ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3208 by chuckv, Thu Aug 23 17:47:31 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3218 by chuckv, Thu Sep 6 15:07:28 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 \input{header.tex}
1   \section{Introduction}
2 <
3 < \input{footer.tex}
2 >
3 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
4 > attracted enormous interest in the past several years.  This is partly
5 > due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
6 > in a wide range of sizes and geometries.  (Living tissue is nearly
7 > transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
8 > unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
9 > diagnostic and therapeutic settings.)  One of the side effects of
10 > absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid
11 > (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the
12 > metal.  This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon
13 > modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal
14 > particles.
15 >
16 > Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume
17 > ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience
18 > relatively weak bonding.  This is observable in a lowering of the
19 > melting temperatures and a substantial softening of the bulk modulus
20 > of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.  One of
21 > the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at
22 > the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
23 > droplets.  
24 >
25 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
26 > the Hartland and von~Plessen
27 > groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003yf,HuM._jp020581+,plech:195423}
28 > They have [BRIEF SURVEY OF THE EXPERIMENTAL WORK]
29 >
30 >
31 > Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase
32 > surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
33 > transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process.
34 > In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
35 > nanoparticles,\cite{} we observed that the cooling rate for these
36 > particles (10$^11$-10$^12$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate
37 > required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys.  Given this
38 > fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and
39 > quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form metallic glass
40 > nanobeads.  
41 >
42 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
43 > chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
44 > model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and
45 > has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
46 > dynamics.\cite{Vardeman2001}
47 >
48 > \section{Background}
49 > Hume-Rothery rules suggest that alloys composed of Copper and Silver noble fcc metals should be miscible in the solid state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each another.
50 > \begin{figure}[htbp]
51 > \begin{center}
52 > \includegraphics[]{agcu_phase_diagram.pdf}
53 > \caption{Equilibrium Phase Diagram for Ag-Cu binary system from reference \cite{Banhart:1992sv}. The dashed line indicates the lowest temperature required to obtain the metastable crystalline phase of the same composition.}
54 > \label{fig:phasedia}
55 > \end{center}
56 > \end{figure}
57 > Experimentally, Ag-Cu alloys are an exception to this well-known rule and are only miscible in the liquid state given equilibrium conditions. Below the eutectic temperature of \unit{779}{\celsius} and composition (60.1 wt. \% Ag,39.9 wt .\% Cu), the solid alloy Ag and Cu phase separate into a Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phase respectively. This behavior is due to a positive heat of mixing in both solid and liquid phases. For the equatomic composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H$ is on the order of \unit{+6}{\kilo\joule\per\mole}\cite{Ma:2005zt}. Figure \ref{fig:phasedia} shows the equilibrium phase diagram for the Ag-Cu binary system\cite{Massalski:1986kl}\cite{Banhart:1992sv}, where the dashed line indicates the temperature at which a non-equilibrium solid solution may be formed. Under these non-equilibrium conditions, a crystalline-disordered fcc $\gamma$ phase can be created.
58 >
59 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Dewez\cite{duwez:1136} in 1960 and were created by using a "splat quenching" technique where a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a super-cooled metallic target. Because of the small positive $\Delta H$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} molecular dynamics computational studies have also been performed on this system providing an excellent model for the behavior of glass forming systems.
60 >
61 > Although, Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely studied in bulk phase, this alloy has been
62 > scarcely studied in nano scale materials. Most of the literature on alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been successfully constructed using techniques such as laser ablation\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and  the synthetic reduction of metal ions in solution\cite{Kim:2003lv}. Laser induced alloying has been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from core-shell particles\cite{Hartland:2003yf}. To date, attempts at creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed nanoparticles in a glass matrix\cite{De:1996ta}\cite{Magruder:1994rg}. These attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy nanoparticles, and instead produce a phase segregated or a core-shell structure.
63 >
64 > \begin{figure}[htbp]
65 > \begin{center}
66 > \includegraphics[width=3in]{SPR_Ag_Cu.pdf}
67 > \caption{Absorption spectra, from reference \cite{gonzalo:5163}, of films containing nanoparticles of different atomic \% Ag (0 \% being pure Cu). Inset compares nanoparticles with 57 at. \% with the simulated normalized spectrum calculated by the weighted average of spectra for pure Ag and Cu particles. }
68 > \label{fig:spr}
69 > \end{center}
70 > \end{figure}
71 > One of the more successful attempts at creating Ag-Cu mixed nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in an amorphous $\ch Al_2O_3$ matrix\cite{gonzalo:5163}. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two distinct  resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted and broadened resonance peak\cite{Hodak:2000rb}. The SPR for pure silver occurs at \unit{400}{\nano\meter} and for copper at \unit{570}{\nano\meter}. Figure \ref{fig:spr} shows the absorption spectra for pure Cu and Ag $\ch Al_2O_3$ films with SPR peaks at \unit{572}{\nano\meter} and \unit{424}{\nano\meter} respectively as a reference for the pure states. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40 at.\% Ag an absorption peak is seen between \unit{400\mbox{-}550}{\nano\meter}. With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of 57 at.\% Ag. The authors cited the existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a phase segregated system. Unfortunately, it was not determined whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix interaction\cite{De:1996ta}\cite{Roy:2003dy}. It would be useful to create free Ag-Cu nanoparticles that could be studied independent of the surrounding environment.
72 >
73 > Theoretical molecular dynamics computational studies have been performed on the formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either gold\cite{Chen:2004ec}\cite{Cleveland:1997jb}\cite{Cleveland:1997gu} or nickel\cite{Gafner:2004bg}\cite{Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim \unit{10^{12}-10^{13}}{\kelvin\per\second}$) from a liquid state. All of these studies found icosahedral ordering in the  resulting structures produced by this rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of a amorphous structure\cite{Sachdev:1992mo}. The nearest neighbor information was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and bond order parameters\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo}. It should be noted that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less than 20\AA.  Single component systems are known to form amorphous states in small clusters\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned particles\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}.
74 >
75 > Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of such a system. Does the large surface to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state? Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle?  Nanoparticles have been shown to have  size dependent melting transition\cite{Buffat:1976yq}, one would expect a similar trend with the glass transition temperature, because cooling rate is dependent on particle size and the glass transition temperature is dependent on cooling rate.
76 >
77 >
78 >
79 > XXX stuff from ORP
80 >
81 > In the sections below, we describe our
82 > modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the
83 > particles in silico to mimic real experimental conditions.
84 >
85 >
86 > constructing and relaxing the eutectic composition (Ag$_6$Cu$_4$) on a
87 > FCC lattice with a lattice constant of 4.09 \AA\ for 20, 30 and 40
88 > \AA\ radius nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are melted at 900 K and
89 > allowed to mix for 1 ns. Resulting structures are then quenched using
90 > a implicit solvent model where Langevin dynamics is applied to the
91 > outer 4 \AA\ radius of the nanoparticle and normal Newtonian dynamics
92 > are applied to the rest of the atoms. By fitting to
93 > experimentally-determined cooling rates, we find that collision
94 > frequencies of 3.58 fs$^-1$ for Ag and 5.00 fs$^-1$ for Cu lead to
95 > nearly exact agreement with the Temperature vs. time data. The cooling
96 > rates are therefore 2.37 x 10$^13$ K/s, 1.37 x 10$^13$ K/s and 1.06 x
97 > 10$^13$ K/s for the 20, 30 and 40 \AA\ radius nanoparticles
98 > respectively.
99 >
100 > Structural Measures for Glass Formation
101 >
102 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
103 > is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
104 > displacement, <r2(t)>. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement
105 > that is linear in time. Glassy materials deviate significantly from
106 > this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear
107 > regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time
108 > limit. Diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk
109 > in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot
110 > explore any region larger than the particle radius. In these confined
111 > geometries, <r2(t)> in the radial direction approaches a limiting
112 > value of 6R2/40.
113 >
114 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors in contrast to crystalline or liquid structures. Steinhart, et al., defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to the nearest-neighbor environment by using invariant combinations of spherical harmonics Yl,m(?,?).[10] Spherical harmonics involving the Y6,m(?,?) are particularly sensitive to icosohedral order among nearest neighbors as can be seen in the cartoon to the left. The second and third-order invariants, Q6 and W6 are used to determine the level of icosahedral order present in a quenched nanoparticle. Perfect icosahedral structures have a maximal value of 0.663 for Q6 and -0.170 for W6. A plot of the distributions of Q6 and W6 with cooling temperature indicates increasing icosahedral order with decreasing temperature. This is a clear indication that glassy structures are forming as the nanoparticles are quenched.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines