ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3252 by gezelter, Tue Sep 25 19:23:21 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3253 by chuckv, Wed Oct 10 00:26:04 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 %!TEX root = /Users/charles/Desktop/nanoglass/nanoglass.tex
1  
3 \section{Introduction}
2  
3 < Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
6 < attracted enormous interest in the past several years.  This is partly
7 < due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
8 < in a wide range of sizes and geometries.  (Living tissue is nearly
9 < transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
10 < unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
11 < diagnostic and therapeutic settings.)  One of the side effects of
12 < absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid
13 < (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the
14 < metal.  This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon
15 < modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal
16 < particles.
3 > %!TEX root = /Users/charles/Desktop/nanoglass/nanoglass.tex
4  
5 < Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume
19 < ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience
20 < relatively weak bonding.  This is observable in a lowering of the
21 < melting temperatures and a substantial softening of the bulk modulus
22 < of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.  One of
23 < the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at
24 < the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
25 < droplets.  
5 > \section{Introduction}
6  
7 < Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
28 < the Hartland and von~Plessen
29 < groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr}
30 < These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical
31 < pump-probe spectroscopy where a pump laser pulse serves to excite
32 < conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe
33 < laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the
34 < electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct
35 < relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling
36 < rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{HuM._jp020581+} Plech
37 < {\it et al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly
38 < access changes to atomic structure following pump
39 < excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat
40 < transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by
41 < interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the
42 < solvent.
7 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has attracted enormous interest in the past several years. This is partly due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles in a wide range of sizes and geometries. (Living tissue is nearly transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings.\cite{West:2003fk,Hu:2006lr} One of the side effects of absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the metal. This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal particles.
8  
9 < Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase
45 < surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
46 < transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process.
47 < In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
48 < nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the
49 < cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in
50 < excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk
51 < metallic alloys.  Given this fact, it may be possible to use laser
52 < excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic nanoparticles in order
53 < to form glassy nanobeads.
9 > Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience relatively weak bonding. This is observable in a lowering of the melting temperatures and of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} One of the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal droplets.
10  
11 < To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
56 < chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
57 < model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and
58 < has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
59 < dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that
60 < alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid
61 < state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each
62 < another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a
63 < well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid
64 < state given equilibrium conditions. Below the eutectic temperature of
65 < 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the
66 < solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich
67 < $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively. This behavior is due to a
68 < positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the
69 < one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on the order
70 < of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be
71 < formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a
72 < compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.
11 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in the Hartland and von~Plessen groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr} These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical pump-probe spectroscopy where a pump laser pulse serves to excite conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{HuM._jp020581+} Plech {\it et al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access changes to atomic structure following pump excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the solvent.
12  
13 < Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in
75 < 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in
76 < which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled
77 < metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive
78 < $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are
79 < typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta
80 < H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid
81 < states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than
82 < Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the
83 < minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique
84 < crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely
85 < studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat
86 < quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical
87 < alloying. Both structural
88 < \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn}
89 < computational studies have also been performed on this system.
13 > Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process. In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys. Given this fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form glassy nanobeads.
14  
15 < Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has
92 < been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials.  The literature on
93 < alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which
94 < has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid
95 < phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been
96 < successfully constructed using techniques such as laser
97 < ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of
98 < metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has
99 < been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from
100 < core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at
101 < creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed
102 < nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These
103 < attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy
104 < nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell
105 < structures.
15 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid state given equilibrium conditions.\cite{Massalski:1986rt} Below the eutectic temperature of 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively.\cite{Banhart:1992sv,Ma:2005fk} This behavior is due to a positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on the order of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.\cite{najafabadi:3144}
16  
17 < One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu
108 < nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in
109 < an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon
110 < resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two
111 < distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted
112 < and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver
113 < occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g}  
114 < On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For
115 < bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen
116 < between 400-550 nm.  With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts
117 < towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of
118 < 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the existence of a single broad
119 < resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a
120 < phase segregated system. Unfortunately, they were unable to determine
121 < whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a
122 < supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the
123 < Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted
124 < because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix
125 < interaction.\cite{De:1996ta,Roy:2003dy}
17 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} computational studies have also been performed on this system.
18  
19 < Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
128 < is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
129 < displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared
130 < displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials
131 < deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times,
132 < entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the
133 < infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in nanoparticles
134 < differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a
135 < roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the
136 < particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t)
137 < \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r}  This limits the
138 < utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying
139 < nanoparticles.
19 > Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials. The literature on alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been successfully constructed using techniques such as laser ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell structures.
20  
21 < However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among
142 < nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like
143 < configurations).  Local icosahedral structures are the
144 < three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with
145 < 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic
146 < fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in
147 < amorphous solids.  Steinhart {\it et al.}  defined an orientational
148 < bond order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral
149 < ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can
150 < therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid
151 < solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
21 > One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g} On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen between 400-550 nm. With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a phase segregated system. Unfortunately, they were unable to determine whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix interaction.\cite{De:1996ta,Roy:2003dy}
22  
23 < Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the
154 < formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either
155 < gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or
156 < nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim
157 < 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found
158 < icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this
159 < rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous
160 < structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information
161 < was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis
162 < and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted
163 < that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates
164 < that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes
165 < less than 20\AA.  Single component systems are known to form amorphous
166 < states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form
167 < amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have
168 < also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned
169 < particles.\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}
23 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r} This limits the utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying nanoparticles.
24  
25 < Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many
172 < interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of
173 < such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu
174 < nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state?
175 < Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also
176 < allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the
177 < preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle?  Nanoparticles have
178 < been shown to have size dependent melting
179 < transition,\cite{Buffat:1976yq} so we would expect a similar trend to
180 < follow for the glass transition temperature.
25 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like configurations). Local icosahedral structures are the three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in amorphous solids. Steinhart {\it et al.} defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
26  
27 < In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser
183 < excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to
184 < mimic real experimental conditions.  The simulation parameters have
185 < been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions,
186 < and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well
187 < as the clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.
27 > Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less than 20\AA. Single component systems are known to form amorphous states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned particles.\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}
28  
29 + Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state? Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle? Nanoparticles have been shown to have size dependent melting transition,\cite{Buffat:1976yq} so we would expect a similar trend to follow for the glass transition temperature.
30 +
31 + In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to mimic real experimental conditions. The simulation parameters have been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions, and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well as the clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines