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phase respectively. This behavior is due to a positive heat of mixing in both solid and liquid phases. For the equatomic composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H$ is on the order of \unit{+6}{\kilo\joule\per\mole}\cite{Ma:2005zt}. Figure \ref{fig:phasedia} shows the equilibrium phase diagram for the Ag-Cu binary system\cite{Massalski:1986kl}\cite{Banhart:1992sv}, where the dashed line indicates the temperature at which a non-equilibrium solid solution may be formed. Under these non-equilibrium conditions, a crystalline-disordered fcc $\gamma$ phase can be created.
61 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in
62 > 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in
63 > which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled
64 > metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive
65 > $\Delta H$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically
66 > obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H$ systems,
67 > such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to
68 > form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the
69 > amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most
70 > experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior,
71 > the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such
72 > bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion
73 > beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural
74 > \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn}
75 > computational studies have also been performed on this system.
76  
77 < Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Dewez\cite{duwez:1136} in 1960 and were created by using a "splat quenching" technique where a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a super-cooled metallic target. Because of the small positive $\Delta H$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} molecular dynamics computational studies have also been performed on this system providing an excellent model for the behavior of glass forming systems.
77 > Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has
78 > been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials.  The literature on
79 > alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which
80 > has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid
81 > phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been
82 > successfully constructed using techniques such as laser
83 > ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of
84 > metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has
85 > been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from
86 > core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003yf} To date, attempts at
87 > creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed
88 > nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These
89 > attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy
90 > nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell
91 > structures.
92  
93 < Although, Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely studied in bulk phase, this alloy has been
94 < scarcely studied in nano scale materials. Most of the literature on alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been successfully constructed using techniques such as laser ablation\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and  the synthetic reduction of metal ions in solution\cite{Kim:2003lv}. Laser induced alloying has been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from core-shell particles\cite{Hartland:2003yf}. To date, attempts at creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed nanoparticles in a glass matrix\cite{De:1996ta}\cite{Magruder:1994rg}. These attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy nanoparticles, and instead produce a phase segregated or a core-shell structure.
93 > One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu
94 > nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in
95 > an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon
96 > resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two
97 > distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted
98 > and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver
99 > occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.  On Al$_2$O$_3$ films,
100 > these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For
101 > bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen
102 > between 400-550 nm.  With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts
103 > towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of
104 > 57\% Ag. The authors (WHO?) cited the existence of a single broad
105 > resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a
106 > phase segregated system. Unfortunately, they were unable to determine
107 > whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a
108 > supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the
109 > Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted
110 > because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix
111 > interaction.\cite{De:1996ta,Roy:2003dy}
112  
113 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
114 < \begin{center}
115 < \includegraphics[width=3in]{SPR_Ag_Cu.pdf}
116 < \caption{Absorption spectra, from reference \cite{gonzalo:5163}, of films containing nanoparticles of different atomic \% Ag (0 \% being pure Cu). Inset compares nanoparticles with 57 at. \% with the simulated normalized spectrum calculated by the weighted average of spectra for pure Ag and Cu particles. }
117 < \label{fig:spr}
118 < \end{center}
119 < \end{figure}
120 < One of the more successful attempts at creating Ag-Cu mixed nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in an amorphous $\ch Al_2O_3$ matrix\cite{gonzalo:5163}. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two distinct  resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted and broadened resonance peak\cite{Hodak:2000rb}. The SPR for pure silver occurs at \unit{400}{\nano\meter} and for copper at \unit{570}{\nano\meter}. Figure \ref{fig:spr} shows the absorption spectra for pure Cu and Ag $\ch Al_2O_3$ films with SPR peaks at \unit{572}{\nano\meter} and \unit{424}{\nano\meter} respectively as a reference for the pure states. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40 at.\% Ag an absorption peak is seen between \unit{400\mbox{-}550}{\nano\meter}. With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of 57 at.\% Ag. The authors cited the existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a phase segregated system. Unfortunately, it was not determined whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix interaction\cite{De:1996ta}\cite{Roy:2003dy}. It would be useful to create free Ag-Cu nanoparticles that could be studied independent of the surrounding environment.
113 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
114 > is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
115 > displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared
116 > displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials
117 > deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times,
118 > entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the
119 > infinite time limit.\cite{Kob} However, diffusion in nanoparticles
120 > differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a
121 > roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the
122 > particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t)
123 > \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{CHUCK}  This limits the
124 > utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying
125 > nanoparticles.
126  
127 < Theoretical molecular dynamics computational studies have been performed on the formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either gold\cite{Chen:2004ec}\cite{Cleveland:1997jb}\cite{Cleveland:1997gu} or nickel\cite{Gafner:2004bg}\cite{Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim \unit{10^{12}-10^{13}}{\kelvin\per\second}$) from a liquid state. All of these studies found icosahedral ordering in the  resulting structures produced by this rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of a amorphous structure\cite{Sachdev:1992mo}. The nearest neighbor information was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and bond order parameters\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo}. It should be noted that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less than 20\AA.  Single component systems are known to form amorphous states in small clusters\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned particles\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}.
127 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among
128 > nearest-neghbors in contrast to crystalline or liquid structures.
129 > Local icosahedral structures are the three-dimensional equivalent of
130 > covering a two-dimensional plane with 5-sided tiles; they cannot be
131 > used to tile space in a periodic fashion, and are therefore an
132 > indicator of non-periodic packing in amorphous solids.  Steinhart {\it
133 > et al.}  defined an orientational bond order parameter that is
134 > sensitive to icosahedral ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond
135 > order parameter can therefore be used to characterize glass formation
136 > in liquid and solid solutions.\cite{FrenkelXXX}
137  
138 < Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of such a system. Does the large surface to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state? Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle?  Nanoparticles have been shown to have  size dependent melting transition\cite{Buffat:1976yq}, one would expect a similar trend with the glass transition temperature, because cooling rate is dependent on particle size and the glass transition temperature is dependent on cooling rate.
138 > Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the
139 > formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either
140 > gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or
141 > nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim
142 > 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found
143 > icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this
144 > rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of a amorphous
145 > structure.\cite{Sachdev:1992mo} The nearest neighbor information was
146 > obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and
147 > bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted that
148 > these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that
149 > are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less
150 > than 20\AA.  Single component systems are known to form amorphous
151 > states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form
152 > amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have
153 > also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned
154 > particles.\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}
155  
156 + Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many
157 + interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of
158 + such a system. Does the large surface to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu
159 + nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state?
160 + Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also
161 + allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the
162 + preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle?  Nanoparticles have
163 + been shown to have size dependent melting
164 + transition,\cite{Buffat:1976yq} and we would expect a similar trend
165 + to follow for the glass transition temperature.
166  
167 + In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser
168 + excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles in silico to mimic
169 + real experimental conditions.  The simulation parameters have been
170 + tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions, and we
171 + discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well as the
172 + clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.
173  
79 XXX stuff from ORP
80
81 In the sections below, we describe our
82 modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the
83 particles in silico to mimic real experimental conditions.
84
85
86 constructing and relaxing the eutectic composition (Ag$_6$Cu$_4$) on a
87 FCC lattice with a lattice constant of 4.09 \AA\ for 20, 30 and 40
88 \AA\ radius nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are melted at 900 K and
89 allowed to mix for 1 ns. Resulting structures are then quenched using
90 a implicit solvent model where Langevin dynamics is applied to the
91 outer 4 \AA\ radius of the nanoparticle and normal Newtonian dynamics
92 are applied to the rest of the atoms. By fitting to
93 experimentally-determined cooling rates, we find that collision
94 frequencies of 3.58 fs$^-1$ for Ag and 5.00 fs$^-1$ for Cu lead to
95 nearly exact agreement with the Temperature vs. time data. The cooling
96 rates are therefore 2.37 x 10$^13$ K/s, 1.37 x 10$^13$ K/s and 1.06 x
97 10$^13$ K/s for the 20, 30 and 40 \AA\ radius nanoparticles
98 respectively.
99
100 Structural Measures for Glass Formation
101
102 Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
103 is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
104 displacement, <r2(t)>. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement
105 that is linear in time. Glassy materials deviate significantly from
106 this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear
107 regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time
108 limit. Diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk
109 in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot
110 explore any region larger than the particle radius. In these confined
111 geometries, <r2(t)> in the radial direction approaches a limiting
112 value of 6R2/40.
113
114 However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors in contrast to crystalline or liquid structures. Steinhart, et al., defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to the nearest-neighbor environment by using invariant combinations of spherical harmonics Yl,m(?,?).[10] Spherical harmonics involving the Y6,m(?,?) are particularly sensitive to icosohedral order among nearest neighbors as can be seen in the cartoon to the left. The second and third-order invariants, Q6 and W6 are used to determine the level of icosahedral order present in a quenched nanoparticle. Perfect icosahedral structures have a maximal value of 0.663 for Q6 and -0.170 for W6. A plot of the distributions of Q6 and W6 with cooling temperature indicates increasing icosahedral order with decreasing temperature. This is a clear indication that glassy structures are forming as the nanoparticles are quenched.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines