ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3208 by chuckv, Thu Aug 23 17:47:31 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3226 by chuckv, Wed Sep 19 16:53:58 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \input{header.tex}
1 > %!TEX root = /Users/charles/Desktop/nanoglass/nanoglass.tex
2 >
3   \section{Introduction}
4 <
5 < \input{footer.tex}
4 >
5 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
6 > attracted enormous interest in the past several years.  This is partly
7 > due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
8 > in a wide range of sizes and geometries.  (Living tissue is nearly
9 > transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
10 > unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
11 > diagnostic and therapeutic settings.)  One of the side effects of
12 > absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid
13 > (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the
14 > metal.  This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon
15 > modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal
16 > particles.
17 >
18 > Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume
19 > ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience
20 > relatively weak bonding.  This is observable in a lowering of the
21 > melting temperatures and a substantial softening of the bulk modulus
22 > of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.  One of
23 > the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at
24 > the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
25 > droplets.  
26 >
27 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
28 > the Hartland and von~Plessen groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr} These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical pump-probe spectroscopy where a pump laser pulse serves to excite conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe laser pulse allows the electron-phonon coupling to be observed as a function of time. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{HuM._jp020581+} Pleach {\it et al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access changes to atomic structure following pump excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the solvent.
29 >
30 >
31 > Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase
32 > surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
33 > transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process.
34 > In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
35 > nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the cooling rate for these
36 > particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate
37 > required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys.  Given this
38 > fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and
39 > quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form metallic glass
40 > nanobeads.  
41 >
42 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
43 > chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
44 > model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and
45 > has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
46 > dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that
47 > alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid
48 > state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each
49 > another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a
50 > well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid
51 > state given equilibrium conditions. Below the eutectic temperature of
52 > 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the
53 > solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich
54 > $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively. This behavior is due to a
55 > positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the
56 > one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H$ is on the order
57 > of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be
58 > formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a
59 > compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.
60 >
61 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in
62 > 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in
63 > which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled
64 > metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive
65 > $\Delta H$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically
66 > obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H$ systems,
67 > such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to
68 > form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the
69 > amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most
70 > experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior,
71 > the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such
72 > bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion
73 > beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural
74 > \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn}
75 > computational studies have also been performed on this system.
76 >
77 > Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has
78 > been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials.  The literature on
79 > alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which
80 > has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid
81 > phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been
82 > successfully constructed using techniques such as laser
83 > ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of
84 > metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has
85 > been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from
86 > core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at
87 > creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed
88 > nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These
89 > attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy
90 > nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell
91 > structures.
92 >
93 > One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu
94 > nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in
95 > an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon
96 > resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two
97 > distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted
98 > and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver
99 > occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g}  
100 > On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For
101 > bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen
102 > between 400-550 nm.  With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts
103 > towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of
104 > 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the existence of a single broad
105 > resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a
106 > phase segregated system. Unfortunately, they were unable to determine
107 > whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a
108 > supersaturated crystalline phase. One consequence of embedding the
109 > Ag-Cu nanoparticles in a glass matrix is that the SPR can be shifted
110 > because of the nanoparticle-glass matrix
111 > interaction.\cite{De:1996ta,Roy:2003dy}
112 >
113 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
114 > is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
115 > displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared
116 > displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials
117 > deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times,
118 > entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the
119 > infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in nanoparticles
120 > differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a
121 > roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the
122 > particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t)
123 > \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r}  This limits the
124 > utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying
125 > nanoparticles.
126 >
127 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among
128 > nearest-neghbors in contrast to crystalline or liquid structures.
129 > Local icosahedral structures are the three-dimensional equivalent of
130 > covering a two-dimensional plane with 5-sided tiles; they cannot be
131 > used to tile space in a periodic fashion, and are therefore an
132 > indicator of non-periodic packing in amorphous solids.  Steinhart {\it
133 > et al.}  defined an orientational bond order parameter that is
134 > sensitive to icosahedral ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond
135 > order parameter can therefore be used to characterize glass formation
136 > in liquid and solid solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
137 >
138 > Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the
139 > formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either
140 > gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or
141 > nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim
142 > 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found
143 > icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this
144 > rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of a amorphous
145 > structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information was
146 > obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and
147 > bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted that
148 > these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that
149 > are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less
150 > than 20\AA.  Single component systems are known to form amorphous
151 > states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form
152 > amorphous structures in bulk materials. Icosahedral structures have
153 > also been reported in nanoparticles, particularly multiply twinned
154 > particles.\cite{Ascencio:2000qy}
155 >
156 > Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many
157 > interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of
158 > such a system. Does the large surface to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu
159 > nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state?
160 > Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also
161 > allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the
162 > preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle?  Nanoparticles have
163 > been shown to have size dependent melting
164 > transition,\cite{Buffat:1976yq} and we would expect a similar trend
165 > to follow for the glass transition temperature.
166 >
167 > In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser
168 > excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles in silico to mimic
169 > real experimental conditions.  The simulation parameters have been
170 > tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions, and we
171 > discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well as the
172 > clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.
173 >

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines